Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 8 Jul 2008

Vol. 190 No. 11

Housing Market: Statements.

I am pleased to have this opportunity to address the House. I wish to use my time to outline recent developments in regard to housing policy. In particular, I wish to update Senators on the progress we are making on implementation of the programme and policy reforms set out in the housing policy statement, Delivering Homes, Sustaining Communities, which was published early last year.

The policy statement set out a vision to guide the transformation of the housing sector over the medium term by delivering more and better quality housing responses and by doing so in a more strategic way, focused on the building of sustainable communities, in particular.

We are now working on the implementation issues which need to be addressed if we are to transform the housing environment to meet the challenges arising, many of which are identified in the policy statement. I am pleased to say that substantial progress has been already made.

Recent guidance documents produced by my Department, such as Quality Housing for Sustainable Communities, published in March 2007, and draft Guidelines on Sustainable Residential Development in Urban Areas, have focused on the process surrounding the delivery of quality housing for sustainable communities and the promotion of better place-making through the delivery of quality neighbourhoods and homes. These documents form part of a suite of guidance which my Department is developing to promote quality in housing and neighbourhoods.

Part of this new approach is to ensure that all new developments and urban design frameworks are socially, environmentally and economically sustainable. The key is to provide high quality environments that meet the needs and, as far as possible, the preferences of residents and to foster the development of sustainable communities through improved settlement patterns and better use of our resources in terms of the consolidation of our urban centres.

Apart from looking at urban design and context issues, our quality agenda is also much focused on the quality of individual homes. In that context, it is very important that we constantly strive to improve the energy efficiency of our buildings. Against the ever growing threat of global warming, we must seek to minimise our harmful emissions as much as possible. The residential sector's energy-related CO2 emissions represent 27% of total energy attributable emissions. It is a huge figure. That is why, in full compliance with the priorities which were identified in the programme for Government, my colleague, the Minister, Deputy John Gormley, introduced new Part L building regulations at the end of 2007 which require new buildings to achieve a 40% reduction in energy consumption and a 40% reduction in related CO2 emissions from the start of this month. For the first time, there is a mandatory requirement that new dwellings should have a minimum level of renewable energy sources. These measures represent very significant advances towards the achievement of much improved environmental sustainability in our housing developments.

I now turn to the range of housing supports available. The policy statement and the National Development Plan 2007-13 reflect the strong commitment to expand the provision of social and affordable housing contained in the social partnership agreement Towards 2016. The impact of the record levels of investment this Government is committing to these housing programmes is already evident. Last year more than 13,000 social and affordable housing units were delivered and, overall, the needs of almost 18,300 households were met through the broad range of social and affordable housing programmes. That represents a very significant increase of 24% on the level of needs met in 2006 and is a great tribute to the way in which local authorities and voluntary and co-operative housing bodies have stepped up to the mark.

The funding provided for housing programmes has been increased again in 2008 with some €2.5 billion available to local authorities and the voluntary and co-operative sectors for their activities. This will allow for the commencement of a significant number of new social housing units, further progress under regeneration programmes and the completion of a large number of units under both the local authority and voluntary housing programmes.

The level of delivery under Part V is experiencing a surge in 2008. My Department is liaising closely with local authorities and the voluntary and co-operative housing sector to ensure that available resources are appropriately targeted in order to ensure that this Part V bulge can be accommodated. More broadly, given the well flagged more constrained current state of the public finances, there will be a need for all of us to explore new ways to fund and deliver housing programmes making optimal use of the available resources to meet the range of needs which exist.

The Government's commitment to social housing is not only focused on the process of building and managing social housing but rather looks to the wider context and the imperative of developing stable, sustainable communities. A key element in this new perspective is recognising and delivering on the need to redevelop and regenerate large, primarily mono-tenure local authority estates which are experiencing high levels of social and economic disadvantage. My Department is supporting a very ambitious regeneration programme, with projects across the country receiving funding and support to develop more sustainable communities through a combination of social and economic initiatives as well as by regenerating the physical environment of the estates concerned. Overall, the funding available for regeneration projects in 2008 has been increased by 28% to €121 million.

Our approach now builds on the Ballymun regeneration experience with, for example, the Limerick regeneration agencies very clearly looking beyond the renewal of social housing to the wider social and economic impacts.

Senators will be aware of the difficulties which have emerged in regard to a number of public private partnership housing regeneration projects in Dublin. However, I can assure them that Dublin City Council, the lead authority on these projects, is actively pursuing the options for moving forward these projects and my Department is actively engaging with the council in that regard. As has been already stated by the council, meeting the accommodation needs of affected residents is of the utmost priority and will remain so.

Moving on from social housing, I have no doubt the House welcomes the fact that the supply of affordable housing has consistently increased in the past few years. From about 2,000 units in 2004, delivery reached almost 3,600 units last year and further expansion is envisaged under the National Development Plan 2007-13.

The Government believes that home ownership should be available to as many people as possible where this is their preferred option. Building on the general policy framework set out in Delivering Homes, Sustaining Communities, the Affordable Homes Partnership was requested to examine ways to enhance the delivery of affordable housing. The report, prepared on foot of its study, was published in April 2008 for public consultation and my Department is also consulting with the social partners in regard to the report's recommendations. The report suggests some improvements in aspects of programme delivery and recommends a new product to replace the existing range of schemes. We will give careful consideration to the results of this consultation process in deciding on future directions in relation to affordable housing.

While the main housing supports provide a range of approaches to meeting mainstream housing needs, the Government is very much aware of the critical role that the adaptation grant schemes play in meeting special housing needs within a broader continuum of care for older people and people with disabilities.

As Senators are aware, in order to facilitate the continued independent occupation of their own homes by older people and people with disabilities, and following a comprehensive review undertaken by the Department, a revised framework of adaptation grant schemes to assist older people and people with a disability with their accommodation needs was implemented in November 2007. The revised grant framework streamlines the administrative and operational procedures governing the schemes, provides a more targeted and integrated response to the housing needs of older people and people with a disability and ensures the most efficient and cost effective outcomes from the funding available. These new grant schemes are proving popular. This requires local authorities, in operating the schemes, to prioritise applications in order to ensure the available resources are targeted at those in greatest need. The Department will watch activity under the schemes in each local authority area and, in the event of underspends by some local authorities, will reallocate these resources to other authorities later in the year.

On the issue of disability, the Department is leading the development of a national housing strategy for people with disabilities. The strategy, which will be developed by the end of 2009, will support the provision of tailored housing and housing supports for people with a disability and will have particular regard to adults with significant disabilities and people who experience mental health issues.

We have also convened a cross-departmental team on sheltered housing. In conjunction with the office of the Minister with responsibility for older people, we will develop a policy governing sheltered housing provision for older people over the course of 2008 and agree local structures and protocols for integrated management and delivery of housing requirements and the provision of care.

The new homeless strategy is being finalised and I expect it will be published shortly, following resolution of a number of outstanding issues, including the availability of funding for care costs in certain homeless facilities. This is being pursued as a priority by the relevant Departments and agencies. The new strategy will set out a vision to address adult homelessness over the next five years, underpinned by a detailed programme of action. It builds on the commitments in Towards 2016 and the programme for Government. Key objectives are to eliminate long term occupation of emergency homeless facilities and the need to sleep rough by 2010 and to prevent the occurrence of homelessness as far as possible.

Effectiveness in the implementation of the new strategy will be a priority. The strategy contains both national and local actions related to its strategic aims. An implementation plan setting out detailed timelines and lead roles for the range of actions is being developed under the aegis of the cross-departmental team on homelessness and will be finalised following publication of the strategy. There will be a strong focus on maximising efficiency and value for money from the significant funding which the State is providing to address adult homelessness.

This year the Department is providing some €53 million to fund accommodation related costs, while the Government has provided approximately €33 million for funding care and health services through the HSE. A value for money study and an evaluation of homeless services in Dublin are currently under way and their findings will be critical in the drive to maximise efficiency and value for money, including avoidance of duplication, more streamlined and integrated services and rigorous assessment of what services are required.

It is important that we provide a robust legal base for the broad housing reform programme. A draft Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill will be submitted to Government shortly, for approval to publish. The new legislation will give effect to the range of reforms, outlined in Delivering Homes, Sustaining Communities, aimed at improving services and their delivery. The reform programme includes new provisions on the assessment of social housing needs, updated management and control powers and a statutory basis for housing action plans. The Bill will also broaden choices available to those seeking social housing, by providing a more developed legislative basis for the rental accommodation scheme and expanding paths to home ownership through the new incremental purchase scheme. I look forward to a thorough examination of all the proposals in the Bill as it passes through the Oireachtas and believe it will be recognised as a major contribution to the reform of the social housing sector.

It would be remiss of me to conclude without making reference to the current state of the housing market. Our housing market has slowed down significantly since its peak in the second half of 2006, following a decade of unprecedented demand for and supply of housing. Key factors in this long growth phase were national demographic changes, particularly the large population cohort in the key household formation age group between 25 and 34 years, easier access to credit, historically low interest rates and increased levels of disposable income. From its 2006 high point, housing output has dropped substantially, due initially to a doubling of interest rates between December 2005 and June 2007, which, combined with high prices, caused affordability to deteriorate.

