Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 21 Jun 2011

Vol. 208 No. 10

Adjournment Matters

Agri-Environment Options Scheme

I apologise to the Minister and the House for being late. I was at another meeting.

The agri-environment options scheme, EOPS, is the replacement of REPS, particularly REPS 4, which was preceded, in turn, by REPS 3, 2, and 1. The scheme as currently applied leaves many queries for farmers and their agricultural consultants. This is particularly the case with regard to two or three points. The first is the reduction in the overall amount of money available for the scheme this year compared with 2010. The reduction of the maximum payment from €5,000 to €4,000 is placing a great burden on farmers. Given that there are only 6,850 applicants in the system, the average payment this year will be approximately €3,200. Last year, the average payment was €3,800 or closer to €4,000. It would appear, therefore, that the €25 million available for the scheme this year would not all be spent. This raises the question of where the money will go? What does the Department propose to do with any money that is left over?

While the REP scheme was excellent, unfortunately there were difficulties from Europe with the continuation of REPS 4 or a new REPS 5. The AEOS in some way replaced REPS, it is alarming that while the previous Minister gave a commitment to the IFA and other farming organisations that the natura scheme payment would be increased from €75 to €150, the current Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food has somewhat refused to consider increasing the payment to €150 per hectare, which is a major cause of concern particularly to farmers in rural areas. I would hope that while agreement seems to have been received from Europe to increase the payment from €75 to €150, I would hope the Minister would proceed to increasing the natura payment to €150, which would at least assist farmers in severely disadvantaged areas who had to destock — we all know the difficulties with the destocking with the gorse fires and so forth. They were receiving €242 per hectare on their REPS and are now reduced to €75 per hectare. It would only be appropriate as a compromise that a payment of €150 per hectare would be made available under the agri-environment options scheme.

The other issue with the scheme is whether it will be reopened to new applications next year. It is a major cause of concern for many farmers currently in REPS 3 whose term is coming to an end. Figures I have seen would suggest approximately 30,000 farmers will be discontinuing in REPS 3 and they need to know where they will go from here if there is no agri-environment options scheme open for new applications in 2012. While the farming community needs clarification on it, the crux of the issue for the disadvantaged sector would be the need to increase the natura payments for the special grassland species to €150.

Farmers whose applications for the agri-environment options scheme were approved, for example, in August 2010 have not yet received any payments. None of the 6,850 applicants approved under the scheme has yet received any payments even though they have carried out fencing works, and have planted shrubs and trees. They have expended a considerable amount of money but have received no assistance under the scheme to date.

There are a number of queries with the scheme, including the payment and whether the natura scheme will be open for applications again in 2012. If it is not open for applications in 2012, many of those farmers will be forced into the farm assist scheme which is wholly funded by the State and not by Europe. If farmers were forced away from the agri-environment options scheme and REPS into the farm assist, the burden on the State would be greater than providing the agri-environment options scheme, which is partially funded from Europe. I welcome the Minister of State, who was in my county recently and I was glad to see him there.

I thank the Senator for raising the matter. It is an issue about which I did not know very much until we got a full briefing from those involved. There is no point in me giving an answer about a matter where I do not know the answer: I do not know about next year's scheme.

On the other issue, I will make it my business to come back to the Senator directly. The payment of €75 as opposed to €150 was an issue. With the Minister, Deputy Coveney, I had the privilege of meeting those involved who put forward a very strong case and we understand where they came from. I cannot say any more about that or what will happen. We were properly briefed and they made their point very strongly. They are totally committed to wanting to farm these areas.

While I do not mean this as a dig at the Senator, the promise to increase from €75 to €150 was like many other promises the previous Minister made where he never told anyone where he would get the money, whether it was the AEOS or the natura scheme. There was never any indication of where the money would come from and it will need to be addressed in a different way.

I acknowledge the importance of the agri-environment schemes which are operated by my Department and the fact that Irish farmers have been successfully taking part in these schemes since 1994 when the first rural environmental protection scheme, REPS, was introduced. These schemes encourage farmers in their role as custodians of the countryside and participating farmers undertake to adopt farming practices in line with best environmental land management techniques. In doing so, they realise verifiable public goods in terms of conservation, landscape enhancement and protection of our biodiversity for the benefit of all society.

