Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Economic Partnership Agreements.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Thursday - 3 March 2005

Thursday, 3 March 2005

Ceisteanna (121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

121 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister of State at the Department of Foreign Affairs if the Government will actively urge the EU to work with the 77 African, Caribbean and Pacific countries at the WTO to achieve an extension of the Cotonou waiver or to change GATT Article XXIV in order that Europe can continue to give preferential access to developing countries; and his views on whether this approach is preferable to pushing ahead with reciprocal economic partnership agreements in view of the fact that the EU 25 and the ACP 77 together constitute the vast majority of WTO members. [7320/05]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

122 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister of State at the Department of Foreign Affairs the assessment undertaken by the Government on the impact of the economic partnership agreements on industrial and agricultural producers in Ireland’s priority aid countries, including and specifically the required liberalisation of 90% of trade with the poorest countries; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7321/05]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

123 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister of State at the Department of Foreign Affairs the number and dates of communications, meetings and other representations between his Department and the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment in relation to EU requests for the opening of markets under the proposed economic partnership agreements; and if he will publish or otherwise lay the documents relating to these meetings before Dáil Éireann. [7322/05]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

124 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister of State at the Department of Foreign Affairs the concerns his Department has raised with the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment in relation to the opening up of priority country markets to EU competition; and the areas of their markets which his Department has recommended be excluded from liberalisation. [7323/05]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

125 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister of State at the Department of Foreign Affairs the nature of the representation of his Department at the EU 133 committee meetings considering liberalisation of trade with priority countries under economic partnership agreements. [7324/05]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

126 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister of State at the Department of Foreign Affairs the consultations his Department has had with priority country governments, business interests and civil society regarding their defensive interests in the economic partnership agreement trade negotiations; the areas of concern highlighted through those consultations; and the steps taken by his Department to ensure those interests are catered for in the EU position on EPAs. [7325/05]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

127 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister of State at the Department of Foreign Affairs the concerns of his Department regarding the regional groupings being established under the economic partnership agreements, specifically his Department’s views on whether Zambia, an Irish priority aid country, is forced by this process to decide between the two regional groups, SADC and COMESA, in which it has invested years of energy; and his further views on whether it is appropriate for Europe through EPAs to effectively redraw the economic map of Africa. [7326/05]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

128 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister of State at the Department of Foreign Affairs his views on whether there are parallels between the 1884 redivision of Africa and the contemporary redrawing of the economic map of Africa through the economic partnership agreements. [7327/05]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

129 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister of State at the Department of Foreign Affairs his Department’s assessment of the industries in each of Ireland’s priority aid countries that will come under most pressure as a result of the liberalisation envisaged in the economic partnership agreements; the industries thus identified and the number of persons employed in each such industry in each priority country; the estimated capacity these industries have to adjust to competition from European exports during the transition period; and the expected change in the level of unemployment in each of the priority aid countries as a result of such liberalisation under the EPAs. [7328/05]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 121 to 129, inclusive, together.

The legally binding Cotonou Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific, ACP, states and the European Union provides for the negotiation of economic partnership agreements, EPAs, between the parties. As trade is a European Community competence, it is the European Commission which negotiates the EPAs between the EU and six regional groupings of ACP states on behalf of the member states. The Commission provides member states with regular updates on the progress of the negotiations. The EPAs are to enter into force by 1 January 2008.

The EPAs are first and foremost instruments for development that will foster the smooth and gradual integration of ACP states into the world economy, with due regard for their own political choices and their own development priorities, thereby promoting their sustainable development and contributing to poverty eradication in the ACP countries. They combine trade and wider development issues in a unified framework while taking account of the specific economic, social and environmental circumstances of each regional group and its component states. By enlarging ACP markets through regional integration and by making regulatory frameworks in these countries more transparent, EPAs can create an environment conducive to the private sector and thus function as a vehicle for long-term economic development.

According to Article 37/7 of the Cotonou Agreement the negotiations on the EPAs:

. . . shall take account of the level of development and the socio-economic impact of trade measures on ACP countries, and their capacity to adapt and adjust their economies to the liberalisation process. Negotiations will therefore be as flexible as possible in establishing the duration of a sufficient transitional period, the final product coverage, taking into account sensitive sectors, and the degree of asymmetry in terms of timetable for tariff dismantlement, while remaining in conformity with WTO rules then prevailing.

While Ireland like the other member states does not participate in the ongoing EPA negotiations, we are satisfied that the Commission is discharging its mandate in accordance with these provisions of the Cotonou Agreement. It is clear from the most recent EU-ACP joint report of last October on the state of play of regional EPA negotiations that the process with the six regions is conducted with considerable concern for its impact on the economies of the ACP countries. As with all trade negotiations, the EPA negotiation has brought to light differences of approach between the parties in a number of areas. It is to be hoped that as the talks progress, these divergences can be resolved in accordance with the principles and objectives underlying the negotiations. However, I do not think that it is helpful for the success of the EPA project at this stage to suggest taking action at the WTO for a continuation beyond 2008 of the preferential access of ACP countries to EU markets.

In Ireland, the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment has primary responsibility for trade policy. An officer of that Department represents Ireland at meetings of the 133 committee. The committee normally meets once a month at the level of full members. An officer of the Department of Foreign Affairs also attends meetings of the committee on a regular basis.

Given the importance for Ireland of trade and trade relations with other countries, including those which are programme countries for Ireland's development co-operation programme, there is very regular and ongoing contact with the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment and other Departments including the Department of Agriculture and Food in preparing for meetings of the 133 committee and on questions relating to trade generally, including the EPA negotiations.

All of the programme countries in Ireland's bilateral aid programme — Ethiopia, Lesotho, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Timor Leste — are ACP states. Our underlying approach in those countries is complementary to that of the EPAs in that we are sensitive to the need to help build the economic infrastructure in these least developed countries, LDCs, so that they will be able to avail of an improving international trading environment. To that end Ireland works both with its partner governments and with other donor countries to ensure that there is a real focus on economic development, employment generation and on helping to equip our African partners to pursue access for their goods and progressively the means to avail of that access. On the aid side Ireland is achieving the UN target of 0.15% of GNP to LDCs.

Part of our overall engagement with the private sector in sub-Saharan Africa involves working to create a better climate for enterprise development and economic growth and involves efforts aimed at creating a more enabling international environment and improving coherence on trade and agriculture domestically. Finally, the level of detail being sought by the Deputy in relation to employment in particular industries in sub-Saharan Africa and other related details is not available to me.

Barr
Roinn