Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 25 Feb 2014

Adjournment Matters

Job Creation

I welcome the Minister of State. He may be aware that a couple of weeks ago there was again an announcement of more job losses in Waterford city from Honeywell Process Solutions. The unemployment figure in Waterford and in the south east is still way above the national average. It is over a year since I published the Southeast Economic Development Strategy, or SEEDS report, which was endorsed by all parties, published in Waterford and supported by the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation. The report called for a suite of Government interventions by a number of statutory and non-statutory agencies to support the creation and retention of jobs in Waterford city and county and across the south east.

Unfortunately, many of the key recommendations have not been delivered. If we are to allow the region to properly grow and develop economically, culturally and socially, we must create a level playing field. An obvious area to consider is regional aid. Currently, the south east is not on a par with the Border, midlands and west, BMW, region. If a multinational company has a choice of investing in Waterford or Galway, there are more attractive grant aid rates available in Galway, which puts Waterford and the south east at a big disadvantage. It is important that there be a level playing field. As the regional aid guidelines are being reviewed this year, there should be a progressive move, with Waterford and the south east brought to the same point as the BMW region. Any reverse of this would not be a net gain for the State but instead would be a step backwards. At least there would be a level playing field for the south east.

There are a number of other necessary interventions. We still do not have a regional IDA Ireland office, a regional IDA Ireland director or a regional strategy. We do not have a university. All of these issues must be resolved if Waterford and the south east are to be put on a level playing field. The Government must not drags its heels on any of the recommendations in my report or the report published by the new city and county council in Waterford calling for very similar proposals, including the roll-out of the dark fibre network, better broadband connectivity and the upgrading of systems, as well as investment in the regional airport, a regional director of the IDA Ireland and a proper joined-up regional strategy. There should also be an educational attainment strategy to consider the issue across all levels and how we can increase educational attainment in the region, where the level is among the worst in the country.

The Minister of State would agree there is no silver bullet or panacea for solving the obvious problem in the south east, where the entire region is underperforming. There is no reason for this but it is accepted by the Government that the south east is underperforming for the wrong reasons. If we can get the interventions we need from the Government and State agencies, I have no doubt the people in the south east can turn things around. We can and will create jobs but we need the tools and Government support to do this. One of the clear recommendations I made in the report is to create a level playing field with regard to regional aid, and I ask the Government to follow through in that regard. We cannot continue with the position where Waterford is unfairly treated in comparison with Galway or other cities and counties in the BMW region when unemployment figures for Waterford city and county are so high. I ask the Government to consider the issue and deliver the recommendations made by the Oireachtas committee and the newly-merged local authorities.

I thank the Senator for raising this important issue. The House is aware that the guidelines for regional aid, also known as investment aid, enable the State's industrial development agencies to pay grants at enhanced rates to business in order to support new investment and employment in productive projects in Ireland's most disadvantaged reasons. This helps in the convergence of these regions with the more advantaged regions. All such grants come from the Exchequer and there is no EU or other external funding.

The guidelines for 2014 to 2020 were adopted by the Commission on 19 June 2013 and will enter into force on 1 July 2014. Waterford and the wider south-east region qualify for regional investment aid at the rate of 30% for small companies with fewer than 50 employees, 20% for medium-sized companies with 50 to 249 employees and 10% for large companies. The companies in the BMW region can currently be aided at rates 5% higher than these rates but this is a transition arrangement from 2007 to the end of June 2014. Due to the BMW region moving ahead of the status it had between 2002 and 2006 as one of the most deprived areas of the European Union, for 2014 to 2020 the regional aid guidelines stipulate that all Irish areas designated for aid will have the same rates from 1 July 2014. The same rates will apply in Waterford as the BMW region from 1 July this year.

Departmental officials are compiling the most up-to-date economic data for each county in order to determine which counties will qualify for inclusion in a revised regional aid map for Ireland. Once the data have been compiled and analysed, qualifying regions, to a maximum of 51.28% of total population, will be included in the new map. This will be agreed by the Government and submitted to the Commission by the end of June 2014. The most regional employment data from the Central Statistics Office indicates that in the 12 months to the end of September 2013, an additional 10,000 people were in employment in the south-east region, including Waterford, and the unemployment rate fell by 2.8% in that period. This is a very positive development, representing a significant improvement in the numbers at work in the region, and it reflects the success of Government policy, especially an Action Plan for Jobs and various initiatives to enhance competitiveness and boost economic activity.