Since 2010, the agri-environment options scheme and the natura 2000 scheme, generally referred to as AEOS, builds on this fine tradition. This targeted scheme offers farmers a menu of environmental options to choose from and allows them to choose the best fit for their holding. Under the scheme farmers are paid to undertake actions which specifically target three environmental challenges, namely, halting the loss of biodiversity, contributing to the improvement of water quality and combating climate change.

The scheme was introduced last year and was very well received, with 8,482 applications approved. We reopened the scheme this year in very difficult financial circumstances and some 6,900 applications were received. We reopened the scheme because we are convinced that it will deliver recognised and verifiable environmental public goods which will go some way towards addressing the very serious challenges of sustainability and conservation. Nonetheless, the current difficult budgetary situation must be acknowledged and any requests for funding over and above what has already been announced must be viewed against what is affordable and possible. The request for an increase in the natura payment from €75 per hectare to €150 per hectare must be viewed in this context.

The natura 2000 scheme, as part of AEOS, specifically addresses the challenge of halting the loss of biodiversity in specially designated areas. Throughout Europe, natura lands are designated as a network of protected areas which protect both birds and habitats. In Ireland, it is the National Parks and Wildlife Service of the Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht which designates the special areas of conservation and special protected areas which form part of this natura network. These designations are made under the birds and habitats directives which are legally binding.

As part of the designation process, a series of notifiable actions are developed for natura scheme lands which include a list of activities that may alter, destroy or interfere with the integrity of the site. Landowners receive formal notification that their lands have been designated and of any notifiable actions associated with the designation. Farmers who are in receipt of the single payment must, as part of cross-compliance, comply with these restrictions.

Farmers who join AEOS and have natura scheme land must commission a sustainable management plan from an environmentalist which sets out the appropriate farming practices compatible with the conservation of this land. They receive a payment of €75 per hectare under AEOS to cover the cost of having this sustainable management plan drawn up. Farmers must in any event farm in a way which is compatible with their natura scheme site, as required under single payment scheme rules but this plan gives them extra assurance and guidance in complying with the designation.

My predecessor in the previous Government gave a commitment to seek an increase from the European Commission to double the natura scheme payment. This was on foot of representations from the farm bodies that farmers in these areas were being particularly disadvantaged by the requirement to farm in a way which was not commercially viable, particularly on commonages where destocking had been required under the commonage framework plan. My Department submitted a request to the European Commission for such an increase. This increase, if applied to both AEOS 1 and 2, could have resulted in additional expenditure of up to €4 million per annum.

In view of the current budgetary circumstances, I felt that I had no option but to withdraw the request for an increase. The reality is that cuts are being felt across all sectors and while I am fully committed to supporting farmers, particularly those engaged in important environmental work, I must operate within the current very stringent fiscal constraints. The House will be aware that any extra funding would have to be found within the overall expenditure ceilings for my Department which are set out in the national recovery plan. The House will also be aware that the plan provides diminishing resources for my Department over the next three years and I have been critically examining every element of the Department's expenditure to ensure that maximum benefit is obtained for all available funding. It is already clear to me that significant savings will have to be achieved across a wide range of schemes and services in the Department's 2012 Vote so that expenditure can be kept within the limits available next year.

Having said that, I am aware that some farmers in natura scheme areas, particularly commonages, face real difficulties. For that reason, my Department will be co-operating with and assisting in any way possible the Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht which is carrying out a review of the commonage framework plans. Since the plans were first introduced improvements have been noted on several commonages and the review will consider stocking rates with a view to increasing them where indicated by up-to-date conditions on the commonages.

As regards payments, some 8,500 farmers approved into AEOS 1 are due an estimated €32 million per year. The scheme, like all co-funded EU schemes, is subject to very stringent administrative checks under EU regulations. It has been my Department's experience, from EU audits of previous schemes, that such checks must be in place and must be carried out to the highest possible standard before any payments issue. Failure to adhere to and comply with these regulations could have very serious consequences and result in significant monetary fines.

My officials are carrying out these comprehensive checks at present. Many of the applications require re-digitisation or other issues must be resolved before valid and accountable payments can be made. I recognise that farmers wish to be paid as soon as possible and I have, therefore, enhanced the resources devoted to the AEOS in order to ensure that payments for the 2010 partial year element of the scheme will be made in August. In addition, these farmers will receive their payment for the full 2011 year towards the end of the year.