Since then, global developments, both in the general economic environment and financial markets, have had an impact. American and international financial exposure to sub-prime liabilities led to a credit crunch that has spread around the globe and negatively impacted on the cost and availability of inter-bank financing. This has had an impact on retail lending, and banks, it would appear, have become more cautious in their approach to lending, whether for development or mortgage purposes.

It is important to have a clear historical perspective in looking at the Irish housing market and to recognise that housing output rose well beyond what would be warranted on the basis of underlying long-term demand. The Department has estimated that a sustainable long-term housing requirement of 60,000 to 65,000 units per annum is realistic. Therefore, it is clear that the 2006 output of more than 90,000 houses was unsustainable. There is still significant underlying demand for housing where prices have adjusted to reflect current market conditions, although this is dependent on access to credit. It is also important to note, notwithstanding last week's ECB interest rate increase, that there has been an improvement in affordability in recent months, as a result of increases in mortgage relief and disposable income and reductions in average house prices.

The effective demand for housing in the market at any given time is affected by many short-term factors, such as the cost and volume of lending, price expectations, confidence, etc., and, therefore, can vary significantly from the anticipated longer-term underlying housing requirement. However, the Irish housing market is generally considered fundamentally sound and likely to be underpinned on a long-term basis by strong underlying demand. While the market is currently experiencing difficult times, I expect that in the short to medium term we will return to a more stable and sustainable market. The continued prudent approach to managing the economy and public finances which has been the hallmark of this Government will be crucial to the achievement of this objective.

The programme of work which I have outlined and the policy reforms now under way all serve to underline the Government's commitment to meeting a broad range of housing needs. I assure Senators that I am committed to driving the housing agenda forward positively within the resources available. My core aim will continue to be to address real needs and to do this in a way that builds sustainable communities and develops places where our people will want to live and work, now and in the future.

I welcome the Minister of State to the House and thank him for facilitating the debate on housing. It is an appropriate time to debate this important matter of concern for many citizens, whether they are people on housing lists or people who have purchased privately and are paying mortgages. We need to debate the issue of housing and to consider in detail how we will meet the new challenges of the current economic climate.

The last occasion this House debated housing was in October 2007 when, despite the concerns expressed by the Opposition, the Minister of State's predecessor, Deputy Batt O'Keeffe, stated, "A key point I want to make is that recent trends in aspects such as house prices and housing output involve, essentially, a return to a more normal and sustainable pattern and will not necessarily have negative results as some media comments might suggest." He was referring to media reports that the housing market was about to experience serious challenges and would not experience a soft landing but he got it wrong on that occasion. Disappointingly, the Government questioned media commentators, economists and Opposition Members who raised concerns about housing and labelled them as prophets of doom. The current reality is stagnation in the housing market and increases in negative equity.

The delivery of social and affordable housing needs to be reviewed. I welcome the announcement by the Minister of State of the housing provisions Bill. The targets in this area are not being met at present and hundreds, if not thousands, of people are languishing on housing lists in local authority areas. These people will not be comforted by statistics about spending on the national development plan if their houses are not built. In the past several years, local authorities have reduced their direct provision of social housing and have depended instead on developers and Part V of the Planning and Development Act 2000 to deliver on their obligations. However, local authorities need to be properly resourced if they are to meet the challenge of housing.

I disagree with the Minister of State when he stated, "The continued prudent approach to managing the economy and public finances which has been the hallmark of this Government will be crucial to the achievement of this objective." That could not be further from the truth. The end of the housing boom has exposed the fallacy of the Government's claim to superior economic management. The credit fuelled and tax driven housing boom contributed to a deterioration in the underlying health of Ireland's economy. With house building overtaking foreign trade as the main driver of economic growth, 2002 marked an important milestone in the Irish economy. Building overtook manufacturing as the largest single employment sector in 2004. Construction accounted for 14% of Irish jobs, or more than twice the OECD average, by late 2006, while 2007 was the sixth year in succession that new housing output significantly exceeded underlying household formation, estimated at 50,000 per year.

Over-building did not initially slow house price growth thanks to tax breaks for developers and investors, housing demand from immigrant building workers and property speculation driven by cheap credit and capital gains. Average house prices doubled between 2000 and 2006 and tripled between 1997 and 2006 but the IMF was able to relate only half the growth in house prices to underlying economic fundamentals such as income and interest rates. At the peak of the housing credit cycle in early 2006, mortgage lending increased by more than 30% per annum. Some 69% of mortgages had loan-to-value ratios of above 90% and 36% had ratios of above 100%. This massive credit expansion drove up house prices, which in turn became the security for further credit expansion. The result was that by 2007 Irish household debt was the highest by far in the eurozone. In late 2006, the CSO reported that 15% of the Irish housing stock, or 300,000 houses and apartments, were vacant. I question whether that demonstrates the protection of the fundamentals of the economy. The current housing market is suffering from excess supply, high mortgages and a rapid increase in the number of repossessions coming before the courts. The housing market was seriously overheated but the Government exacerbated the problem at a time when controls were needed. The banks also had a role to play in the way they loosened credit and threw money at people. We are now seeing the flip side in terms of a credit crunch and string tightening by banks.

It has become more difficult for first time buyers to enter the property market, despite falling house prices. The Central Bank has reported that mortgage lending growth fell in May to its lowest point since 1992. The first time buyers' share of the market was 22.5% in the first quarter of 2007. In the same quarter of this year, it was 17.4%. That first time buyers are unable to purchase property has to be a cause of concern for the Government, politicians and the general public. They also face higher mortgage rates, tightened credit and lending criteria and decreased job security. Banks are also requiring larger deposits before offering mortgages.

It is a person's fundamental right to have a roof over his or her head, irrespective of whether that comes from public or private housing. It is the Government's responsibility to assist people on housing lists and prospective house buyers in finding comfortable and adequate housing. New initiatives are needed to stimulate demand in housing markets. The shared ownership scheme, which was intended to help people on housing lists, is good in theory but it needs to be reviewed in order to support with grants or equity loans those who cannot meet the full cost of a house in the present climate.

The Minister of State has indicated that the forthcoming housing provisions Bill will review direct provision of social and affordable housing by local authorities. Some local authorities abdicated their responsibilities through the Part V provisions which allowed them to use 20% of private developments to meet housing demands. However, housing programmes and land acquisition need sustainable models of community building. Local authorities have a role to play in this regard but if they are given that role, they need to be properly resourced.

I am aware that the national development plan provides funding for social and affordable housing. I hope there will be no cuts to housing assistance grants for disabled persons and essential repairs or to the newer housing adaptation grants because these are a significant source of help for people in meeting their accommodation needs. Where funds are not taken up by local authorities, the Minister of State suggested that they would be redistributed. In my constituency of Waterford, these grants are in high demand in both the city and the county. As chairman of a housing strategic policy committee, I have experienced the difficulties that arise in regard to providing the local authority portion of grants. The Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government offers 90% of the funds but the local authority has to provide the remainder. Due to the number of applications that were made previously in my area, that 10% was difficult to find. It is a successful scheme. I encourage the Minister of State to ensure it is properly resourced.

My colleague, Senator McFadden, will address the issues of homelessness and grant schemes in more detail. There is an over-supply of housing at the moment given the current level of vacant housing stock of which there are 300,000 made up of houses and apartments. We need to move this housing stock. I am speaking not of developers but of people on waiting lists for houses, including young couples wishing to have a house of their own to start a family. These vacant houses must be removed from the market and be lived in once again. It is up to Government to provide the initiatives required be it by way of equity loans, affordable housing schemes or shared ownership schemes. It is important this stock is moved as this will assist in stimulating the housing market and in moving the construction industry in the right direction.

I welcome this debate. We could speak all day about the serious implications of the current housing situation. However, with proper policies, sound management and the required investment and resources we can overcome the challenges we face. We need to reduce housing waiting lists and to assist young families obtain a house of their own. I thank the Minister of State for attending the debate today.

I welcome the Minister of State to the House and welcome the new legislation which is long overdue and will reform how local authorities operate.

I am glad the 2008 programme remains intact. However, as Senator Coffey stated, we do not know what might occur after 3.30 p.m. today. I welcome the Minister of State's announcement in respect of the €74 million for affordable housing; €51 million for rental accommodation, which is vitally important; €40 million for Traveller accommodation which will assist people at the lower end of the market; €290 million for voluntary and co-operative housing with 100% grants and, the €1 billion for local authorities in respect of social housing provision. I worry about the capacity of local authorities to deliver this type of development. The Minister of State should consider their capacity to do what is required.

I welcome the €199 million for regeneration in places such as Sligo, Cork and Limerick under the public private partnership schemes. With the downturn in the economy it is essential funding is spent sensibly and efficiently. The Minister of State said we must ensure more efficiency in the provision of services, which is vitally important, and that we must ensure there is better management of county council housing stock. He also stated that such funding may not be spent to compensate for poor local management. I know that previously my council had to return unspent funding and I do not believe this is acceptable any more. It is right and proper that we introduce new measures for regulation of local authorities.

