Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 1 Mar 2012

Vol. 213 No. 15

Order of Business

The Order of Business is No. 1, Protection of Employees (Temporary Agency Work) Bill 2011 — Committee Stage, to be taken at the conclusion of the Order of Business and conclude not later than 2 p.m., if not previously concluded.

While I accept what has been ordered, I am sure the Leader will agree that it is somewhat light, even on a Thursday. Will he endeavour to get some of his ministerial colleagues to consider bringing forward more legislation on a Thursday?

Once again, the Government has been embarrassed, but I am sure it is also seething with anger at another leak from the European Commission to the finance committee of the German Bundestag. Once again, members of the German government have been given discussion documents and draft papers on the Ireland's budgetary position ahead of their being discussed in the Oireachtas. At a time when we are about to embark on a very important referendum campaign, this activity undermines and further erodes the waning trust many people have in the European project. Will the Leader indicate what steps the Government is taking, given that this is the second occasion, within three months, such a leak has come from the Commission, to ensure this does not happen again? Can he give an assurance that these documents will find their proper way to this sovereign Parliament, despite our difficulties? It is clear the issue is linked to the referendum. It is obvious from looking at the document that the Government's economic policy is in disarray and not receiving the acceptance——

I am talking about the perception from the EU and that it is not receiving the level——

Did the Senator not hear about the second budget?

Senator Mooney to continue, without interruption.

It is possible that the level of acceptance the Government is conveying of it being ad idem with the EU and the troika in respect of budgetary policy may not necessarily be what it appears. Given that it is very much in the news I reassure the Leader and the House that Fianna Fáil remains steadfast in its support for the Government in respect of the referendum. It is with regret that the former deputy leader of our party should dissent on a matter of policy. However, I can also inform the House that much of what Deputy Ó Cuív has been saying about the continuing unsustainability of the bank debt has been raised here consistently. I have no doubt the Leader will agree that these issues will form an important and central part of the debate in order to ensure the people have a full awareness of the issues on which they will vote. I reiterate that the bank debt is unsustainable. This is a unique opportunity for the Government to play hardball with the EU on this issue. This is not a conditional support, neither is it equivocation on our part, we are simply stating a particular fact that there are elements of the bank debt that can be renegotiated, specifically the promissory notes, which are effectively a ball of smoke. It is a sum of money that was created and printed by the Irish Central Bank, underscored by the ECB and the State has to pay it back to the Central Bank. As Professor Karl Whelan, Professor Brian Lucey and others have pointed out in recent weeks to the relevant committee, this is effectively little more than a technical exercise. If that €31 billion was to be taken out of the equation it would go a long way towards ensuring we return to prosperity and economic independence.

I ask the Leader what steps the Government is taking to ensure there are no further leaks from the Commission. While the Commission was set up to help and protect small nations, recently it has not shown many examples of same.

I am confused in regard to the reference to a ball of smoke —€31 billion is a fair ball of smoke. It was like groundhog day coming in this morning. It was as if 29 February had never occurred.

Once every four years.

As I understood it, the Fianna Fáil Party on the Order of Business yesterday was united and unequivocal in its support for the referendum. However, by teatime all that support had evaporated and septic tanks, turf cutting and everything bar the kitchen sink had been thrown into the equation and support is clearly conditional. It is dangerous to raise people's expectations on what is and is not in the treaty. The promissory notes have nothing to do with the treaty as Senator Mooney is well aware.

To say to the people that if we play hard ball on this we will get a good deal and a good cut-off from the EU is a dangerous tack. Clearly we do not know whether the Deputy Micheál Martin wing is supporting the referendum, but the Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív wing, which is a substantial wing——

Does Senator Whelan want the Bill to pass?

That is a question the Senator should ask himself and his own deputy leader to be fair.

The Government has responsibility first.

Does Senator Whelan have a question for the Leader?

As today is officially the first day of spring, I commend the Minister of State at the Department of Arts, Heritage and Gaeltacht, Deputy Jimmy Deenihan, and Mr. Conor Skehan of the Peatland Council for the Trojan work they are doing in trying to resolve the turf cutting issue.

The first day of spring is 1 February, St. Brigid's Day.

Senator Whelan to continue, without interruption.

As one who comes from the heart of the bogs and who cut turf, as did my family, I am cognisant of the emotional attachment to land, turf cutting and turbary rights. A forum is concluding in Athlone today at which Mr. Conor Skehan with Judge John Quirke have tried to facilitate families. It is important to note that only 53 raised bogs out of 1,400 across the country are affected by the measure. The families in question are being offered substantial and fair compensation, alternative deliveries of turf, ten tonnes per annum to their homes for 15 years or alternative turf plots nearby. Most people would agree that is not an unreasonable proposition.

Is the Senator seeking a debate?

No. I simply want to draw the attention of the House to the matter because it is fair and good work. Others who seek confrontation and protest on the matter are leading people up a cul-de-sac or a boithrín at which there is no good.

