Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Cancer Screening Programme.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 3 March 2004

Wednesday, 3 March 2004

Ceisteanna (58)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

124 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Health and Children if his attention has been drawn to the fact that some women are still waiting up to four months for the results of cervical smear tears; the steps he intends to take to reduce this waiting time and ensure that women receive the results promptly; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7007/04]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Having made inquiries of the Eastern Regional Health Authority and those health boards in which there are laboratories undertaking the analysis of cervical smears, I am advised that the position with regard to turnaround times is as follows:

Board

Routine

Urgent

ERHA

4-16 weeks

1-3 weeks

NEHB

8-9 weeks

Under 1 week

NWHB

16 weeks

4 weeks

SHB

3 weeks —29 days

2 days —1 week

WHB

5 weeks

Under 3 weeks

I should point out that phase one of the national cervical screening programme has been up and running in the Mid-Western Health Board since October 2000. Under the programme, cervical screening is being offered at five year intervals to approximately 74,000 women in the 25-60 age group, free of charge.

The national health strategy includes a commitment to extend the programme to the rest of the country. The Health Boards Executive, HeBE, has initiated an examination of the feasibility and implications of a roll out of the national programme which is a major undertaking with significant logistical and resource implications. The work currently being undertaken as part of the roll out includes an evaluation of phase one, policy development and the establishment of national governance arrangements. This work has regard to both the experiences gained from the phase one programme and other international programmes as well as current best practice.

The evaluation of phase one is a key element in informing the development of a high quality cervical screening model for Ireland. The evaluation is currently under way and it is anticipated that it will be completed within the next few months. Once completed, HeBE has advised that it will be in a position to prepare a draft roll out plan.

With regard to the issue of resourcing of cervical cytology laboratories, it is the case that over the past number of years my Department has allocated additional funding to support the ongoing development and enhancement of cervical cytology services including the achievement of a reduction in waiting times for smear test results. The funding has facilitated the employment of staff, provision of training, introduction of new technologies such as liquid-based cytology, investment in new equipment and upgrading of facilities. Further additional funding amounting to €500,000 was allocated in 2004 as part of a programme of continued investment in cervical cytology and colposcopy services.

Barr
Roinn