Currently, when a house which has been upgraded is returned to a council, the council is required to return that house to its original state. That is a waste of money. It is no longer acceptable. There are in excess of 3,000 houses vacant in the Dublin City Council area and 5,300 houses vacant countrywide. While some of these units may be vacant as a result of regeneration schemes, this and future governments will be required to invest a couple of billion euro in the housing sector. We cannot continue in this way. The Minister of State should consider carrying out an audit in this regard.

We need to adjust to the new situation and to ensure we do better; to retain the skills currently available to us in the construction industry and to recommence community employment schemes and the housing refurbishment scheme. Also, county councils must ensure efficiency. I mentioned previously that much of the work undertaken is being duplicated. We must improve the turnaround time in respect of the provision of council houses. The current surplus in construction capacity provides us with an opportunity to utilise excess labour in the renovation of these houses.

We must fast forward the national development plan and move construction industry resources from speculative development to social and affordable development. The current situation in the construction industry provides us with the manpower to do this. Provision is made for local authorities to engage contractors in respect of waste and water management and in designing and maintaining major projects. They could be permitted to do likewise in respect of housing provision. This would ensure more efficiency in this area. Often, a full year has passed before planning permission is agreed by a county council. It takes a further six to eight months for contracts to be agreed. This means it is often two years before a development commences. One cannot deliver a housing programme with inefficiencies like this.

Access to credit plays an important part in the construction industry. Access and low interest rates were the key drivers of the sustained boom we witnessed in recent years. There is an opportunity in crises. For example, one bed apartments which cost €310,000 are now being advertised for sale at €245,000. This provides young people with an opportunity to get on the housing ladder, despite the tighter controls in respect of access to credit.

It is important people do not find themselves in the position of not being able to pay their mortgages. It is important we put in place incentives to encourage house buyers, who are currently sitting on the fence, to get back into the market. Some 700 to 800 house sales are being held up as a result of poor conveyancing. This issue should be examined. The council should look to the local solicitor if it cannot complete the conveyancing work itself. There is also an opportunity for an increase in the availability of credit through the Housing Finance Agency. We should allow the agency to play a key role in terms of credit.

At a time when extra labour is coming on stream, more than 90% of Irish houses do not meet energy standards. According to an EU directive, we must tackle this. We should make use of spare construction capacity and encourage people to bring their homes up to the required energy standards. Other countries, such as Canada and Germany, have already done this. We should target the lower paid and people who would not otherwise be able to do this work with special grants which will prevent their becoming energy-poor. We should also allow private occupiers an income tax advantage for employing registered construction firms to upgrade their homes. This will represent a definite return on investment for the Government and could be a neutral expenditure if carbon taxes are introduced and the resulting funds reinvested into this green collar sector. This sector will play an important role in job creation. The Commission on Taxation is currently investigating the possibility of carbon taxes. This was promised under the Programme for Government and I hope the commission will examine my suggestion as soon as possible.

It is expected that in the future, green collar workers will outnumber workers in many other areas of employment. FÁS, the CIF, Enterprise Ireland and all other partners must come together and create awareness of this new job creation opportunity. I support the introduction of grants for home owners to invest in improving the energy rating of their homes by installing energy-saving solutions. The VAT return to the Exchequer would support any investment in the future.

The Government's greener homes scheme, operated by Sustainable Energy Ireland and costing €27 million over five years from March 2006, saw 20,500 people apply for grants to install wood, solar and thermal heating. So far, 12,300 installations, including 4,300 wood pellet boilers, 4,700 solar thermal units and 3,300 heat pumps, have been approved. Thus, there is considerable opportunity within the present market. I am glad the Minister has ensured that the 2008 programme is in place and that we can ensure we deliver social and affordable housing to the people who require it.

I welcome the Minister of State, Deputy Power. I found the speech of the Minister of State, Deputy Finneran, very impressive. The concept of the policy statement, which is based on delivering homes and sustaining communities, is well worth while. There was a vision behind it when it was published last year. The objective, as the Minister of State said, is the transformation of the housing sector.

I will concentrate on three things, one of which is funding. A funding crisis has arisen because of a glut in completion of Part V housing units, which are units built by developers to meet their obligations to provide 20% social and affordable housing in each development and which are then sold to local authorities. The number of Part V completions has soared and, with it, the bill payable by county councils. This has drawn funds away from traditional projects undertaken by housing associations, charitable groups, and various other trusts. A Department spokesman said the Part V housing scheme gets priority because the houses are already built. Another factor prompting councils to divert money to Part V housing is believed to be the fear of litigation if developers are not paid.

Some 700 new homes were planned for St. Michael's estate in Inchicore in a deal worth €265 million, at least 220 of which were social and affordable housing. Other projects included the redevelopment of O'Devaney Gardens off the North Circular Road, with 860 homes, worth €180 million, and 360 apartments on Dominick Street, worth €150 million. Another 179 units were due to be built at the convent lands on Seán McDermott Street, of which 20% were to be social and affordable housing, and another 162 units on Infirmary Road, including 130 social and affordable homes. I am sorry for giving so many figures. However, the funding for voluntary social housing in Dublin has been suspended because Dublin City Council has stated that it has used up its annual allocation under the main scheme operated by the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. A spokesman for the Department said the council had reached its allocated borrowing level for the year and, as a result, no further social housing projects would be sanctioned under the scheme. The result was that McNamara Construction decided not to continue with the construction of five vital public private housing projects in Dublin. This is a disaster for inner-city Dublin, as the Minister of State knows, and not just for the estates that were to be regenerated. The rebuilding of St. Michael's estate in Inchicore, for example, involved not only the provision of private and public housing, but also a library, a civic centre, a health clinic and a shopping centre. The regeneration schemes held out the promise of an end to social segregation and the sink estates that had grown up over time in the city's social black spots.

The old, discredited model of segregated social housing has not been replaced by a working alternative. There are currently 44,000 households on housing waiting lists, as mentioned by the Minister of State, and some have been there for up to a decade. The collapse of these public private partnership schemes highlights the continuing failure of the Government to tackle the housing crisis. This is an important point and one that needs attention. The situation has come about because of success rather than failure, but that is the problem. It is a challenge for the Government.

I also wish to speak about Government support for non-housing parts of the Irish economy and tax measures to cool overheating in the housing market. Now that the housing market has slowed, Ireland is again out of sync with most of Europe, with the drop in house construction depressing growth. Analysis of the Irish market by Dr. Alan Ahearne of NUI Galway for Bruegel argues that we should not follow the example of Spain. He report states that "some building firms will collapse" and warns that the Government should not intervene as it did in Spain, where the state has ordered big social housing projects. Housing-related activity, which has driven strong revenue growth, will no longer boost Government coffers. The Government should now support non-housing parts of the economy, such as infrastructure. According to some estimates, infrastructure deficits are costing Irish businesses €2.5 billion in lost profits. The Government should also provide incentives for people to improve insulation in their homes to help the construction industry.

Dr. Ahearne has argued that since governments in the eurozone cannot change interest rates in response to overheating housing and credit markets, they must learn to use other mechanisms, such as tax, and intervene early with tax measures to cool overheating. The report by Bruegel suggests that mortgage interest relief should have been eliminated and capital gains tax introduced on the sale of primary residences to dampen the boom that began in 1996, and argues that a tax on interest payments for flexible-rate mortgages might also be called for. We must bear in mind the problems experienced in Spain and avoid intervening as the Spanish Government has done. Such measures may worsen the problem of extra inventory of unsold houses and prolong the adjustment process. It is a lesson to us that we must take care. If we look at what happened in Spain we can appreciate the problems that were created there.

Senator Ross is not here to comment on estate agents and he shows no love for them, though he has become one. Half of Spain's estate agents have collapsed in the past year due to a slowdown in the once-booming building sector. The figures amaze me. Of 80,000 that operated at the beginning of 2007, only around 40,000 have survived and some 100,000 employees lost their jobs, according to the Superior Council of Real Estate Agents, a nationwide group there.

My final point relates to the glut of housing in Dublin and the lack of accommodation for those who need it. In some counties, up to 30% of housing units lie empty. In Dublin, developers were aided greatly by Dublin City Council planners who raised the height limit in the city and permitted the construction of multi-storey blocks. One result is a glut of housing that is not needed, is not occupied and is in the wrong places. Another result is a dearth of housing that is urgently needed and which is suitable for families to live in. In Dublin alone, 2,000 households are trying to break out of homelessness each year, yet places can be found for just 300 of them. Why are the people who need housing being left behind in the light of such scandalous waste of unoccupied accommodation in the city?