With the permission of the Cathaoirleach I commend the efforts in the pipeline by the Minister for Education and Skills, Deputy Ruairí Quinn, to resolve the scandal of the use of prefabs in primary schools throughout the country. Some 50,000 children attend school in prefabs. The amount of money being wasted on rented prefabs is nothing short of a scandal. I commend the Minister for the efforts he is making in this area and I look forward to a positive intervention by him in this regard in the near future.

Last week Goodbodys and AECOM published a review of the Irish railway network, although dated October 2011. It shows up a serious problem that we spent €559 million on putting in place four railway tracks to Kildare, that the passenger business was down by 25% and the freight business, between 2003 and 2009, was down 61%. This is another example of the reason capital projects should be independently evaluated — this one appears to have continued with the press releases up to 2009. We continued to put in €595 million to double the capacity to cater for 25% fewer passengers and 61% less freight.

We need to get a grip on the weaknesses in the Departments of Finance and Transport in appraising projects. It is strange that this project was allowed to go through while GAA referees are being pursued for €13 or whatever they get, for refereeing a match, to try to remedy the national finances. If we had proper project appraisal we could save much more money. This one appears to have been unnecessary to double the capacity of what has proved to be declining activity in the past four years.

On the issue of unfinished housing estates, the Minister has asked Westmeath County Council to carry out an investigation following the tragic death of a toddler in an estate. Our sympathies are with the family of the toddler who died. The problem of unfinished housing estates is serious. The Minister should investigate if the same developers are continually working on office buildings and other buildings and ensure priority is given to the estates in which people live to make them safer. I appreciate the Minister has asked Westmeath County Council for a report under category 3, which is under the responsibility of the developer. When does a building site cease to be a building site? I understand five houses in the estate are occupied while all the others are vacant. We have a responsibility to those living in unfinished estates. If work is taking place and there is money the priority should be to ensure safety and that whoever is responsible is held to account.

Can the Leader confirm that the Government parties will play a substantial role and put all their efforts into ensuring that, along with the pronouncement made by Fianna Fáil, this important referendum is passed? I have canvassed on a number of referendums and the then Opposition, consisting of Fine Gael and the Labour Party, had a negative attitude towards us when we were in government. Recently it was confirmed to me by a senior Fine Gael politician that they had smirked at us when we canvassed for Lisbon I and II and Nice I and II, which was unfair.

They did not lift a finger.

Our position this time is clear and unequivocal. The referendum should not just be about Éamon Ó Cuív and his position. He is one man and democracy is at stake. It was important for Senator Whelan to lecture us about a man going overboard and mistakes being made. Given that there was a motion before his parliamentary party not that long ago to silence one of its own Senators, I ask him to be fair on this issue. The Government parties need to put all of their efforts into the referendum. It is primarily the function of the Government side of the House, the Taoiseach and his Cabinet to sell the referendum. My party will play its part and all of its members here are in unison. The last referendum was on the legal fallout of the Abbeylara tribunal but it was badly sold. I am afraid again because this is the first referendum on Europe that the Government will face and it is a critical one. The onus is on the Government to ensure that it is passed and that shoe leather is worn out travelling around rural Ireland.

It was done in the countryside.

It was not done in the past and that is an important point. I sincerely ask the Leader - he knows me a long time as I am a long-standing member of the House - to agree that it is important that the referendum is passed. The onus is on the Government side and we should not be lectured to. Our position has been made clear by Deputy Micheál Martin and we should not be lectured to. The Government side can be assured that we will deliver the votes but if the referendum fails, it will not be our fault.

I was shocked by the lack of facts and accuracy on "Tonight with Vincent Browne" last night.

We cannot discuss the content of television programmes on the Order of Business. Does the Senator have a question for the Leader?

The Senator's party representative did not do too well.

He was not that bad.

Senator Healy Eames to continue, without interruption, please.

I thank the Cathaoirleach. I would love to speak.

Last night Deputy John Paul Phelan gave a good speech but he can do better.

Like the Senator, he can improve.

I saw and heard clearly why we need the facts on the fiscal compact treaty. Last night it was not clearly stated that the treaty is not an EU one and there is no need for a "fiscal compact II". Only 12 countries out of 17 must ratify the fiscal compact for it to take effect.

That is why Deputy Eamon Ó Cuív is against it.

The train will leave without us. The treaty reduces Ireland's negotiating hand considerably. Only 12 countries need to ratify the fiscal compact.

The Senator's Government signed us up for it and it is why we must vote "Yes."

We might call the train back since we are on it.

It was the last Government that put us in this position.

The Senator's party signed us up to this agreement.

We are trying to get our sovereignty back.

Of course we want to get the best possible deal on promissory notes. Please be assured that the Minister, Deputy Noonan, is a man of masterful timing and knows when to strike.

I thought the Taoiseach was looking for a write-off.

Please be 100% assured because it is his job.

Does the Senator have a question for the Leader?

Let us not pretend to the public that something is possible when it is not. The former Minister, Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív, is misleading people and last night's television debate was passé and completely confusing.