The IDA Ireland south-east region comprises counties Waterford, Wexford, Carlow, Kilkenny and south Tipperary, and I visited Waterford twice recently. IDA Ireland is focused on advancing the economic development of the region, primarily through the gateway of Waterford city, with the other key centres being Wexford, Kilkenny, Carlow and Clonmel. In the region as a whole there are 63 IDA Ireland client companies employing 10,712 people in full-time jobs, with a further 1,207 in part-time employment. That amounts to approximately 12,000 people. IDA Ireland has a long relationship with these companies and works closely with them to ensure their long-term sustainability and encourage growth, development and continuing reinvestment.

Following the closure of TalkTalk in Waterford in 2011, the Government put a particular focus on the region and the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, Deputy Richard Bruton, published the south-east employment action plan and established a forum of all State agencies and local players to set out actions to increase employment in the area. The Minister has regularly met representatives of IDA Ireland, Enterprise Ireland and the forum to review progress.

Work is ongoing on the implementation of the south-east employment action plan recommendations, with the agencies and stakeholders working together to maximise benefits for the region. The south-east forum, established to oversee the implementation of the action plan, will continue to examine options that will lead to job creation and investment opportunities in the south east. There have been significant gains for the region, including a major investment by Glanbia in Belview on the Kilkenny-Waterford border which will provide 1,600 direct and indirect jobs, as well as an additional 450 jobs during the construction phase. In February 2013 Sanofi announced plans to invest €44 million in Genzyme's biotechnology campus in Waterford. This investment will increase the site's diversity of products and comes on top of an investment of €150 million just over a year ago. This investment ensures the Waterford facility which employs approximately 500 people can produce the company's latest products and gives an indication of the Waterford site's value to the company. In March 2013 Nypro Healthcare announced plans to establish an additional state-of-the-art medical device facility in Waterford which will result in the creation of over 200 high quality jobs in the coming years. Eishtec, the call centre operator, has in the region of 750 staff between its Waterford and Wexford centres. The company aims to bring that total to approximately 900 by the summer of this year. A further 65 Enterprise Ireland-supported new jobs were created by Dawn Meats in Waterford as a result of a five year, €300 million contract with McDonald's restaurants. Danone baby nutrition in Wexford announced an investment in its manufacturing facility which will create approximately 45 new jobs. The two local Waterford County and City Enterprise Boards have created 59 new jobs, while IDA Ireland has announced plans to build new advance, open-plan manufacturing facilities in Waterford in order to enhance the offering in the area to win new business. I am informed by IDA Ireland that the proposed new advance building facility, which the agency is funding in Waterford, will be 2,348 m² and will be located at the IDA Ireland technology park on the Cork Road in Waterford. I understand the procurement process has commenced, with the outcome expected within the next month.
The Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation has asked IDA Ireland and Enterprise Ireland to work with the Department to explore what further initiatives can be taken to ensure a better approach to enterprise development in the region. The Minister has done extraordinary work on behalf of the region. I have met the regional directors of both IDA Ireland and Enterprise Ireland, whose commitment to the region is also very evident. This exercise will complement an indepth analysis of our foreign direct investment strategy which is currently being undertaken by Forfás and will take account of factors such as the key trends emerging in foreign direct investment best practice internationally, Ireland's strengths in attracting foreign direct investment, as well as state aid rules. The results of these two exercises will form the basis of IDA Ireland's strategy from 2015 onwards. All of the key State players have been actively pursuing initiatives to facilitate development and job creation in the south east and with continued co-operation and collaboration, it is hoped further benefits will accrue to the region.

I do not doubt the Minister's support for the south east and know that he is aware of the problems in the region. However, the people who live in the south east and particularly in Waterford will not be clapping the Government on the back, given the very high levels of unemployment in the county. I spoke about levelling the playing field and making sure a number of promises contained in the programme for Government are delivered upon. These need to be driven over the Cabinet line by Ministers who live in the constituency, particularly Deputies Phil Hogan and Brendan Howlin, who have a responsibility to ensure we get a university, investment in broadband provision and a regional IDA Ireland office with a regional director who is working to a regional strategy. There must also be a level playing field in the context of grant aid. This is what the south-east region needs and such developments will need Cabinet support from Ministers who live in the constituency.