These are some of the challenges that face us and there are no easy solutions. Part of the problem has emerged from the success of past efforts; that is to say, the public private partnership was so successful that we have used up our allocation. This is a challenge that is worthy of debate and concentration. We face up to this and set objectives, as the Minister did so well in the original document. On delivering homes in sustainable communities he said "the policy statement set out a vision to guide the transformation of the Irish housing sector over the medium term by delivering more and better quality housing responses and by doing this in a more strategic way, focused on the building of sustainable communities". The vision and the objective here are perfect. Disability and those left behind due to disability are included in the vision and it was interesting to read this because I was not aware of the amount that had been done. The efforts being made are very worthy.

I support the efforts and the objective but let us ensure we can achieve this in the short term, not just the long term.

I have been critical of housing policy in the past and derive no joy from saying that the Irish economy has been overly reliant on construction. This is more the case here than in similar economies. In future our economy must find a sustainable place for construction in economic activities. We continue to have difficulties that must be overcome in the short term, many of which have been outlined by Senator Quinn. We have a long local authority social housing list and there are many empty properties across the country. The ability of developers to initiate new developments has been compromised by a lack of capital that stems from an inability to sell the vacant properties already in their possession. For the same reason, financial institutions that provided capital to such developers are either unable or unwilling to give further impetus to allow developers initiate new projects.

On all these grounds, a possible answer to the social housing situation would be to use all these negatives to create a virtuous circle. We may need a special, tripartite convention on housing consisting of the Government, through local authorities, financial institutions and the Construction Industry Federation. This could help convert as many as possible of the existing vacant properties into social housing units. Agreement could be sought with the financial institutions that payment not be immediate but made on a deferred time basis. If we managed to do this we would remove a monkey, in the form of the financial institutions, from the backs of developers and we would offer financial institutions guaranteed payment at an agreed time, though not necessarily in the immediate future. We would also provide local authorities with the ability to speed up a social housing programme at a time of constrained public expenditure. The housing situation is such that an innovative approach is demanded; we cannot do things as they were traditionally done or as we allowed happen during the Celtic tiger years. We must knock heads together to ensure that the contradictions that exist in housing policy, as outlined by Senator Quinn, do not continue into the future.

Other opportunities also exist because of the lack of effective housing policies in the past. Some 50% of our housing stock was built no later than 1990 and most of this does not meet the type of building standards, especially in terms of energy efficiency, that we see in more enlightened countries with policies on housing energy ratings that are superior to ours. Through our new building regulations, we have put in place the first phase of a new Government policy that obliges new housing to reach a 40% standard. In two years it is intended that this will rise to a 60% standard. It will ultimately reach an 80% standard and the concept of passive housing will apply in a short amount of time.

This does not overcome the fact that much of the country's housing stock comes nowhere close to the 40% standard. Much work must be done on this, through the provision of adequate resources. As has been argued, with the co-operation of the construction industry, a large-scale national insulation programme should be put in place that involves those who have experience in the industry. This programme would look at existing building stock and ensure that money that is being leaked, literally, by householders due to ever-rising energy costs can be saved. The country would benefit through less importation of fossil fuels and householders would benefit through greater control of daily and weekly expenditure. As a result, inflation should be curtailed.

These seem like simple solutions but, like all simple solutions, there is bound to be a fly in the ointment somewhere; a person in a Department is bound to say "we would like to do that, but". However, with the situation as it is and resources as they are, it is not good enough to say that the way things were done in the past will improve things in the future. What was done in the past provided a short-term fillip but never a long-term answer; it was always going to be far from sustainable. Our housing policy must be turned on its head. As Senator Quinn said, we must provide the appropriate number, type and location of housing units. Historically, through the lifetime of this State, on all of these levels, we have failed. We have never planned effectively for the type of housing that was needed by people — housing that would conform with their lives.

This matter should be seen as a series of difficulties that we now have, in terms of the contradiction between a dearth of housing and a surplus of housing and the difficulties caused by the credit crunch for the construction industry. However, it should also be seen as a huge opportunity to put in place a housing policy that will sustain this country further into this century and meet the needs of its people.

We have lived under a number of difficult constraints and historically, due to our past as a colonised country, we have put a great value on land. We have achieved among the highest levels of house ownership in the world but this has seen families put aside much income towards the acquisition of property. Such an approach does not occur in other countries and I do not believe our future housing policy must be based on the idea of ownership. This would represent a huge cultural shift in our country. We have a very small private rental sector and it remains so due to a combination of a lack of appropriate incentives for people to provide appropriate property for rent and the lack of proper policing to encourage people who would like to rent to do so. If we get that balance right, we will be doing a great service towards tackling the ongoing problems associated with housing.

The third area concerns social housing, housing agencies and housing co-operatives. These comprise a very small sector of our housing market, yet they comprise the area that is most innovative in providing housing in the types of arenas I have described.

Will the Minister of State pay particular attention in his response to the issue of homelessness in light of the current economic climate? It comprises an important part of his brief. We should never lose sight of the fact that spending money on homelessness is never false economy and that cuts made in this area in the name of economy always represent false economy. The reasons people are homeless are many and complex and have as much to do with mental illness and substance abuse as they have with the economy itself. I appeal to the Minister of State, given the day that is in it, to make efforts, with the support of the Minister and the Department, to ensure spending in this area is protected.

I welcome the Minister of State to the House. I am glad the Leader has facilitated this debate today because housing is of great concern to people throughout the country, not just Members of this House. The housing industry has, until recently, been the bedrock of the construction industry and has played a large part in the creation of the Celtic tiger.

Since 1997, over 600,000 new houses have been built. In other words, one third of our housing stock has been produced since then. Over half of these houses are in new housing estates dotted around the country, mostly in urban areas. Many of these estates were poorly planned and, when they were built, the necessary infrastructure, including playgrounds and schools, was not put in place. I know of many estates with no footpaths around them. While we must ask why this was allowed to happen, we must recognise there seems, at last, to be an improvement on foot of the new planning regulations that affect new estates. Furthermore, given the new building regulations, it is hoped new estates will be planned properly, sensitive to environmental requirements and more energy efficient.

I will focus on two other areas, the management of houses in housing estates and the affordability of housing in general. Outside Dublin, the management of estates comprises a major problem. There is no parks department in many counties, including my county, County Meath. Consequently, there are no management rules or regulations and it is not clear whether it is up to the council or the residents to take care of the common areas.

Recent advice notices from the Departments call for a faster process for taking charge of estates. However, in many council areas there are many unfinished housing estates. The developers have walked away and considerable work still needs to be done. The bonds are not sufficient to cover the cost of the work. It is one thing for the Minister to tell the local authorities they should take charge of the estates, but it is not clear where the additional money will come from. It must come from somewhere. Will the Minister of State make a statement on how this will work in practice? In County Meath alone, efforts are being made by residents of scores of estates to have councils take charge of them.

Some estates have their own management companies. In this regard, we are told legislation is due shortly that will specify how to deal with the issue of management companies. It is badly needed and will not be before time.

Issues arise regarding the affordability of housing, in respect of which many people should have had options over recent years. Unfortunately, they have not had such options and the Government's track record in this regard is abysmal. Part V of the Planning and Development Act 2000 was meant to result in 20% of all new housing developments being made available for social and affordable housing. However, the ratio of affordable to social housing differs according to the area in question. In east Meath, for example, 17% of the required 20% is supposed to be affordable housing while 3% is supposed to be social housing. This ratio varies throughout the country. The requirements in this regard should have generated approximately 30,000 homes by 2006 but only 3,000 materialised.

There is a straightforward reason for these developments. The Government changed the law to allow developers to give money to local authorities in lieu of houses. The local authorities were supposed to use this money to purchase or build houses but this did not happen. The money disappeared, be it on day-to-day expenditure or other schemes that were the flavour of the month. I do not know what it was spent on and will not speculate but it is clear that, in the vast majority of cases, the money was not used to increase the local housing stock.

Our analysis suggests approximately 6,000 homes should have been produced every year by local authorities since the enactment of the Housing and Development Act 2000. This has not occurred and we need to tighten up in this regard.

The social housing list, which is due to be updated later this year, is of concern. Given the current economic decline, it is probable that the list will grow longer. However, this presents an opportunity to build more houses and kick-start the construction industry. The last detailed publication in this regard was published by the Department three years ago, at which time it was complimenting itself on the fact that the number on the housing list was only 40,000, which represented a 10% decrease over the preceding three years. I am not sure this was a cause for celebration because the figure had increased by 50% in the preceding ten years, namely, from 20,000 to 40,000. This is creating problems nationally. In Navan, for instance, there was an increase of 6% in the three-year period. In Drogheda Borough Council there was an increase of one third in just three years.

Since we are beginning to experience an economic downturn or an opportunity for savings, the unemployment rate is increasing, as is the cost of living. It is therefore clear that homes will be harder to pay for. Those with large mortgages will see an increase in repayments, as will those who rent their homes.

The rent allowance structure requires reform. One must ask whether the current rent allowance system distorts the number of people actually seeking housing. Anyone who ends up availing of a jobseeker's allowance on becoming unemployed might seek a rent supplement to get him through tough times. The number in this category is very likely to increase but it is necessary for anybody seeking rent allowance to get onto the housing list first. Therefore, it is of concern that this might distort the number actually waiting for social housing.