We want to get Chancellor Merkel on board to explain it clearly.

On a positive note, today is World Book Day and there are many children in the Visitors Gallery. It is so important that we continue to promote the reading of books and the household charge will go towards funding——

What is the Senator talking about?

I am talking about public libraries.

The Senator's time is up.

Let us keep literacy on the agenda.

I want to share the concern that was already expressed that, for the second time, a committee of a foreign parliament is considering information that emanated from an institution of the European Union that deals with matters that relate to the economy and finances of this state, yet the information has not been presented to the legitimate Parliament of this state. This shows there is an appalling attitude somewhere within the European Union and other member states.

The Leader was correct to say the other day that we should not direct our ire at the people of another member state. It is also true that small countries in the European Union, and especially at a time of crisis like this, need to be treated with a measure of respect. Treating a small country like Ireland as though it were little better, with due respect to local authorities, than a county council in the European Union is an appalling message to be sending, particularly at a time when our people must make a sensitive decision on the fiscal compact.

It is a matter of national interest.

There is something seriously lacking in the attitudes of powerful people in the EU that this would be allowed to happen a second time. This is not just a matter of political point scoring or an opportunity to slag the Irish Government. I would like to see the Government make representations about the issue and express its annoyance in forthright terms. If I am wrong, I would like to hear why.

If the Senator is wrong, he will stand corrected.

Most of us would agree that the Irish people are not a stupid race and will not be politically bribed or brow beaten. With regard to the forthcoming vote, the most important thing in the next couple of weeks is that full information on the contents of the treaty, not on what it does not contain, will be provided for every single voter. The House can do itself a favour, but more importantly can do the public a huge political favour, by having an engaging, informative debate in advance of the legislation being published. As we know, the formula is that the legislation is published to allow a referendum, we have a debate for a day or two and a few weeks later the referendum takes place. This House, in advance of the publication of any referendum Bill, needs to have a substantive debate on the fiscal compact treaty and its contents, thus avoiding a debate on what it does not contain.

We can talk about revising history. It is quite bemusing to hear people claim that they were not in government or responsible for massively incorrect financial decisions. To use an awful political phrase, "we are where we are" and must move forward. The public demands that we do not lecture them on how to vote but advise and inform them about what the treaty contains. I ask the Leader to arrange, at an early date, a substantive debate on the fiscal compact arrangement or treaty that will be signed by the Taoiseach tomorrow. I ask that, in advance of the referendum legislation coming here, we debate the treaty and give everybody, irrespective of their views, an opportunity to debate it, not just a three minute slot each. That will be good for the House and the public. Irish people are not stupid and they want information, not lectures.

I agree with the previous speakers that raised the issue of the leaked documents discussed at the meeting of the German finance committee. The Dáil and the Seanad are being treated with contempt and being usurped by the people that leak the documents. Such behaviour is unacceptable. Wherever we might find ourselves in terms of the argument on the fiscal compact treaty, it is disgraceful that our finance committee did not have sight of those documents which referred to a number of important things that could impact on the country. The documents raised the possibility of a mini-budget and that, following discussions with the troika, the figure for the sale of assets increased from €2 billion to €3 billion.

German parliamentarians are debating all of these issues. They have full knowledge of what is happening in the discussions on Ireland's financial affairs. However, parliamentarians here are not being given the same opportunity. Regardless of our various stances on the fiscal compact treaty, let us all agree that the leaking of these documents and the provision of information that is of vital importance to Ireland should, in the first instance, be discussed in this Parliament before it is the subject of debate elsewhere. People are angry about austerity measures, about the fact that we do not have power over our own fiscal affairs and our loss of sovereignty. We all want to work together to assuage that anger and regain our sovereignty. However, when the German Parliament rubs our faces in it by discussing these matters when we have not had the opportunity to do so, it is an embarrassment for the country.

It is a matter of national interest.

Is Senator David Cullinane seeking a debate on the issue?

I am in order that there will not be a recurrence of what happened yesterday. Will the Leader clarify whether, as indicated in the paper that was leaked, a mini-budget will be introduced later in the year?

In dealing with this issue it is important that people approach it in a balanced way. I worked in Brussels for two years and one of the things I learned was that people from the various member states had respect for parliamentarians or officials from other countries. It is unfortunate, therefore, that this matter has again arisen in respect of Germany. It is not a welcome development. It is important, however, that we do not exaggerate the problem and make it far greater than it actually is.

That is a poor choice of words.

We need to approach the matter in an extremely delicate way.

I wish to comment on the need to be positive. Today some people from Northern Ireland are visiting the Oireachtas to discuss matters relating to health. That is a welcome development. This is a matter on which a great deal of progress has been made. Yesterday was International Rare Disease Day. The authorities both here and in Northern Ireland can work together on an all-island basis. It is important that we continue to encourage the sharing of services and information. The process relating to such sharing is welcome and we must ensure it continues and is developed further.