The Senator will have to admit that there is a lot of straight talk in the reply I have given him. Action is being taken and it is yielding results, as is clear from various job creation announcements, the plan by IDA Ireland to build an advance manufacturing facility, as well as the enormous investment by Glanbia on the Waterford-Kilkenny border. A lot of new jobs are being created in the region, irrespective of the location of the offices of IDA Ireland. The Government has delivered a considerable amount for the south-east region in the short time it has been in office and the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation is determined to deliver more. No Government has been as committed to the south-east region as this one.

Water Quality

Tá áthas orm deis a bheith agam labhairt ar an ábhar tábhachtach seo agus cuirim fáilte roimh an Aire freisin. I thank the Minister for coming to the House to discuss an issue which is significant in County Meath, particularly in those areas where hard water is a feature. Many of County Meath's residents who are new to the area are not used to hard water; we are talking about a sizeable number of people, given the fact that 60% of the population was not born in the county. In various parts of County Meath the water is very hard, as has been acknowledged by Meath County Council. The council has produced an information leaflet outlining to people what to do about hard water. The practical reality for those who have hard water is that it is very costly. They incur costs through, for example, having to replace kettles regularly. At a more serious level, however, costs are incurred through having to replace boilers, tanks and so forth.

I attended a public meeting in Ashbourne a number of weeks ago which was organised by a completely non-political group of concerned residents. I was very impressed because normally such meetings have a political angle, particularly in the run-up to elections but this one did not. The aim of the group was to put pressure on politicians of all hues to raise and address this issue. I attended the meeting with my party colleague, Mr. Sean Smith from Ashbourne.

People have had to spend huge sums of money dealing with the consequences of hard water. It was interesting to note at the meeting that very few people were saying that they were not going to pay the water charges. Most of those who attended were more concerned with making sure that the charging structure would be fair and would reflect the extra costs incurred by those living in hard water areas because those costs are huge. I am not asking for a subsidy for the installation of water softeners, although some people at the meeting did suggest that. Most people would be happy if there was a recognition in the charging structure of the extra costs incurred in hard water areas and it is worthwhile exerting political pressure in this regard. The Commission for Energy Regulation is engaging in a consultation process where this matter can be raised, but it is also important to raise it in the Houses. I look forward to the Minister's response.

The programme for Government includes a commitment to introduce water charges based on usage above a free allowance. The Government considers that charging based on usage is the fairest way to charge for water and it has decided that water meters should be installed in households connected to public water supplies. The Water Services Act (No. 2) 2013 provides for the transfer of water services functions from the local authorities to Irish Water. The Act also provides that the Commission for Energy Regulation, CER, will be responsible for the independent economic regulation of Irish Water. The CER has been given statutory responsibility for protecting the interests of customers.

Under the European Communities (Drinking Water) (No. 2) Regulations, 2007, a copy of which is available in the Oireachtas Library, suppliers of drinking water are required to ensure that the water supplied is wholesome and clean. Water which is wholesome and clean is defined as water which is free from any micro-organisms and parasites and from any substances which in numbers or concentrations constitute a potential danger to human health, and which meets the quality standards specified in the schedule to the regulations. Hard water is not included as a parameter in the quality standards specified in the regulations as it does not pose a threat to human health. The Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, is the supervisory authority with responsibility for monitoring Irish Water's compliance with these regulations.

I have listened to what the Senator had to say and suggest the group to which he referred makes a submission to the CER and the EPA to draw attention to the specific issue of hard water in Ashbourne and other parts of County Meath.

As you know, a Chathaoirligh, I know County Meath is more renowned for hard men than hard water. The consultation process with the regulator will begin in April and, by making a submission, the regulator will decide measures on charging for water.

I am grateful to the Minister for his answer. The fact this emerging issue is being taken seriously by him and the head of the Commission for Energy Regulation is welcome. I am making no claims about the safety of hard water. It is perfectly safe. I am glad that County Meath is built on strong foundations, but it has consequences. As well as other public representatives, I will advise the residents to make a submission. I receive complaints on this emerging issue from Ashbourne and Dunshauglin while my colleague, Deirdre Smith, is having a public meeting in Ratoath tomorrow evening. While I thank the Minister for his reply, I will not accept this is the final world on this significant issue and we will continue the fight.

Beef Industry

I thank the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Deputy Simon Coveney, for taking time from his busy schedule to address the issue of the drop in beef prices in meat factories in the past weeks. This will have implications for Food Harvest 2020 and farmer confidence in stocking levels. Will the Minister consider bringing all the stakeholders together in an emergency beef summit to discuss this issue and find a way of moving forward? Following a meeting with the IFA, the Minister met a delegation from Meat Industry Ireland. Have there been any developments from this meeting?