Almost 14,000 of the people on the housing list are receiving supplementary rent allowance. However, anyone who takes up full-time employment will immediately lose this benefit, regardless of how small his or her income. In many cases, it is more economical to stay out of the workplace and continue receiving rent allowance. The allowance can serve as a disincentive to taking up employment and is therefore almost like a poverty trap. The rent allowance system is in need of real reform, for various reasons.

One of the most important housing supports is outlined in the Social Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2006. This will afford those who have benefited from social housing for a long period the option of buying their homes from the local authority. This is an important step in the development of housing policy and the sooner it is taken, the better. However, the Bill has been delayed for two years. It did not materialise in 2006 or 2007 and, although the Taoiseach promised it would be considered before the summer recess, in two days, there is no sign of it. Will the Minister of State inform us when it will be published?

Some improvements have been made to the planning and building regulations governing new housing developments but we need to do more, particularly regarding the supply of affordable and social housing. The downturn in the construction industry could be addressed by investing more in social and affordable housing. This, in turn, would reduce the numbers on housing lists.

I am glad to be present to speak on housing. To answer Senator Hannigan's question, the Minister of State said in his speech the Bill to which he referred will be submitted to the Government for approval shortly. I do not suppose it will happen within the next two days but it will be available soon.

This debate covers a wide area, including housing provided by local authorities, the private rental sector and the housing market itself. The housing sector has been subject to considerable change and, as has been alluded to, much of the national housing stock is very new. I caught a glimpse of a television programme last night in which a man who was building his own house to a very high environmental standard discussed the difficulties involved. As this was a new-build once-off house, it was easy for him to do it. He spoke of his CO2 emissions and how his bill for quite a substantial house would be approximately €120 per year. He did not require a boiler, chimney apparatus or central heating because he intended to use solar panels or whatever. It was a tremendous achievement. He made a point, with which I am familiar from work I have done in this regard, that were the Government to decide to opt for higher insulation standards, zero emission houses would be possible. The Minister of State's speech referred to building sustainable communities, which I consider to be an important second part of the process of building houses and planning for housing. In times past, the imperative was to put up houses because people required housing. However, greater thought is being given at present to the types of community to be created. It is not simply to do with housing estates on their own as one also requires integration and the provision of other services, particularly transport.

In addition, one also must consider the quality of the houses that are being built. The British Government is seeking to have passive houses with zero carbon emissions by 2016 and I wish Ireland would do something similar because it is possible. I am glad the Government finally introduced higher insulation standards recently as they will be of tremendous benefit. However, those who bought houses that were built in the 1980s, 1990s and the early 2000s now are subject to crippling fuel bills because of the lack of insulation. People have been left with a terrible legacy in this regard and the Department should focus on a zero carbon project. While I am sure the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Gormley, is quite aware of this issue, it also is important to consider it from the perspective of energy security and trade to avoid increasing bills in respect of energy and electricity demand.

Another issue I wish to discuss concerns the changes that have taken place in areas called strategic development zones. I visited Tallaght and Adamstown recently to view progress there and this is the manner in which development should be carried out. All new developments should be modelled on the Adamstown model because it is working. The bus stops, train station and other facilities have been put in place before the arrival of the people, which is as it should be. One can see where the schools are located and people can buy into a sense of community. In many housing estates that have been erected, however, in both cities and smaller centres, people merely buy rows of houses that have no services, never mind the provision of schools and other facilities, and in which one is completely dependent on cars. The strategic development zone model is good and should be rolled out to ensure all developments take place in this manner in the future.

When a member of Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council, I chaired its strategic policy committee on housing. Senator Quinn has alluded to an issue that I found to be extraordinary, namely, the tension that exists between the council and the voluntary housing sector, which is a pity. What difference does it make who intends to build the houses or whose money they receive to build them, as long as they do so for those who are on a housing list and who have a housing need? It was most extraordinary that the council should become iffy about granting permissions, facilitating or allowing the voluntary sector to expand. That was a pity because there is a great tradition in Ireland of the delivery to a high standard of houses by the voluntary sector in respect of both building and architectural standards. This tradition must be embraced to a greater extent and it is regrettable that such tension exists between the two housing providers.

I wish to mention the housing market itself, to which the Minister of State also referred. One is damned if one does and damned if one does not in this regard. Two or three years ago, everyone was complaining about the rate of increase of house prices and how they were beyond the reach of most people on an average industrial wage. This certainly was the case if one lived in Dublin, which was not a desirable position. At present the reverse is true and the slowdown that has occurred is being described as a disaster. People should get a grip on matters. A cooling down of the market probably is no bad thing because it has meant that houses have reached a sustainable level. When increases were flying ahead, people began to use their homes in a speculative way, which is not the purpose for which most people buy their homes. Even talk of the number of people who have gone into negative equity is somewhat theoretical because I imagine that 99% of those who buy homes, do not do so with a view to selling them off within two years to try to make a killing. They make such an investment for at least a five-year period, after which changes in their lifestyles or family lives may dictate they will sell and move on. Members should keep a perspective in this regard.

I wish to make two further brief points. The first pertains to housing need and the number of people who have refused housing as reported recently in the newspapers. This is extraordinary because housing need should show that someone is in dire straits without a house or that a need exists. However, such a high level of refusals suggests this matter must be reconsidered.

My final point concerns homelessness and I agree with the point made by Senator Boyle that homelessness is not simply the absence of shelter. It is a complex issue that needs all the money and resources available. Anything that is withdrawn from that sector will set back matters and Members must be highly cognisant of the homelessness issue.

I welcome to the House the Minister of State at the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, Deputy Seán Power. I am sorry the Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Michael Finneran, has left the Chamber because he paid a welcome visit to Athlone last week in respect of a housing estate that is in dire need of regeneration and I wished to commend him on his visit. Perhaps the Minister of State will pass on my thanks to him.

The Minister of State would be more than welcome.

I join with Senators O'Malley and Hannigan in raising my concerns regarding homelessness. Representatives from the Simon Communities of Ireland are due to appear tomorrow before the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Social and Family Affairs to make a presentation on all matters pertaining to housing. I am particularly concerned about homelessness as I am spokesperson for social and family affairs. As for the definition of the word, "homeless", it does not necessarily mean one does not have a house. That is not the only reason as one can be sleeping on someone's couch or be in emergency accommodation and still be homeless. It does not pertain simply to those who are sleeping rough and Members will concur that thousands of people are homeless.

This is a value for money issue and the Minister of State mentioned a figure of €53 million. While this constitutes an enormous sum of money, a great deal of it is being spent on emergency accommodation and people are living in appalling long-term emergency accommodation. I believe proper homes must be found for such people as it is a human right to have a proper home and to live in comfort with one's family. I encourage those Members of the Oireachtas who will be present tomorrow to listen to what the Simon Communities of Ireland delegation has to say.

The Midlands Simon Community has a resettlement programme that is not about the provision of hostels or homes for the homeless. It is about helping people, who are addicted or down on their luck, to sustain a living. It is about helping them to budget and to get on the property ladder by being able to have a house. Often such people do not have an address and it is almost impossible for them to register with the local authority. The Simon Community, in its resettlement programme in the midlands, is doing Trojan work. I am acutely aware of the work it is doing and I commend them on it. Homelessness is not just a Dublin issue, it pertains to the entire country.

The second issue I want to address relates to affordable housing. In my role as a county councillor before I was elected to the Seanad, I made a considerable number of representations on behalf of people wishing to avail of the affordable housing scheme. Sadly, the number of units available this year in my area of Westmeath is 97, 45 of which will be under the 1999 scheme where the local authority build the affordable housing. It is envisaged that will not happen in future. There were only 54 under Part V. In an environment where there has been a considerable amount of house building, the amount is so small that I question the direction of our affordable housing policy in the future.

I have a suggestion for the Minister which I would like to put on the record of the House. There should be negotiations with developers in relation to all of the vacant houses which are on the market for a number of months and have not been sold. It is time for councils and county managers to re-negotiate with developers and perhaps clear the backlog of people who are trying to get affordable housing. Athlone is a gateway town and, therefore, we are trying to double our population. There are 600 people on the social housing list in that area. Perhaps the councils around the country could enter discussions with developers who have these gluts of houses. It might counteract the cutbacks and provide greater value for money for local authorities.

This year we, in the Westmeath area, have €600,000 less in the budget for essential repairs grants and disabled persons' grants and we have made an application for further funding. Only yesterday I was approached by a lady whose application had been approved and who had been in contact with the council only to find that there is no money in the coffers. She has borrowed the money for a chair lift for her severely handicapped child. She is also caring for her mother who has Alzheimer's disease. The lady is sitting there with a lender shouting at her and no money forthcoming from the local authority.

I am also aware that some local authorities means test their grants for disabled persons. Means testing is a good idea and it should be uniform throughout the country. I am aware that a means test applies in County Waterford, for instance, and I wonder is there a likelihood that a means test will apply all over the country. It is outrageous that somebody who is extraordinarily well off can get a grant to do up his or her house.