The cross-border health care directive was adopted in February 2011. However, it has not yet been transposed into Irish law. I have raised the matter with the Department of Health. If we are not able to provide particular health care in this country, it is important that people be entitled to travel to another member state in order to access it. This highlights the advantages of membership of the European Union. Will the Leader request the Minister for Health to ensure the directive to which I refer is transposed into Irish law at the earliest possible opportunity? In addition, we must carry on and develop the work being done on health issues with our colleagues in Northern Ireland.

The first matter to which I wish to refer relates to the fact that the statutory instrument on copyright which was signed last night is not on today's Order Paper. While I was able to procure a copy of it from the Oireachtas Library and Research Service, when statutory instruments become available on the Internet and are the subject of discussion in the media, they should be listed on the Order Paper and readily available from the Oireachtas Library and Research Service. I request that the relevant officials examine the position in this regard. I am not complaining, however, because staff in the Oireachtas Library and Research Service eventually obtained for me a copy of the statutory instrument to which I refer. However, it took some effort to procure it.

Fianna Fáil is absolutely clear in its position on the fiscal compact. We will be voting "Yes". This is despite the fact that many of us have the same misgivings as the former Minister, Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív, and understand his genuineness on the issue. Fianna Fáil is a pro-European Union party and has done more than any other party in this country to integrate Ireland into the Union. We are going to continue our work in this regard. The reality, however, is that the people do not have a choice: they must vote in favour of the treaty. This is because the Government has signed up to a pact, under which we do not have a veto in respect of the treaty. If we vote "No", it will mean nothing because only 12 countries need to assent to the treaty for it to come into force. We will not, therefore, have the same leverage which applied in the case of the Lisbon treaty. It is unfortunate that the Government has signed us up to these arrangements.

The Government also signed us up to a blackmail clause, whereby there will be no further bailouts if we do not sign up to the treaty.

Strong language.

(Interruptions).

If we need more money from the European Union, it has been stated it will not be given to us if we do not vote in favour of the treaty.

I would not like to hear what the Senator might say if his party was opposed to the fiscal compact.

Senator Byrne to continue, without interruption.

The people have absolutely no option but to vote "Yes", both in their own interests and in those of the country.

Let us get back to first principles. Fianna Fáil is responsible for our current difficulties.

Does Senator Thomas Byrne have a question for the Leader?

We must vote "Yes" because otherwise we will place the people in an extremely difficult position.

The Senator's party is going to vote "Yes" in any event.

As a result of what was negotiated by the Government, we have no other option.

The document discussed in the German Parliament was circulated to the governments of the various member states. We should not be asking why it was leaked to the Bundestag because the German Government is obliged under its country's constitution to circulate such documents to Members of Parliament. Why did the Government not circulate the document to Members of the Oireachtas in order that we had an opportunity to read it before our German counterparts? The Government was aware of the German legal obligation from the previous occasion on which this occurred. Why is the document in question not listed on today's Order Paper for discussion? The Government is going to be obliged to introduce a second budget. It spent all of last year claiming credit for the budget it had opposed. However, nearly three months after its own budget was introduced, it is already contemplating the introduction of a second budget.

Does the Senator have a question for the Leader?

Such a budget will further depress consumer confidence in the country. Why did the Government not do the job properly this year in the same way we did last year?

Why did the Government led by the Deputy's party not take suitable action in 2008?

Is that not a bit rich?

Is it not ironic the way history repeats itself? Deputy Micheál Martin is not the first Corkman to be shot in the back by a de Valera. I refer to events which occurred 90 years ago.

(Interruptions).

That is an absolutely outrageous statement to make, either inside or outside the House.

That comment is unworthy of Senator Tom Sheahan.

I ask Senator Tom Sheahan to withdraw the remark he has just made.

There is no evidence that Éamon de Valera was involved in the death of Michael Collins.

On a point of order, if the remark in question is not withdrawn, the Fianna Fáil Senators will leave the House.

I ask Senator Tom Sheahan to withdraw the remark.

I will withdraw the comment which appears to have caused upset.

Does the Senator have a question for the Leader?

Yes. I request the Leader to make time available for the House to debate the role of the Referendum Commission in the forthcoming referendum.

The commission did a great job on the previous occasion.

That was a very uncharacteristic remark from Senator Tom Sheahan who is a gentleman. I am glad he withdrew it immediately.

I am delighted that colleagues on both sides of the House referred to the leaking of a particular document to the finance committee of the German Bundestag. What has happened in disgraceful. People in this country are obviously of the view that this is a matter of importance and it is the subject of a leading article on the front page of today's edition of The Irish Times. Yesterday I raised this issue under Standing Order 30 and the Cathaoirleach ruled it out of order. He has my sympathy. Thereafter, the Leader informed the House that a particular Bill would be introduced next week when he knew that this was not correct. There is an urgent case to be made in respect of the revision of Standing Orders in order that we might have honesty, openness and transparency.