I reiterate my full and total commitment to protecting our environmental heritage and in compensating farmers engaged in this vital work. I have shown this commitment through the re-launch this year of the AEOS and through support for the review of the commonage framework plans. These are challenging times which mean that tough choices must be made. However, I assure the House I will continue to work to support these farmers in their role as stewards of the countryside.

I thank the Minister of State. I am very disappointed by the response, particularly in light of the fact that the funding to meet the increased natura scheme payment was put in place by the former Minister, Deputy Brendan Smith, to whom I spoke about this matter. A sum of €4 million in the overall context of the AEOS or the REP scheme is very small money. I ask the Minister to reconsider this matter.

With regard to the payment being issued to farmers, it appears the delay has something to do with a technical computer error in the Department. If there were sufficient willingness, would it not be possible, within a week or ten days, for the Department to issue payments to farmers manually? They should be considered. Many farmers cannot afford to continue operating under the scheme. They will be forced out of it unless they receive some form of payment.

I take all the Senator has said on board. We met the people involved in the natura scheme areas and they put their case forward very strongly. With regard to payments, the Department is trying to get everybody on computer. I am not a great computer man myself and would nearly prefer to do everything by hand. I take on board what the Deputy said.

School Transport

Cuirim fáilte roimh an Aire Stáit ar ais go dtí an tSeanaid. It appears we are having some sort of political love affair on the Adjournment but I can assure him that it is just a pure coincidence.

This matter arose as a result of an appeal by the Leitrim Development Company for the retention of bus services for Traveller children. As the Minister of State will be very much aware, Leitrim Development Company, like all integrated development companies, which are the successors to the Leader bodies and the partnerships, is very much focused on the socially disadvantaged in our community. In many cases, the integrated development companies are the bodies that bring to the attention of the wider public and political establishment issues that might sometimes fall under the radar. This is one such issue because it deals with the Traveller community.

Leitrim Development Company started working with the Traveller community in Mohill in Carrick-on-Shannon, County Leitrim, some ten years ago when none of the Traveller children was making the transition from primary to second level education. In recent years, all Traveller children have made the transition to secondary school due to the educational supports provided by a number of agencies on a partnership basis. As a parents' representative on County Leitrim VEC, which supports the Traveller centre in Carrick-on-Shannon, I am very much aware of the progress that has been made in encouraging an increasing number of Traveller children to avail of education. Within the past year or two, a number of the Traveller children have achieved success in the junior certificate, which is extraordinary when one considers that, once some Traveller children tend to reach the age of adulthood at 17 or 18, they have a tendency to drop out. I am not suggesting this is endemic in the Traveller community but it is a pattern.

The success has been as a result of the primary school bus service, an essential support in facilitating Traveller children to benefit from the education system. The development company appealed the decision on behalf of the Traveller community for the retention of the bus service under threat. At present, a bus service takes 16 primary school children from the Traveller site at Mohill to St. Manchan's primary school. In Carrick-on-Shannon, there is a bus service from the halting site, calling at Summerhill, which takes 45 children to St. Mary's boys' school and the Marist primary school. The halting site is not directly opposite Páirc Seán Mac Diarmada, the GAA grounds, but about half a mile therefrom. Therefore, it is accessible to St. Mary's boys' school and the Marist primary school.

Any reduction in the service would be detrimental to the Traveller community, which is the most socially excluded group in Irish society, as all of us would agree. The impact of any curtailment of the service will mean a drop in school attendance by Traveller children, and it will have wider social and economic implications. Without the bus service, 30 children will be unable to attend the after-school run by Leitrim Development Company, which provides homework support, social skills and sports activities. This programme is a key factor in children remaining in school.

As chairman of the Leitrim County Childcare Committee, a purely voluntary position I have been proud and honoured to hold for some years, I am much aware of the importance of the bus service in the context of providing after-school activities. Therefore, my appeal is obvious. It is vital to the ongoing education of Traveller children in Leitrim and to the continuation of the after-school activities of 30 children that the bus service be retained in its current form. I will be interested in hearing the Minister of State's reply.

I thank the Senator for giving me the opportunity to explain the position on school transport provision for Traveller children. The general position of the Department regarding the issue of school transport provision for Traveller children is to accommodate Traveller children within mainstream school transport provision rather than to promote segregation and marginalisation. This flows from the Traveller Education Strategy, 2006, which states in respect of both primary and post-primary pupils:

Traveller children should use mainstream school transport in operation at present. Only in exceptional circumstances based on special needs should special transport be provided as a positive action measure.