The beef market is challenging. Prices are still very low which could put some farmers at risk of going out of business. Will the Minister consider a slaughter policy for male calves? Will he also consider waiving the €10 export inspection fee on calves?

I thank the Senator for giving me the opportunity to discuss this matter in the Seanad.

The value of beef exports was estimated at €2.1 billion in 2013. This export performance, based on wide portfolio of customers, has contributed significantly to higher returns for Irish beef in recent years. It also reflects the success of Bord Bia’s marketing strategy which focuses on the key attributes of Irish beef such as environmentally sustainable, grass-based production systems, full traceability, quality assurance at all stages and superior eating quality. I am committed to developing a policy framework that fosters innovation and promotes efficiency and improved performance at all levels of the beef supply chain. These export figures are underpinned by the high quality output from the primary sector. I fully agree with those who advocate for a strong suckler cow sector.

Under Food Harvest 2020, the original target for the beef sector was to increase the value of exports by 20% by 2020. This was increased on the recommendation of the beef activation group to 40%. The various targets under Food Harvest 2020 are regularly monitored and reviewed by the high level implementation group which I chair. Obviously, any factors which may significantly affect beef prices or which lead to a fall in production would be of concern and it is important that beef farmers have confidence in their sector. However, it would be premature to consider any adjustment in the target for the beef sector on the basis of the recent drop in prices. It would not be prudent to change targets on the basis of temporary price adjustments in the context of a strategy which has another six years to run.

The average R3 steer price per kg, excluding VAT, the benchmark price for cattle, increased by 42% between 2008 and 2013. It is too early to say if the current drop in prices will continue and I hope this will just be a short-term drop. Aggregate cattle supplies at Department-approved meat plants to early February 2014 are up 7% on the corresponding period in 2013 with strong increases recorded in the steer, heifer and cull cow categories. This higher throughput has led to factories giving preference to certain types of stock that are better suited to the requirements of their retail customers. Prices for prime steers and heifers have remained relatively stable but the young bull trade is challenging at present as age and weight issues continue to affect demand. I note, however, that the young bull kill has increased by 60% between week 1 and week 6 of 2014. Up to 6,000 bulls are being killed a week to get through oversupply.

The beef industry is dependent on exports and the need to ensure it is producing efficiently for overseas markets cannot be ignored. One of the main difficulties in marketing young bulls older than 16 months is that these animals are outside the specifications preferred by the UK market. This is a major disadvantage because the UK market has effectively become the highest-priced beef market in the European Union. Delays in young bull slaughtering undoubtedly put pressure on producer profit margins. Neither I nor any European agriculture Minister can interfere in a trade that is cyclical in nature and prone to short-term price fluctuations. I am, of course, entirely sympathetic to those farmers facing difficulties in getting their cattle slaughtered. Cattle prices are determined, however, by the interplay of supply and demand. I have no function in commercial transactions between the meat factories and their suppliers.

In response to resent issues in the beef sector, I met last week the IFA and Meat Industry Ireland, comprising the main beef processors in the country, to discuss the situation. I had a constructive and focused meeting with both parties on this issue. At my request MII member company members agreed to have their livestock offices available to deal with any cases where producers had queries or concerns about the marketing of their stock. Lists of contact telephone numbers for all the main beef processors have been published in the farming press. It is important farmers with concerns make direct contact with their factories to discuss any issues they may have regarding their supplies. I have had anecdotal evidence that some farmers simply cannot get rid of their animals but factory owners tell me they will take animals. Of course, farmers want more money for their animals.

There is a responsibility on the beef industry to think in the medium and long term about beef supplies and the need to maintain confidence in this sector, but they can only do that within reason if they a have problem selling on this product afterwards because it is out of specification.

It is the responsibility of the industry – processors and farmers working together – to manage the type and volume of cattle being brought to market so that the supply chain operates for the benefit of both parties and does not undermine the viability of bull beef production systems for either winter finishers or suckler farmers. It is essential that all parties communicate with each other and understand the needs of the market for quality animals produced to an agreed specification. I urge the various farm bodies, the Irish Farmers Association, IFA, Irish Creamery Milk Supplier Association, ICMSA and Irish Cattle and Sheep Farmers’ Association, ICSA, and Meat Industry Ireland, MII to continue to meet, as they did in January, to resolve any outstanding issues so all parties can benefit from the opportunities available to the Irish beef sector in other EU member states and in emerging third countries.