It is absolutely appalling that the Cathaoirleach informed the House that a matter of direct relevance to the people, namely, the fact that we have been told that we will require further austerity measures and possibly another budget and that we were obliged to scale upwards the level of State assets to be sold, a matter discussed by another sovereign parliament, was out of order. Members of the Bundestag were able to discuss what affected our people before elected representatives here were in a position to do so. However, that does not surprise me, although I am not criticising the Cathaoirleach. On a previous occasion when I raised something I considered to be a national emergency, namely, a strike in the ESB, I was informed that it was not a matter of national importance. Simultaneously, the then Taoiseach, Charles J. Haughey, was declaring a national emergency in the Lower House. These things make a farce of Seanad Éireann.

I ruled the Senator's motion out of order yesterday on the basis that it was related to a European Commission document which was available on the Department of Finance's website.

I thank the Cathaoirleach. However, this is still a matter of national importance.

Does the Senator have a question for the Leader?

I have made it clear that I am not criticising the Cathaoirleach, particularly as he always operates in an extremely fair way and within the rules of the House. I am not impugning his reputation, I am merely stating the rules of the Seanad are completely farcical and nonsensical.

The other matter to which I refer is the fact that an honourable man whom I do not believe has ever been obliged to tell a lie outside the House was forced to tell one yesterday. We all knew that the relevant Bill would not be introduced next week and we were told that what had been said reflected a form of words used under Standing Orders. No one should be compelled by Standing Orders to tell a lie. They are a complete and absolute antiquated nonsense and must be revised in the interests of this House.

I have no doubt that during the course of the debate we will have during the coming weeks, the people will be very much focused on economic recovery, job creation and how we can get our country out of the mess it is in right now. In that vein I welcome the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, Deputy Richard Bruton, opening the Enterprise Ireland high potential start-ups showcase yesterday, which featured 92 brand new companies which will employ 1,600 people by 2013 and generate in excess of €200 million in annual sales. This is on top of the Government announcement that €500 million is to be spent on research aimed at turning good ideas into jobs. I very much welcome that 18 trade delegations will take place in 2012, with many going to Brazil, Russia, India and China. Three visits to China alone are planned for this year.

In some further good news on the jobs front, I see in this morning's newspaper that the Lynch farm in Clarecastle, County Clare, lit up Chinese eyes, with a focus on agricultural production and how we can increase the very significant exports we already have to China in baby food and milk products. There are some positive issues on the horizon.

Is the Senator seeking a debate?

Following our recent very comprehensive debate on job creation, perhaps we could have the Minister in the Chamber each quarter to update Members on how things are going and the jobs initiative is developing. He could give Members a further opportunity to feed into Government plans on an ongoing basis with regard to job creation.

I join others in expressing concern about the Europe-wide discussion on budgetary matters for Ireland before we discuss them here. It is unacceptable, as the Leader of the Opposition, Senator Byrne and others have articulated very well. In the context of ongoing and future debates about the forthcoming referendum, I will unequivocally support its passage. It is incumbent on all of us to keep the message simple. Much of the analysis I have seen so far is much too complex and there is a finite amount of time to get one's message across. I will support it because it will put a mechanism in place to prevent a repeat of the financial catastrophe we have seen throughout Europe and the wider world, as well as Ireland. That should be welcomed.

That does not deduct in any way from my passionate view that the European Union owes the Irish people. In advance of international acceptance of problems in Spain, Italy, Portugal and even France and the United States, the Irish people fronted up in a way and absorbed austerity, blanket guarantees and other measures. Nobody would wish to have to put such measures in place, but we did so, and I sat on the Government side of the House and had to defend these. For that reason, make no mistake that the European Union owes the Irish people — not Fine Gael or Fianna Fáil. For that reason, every time I speak on the issue or canvass for a "Yes" vote, I will push the Government and any person with influence in Europe to ensure that they do the decent thing, front up for us now and ensure we get debt write-down, action on the promissory notes and other concessions that acknowledge the actions and support given unequivocally by the Irish people to the European Union.

I have no doubt in regard to the alleged German leak——

It is not alleged. It is on the record of the German Parliament.

Senator Paul Coghlan to continue, without interruption.

Bear with me as I do not mean to be argumentative about the matter. Senators should have no fear that if something went wrong, any government, including this Government, would protest in the strongest possible manner. We do not know the detail and Senator Byrne's comments are interesting. They had better get the timing right if his comments are right, and there may be something in it.

There is no point in us needlessly getting into a flap, which is happening far too frequently. Everyone on the Government side would accept the bona fides of the Opposition with regard to the very important referendum which is staring us in the face and which is necessary legally and constitutionally. Let us not argue about it, and Senator MacSharry is probably right that we should keep it in terms as simple as possible when presenting the argument. Allied to this, I have no doubt that the Referendum Commission will do a fair, impartial and good job of work in presenting the facts.

Does the Senator have a question for the Leader?