Traveller children are among the 123,000 children currently being transported under the general terms of the primary or post-primary school transport schemes or under the scheme for children with special needs, and no distinction is made between any children applying for such services. This is consistent with the report and recommendations of the strategy I referred to. However, historically, exceptional school transport arrangements, confined to Traveller children, were funded by the Department. These were provided through a mix of the Society of St. Vincent de Paul, a number of individual primary school boards of management and, in some instances, through the provision of tickets on services using a mix of Bus Éireann general school transport services and scheduled Dublin Bus or Bus Éireann services. This exceptional school transport was provided without reference to the distance criterion or the other general terms of the school transport schemes. The only criterion applied was being a member of the Traveller community.

In line with the Traveller education strategy, as a first step in a phased approach to changing this exceptional school transport provision Bus Éireann, which operates the general school transport scheme on behalf of the Department, assumed the management of all school transport arrangements for all children, including the exceptional school transport arrangements for Traveller children for this school year.

All existing Traveller children being transported under the exceptional transport arrangements continued to avail of school transport without the application of the general terms of the school transport schemes, including the distance criteria. This meant that for the 2010-11 school year, in the region of 1,500 Traveller children availed of exceptional school transport on the services organised by Bus Éireann.

From the commencement of the 2011-12 school year, the distance criteria will be applied to all children, including Traveller children, currently availing of exceptional transport.

This change means that the distance criteria are being applied on an equitable basis nationally in respect of all primary and post-primary children. Bus Éireann has advised that the Traveller children referred to reside less than the requisite distance required and, therefore, will lose their eligibility for school transport for the 2011 school year.

I thank the Senator once again for raising this matter.

I am very grateful to the Minister of State but I pose the question that as a result of their residing less than the requisite distance, how does he address what is a stark reality, as pointed out in the appeal made by the Leitrim Integrated Development Company, which is that Traveller children making the transition to secondary school is due to the educational supports provided by a number of agencies and that the primary school bus service is an essential support in facilitating Traveller children to benefit from the education system?

Does the Minister of State have an opinion on what will happen once the school transport service is withdrawn? Will these children remain in halting sites not bothering to avail of education? Irrespective of what was in the report about mainstreaming, there is a real problem, of which we are all aware, in trying to encourage them to be educated. I am very concerned that as a result of the withdrawal of the service in Mohill and Carrick-on-Shannon, they may no longer continue to avail of educational services. This is what I wish to have addressed here. Is there any indication that despite the reference in the 2006 report the evidence on the ground would suggest otherwise?

The Traveller education strategy published in 2006 had significant input from all stakeholders in education, in particular from the Traveller community itself. I argue that the conclusion arrived at, that the children should use mainstream transport except in exceptional circumstances, works to promote segregation and decrease marginalisation. The value for money report published last year by the Department of Education and Skills also concluded that the operation of the distance criteria pertaining to school transport was very much operated on an inequitable basis throughout the country and that a number of exceptions had risen in the past two or three decades.

The value for money report concluded that it was only fair and equitable that the distance criteria — 4.5 km for post-primary schools and 3.2 km for primary schools — be applied equally throughout all sections of society and in all geographic areas. To single out the Traveller community anywhere in the country and give Traveller children special treatment would serve only to promote that segregation and marginalisation which we all aim to have eradicated.

The Traveller education strategy made a number of conclusions and one of the overriding conclusions was that to give Traveller children special preferential treatment in any community, particularly in a community as small as the one to which the Senator referred, would serve only to further exacerbate the problem. This conclusion still stands.

This is a cost saving exercise.

Docklands Development

I welcome the Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government, Deputy Willie Penrose, to the House. I believe this is his first time here. I congratulate him and wish him well in his portfolio.

I thank the Cathaoirleach for allowing me to raise this issue. I am glad the Minister of State is here to respond. I am calling on the Government to ensure an economic assessment of the Cork docklands area be carried out and the results be made public to assist further development of the area, which comprises 162 ha of land located to the east of the city with approximately 4 km of waterfront. It is very visible, with mainly brownfield sites in public ownership. Like many cities, it tells the story of a past industrial base which gave significant employment in the area, with names such as Ford and Dunlop residing there. There is large warehousing as it is close to the docks and Cork Harbour which was the scene of a major economic activity. These activities are no longer in place and no longer relevant. As is the case in many European cities, the potential to develop this area as an urban regeneration scheme exists. When I mention cities such as Dublin, Liverpool, London, Barcelona and Hamburg I am sure the Minister of State realises the potential there is in this area.