Since my appointment as Minister I have been very active in developing relationships in new and expanding international markets for the beef industry, raising Ireland's profile and increasing international confidence in our production and control systems. These initiatives have led to a number of notable successes last year in securing new markets for Irish beef in Japan, Singapore, Egypt, Lebanon and Iran. I am hopeful this year will also see significant progress in gaining access to the US, Canada and, perhaps most exciting, the Chinese market.

I fully recognise the importance of maintaining confidence in the beef sector and earlier this month I announced the operational details of an investment package worth up to €40 million for beef farmers in 2014. This package will include €23 million for a beef genomics scheme - which is exciting new thinking about paying farmers to buy into a new genomics breeding programme - €10 million for the beef data programme, €5 million for the beef technology adoption programme and €2 million in residual payments under the suckler cow welfare scheme. The Government’s investment is a continuing strong vote of confidence in the suckler beef sector. It exemplifies the smart, green growth initiatives envisioned in the Food Harvest 2020 strategy.

I am very cognisant of the fact that, regardless of the overall macro figures in terms of beef exports being significantly up last year on the previous year and the numbers of beef animals also being up going into this year, there is an issue for some beef farmers, particularly around bull beef, who were producing what they would see as very good animals but which factories tell me are outside the spec of their customers. That is why farming organisations and factories must work together on this to clear out an oversupply of animals that are not in demand in the marketplace. That can be done in the next three to four weeks at current slaughter rates of bulls in that category. This has been ramped up to 5,000 to 7,000 per week. If that continues for the next three to four weeks, we will get back to normal pricing.

A farmer who produces bull beef must do it in consultation with a factory that will buy it in order that the farmer produces it to a spec the marketplace wants. The problem has arisen when farmers seek to sell animals into a factory that does not want them because they are outside of the spec of what is being demanded in the marketplace. There are a number of examples of farmers producing bull beef at 18 to 22 months and selling them for good prices to the factory because they have been negotiating and talking to the factory about that and the company involved has found an outlet, whether in Italy or somewhere else, for that spec of beef. However, one cannot expect to come to a factory with something nobody wants and expect to get a top price for it. We must learn some lessons from this and I hope we will get a response from the industry that will maintain confidence in this sector into the medium term. Ultimately this is a sector in which we want to facilitate growth and expansion. We want farmers to get a fair and good return that will facilitate that expansion but that will also facilitate meat factories making the margin they need to survive.

I thank the Minister very much for his response. If things do not work out in the next three or four weeks perhaps the Minister would consider a slaughter-out policy of male calves. Farmers are under pressure and there is a danger they will not continue to produce bull beef in the future.

No policy around young male calves, particularly those born in the dairy sector, will provide any instant solution around getting a better price for beef. We can produce much more beef in Ireland, get a good price for it and sell it into markets, but it must be produced according to the spec customers want. Most farmers understand that but, unfortunately, some farmers in the bull beef category have been caught out because of a changing market in this area. We need to learn lessons from this. We will see less bull beef, more steers and more heifers in the future but there will be some specialist bull beef farmers who will produce for factories and they will negotiate spec with those factories. That is a profitable business. However, producing bull beef without knowing one has an outlet for that, and expecting to sell 24 or 26-month-old animals is a very challenging area. We need to get through this immediate problem. We need understanding from the factories regarding pricing and taking bull beef, but for next year and for future planning we need to learn the lessons from what has happened in the past few weeks.

Post Office Network

I thank the Cathaoirleach for selecting this item. I appreciate that the Minister is here to respond. He is probably hearing a lot about the concerns communities throughout the country have about the future of the post office network. The issue has been raised on many previous occasions. The concern from the post officer workers, the network and the Irish Postmasters Union, IPU, is that a plan be prepared as was committed to in the programme for Government, as to the future of the post office network. I come from an urban area and I completely understand the value of my local post office, as well as in rural areas. They play a very valuable role. That is their strength and they are playing to that. The network employs 3,000 people and in 2012 there were 1,152 post offices located throughout Ireland. Grant Thornton recently produced a report on the future viability of the network and it claimed that 450 to 500 post office could close between 2013 and 2017. I do not understand that because in the years 2006 to 2010 197 post offices closed, but since then only 17 have closed. That question should be addressed.