I am coming to it, as the Cathaoirleach correctly anticipated, as ever. There have been calls for the Leader to provide a debate, but he has been working on this and has had it in the pipeline for ages. That is what we are about. I have no doubt, and I am sure the Leader will confirm that himself, that we will have the debate as early as possible, and even in advance of the necessary Bill.

I refer to the septic tank legislation, the Water Services (Amendment) Bill, and the so-called standards which were published approximately one hour ago on the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government website. It is a seven-page document which asks more questions than it gives answers, to say the least. I call on the Leader to facilitate a debate in the House, next week if possible, on the standards for septic tanks that the Minister, Deputy Hogan, is seeking people to meet.

Regarding the discussion in the House this morning concerning the fiscal treaty, much has been said in trying to blame, in a political fashion, people who have spoken and have sought concessions for this country. It is only right and proper that those concessions would be made. The only reason those questions are now being asked and that Fianna Fáil has debated this over the past 36 hours is because of the shortcomings of the negotiation team representing this country and the Government: the Taoiseach and the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade. The Minister of State with responsibility for European Affairs is also at fault. We have not achieved what Ireland sought in terms of a write-down on the banking debt. It appears we have not even discussed the write-down or even the promissory notes.

Is the Senator supporting the call for a debate?

Why not? The Government did not want a referendum and, on the request of the Irish Government, the treaty was watered down, which was confirmed by a Minister of finance in Germany.

That is in Germany.

The Senator is behind the times.

Is the Senator supporting the call for the debate?

If it is a question that Fine Gael and the Labour Party, as they appear to stand for——

We are having a referendum. Has the Senator not heard that?

Does Senator Ó Domhnaill have a question for the Leader?

They are questioning Vincent Browne now. Perhaps they should invite Angela Merkel or President Sarkozy to represent their views on the Vincent Browne programme and others. Their view seems to be the unilateral view of what is happening in Germany.

Does the Senator have a question for the Leader?

Yes, I have. I certainly think, if the Members agree, that this House deserves to have the Taoiseach or the Minister for Finance and the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade before it to explain what they are doing currently.

They can discuss the septic tanks issue.

No, they should discuss the EU fiscal compact.

The Senator obviously does not want a discussion.

We have had 18 hours of discussion.

Ba mhaith liom chuile ádh a ghuí ar mhuintir Fhianna Fáil roimh an Ard-Fheis ag an deireadh seachtaine. Ta súil agam go n-imeoidh an Ard-Fheis go maith dóibh. Tuigim go bhfuil deacrachtaí acu faoi láthair. Sílim go léiríonn an méid atá ag tarlú faoi láthair go bhfuil tuairimíéagsúla ann faoin reafrainn atá ag teacht chun cinn. Léiríonn sé freisin an gá atá ann le díospóireacht an-leathan ar na ceisteanna seo.

I wish my Fianna Fáil compadres all the best for the Ard-Fheis and, in all seriousness, what is important about the events of the past 24 hours is that they have shown that there is a need for a very broad debate on the issues. It is a polarising treaty and there are very different viewpoints within all parties. It is very important that the debate be as wide, honest and open as possible. I say this in all sincerity. Tacaím leis an méid atá ráite ag an Seanadóir Ó Domhnaill maidir le ceist na dabhcha séarachais. Yesterday, a large crowd protested outside the House on the important issue of septic tanks. The Minister promised to have a debate on the standards that will apply to septic tanks once they were published. I welcome the publication of this information because it may put to bed many of the rumours and scaremongering that may have taken place.

I ask that the Minister for Education and Skills come before the House to debate the future of rural schools. While the House has debated educational issues on a number of occasions, it has not had a specific debate on rural schools. The Government has rowed back somewhat on its proposals on DEIS schools in urban areas but has failed to row back on its proposals for DEIS schools in rural areas. Hundreds of rural schools with between one and four teachers still do not know what the future will hold. It is important, therefore, that Senators discuss the implications of cutbacks in rural schools, school transport, scholarships and other areas. It is important to have a debate on rural Ireland. I will quickly plug the launch of our rural campaign in Castlebar tomorrow. Perhaps we will see the Taoiseach at the event.

We do not have advertisements on the Order of Business.

I have asked the Leader on a number of occasions to ensure the Taoiseach addresses the House and treats Senators properly. Under the 1937 Constitution, Senators are nominated or democratically elected. I ask the Leader, on my behalf, to request that the Taoiseach come before the Seanad to discuss the EU fiscal treaty and inform us about the negotiations in which the Government is engaged with a view to securing a reduction in the €31 billion in promissory notes issued to the Central Bank. I understand such negotiations are ongoing.

Ireland must pass the fiscal treaty. The Fianna Fáil Party was the driving force behind Ireland joining the European Economic Community. When I was doing my leaving certificate we did compositions and discussed the issue, Buntáiste agus míbhuntáiste an chomhargaidh. Ireland is a small country with a population of just 4.4 million. Access to a European market of 300 million people — it has since increased to 500 million people — was the reason multinational companies thronged to this country. We are the only English speaking people in the European Union.