The Minister of State, Deputy Finneran, spoke about housing policy and sustainability. I was shocked to read the article in The Sunday Tribune on elderly persons and pensioners having to choose between food and fuel. Some of these pensioners’ houses are so old that they have no insulation. Senators O’Malley and Hannigan both referred to sustainability. I am aware of a number of elderly pensioners who cannot afford to heat their houses and who, when they do, must go without food. That is a harsh reality. We need to investigate ways of helping the elderly. There are ways of insulating such homes and installing new windows, etc. I would encourage the Government to do this.

The Minister of State, Deputy Finneran, also spoke about a disability strategy and an older person's policy. I await both of those policy documents. He did not mention a budget for either. How much money has been allocated for this?

Anti-social behaviour is an issue, especially in local authority housing estates. We all have spoken here about the Social Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill. Will there be any reference to anti-social behaviour in that Bill? Anti-social behaviour, due to drugs and alcohol, is the scourge of local authority housing estates. I ask that this area be investigated and legislation in this regard introduced.

I welcome the Minister of State, Deputy Seán Power, to the House.

The Minister of State, Deputy Finneran, referred to the proposed legislation which it is hoped will be published soon. The draft housing Bill, which we hope will be presented to Government shortly, will provide a legislative footing for the delivery of homes to many people, particularly those on local authority waiting lists. I welcome a number of areas which are being addressed under the Bill, particularly the rental accommodation scheme. This scheme is an excellent interim measure for a person who wants a firmer accommodation footing than dealing directly with a landlord. It should be rolled out nationally and the legislation put in place. Local authorities are availing of the scheme, but often in urban areas only. We must examine that. If it is available for people who live in urban areas, it should be also available for people who live in rural areas.

On expanding paths to home ownership, during my clinics at the weekend I met a number of people who were applicants on the housing list. The housing list is moving slowly in Donegal and these people suggested that if they were successful in their applications for mortgages, they would build houses themselves. If people on the housing list are taking steps to take out mortgages, we should support them in doing so by providing an incentive in addition to the mortgage, whether it is obtained through the local authority or from the bank. Even though bank interest rates are rising, the banks' mortgage rates are still lower than the local authority mortgage rates. Perhaps that also needs to be addressed.

I have been reading a report, which was compiled by DKM Economic Consultants on behalf of the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government and which was published in May 2008, entitled Construction Industry Indicators: Issue 13. There has been much debate, particularly in the past few weeks, on the consequences of the deterioration of the housing market, not only for those purchasing or selling houses, but also for the economy. This report outlined that there were three specific areas in the construction sector — residential construction, general construction and civil engineering — and that they latter two were emerging and growing. Incidentally, the first quarter of 2008, according to the report, saw a volume of office space built which was on a par with that built in 2006. It shows that, away from the housing sector, the construction sector is developing.

Today, however, we are concerned with the housing sector. While houses may be more affordable to people's budgets, the difficulty for many is that they cannot get their hands on the money they need from the financial institutions to purchase a house. This is a major difficulty. Even though the price of houses has dropped, people can not obtain mortgages because of the banks' lack of confidence in the housing sector. That is a matter that would need to be addressed in the overall context. The banks supported people when everything was going well and they made a good deal of money. However, now that there is a downturn they are not helping the people who wish to help themselves. At present, the person — or the young couple — who cannot get a mortgage from the bank goes onto the local authority housing list. I have seen this at first hand in the past few weeks. It is affecting the housing lists, driving up the number of applications and this needs to be addressed. I welcome that the National Development Plan 2007-2013 will see a doubling of the housing budget spend. The budget in the last development plan was some €10.5 billion, which was spent on the local authority, voluntary and the affordable housing sectors. This budget is being doubled to €21 billion for the period 2007 to 2013. This figure includes €3 billion in supplementary welfare allowances or the rent supplement scheme.

During my time as a member of Donegal County Council, one of the key issues was providing affordable housing to people, especially to those in rural areas. Local authorities, including Donegal County Council, are not doing enough to promote the development of the specific instance cottage. A specific instance cottage can be built on a person's site in the countryside at a cost approximately 35% to 40% lower than a scheme house in a town. The local authority or the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government does not have to purchase the site. The site is available from the applicant and the house can be built at a very cost effective rate. The Department should promote the development of specific instance cottages to a greater extent and should advocate this view with the local authorities in order that people who wish to have a local authority specific instance cottage built on their lands may do so. At present the guidelines state that a single applicant is prohibited from obtaining a specific instance cottage. He or she must apply for a scheme house, and this needs to be addressed as well.

I refer to the private house grants for older people and those with a disability. This year there was €71.4 million allocated under the scheme. Many local authorities have been given excellent allocations under this scheme, which was announced on 21 May by the Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Michael Finneran. I welcome the funding, under which some 20,000 people have obtained grant aid since 1997. However, the difficulty appears to be that although the funding is available to local authorities there is a backlog of applications. This applies not only in my own county but in other counties as well and it has been brought to my attention by several local authority members. The reason for the backlog is that local authorities do not have the 20% matching funding to pay out grant aid, which needs to be addressed. I suggest the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government should make contact with every local authority to find out the number of applications in the backlog and to determine, in conjunction with the local authority, whether a once-off allocation could be given to clear that backlog by reducing the 20% requirement.

With the permission of the House I will share time with Senator Pearse Doherty.

I welcome the Minister of State to the House and I welcome the opportunity to have a debate on housing. It is very important to have this debate. I read with interest the statement of the Minister of State, Deputy Finneran, and I am pleased he has addressed in such detail the issue of social and affordable housing. I wish to take issue with one point the Minister of State made. He stated there were some difficulties with the PPP projects of regeneration, especially in inner city Dublin. This is the understatement of the year. Having spoken with the residents of St. Michael's Estate, Inchicore, on previous occasions I know how much consultation took place and the tortuous nature of the process to finally get an agreement. I am sorry to see the agreement collapse and it is an indictment of the way the Government has been dependant on private developers and the construction sector. It is not good enough to blame international factors and the so-called credit crunch, as the Minister of State does, when in fact the problems resulted from a squandering of the boom and an over-reliance on the construction sector by this Government. The problems were entirely of its own making.

How does the Minister of State propose to offer adequate protection to tenants in the private rented sector? Although there have been some improvements, notably the requirement that landlords register, there is still evidence in this city of appalling conditions in flats and apartments, especially where old buildings have been inadequately converted. Another issue raised numerous times is the matter of owner occupiers and especially those occupying apartments who deal with management companies. Have such people any recourse if management companies clearly abuse their position of power?

Gabhaim buíochas le Seanadóir Bacik as ucht ama a roinnt liom. Tá mé iontach sásta deis a bheith agam labhairt ar an ábhar seo, cúrsaí tithíochta, sa Seanad inniu. The issue of housing is one of the most basic and essential living requirements and a core human right, which has been consistently neglected by the Government. The Government admits good housing is a bedrock of communities, but it will not admit access to adequate housing is one of the most fundamental human rights. This human right is codified in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Irish republicans have always viewed the ability to rent one's own home fairly and with fixity of tenure, or outright ownership, as a social good and as part of the birthright of all Irish people. The aspirations and the just demands of the 19th century land league and the 20th century civil rights movement have been the touchstone of our struggle over generations and remain today in the 21st century.

There is a major crisis in housing throughout the State. This crisis has emerged unhindered as a result of the policies of the Government. Despite what is happening in the property market, home ownership is spectacularly out of reach for those on low, or even average, incomes. There is a shameful lack of social housing for the 44,000 households lingering on the social housing waiting lists of local authorities. The misnomer of affordable housing continues to depend on the will of the developer and on Part V of the wholly inadequate Planning and Development Acts. Rents are soaring in the private sector, which is made up of low quality, high cost accommodation. The Government is happily subsidising private landlords to house people in receipt of rent supplement. These people should be living in social housing and have a human right to be housed.

The current system has been clearly designed to benefit a certain type of person, including the developer, speculator, landowners, estate agents, management companies and, of course, the establishment parties they sponsor. This system may serve those parties well, but it is clearly failing the housing needs of the population. Policies have been fundamentally inequitable and unbalanced in several respects and must change. It is immoral that the over-emphasis on the financial gains from housing at the expense of its social role has been allowed to continue.

Sinn Féin has a realistic vision for housing based on its understanding of housing as a human right. We call on the Government to share this understanding. There must be a commitment to fully and finally end homelessness in Ireland. Unfortunately, the Government is not inclined to establish a system which would monitor the exact flow of people in and out of homelessness on an annual basis, let alone house them. It is clear now, in July 2008, that the Government is unlikely to meet its own commitment to end long-term homelessness in the State by 2010. This is nothing more than a disgrace. There are no plans to fast-track social housing for those most in need. There are no plans to introduce and implement a plan outlining funding commitments and targets for any new housing strategy, despite previous ministerial commitments to do exactly this. Sinn Féin calls on the Government to accept Article 31 of the European social charter on the right to housing and to hold a referendum to amend the Constitution to include a fully enforceable right to adequate housing as a matter of urgent priority.

