Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Telecommunications Services.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Thursday - 1 April 2004

Thursday, 1 April 2004

Ceisteanna (10, 11, 12, 13)

Eamon Gilmore

Ceist:

10 Mr. Gilmore asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if, as reported in the media, the contract for the management services entity includes an ex-Eircom subsidiary with reportedly continuing close ties to that organisation; the way in which it is proposed to deal with any potential conflicts of interest issues that might arise; the effect that this might have on the desire to provide competition as opposed to the existing near monopoly position; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10205/04]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Paul Kehoe

Ceist:

39 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the role of the entry of a company (details supplied) in the management and roll-out of broadband nationally; and when the appointment will be made and the contract agreed. [10188/04]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Mary Upton

Ceist:

46 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if he will list the tender applications for the management services entity competition and announce the winning tender; and if he will make a statement on the proposed operation of the MSE. [10202/04]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Pat Breen

Ceist:

52 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the role of the MSE in the management and roll-out of broadband services; and the reason its appointment has been delayed. [10236/04]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí ó Béal (13 píosaí cainte)

I propose to take Questions Nos. 10, 39, 46 and 52 together.

The management services entity, MSE, is the independent body which will be engaged to manage, market and maintain the fibre-optic metropolitan area networks, MANs, being constructed under the regional broadband programme, on a basis which is consistent with the Government's strategy of providing broadband infrastructure on an open access and carrier neutral basis.

It is intended that this open-access principle will be enshrined in a code of practice for the use of the metropolitan area networks, thus ensuring that access to the infrastructure is administered on fair, transparent and non-discriminatory terms to all interested parties. Notice of my Department's intention to commence a competitive tender process for the engagement of an MSE was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities on 19 June 2003.

Responses received by the tender deadline of 15 August 2003 have been evaluated and it is anticipated that the MSE procurement process, as outlined in the instructions to tender document which issued on 19 June 2003, will reach a conclusion shortly. It is not proposed to make any public statement on the identity of participating parties prior to such conclusion. The competition for the appointment of the management services entity is a public procurement process. I have, and have had, no role in the selection process.

The Minister states he cannot confirm when the identity of the operator of the management services entity will be made known. Therefore, he cannot confirm the essence of my question which was reported in the media. The group which has obtained the management contract includes a former subsidiary of Eircom. Does the Minister agree that the concerns which lie behind the question relate to the appalling vista which has opened over the last number of years due to the failure of the Department and COMREG to bring down the price of broadband access and address continuing deficiencies in the 200,000 km national network of the Eircom grid.

Last Wednesday, my colleagues, Deputies Coveney and Eamon Ryan, and I met along with members from the Minister's party including Deputy Brady and the Chairman of the Committee on Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Deputy O'Flynn. Does the Minister agree that the broadband report prepared by the Oireachtas committee constitutes a severe criticism of the achievements of his Department on broadband? It has left Ireland three to five years behind the leading states.

I do not accept that.

I do not accept that the Minister has no role in the process of choosing a management services entity. A management services entity should have been announced last September, but we still do not know who has been chosen. While we have been told that there is, supposedly, a preferred bidder, a cloak over the process means no one can mention who that might be. What is the problem with allocating the contract? All over the country there are MANs which the Minister, in fairness, has pushed. These are the main focus of broadband roll out. We require a management services entity to develop access and manage their use to ensure that we achieve the maximum benefit from MANs. While all of the above is positive, there has been a six month delay in the awarding of the contract. Why has it been delayed? It is a nonsense to suggest that the Minister has nothing to do with the process. He is responsible for the roll out of broadband. The awarding of the contract is a key part of that strategy. What is the delay and why is there so much secrecy involved?

If we cannot be told which company has been awarded the contract, has the Minister initiated an investigation within his Department to discover why and how it has been leaked to the press that this has happened?

One of the recommendations in the report of the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Communications, Marine and Natural Resources was that the management services entity should adopt a carrot-and-stick approach to ensure that resources are not duplicated in the development of fibre, particularly in the ground. Can the Minister provide specific directions to the management services entity prior to the awarding of the contract?

I am told by my officials that it is expected a decision will be made at the end of April. Deputies are asking why there is so much secrecy and wondering why I am not involved. They need go no further than the Moriarty tribunal for an answer. I will say no more.

We are not asking the Minister to choose the management services entity.

The Deputies opposite have obviously been lobbied by people who have been unsuccessful.

We have not.

I have received no lobby on this matter.

I ask the Minister to withdraw his outrageous accusation.

Deputies should consider the Moriarty tribunal. I am not making the mistakes of the past.

The Minister is three years behind schedule. The secrecy issue arises because the awarding of the contract is six months late, yet the Minister does not appear to have any interest in it. I suppose we will read about it in the newspapers.

Written Answers follow Adjournment Debate.

Barr
Roinn