We are the only English speaking people in the 17 country eurozone. This is highly attractive to multinational companies which locate in Ireland to manufacture goods and supply services to the European market. Where would we be without multinational companies?

My life has been very much wrapped up in the issue of industrial development. I am pleased the Government and the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, Deputy Richard Bruton, recognises the significance of multinational investment. The former Taoiseach, Mr. John Bruton, did not share his brother's passion when he was Minister for industry.

I do not know if Senator Whelan read today's edition of the Financial Times, the most important newspaper in the world, in which the Minister for Social Protection, Deputy Burton, states she wants to secure a better deal for Ireland. The Minister is not seeking anything different from what Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív wants.

Does the Senator have a question for the Leader?

I would like the Leader to ask the Taoiseach to come to the House. The Minister, Deputy Burton, is saying the same thing as Deputy Ó Cuív. All of us are in favour of passing the referendum. I ask the Leader again to request that the Taoiseach come before the House to sell the fiscal treaty to the Seanad. The issues should be explained in simple terms. What, for example, is a promissory note? In simple English that everyone understands, a promissory note is an IOU.

This is the first day of spring and every year at this time I religiously ask that we have this day the whole year around. The reason I say this is that, as the Leader is aware, I have believed for many years that Ireland should move to central European time. Making this change would give us an extra hour of daylight throughout the year. I raise this issue again because the British are moving in this direction. Any qualms we had about making this change, to which there is no opposition——

Silence in the Chamber, please.

I have difficulty hearing with Senator White still speaking. My apologies to the Senator but I was on the point of saying that the idea of having an extra hour of daylight is under consideration in Britain. The British do not use the term "central European time" but refer to retaining "summer time" throughout the year. The additional hour of daylight has a clear benefit to the economy in terms of tourism, energy costs, road traffic accidents and in many other respects. A Bill to move Britain to central European time is before the House of Commons. The only reason Ireland has not made the transition to central European time, for which there is almost universal support, is that it would create a time gap between Dublin and Belfast. On that basis, let us ensure the Minister for Justice and Equality, Deputy Shatter, who I understand has responsibility for the matter, informs his British counterparts that we are anxious to make this change because they will then follow us.

In light of the reference to the forthcoming Fianna Fáil Party Ard-Fheis, I take this opportunity to congratulate our colleague, Senator Mary White, on her elevation to the position of vice president of our party, which is a prestigious role for her.

As someone who believes the fiscal compact is a no-brainer that must be passed, I am beginning to worry about the forthcoming referendum. If the reasonable people of this country are given proper information, they will accept and pass the referendum. However, the arguments are already becoming fractious, even in this House whose Members like to believe they set an example. Posters were erected by the "No" side before people had a clue what it was they would vote on. Strong and formidable forces, including our colleagues in Sinn Féin with their organisational skills and passion for printing, will campaign against it.

We will do so with our knowledge of the European treaties.

We will more than likely have ranged against it all the various strands of independents, the extreme right and looney left, the Judean liberation front, Uncle Tom Cobley and all. Those of us who occupy the middle ground must be sensible. This is not a time for point scoring but for taking a national government type of approach. I hope it will work because if we do not achieve this type of focus——

On a point of order, I ask that the terms "extreme right" and "looney left" be removed from the record as they brand parties on the left or right which oppose the——

That is not a point of order as Senator O'Sullivan was making a political charge.

There are extreme leftists and lunatics everywhere.

On a point of order, the Senator's use of language is unparliamentary. He is trying to brand those who are opposed to the treaty as in some way extremist, which is highly unfair.

Senator O'Sullivan should withdraw his last comment.

I am happy to withdraw it. I sought to secure some form of consensus in the House and do not wish to offend anybody.

On a point of order, the Senator will not secure much consensus using that type of language.

I do not want to offend anybody and have withdrawn the remark as requested, which I am happy to do.

I ask the Leader to take every opportunity to enable this House to be seen as a shining example of how proper debate can take place. Let Senators provide an example to the nation. If we do not stick together on this issue, it will be a disaster.

I congratulate our colleague, Senator Mary White, on her elevation in her party. Sometimes it is an advantage when one's name does not appear on the preferred list.

Senator Conway is out of order. The House may not discuss Senator White's position in Fianna Fáil. Does the Senator have a question for the Leader?

Yes. Like other Senators, I look forward to an informed debate on the fiscal compact. It may be a good idea to invite a spokesperson for the Referendum Commission before the House as soon as it is appointed to explain how it proposes to run the referendum campaign, distribute information and inform members of the public about a treaty which will define the future of many generations to come.

On an organisational matter, I ask the Leader to suggest to the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government, Deputy Phil Hogan, that presiding officers and polling clerks who will run the polling stations in the referendum be drawn from the live register. They should be people who do not have a job but are competent and capable of doing the job. We should make a strong effort to send out a clear message that people who have given good service over the years but are reasonably well off, with pensions and other jobs and so forth, should be moved aside to give an opportunity for at least a day's work for people who are on the live register.

