Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Environmental Impact Assessments.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Thursday - 4 November 2004

Thursday, 4 November 2004

Ceisteanna (10)

Brian O'Shea

Ceist:

8 Mr. O’Shea asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the action his Department has taken following the European Commission’s initial warning to the Government over the Derrybrien wind farm project in County Galway following the landslide there in October 2003; the measures he has taken to ensure that environmental impact assessments for such projects are improved following the Commission’s statement that the EIAs for Derrybrien were manifestly deficient; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27334/04]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí ó Béal (11 píosaí cainte)

On 15 July 2004, the Government received a detailed letter from the European Commission in regard to implementation of the directive on environmental impact assessment in Ireland. The letter lists a number of individual cases, including the Derrybrien wind farm project. In view of the complexity of the issues involved, Ireland sought an extension of the period for reply to the Commission until 14 November 2004. The Department is now finalising a comprehensive response to the Commission's letter. On the basis of legal advice, my Department does not divulge details of correspondence with the European Commission in connection with EU complaints.

My Department issued guidelines for planning authorities on wind farm development as far back as 1996. The guidelines noted that "wind farm developments, both during the construction and operational phases, may impact significantly on the ecology, archaeology, geology and heritage of an area". They recommended, inter alia, that an assessment of the impact of development on the known or likely geological interest of a site should be made.

In August 2004 my predecessor issued for public consultation draft guidelines for planning authorities in regard to wind energy development, updating the 1996 guidelines. To be fair, the 1996 guidelines could not have envisaged what took place. The recent guidelines update policy on the siting and design of wind farms and include strengthened recommendations on the consideration of geotechnical issues. Some 65 submissions were received by the closing date for the receipt of submissions on 30 September 2004 and are now under consideration by my Department. It was the intention to publish the finalised guidelines in early 2005 but I intend to publish them as soon as is possible.

Responsibility for ensuring the adequacy of an environmental impact statement submitted with a planning application rests with the planning authority in the first instance and, in the event of an appeal, with An Bord Pleanála. Under section 72 of the Environmental Protection Agency Act 1992, the EPA issued in 2002 guidelines on the information to be contained in environmental impact statements. These guidelines and the accompanying detailed advice notes on current practice have been updated and are available.

Additional information not given on the floor of the House

These guidelines, and accompanying detailed advice notes on current practice in the preparation of environmental impact statements, updated draft guidelines and accompanying detailed advice notes issued by the EPA in 1995. The Act provides that those preparing and assessing environmental impact statements must have regard to the EPA guidelines. The guidelines and advice notes address issues in regard to impacts on soil and geology.

How does the Minister respond to the essence of the point made by the Commission that the environmental impact assessments of the development appear to have been manifestly deficient, having failed to provide any adequate information on the geophysical risks associated with the project? Does the Minister accept or reject this assertion by the Commission?

I neither accept nor reject it because the issue is under consideration in the Department. I stated that the tendency is not to divulge details of correspondence with the Commission in connection with EU complaints. I will seek to publish the response as soon as it is conclusive because serious issues have been raised. Even if the Commission had not raised this matter, I am familiar with the events at Derrybrien and know they must be taken seriously. I will respond to the Commission and intend to make as much information available as possible to the Deputy and any other Member of the House.

I thank the Minister for his response. However, this issue is in the public domain. While the Minister stated the correspondence from the Commission related to a number of matters, I am concerned with this specific matter. Was the EIA adequate, in the Minister's view, or can the Minister assure the House it was adequate?

I stated we are working on new guidelines which will obviously--——

The Minister should not mind the guidelines. He should stick with the matter of the EIA.

We are working on new guidelines and responding to the issues regarding the EIA. The Deputy will accept the events were unforeseen and novel. We must make certain, rather than carving out--——

The Minister is slipping around more than the bog was.

I am not slipping around more than the bog because it was a substantial area of bog. I have seen pictures of the events and I accept the Deputy's point that it is a serious issue. The guidelines will deal with it. We must learn from experience in this area, as with so much else.

We all saw the frightening images on television of the bog and land slide, the pollution of rivers and resulting fish kills. While the Minister says it is a complex matter, it is very simple. Were the directives issued by his Department in 1996 implemented?

In so far as I can answer, the answer is yes. However, they have been strengthened. The idea of the draft guidelines issued in 2004 was to strengthen the existing guidelines, which were produced in a different time.

Barr
Roinn