I wish to share time with Senator John Paul Phelan.

I welcome the Minister of State. There has been too much reliance on the private housing sector as the engine of economic development and a lack of foresight on the part of Government in not anticipating the current lack of need for housing. Not only did the Government not anticipate this but it failed to face up in time to the fiscal realities this presented.

That said, a critical recommendation to the Government is that people who will be dislocated in the private housing sector should find employment in construction. There is no logic in putting people on the live register, with its involved costs and the loss of direct and indirect taxation to the economy.

I will make a few brief points. The affordable housing scheme could be very well exploited now to create jobs in construction. This scheme is the most revolutionary, radical and wonderful scheme we have had in recent times. If people can buy an affordable house at an economic price — basically the price of the site and construction — a family would have a viable chance to buy a home. The potential of affordable housing, as both a method of absorbing construction workers and giving cheap homes to people, must be fully exploited. Immediate efforts should be put in place to increase the number of affordable houses produced annually as there will be an uptake from people.

It is interesting to look at the statistics in that regard, which show that every year since 2004 there has been an increase in the uptake of affordable housing, right up to 1,600 last year. The need for affordable housing will be even greater in the present economic climate and because banks are refusing mortgages. Significant potential lies there.

The shared ownership scheme could be made more user friendly. Prices are falling objectively but more realistic figures could be set around the shared ownership scheme, which has potential.

There is no question but that the big challenge now for local authorities is to provide housing for single people because of the changing structure of families.

That must be a current challenge for the local authorities and I hope it can be addressed by the Minister. There is a specific need among single people. As we all know from our clinic work, many single males come to us seeking housing.

It is a major issue. There is much potential to absorb construction workers and people who may be dislocated from the building schemes into this area. The process of insulating houses has much potential to give employment to dislocated construction workers and should be taken up. It may solve the CO2 emissions problem at the same time.

I thank Senator O'Reilly for sharing his time. I do not wish to repeat what has been said by several speakers but there are a couple of issues I will mention. I welcome the opportunity to have a debate, which I have sought for approximately three months. It is fitting for us to have it before the Houses rise for the summer.

I agree wholeheartedly with the comments of Senator Ó Domhnaill earlier when he referred to the role of banks. The reality is that for the past ten years the banks have creamed it in terms of the property market here. They are now responsible for a large part of the problem in the property market in terms of the difficulty younger people have in getting mortgages. I join the Senator's call that the banks adopt a more reasonable approach for the future to ensure we do not have an even worse problem in the housing industry.

There are a number of areas I will briefly touch on, including Senator O'Reilly's point regarding single people. The Minister of State comes from an area like my own, a rural part of Ireland. On several occasions I raised in the last Seanad the number of single men in particular who are still housed in prefabs in rural locations throughout the country. It is shocking, particularly in post-Celtic tiger Ireland. They are a much-neglected group. As we look to a time when money will be tight, one wonders if the problem will be resolved in the immediate future. Not enough has been done and I urge the Minister of State to leave a mark in that area in his time in the Department.

I disagree completely with the earlier comments of Senator Boyle. It is aspirational to say we could move away from a housing system based on ownership but the reality is that will not happen. In the Irish context, people want to own the roof over their heads. The Senator mentioned the colonial context and the wish to own land comes from the fact that for hundreds of years, Irish people did not own their houses and land. There is a very strong attachment between Irish people and property, which will not change. We must focus our energies on a realistic objective rather than a pie in the sky aspiration.

Everybody who wished to examine the industry over the past ten years knew the boom could not continue indefinitely. I was the finance spokesperson for four years in the last Seanad. The current Taoiseach was Minister for Finance at the time and his little helper was a man called Tom Parlon, who is now head of the Construction Industry Federation. The two of them took turns in coming into the House and any time a Senator — myself or other Opposition spokespersons — raised the idea that the housing boom could not continue and we could not base our economic future on an unsustainable boom, we were virtually laughed out of the room.

The chickens have now come home to roost and there does not appear to be a plan B. It is a shocking indictment of the Taoiseach in his time in the Department of Finance that we do not have such a plan. Everybody flagged this problem and he did not put correct measures in place to ensure we had a soft landing in the housing market.

Another area mentioned by a couple of people earlier is that of grant schemes. I agree with these comments. Most of these schemes are successful and many people in my area and throughout the country have availed of them to great effect in installing windows, changing roofs and putting in doors. The problem in Kilkenny is the money for this year's scheme was gone by May. I know there is a possibility of extra funding at the end of the year but it will be wholly inadequate. If we are looking to a future where there will not be as many houses constructed as before and people may not be looking to sell their current house for bigger and better accommodation, more people will look to those grant schemes to try to renovate their houses.

There have also been dramatic cutbacks across the country in terms of housing provided to local authorities for the provision of social and affordable housing. Perhaps the Minister of State will comment on that.

I will miss the Minister of State's response to the debate as I must do some constituency work but I was interested in the part of his contribution where he spoke of the surge in Part V housing units that we are currently experiencing. We are certainly not experiencing a surge in Part V housing units under the Planning and Development Acts in my part of the world. Perhaps it is happening elsewhere but it is not happening in Kilkenny and Carlow. Will the Minister of State clarify those remarks before he leaves?

I wish to share time with Senator Paddy Burke.

Is that agreed? Agreed. Does the Senator wish to split it into five minutes and two minutes?

That is fine. The debate this afternoon is very timely, given that there appears to be an over-reliance on the construction industry. I congratulate the Minister of State on his appointment but he comes into office at a time when waiting lists are growing, we have an increase in vacant dwellings, there is developer-led planning in society and where the banks have given out money ad nauseam but are now putting pressure on young people in particular.

Twelve months on from the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government taking office, he is absent without leave. We have seen no joined-up thinking regarding the provision of social and affordable housing. It is laughable for the Acting Leader to come into the House and speak of a convention on housing. We need leadership from Government rather than more talk and consultation.

I agree with Senator Boyle on the housing stock issue. Many of the houses built are in appalling conditions and must be looked at. Will the Minister of State give a guarantee today that the new building regulations will not be cut as a result of today's Government announcement on spending freezes? How does the Minister intend to reduce the waiting list for social and affordable housing in light of Dublin City Council's decision to suspend its affordable housing panel? A national sea change is needed to make housing affordable and available to the thousands of young people who dream of having their own home.

I concur with the views expressed on single people, particularly men, who are discriminated against by local authorities. Positive discrimination in favour of men is required in the area of social housing.

Senator Butler noted that the 2008 housing programme is intact. He has no cause to celebrate because the current position is an indictment of the Government's mismanagement of the housing sector and economy.

This debate is important because thousands of young people worry about whether they will ever own their own home or secure a council house. The apparatus of State has let them down. I am intrigued by the Minister of State's comment that the level of delivery under Part V is experiencing a surge in 2008. He should show me where in County Cork this surge is taking place. This is Ireland, not Iraq, and there will be no surge in affordable housing. We need to make housing affordable and offer young people an opportunity to buy homes.

Thousands of houses in the private rental sector are in terrible condition and landlords offer any standard of accommodation. Action is required on standards. Who will stand up to landlords and tell them they must deliver or be forced out of the market. Why did the Private Residential Tenancies Board close its public office? Where will people go to make complaints about landlords, the quality of housing or tenants?

The Government's legacy will be one of empty buildings, high rents and high mortgage repayments, problems it has done precious little to address. As Senator Coffey noted, Part V has not achieved its objective. Developers are opting out of the scheme and handing over money to local authorities instead. Local authorities must be able to require developers to deliver housing under the social and affordable scheme. Young people need to fulfil the dream of having their own property. Immediate reform is needed in the area of housing. Nurses and teachers who were once able to buy houses on their own have no hope of securing an affordable home.

On the issue of sustainable communities, the challenge facing us is to provide proper infrastructure, transport facilities and planning and ensure local authorities take areas in charge.

I thank Senator Buttimer for sharing time and welcome the Minister of State, Deputy Michael Finneran, whom I wish well in his portfolio.

I agree with Senators' comments on banks. The Government should not have allowed banks to offer 100% and 120% mortgages. This was a reckless approach and the Government was equally reckless in allowing the practice because people will get into serious financial difficulties as a result.

Some local authorities are in serious financial difficulties and face problems raising the local contributions required for water and sewerage schemes. In some cases, these amount to 30% of the overall cost. In the current climate, where will local authorities generate such sums for the sewerage and water infrastructure that is critical to the supply of housing? Many communities want extensions to water and sewerage schemes but the local authority is unable to raise the necessary local contribution. Will the Minister establish a fund to assist local authorities which are in this position by reducing the contribution they are required to make? My local authority is experiencing difficulty raising the contribution for several sewerage schemes, most of which are small. It is a sad state of affairs when local authorities are unable for financial reasons to proceed with an extension or treatment unit.