The acting Leader of the Opposition, Senator Mooney, mentioned the leaking of documents. The document that was leaked yesterday from the German parliamentary committee is a European Commission staff report, not an Irish document. All of the key documents related to the Irish programme were published on the website of the Department of Finance on 14 February. These include the letter of intent and the accompanying documents such as the memorandum of understanding and the economic and financial policies. The leaked document was a report that was being discussed by European Union officials. It is not an important programme document. The leaking of this document is not an issue of concern for the Government. Following a decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court, official programme documentation must be circulated to the German Government and the relevant parliamentary committee of the German Parliament, as everybody is aware. The Government is working hard, as everybody realises, to exit from the programme of assistance in order that there will no longer be a requirement for the circulation of such information. In order to exit the programme, we will be strongly urging a "Yes" vote in the forthcoming referendum.

We have had a lot of discussion of Fianna Fáil's position on the referendum. I am taking the leader of Fianna Fáil and the leader of the party in this House totally at their word that Fianna Fáil is fully behind this referendum. It is an important referendum for the country and I would expect nothing less from Fianna Fáil. I welcome the comments of Fianna Fáil Members on the issue.

Senator Whelan spoke about the use of prefabs in schools. This has been a waste of money for many years. I am glad the Minister for Education and Skills, Deputy Quinn, is acting on this and I understand he will soon be addressing the issue of funding to rid many of our schools of these prefabs. I agree with Senator Whelan also in his commendation of the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Deputy Deenihan, for his efforts on the important issue of turf cutting.

Senator Barrett spoke about the €595 million spent on the railway lines despite the fact that we have 25% fewer passengers and over 60% less freight. I agree totally with him that we need more project appraisal and can assure him that will happen in the future. We have listened to his comments in this regard.

Senator Keane spoke about unfinished housing estates. I hope to ask the Minister of State with responsibility for housing, Deputy O'Sullivan, to come to the House soon, at which time we can raise any issue we wish.

Senator O'Donovan and many other Members spoke about the referendum on the fiscal compact treaty and some Senators asked for a debate. I have said on numerous occasions that with the agreement of the leaders of the various groupings, we are arranging a debate. It will take place in the AV room on 8 March when representatives of the Oireachtas Library and Research Service will present proposals to us and give us an outline of the fiscal compact. We are ahead of the posse. I have said it on numerous occasions since we decided it. I wonder whether the Members who come in and ask for a debate on the issue have been listening to what we have been saying in the past few weeks.

The Leader should get the Taoiseach to attend the House. They would be here for him.

We are organising such a debate.

Senator Mullen asked about the leaking of documents, as did a number of other Members. I have addressed that question.

Senator Burke spoke about co-operation with our colleagues in Northern Ireland on health issues, which we would all welcome. It is important that we have such co-operation.

Senators Sheahan and Conway spoke about the role of the Referendum Commission and whether we should have somebody here from the commission to outline its proposals about the referendum. The commission is an independent body, but we will see what can be done in that regard.

Senator Norris asked when Committee or Report Stage of Bills would be taken. I was only adhering to procedures when saying that Committee or Report Stage would be taken next week; that is the normal procedure. We are not fully aware of when exactly these will take place. I understand the Senator's point, but I can assure Members that I am in no way misleading the House in suggesting these may take place next week when they may not take place for another week or two. I am adhering to the procedures of the House in that regard.

Senator Mullins mentioned high potential start-ups. There was an exhibition in the Mansion House yesterday that I attended and it was very encouraging to see so many people involved in start-ups. Such companies are the future and lifeblood of the economy. I compliment each and every one of the companies involved in that exhibition. They are wonderful companies.

Senator MacSharry and other Members asked about the promissory notes. I can assure them this issue is being negotiated by the Government with the EU and that these negotiations will continue. I have the utmost confidence in the Minister for Finance and hope we will have early success in our negotiations.

Senator Ó Clochartaigh asked for a debate with the Minister for Education and Skills on rural schools. We will certainly do our best to arrange such a debate and of course all wish Fianna Fáil well in its Ard-Fheis, which the Senator also mentioned.

We all agree with Senator White in recognising the contribution of multinationals to the economy. It is an important area. The Taoiseach will come to the House at some stage in the future. He has indicated he is quite willing to do so. I hope we will have him here before the Easter recess.

I agree with Senator O'Sullivan that the lead-up to the referendum is no time for political point scoring. Let us deal with the issues and avoid having others brought into it such as schools or household charges. If we stick to the issues, we will certainly have a "Yes" vote in this referendum.

Senator Conway spoke about presiding officers and other staff in the context of the referendum. I agree that as many people as possible should be taken from the live register to take up those positions. It is a no-brainer as far as I am concerned. Those people should be employed. Obviously, we need some experienced staff in certain areas, but certainly a majority should be taken from the live register. I am sure county registrars throughout the country will take into account the opinion of Senator Conway and many others in that regard.

Order of Business agreed to.
Barr
Roinn