It is a large project which is outside Dublin. It is not a regional or national issue but an international issue. The national spatial strategy recognised this area in Cork city and in the late 1990s, Cork city and county councils identified the area as having the potential to create 27,000 jobs and 23,000 residents can live there.

Ten years ago in 2001, a docklands development strategy was produced which set out a vision for the area as a quality urban area of mixed use. The most important issue now for the area is to kick-start this by identifying what type of business and foreign direct investment can be attracted. This is why I have raised the matter of developing an economic assessment to identify what can go there. There is no point in developing, building or making planning applications unless we know what type of industry and business can go there. The IFSC in Dublin is extremely successful. Areas such as green taxation, research and development and international education are developing and changing as are other areas, and something can be identified as a suitable business for the area.

Carrying out such an assessment will encourage property owners to further their developments and seek tenants or sell their properties to potential businesses and investments. This very important study needs to be carried out and it will give certainty and encouragement to Cork that the Government recognises the importance of the area. I am not asking for a major financial commitment; I recognise we are in difficult times. Nonetheless, we must make plans for the future and continue to recognise the role an area such as this can play nationally and throughout Europe in attracting investment.

I am pleased to have the opportunity today to discuss the future of the Cork docklands area and I thank the Senator for raising this important issue.

The redevelopment of the Cork docklands is critical to the future development of the city and wider region and it has been identified as a priority project in a number of national and regional policy documents, for example, the national spatial strategy and the South-West Regional Planning Guidelines 2010-2022. It is also a key element of the Cork area strategic plan, the non-statutory strategy jointly agreed by Cork city and county councils.

The Government remains fully behind the redevelopment of the Cork docklands as a means to create a sustainable and compact urban city which will be attractive to prospective investment and to its residents, and as a regional and national focus for economic activity, with an emphasis on higher-skilled employment sectors. The docklands area, with its 166 ha spanning both sides of the river, has the potential to be transformed into a high quality mixed use urban quarter. Setting this in context, the scale of the project would be the equivalent of placing a large Irish town onto a city centre location, with potential accommodation for up to 22,000 residents and the employment potential for approximately 27,000 jobs.

Since the inception of the Cork docklands development initiative and the establishment of the docklands directorate almost ten years ago, much of the groundwork has been prepared to deliver on the area's potential. For example, the planning context for the Cork docklands has been set with two local area plans in place for the north and south docks area. A number of planning applications have been granted permission in the area and An Bord Pleanála has granted planning approval for bridges across the River Lee, and associated approach roads, which will facilitate improved access to the Cork docklands area.

While it is recognised that investment in key enabling infrastructure will be required to facilitate the co-ordinated development of the site and delivery of services in tandem with development to attract appropriate economic development, it is equally important, in the context of our current budgetary constraints, that we make the best use of existing infrastructure in place in the area which can facilitate some development in the short to medium term. We must also ensure the private sector — landowners, developers, businesses — plays its part in facilitating the opening up of the docklands area.

For its part, the Government has committed significant resources in the Cork area, for example, to improve water services under my Department's water services investment programme and enhance public transport services under Transport 21. My Department is continuing to work closely with the councils and, in particular, the directorate and docklands policy committee, to move this project forward. In this context, I welcome the intention of Cork City Council to prepare an economic proposition report which will better position and brand Cork docklands. I understand the economic proposition will, inter alia, include: a detailed assessment of the economic investment opportunities that best fit with the docklands development proposal; identify the economic sectors and functions that should be targeted for locating in the docklands; quantify the employment potential from the sectors identified; and address the unique selling proposition for the docklands and an associated brand which can be marketed internationally.

I look forward to receiving a copy of the report, when completed. Its analysis and recommendations will be given full consideration by my Department with a view to progressing the project as expeditiously as possible.

I thank the Minister of State for his reply. Is he in a position to provide a timeframe for the completion of the economic proposition report?

We will await the report. As soon as it is received, it will be evaluated and assessed with a view to expediting the implementation of the proposals therein in conjunction with Cork City Council and Cork docklands directorate. I will contact the council with a view to ensuring there is no delay in its preparation. It will certainly not be delayed by the Department.