Dublin City Council had to provide an additional €35 million for work done to the Ringsend water and sewerage plant, which was developed through a public private partnership. The Government must examine the operation of public private partnerships. It is unacceptable that local authorities are required to bail out the private partner. Who must pay the piper in such circumstances? It is the business community which pays for water and sewerage services and in many cases the charges are severe. In Castlebar, for example, businesses pay €10 per 1,000 gallons of water and sewerage in what is known as a "water in, water out" system. This is a massive overhead on industries and small businesses, such as hairdressers, restaurants and bars. I ask the Minister to consider alternative funding mechanisms for small future water schemes, which are crucial to the provision of much needed housing.

I thank Senators for their attention and contributions to the debate. I outlined earlier some of the remarkable progress being made in the delivery of the housing policy reforms set out in the policy statement, Delivering Homes, Sustaining Communities. I assure Senators I am committed to driving the housing agenda forward positively within the resources available. My focus will continue to be on addressing real needs and achieving this objective in a manner that builds sustainable communities.

Before responding to some specific points raised in the debate, I will refer in more detail to an initiative I mentioned in passing in my opening remarks, namely, the incremental purchase scheme. The objective of the scheme is to make it possible for households with income lower than for affordable housing to start on the path to home ownership. The scheme will be made available to existing and prospective tenants of rented social housing to purchase new local authority housing. For social housing applicants, the scheme offers the earliest possible start on the path to home ownership for those willing and able to undertake a house purchase.

The proposed scheme is based on the development of the shared equity concept, whereby an applicant would be allowed to build up an equity stake in a new local authority house in an incremental fashion in return for purchasing a stake in the unit up front and taking over responsibility for the property from the day of purchase. The scheme will promote mixed tenure and a broader income mix in social housing estates, fostering stability and community commitment from the outset, as well as optimising available resources through a reduction in ongoing management and maintenance costs and additional sales receipts to fund further social housing provision and improvements.

I acknowledge the important role played by the voluntary and co-operative sector in responding to housing need. This was underlined by the unprecedented 2,200 new housing starts the sector delivered in 2007. Its projects are supported through generous capital funding schemes from my Department, which provide up to 100% of the approved cost of permanent accommodation for low income families and groups with special needs. In response to this greatly increased level of output, a record €290 million will be made available to the sector by my Department this year.

Senator Coffey referred to the shared ownership scheme. Evidence available to my Department indicates that the level of take up in respect of this scheme has been low in recent times. That is one of the reasons I am bringing forward the new loan scheme to which I refer. I am of the view that the new scheme, in respect of which we have done a great deal of research, will be a success and will bridge the gap between affordable and social housing.

The Senator also referred to local authorities building their own housing estates. The current view is that the old type of local authority housing estate is no longer desirable and that a mix of private, affordable, social and voluntary housing is required. It is generally accepted that this is the best way to develop housing policy and sustaining communities.

Senator McFadden has an interest in the Battery Heights project, which I visited last week. I have made arrangements for representatives of Athlone Town Council to meet officials of the Department next week. It is hoped that plans in respect of the area will be progressed at that meeting.

Senator Butler referred to better management on the part of local authorities and inquired about houses that are returned to those authorities. I am conscious that in some local authority areas, houses are left vacant and are not refurbished as quickly as might be desired. I intend to have an audit carried out in respect of this matter in the future in order to discover whether improvements can be made. The Senator also requested an audit in respect of empty houses. Such an audit would be important because such houses could be refurbished and rented out to new tenants.

I was somewhat taken aback by Senator Butler's comment to the effect that houses to which improvements have been carried out and which are then returned to local authorities are again refurbished by those authorities. I will discuss the matter further with the Senator when the opportunity presents itself.

Senators O'Reilly, Ó Domhnaill, John Paul Phelan and others referred to single people. Not all local authorities operate in the way outlined in respect of such individuals. Perhaps the Department should initiate an investigation in respect of this matter. There is no reason single men should be discriminated against. The needs of such individuals are accommodated by the housing officers of both local authorities in my constituency. We will investigate this matter in the interests of encouraging fair play for single men.

Senator O'Reilly also referred to the insulation of houses. There are already in place a number of pilot schemes in this regard. We have received extremely positive reports in respect of these schemes. I have an particular interest in the schemes relating to housing for the elderly that are being developed under the partnership and social inclusion programmes.

Senator Ó Domhnaill and others referred to the banks. I do not have any influence over the banks. Prior to becoming Minister of State, however, I served as Chairman of the Joint Committee on Finance and the Public Service. One of the first things I did when I took over the chairmanship of that committee was to visit the United States to investigate what had happened in the banking sector there. I was taken aback to discover that approximately 40,000 brokers in that country had given loans to people who, in many cases, were not in a position to make the repayments relating to them. This is what gave rise to difficulties in the sub-prime market in the US. There is something now in place in that country which is called "jingle mail", whereby people put their house keys in an envelope and send them back to the banks.

The problems with sub-prime lending in the United States arose on foot of a lack of proper regulation. Ireland has a single regulator. In the US there are a number of regulators but there is no regulation whatsoever in respect of brokers. We are fortunate that we do not have a difficulty as regards sub-prime lending. I accept, however, that some people here obtained 100% mortgages. I am not in a position to state the number of these who were first-time buyers.

The number of repossessions carried out to date this year in Ireland has risen sharply.

I do not have the relevant figures in my possession. Statements regarding the number of repossessions are made on occasion. When representatives of the Irish Banking Federation came before the Joint Committee on Finance and the Public Service a couple of months ago, they indicated that the number of repossessions was extremely small. I accept, however, that the position may have changed in the past two months. I do not want to make a definitive statement in respect of that matter at this stage.

Reference was made to using prefabs to house single people. Old or dilapidated prefabs would not be appropriate for this purpose. I hope local authorities will give single people the same entitlements as those enjoyed by others. I accept that families with children, couples, etc., are probably given higher priority but single people should not be excluded. I am aware that certain local authorities do not discriminate against single people.

Several Senators referred to Part V housing units. Some of those who spoke appeared to indicate that the Part V provisions are not working or have not contributed. My Department will contribute €500 million to Part V projects in the current year. That money, which is no small sum, is contributing to the building of an enormous number of houses. Certain local authorities may not be as good as others in the context of completing Part V housing units but the Department is certainly providing a substantial amount of money towards the construction of such units.

The Part V provisions do not apply to developments consisting of four or fewer houses, houses built on lands with an area of one hectare or less or developments relating to unzoned lands. A query was made with regard to the taking of money or land in lieu of houses to be built under the Part V provisions. It is estimated that financial settlements account for only 13% of the overall picture nationally in this regard.

Senators Boyle and O'Malley referred to the tension that may exist between those in the voluntary sector and local authorities. The administrative arrangements for voluntary and co-operative housing projects were reviewed and a new and more streamlined set of procedures was introduced in June. The objective in this regard is to devolve, to the fullest extent possible, responsibility for detailed appraisal and technical assessment of projects to local authorities. My Department and I will continue to have overall responsibility for policy matters and the multi-annual budget.

I was also asked about targets. While the output of 3,539 units in 2007 did not reach the envisaged target, namely, 5,000, the overall target for the period 2007 to 2009 is 17,000. The latter remains the target for the period as a whole. The output achieved represents an increase of 10% over the output for 2006, which was 20% higher than that which obtained in 2005. Early indications relating to social and affordable housing completions to date in 2008 show a significant increase over the figure for the same period last year. Statistics for the first quarter of 2008 are being finalised and we will be in a position to publish them shortly.

In regard to the private rented sector, we hoped to have draft regulations for new standards by mid-July but there has been some slippage. I aim to go to Government with a memorandum on this matter after the summer, lay draft regulations before the Oireachtas in the autumn and have a commencement date for the standards in early 2009. I hope I have responded to the queries raised by Senators but if there are any I have not covered, we can respond in writing.

I am confident we have in place a clear and comprehensive housing strategy designed to build sustainable and rural communities. We are delivering responses which address a broad range of housing needs. The needs of more than 18,000 households — a substantial figure — under all the headings were met last year, which is a major input into the housing needs of the people.

The challenge is to maintain our record of achievement into the future. My Department and I are committed to meeting this challenge within the available resources in collaboration with our partners in the local authorities and the voluntary and co-operative housing sectors. I look forward to returning to the House in the future and to providing further updates on progress in the housing area.

I thank the Minister of State for his time. I do not doubt his commitment to addressing the housing challenges. Housing policy should be constantly under review because the environment always changes. The Minister of State mentioned that he was bringing forward some loan equity scheme to help people to purchase houses. Is there a time frame for that? I welcome the fact he intends to do an audit of vacant houses which is important in the context of housing policy.

I thank the Minister of State for his contribution. He is certainly a breath of fresh air in the Department and is taking all the views on board, which is very welcome. I wish him well in his portfolio and look forward to having him back in the House in the not too distant future. From listening to other Senators, some of his suggestions are more than welcome and we look forward to working with him to develop them.

The scheme will be published in the coming weeks and it will be dealt with in the next session.

When is it proposed to sit again?

Tomorrow at 10.30 a.m.

Barr
Roinn