My local postmistress told me they wanted to pitch for driving licences and motor tax. The local post offices could provide many services. They are concerned about the move to electronic payments. Electronic payments are the future and in today's world one cannot stop that because this is about making it easy for consumers and service users. Nonetheless, there are areas within which the post office network can develop expertise and provide additional services.

Post bank services are an example. People could be encouraged to use them. If they are concerned about the service they are getting from their local bank, they could move to a post bank.

This is not simply about the Government preparing a plan. That is important, but people must realise, as consumers and customers, that if they wish to retain their local post office, they must support it. That strong message should be conveyed. Perhaps, however, the Minister might respond to their concerns. Will a plan be put in place or is the Government committed to addressing this issue? As he is aware, post offices play a very valuable role in terms of community supports. The postmistress to whom I spoke told me she was the third generation of her family in the post office; therefore, she knows her customers well. It is a valuable and unique support and we should protect it in so far as we can, given all of the constraints.

I thank the Senator for giving me the opportunity, on the same evening as the sustainability of the post office network is being debated in the Dáil, to address in this House the concerns raised by the Irish Postmasters Union, IPU, about the viability of the post office network. The post office has a unique standing. Its social role is highly valued, perhaps most highly in rural Ireland, where 64% of the network serves 38% of the population. I was disappointed to read recent headlines asserting that 557 post offices were to close. The impression is given that somewhere, somehow, the Government has announced a plan to shut down post offices. There is no such plan. In fact, as the Senator said, although 197 post offices were closed between 2006 and 2010, only 17 closures have occurred since 2010.

An Post has not escaped the challenging environment brought about by the economic collapse in 2008. More challenging still are the diminishing mail volumes due to technological advances. Of course, as a network of commercial enterprises, the post office network is also subject to EU competition law.

From where did the headlines about post office closures emerge? The origins are a consultancy report that presumes the loss of the social welfare contract, worth €50 million to An Post, and calculates that such a loss would, in the worst case scenario, lead to the closure of 557 post offices. However, the point is that An Post did not lose the social welfare contract. In fact, it won it in a tender process as recently as last year. The Irish Postmasters Union is prudently asking about what the situation might be in 2019.

There is every reason to be optimistic about the new opportunities that lie ahead for the post office network in the digital age. The retail network has actually grown in the past five years, even as the mail business has been contracting sharply. The over-the-counter business today offers very different services from what was offered in the past, including foreign exchange, passport, bank agency and tax payment services. These services are provided in a competitive environment for customers who can choose to do business in other ways. The professionalism of the postmasters, the unions and the board and management of An Post has served the network well through the years. An Post is a trusted brand and has the largest retail presence in the country, with over 1,100 outlets nationwide reaching almost 1.7 million customers.

While operational matters and the development of commercial strategies are for An Post, as a shareholder, I have a strong interest in and concern about the sustainability of the company. This is backed by the commitment in the programme for Government to ensure the sustainability of the post office network. I am, therefore, pleased to announce that the Government has agreed to a whole-of-government consideration, encompassing central and local government and the wider public service, of the nature and extent of services that can be provided for the public using the post office network as a "front office of government". This will afford an opportunity to have an holistic review of the range of services which could be provided by the post office network and could perhaps yield synergies among the various agencies.

There is no doubt that further challenges will present in the years ahead. I am convinced, however, that An Post possesses the capacity and drive to adapt to the changing needs of customers, as well as the necessary commitment and resolution to continue to develop the post office network. In doing so, it will have my active support and that of the Government.

I welcome what the Minister said, particularly about the proactive approach the Government is taking in addressing the issue across a range of Departments, encompassing central and local government. I am sure that as a result, it will be possible to provide services through the post office as a front office of government. That would be a very welcome development which I am sure would be welcomed by the Irish Postmasters Union and workers in post offices throughout the country. I appreciate the Minister's response.

Working together, the Government and the IPU, notwithstanding the inexorable progress of the digital age and digital enterprise, can ensure there is a future for the post office network. This is a unique retail outlet. No other organisation has 1,150 outlets throughout the country and there is the capacity to win new business and create new products. My view on the fear expressed about the future of the social welfare contract is that the IPU should make common cause with the Irish League of Credit Unions and seek to develop the basic bank account that could be used for this transfer if and when it goes electronic. There are a number of such things that could be done that could prove very useful. The Government's social policy sub-committee will pull together the different strands and consider how to proceed from here.

The Seanad adjourned at 6 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 26 February 2014.
Barr
Roinn