Human Rights Issues

Is mór agam deis a fháil leis an gceist fíor-thábhachtach seo a chur ar an Aire Gnóthaí Eachtracha maidir leis an léigear a bhfuil muintir Gaza faoi agus maidir leis an mbád cabhlaigh atá ag dul anonn le tacú le muintir Gaza, earraí tábhachtacha agus deiseanna taistil agus iompair a thabhairt chucu agus bun-chearta daonna a chothú. Tá mé ag iarraidh go ghníomhfadh an t-Aire láithreach, go háirithe ag leibhéal an Aontas Eorpaigh.

Approximately a dozen aid ships bearing medical supplies, sports equipment and construction materials are due to meet in international waters some 16 hours from Gaza early next week. Among their number will be the Irish vessel, the MV Saoirse. The ship has deep connections with this country where almost €130,000 has been raised to fund the humanitarian mission. At least 20 Irish citizens, including former rugby international Trevor Hogan, are taking part in freedom flotilla II. Mr. Hogan has stated that anything the flotilla faces is a fraction of what the Palestinians face on a daily basis. This, he said, gives him strength.

I extend best wishes to two of my Sinn Féin party colleagues, Councillors Pat Fitzgerald and John Hearne from Waterford, who will be on the flotilla. Other crew include the skipper, Shane Dillon; artist, Felim Egan; former Deputy, Mr. Chris Andrews; and Paul Murphy, MEP. Given the MV Saoirse’s connections with Ireland, it is reasonable and appropriate that the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs makes a statement on the matter. Sinn Féin supports the Irish Anti-War Movement and adds its voice to the demand for the Minister to call on Israel to allow free passage of the Irish vessel to Gaza.

By way of background, during a similar mission last year, nine people were killed when Israeli commandos stormed the MV Marmara, a Turkish aid ship trying to break the naval blockade of Gaza. The population of Gaza has suffered grievously in recent years, including the horrifying and shocking attacks on civilians which occurred during Operation Cast Lead in January 2008 and the continued siege of the territory. Estimates of how many died in Operation Cast Lead vary between 1,166 and 1,417 but the long-term effects of the incursion were equally great. The people of Gaza have long been denied basic human rights and have effectively been placed under a siege which hinders their access to basic goods. Trade embargoes, travel restrictions, Israeli attacks and fuel, food and medical shortages are plaguing the civilian population, pushing Gaza further towards the brink of an all out humanitarian catastrophe. According to the World Food Programme, the Israeli blockade means that 59% of Gaza’s food import needs are not being met. Further, the majority of fuel outlets have closed as a result of Israeli fuel and power reductions, seriously affecting the local economy and internal travel. This has also had a major effect on the public sector as Gaza relies almost exclusively on fuel and electricity imports to run essential services such as hospital power generators and ambulance services.

Large numbers of people do not have proper access to drinking water because water pumps are out of action. In addition, the medical sector is facing further crisis due to severe drug and personnel shortages, lack of medical equipment and external travel restrictions. For example, according to the World Health Organization, supplies of 91 out of 416 essential drugs have run out, as have approximately one third of essential medical supplies, including most children's antibiotics.

The embargo on external travel has resulted in Palestinians being unable to travel for work, education and vital medical treatment. It has also crippled the local economy due to the lack of materials and difficulty in exporting goods. The UN Food and Agriculture Organisation has stated that farmers have thus far lost millions of dollars due to the pressures on exports. Some 25% of Gazans rely on agriculture for their income. The United Nations has warned that the economy of Gaza will become 100% dependent if its borders remain closed for import, export and travel. The closure acts as a de facto trade embargo. It is practically unheard of for the victims of an oppressive regime rather than the regime itself to be subject to such sanctions.

It is vital that the European Union suspends its agreement with Israel until the latter adheres to international human rights law and imposes an embargo on arms sales to Israel. The European Union must also put pressure on the Israeli Government to open border crossings. Against this background, it is clear that the humanitarian position is precarious and most serious. Bearing this in mind, it is important that Ireland supports attempts to alleviate the suffering of the people of Palestine.

I commend those taking part in the humanitarian mission for their brave and selfless initiative, especially given last year's mindless attacks on a peaceful mission. It goes without saying that such initiatives would not be necessary if the Israelis were to end their effective siege of Gaza and alleviate the drastic humanitarian position in the territory. The Government should do everything in its power to end the siege and suffering of the Palestinian people, including calling for an end to the preferential trade agreement between the European Union and Israel until such time as the siege is lifted. The blockade of Gaza and construction of more Israeli settlements in Palestinian territory must stop immediately and the United Nations must recognise a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders.

Given the precarious position in which people in Gaza find themselves and the failure of the international community to persuade the Israelis to respect the rights of Gazans, it is only fitting that we acknowledge initiatives such as freedom flotilla II and do our utmost to ensure it reaches its destination. For this reason, I call on the Minister to make a statement as a matter of priority and do everything in his power to ensure the Irish citizens on board the MV Saoirse remain safe and are granted access to assist the people of Gaza.

While the attention of the world has been dominated by events elsewhere in the wider Middle East, ranging from successful popular revolutions in some countries to harsh repression in others, it is opportune to focus our attention again on the continuing and urgent need for a solution to the most long running issue in the region, the need to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict. The long-standing objective of the Government, European Union and great majority of the international community is to support direct negotiations between the parties leading to a two-state solution in which both Israel and a sovereign state of Palestine can live side by side in peace with each other and their neighbours. The Arab world also subscribes to this objective through the Arab peace initiative.

Considerable efforts have been made in the last two years, particularly by the United States Government, to bring the Israeli and Palestinian sides together in a serious talks process. Unfortunately, however, after a brief start in September last year this process has quickly become deadlocked and there is no direct negotiation process in place at present. Ireland and other EU partners have pressed for the European Union and international Quartet to become more actively engaged to try and bring the parties to resume talks.

The Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Deputy Eamon Gilmore, discussed this matter with his colleagues at the Foreign Affairs Council yesterday. It is also likely to be discussed when the Taoiseach attends the European Council on Friday. While various ideas are in discussion about what may be done, we are all conscious there is no magic bullet — the parties must be convinced or pressed to sit down and work out the issues. For all that this conflict has endured for years, there is a wide belief now that the shape of a peace agreement is there to be grasped, if leaders have the will to do so. This is a position that resonates with us in Ireland.

While we seek to reanimate a political process to achieve a solution, we remain conscious of the many issues of justice and human rights created by the conflict and the occupation. In recent years Ireland has paid particular attention to the situation in Gaza and the blockade there. This matter is again to the fore as activists from Ireland and other countries prepare to launch a second flotilla to try to break the blockade by sailing directly to Gaza.

The Government's long-standing concern about the humanitarian situation in Gaza is well known. The slight relaxation in the blockade in the past year has been completely insufficient. We recognise that Israel is entitled to prevent the transport of weapons and genuinely military materials into Gaza and to check cargos in that context but other goods should not be impeded. With our EU partners, we continue to press for a full opening up of the border crossings into Gaza to allow unimpeded flows of humanitarian aid and normal commercial and human traffic.

The Government recognises the essentially humanitarian motivations which gave rise to last year's Gaza flotilla and also to the further flotillas now being planned. However, the travel advice of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade remains, namely, that people should not attempt to sail to Gaza and certainly should not attempt to break through a naval blockade which Israel has stated it will enforce.

The Tánaiste has expressed his deep concern that there is real potential for an outcome this year similar to the disaster of the 2010 flotilla. He has stated in the Dáil that he cannot support a project that would involve Irish citizens engaging in actions which could lead them into real danger.

The UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon, has also called on governments to discourage such flotillas which clearly have the potential to escalate into violence. Nonetheless, should a further flotilla sail for Gaza with Irish citizens taking part the Government will continue to press the Israeli Government to do all possible to facilitate those wishing to transport humanitarian goods to Gaza and, in particular, to avoid any repetition of the unacceptable use of force against last year's flotilla. The Government will also ensure that all consular services to Irish participants in the flotilla are provided should such prove necessary.

We must remember that the Port of Gaza can never handle more than a fraction of the territories needs and therefore the only real solution is the full opening of the land crossing points. I repeat the European Union's call on Israel to do that to ensure there would be no need for actions such as the planned flotilla.

I thank the Minister of State for the answer but it is very much a sense of the European Union siding with the Israeli Government. I ask the Minister of State to relate to the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the call for an end to the preferential trade agreement between the EU and Israel until such time as the siege is lifted because it is obvious that until action is taken at that level the siege in Gaza will not end. Until we start to fight for the civil and human rights of the people in Gaza, the situation will not be relieved.

I will undertake to raise the Senator's concerns with the Minister.

The Seanad adjourned at 6.15 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 22 June 2011.
Barr
Roinn