Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Domestic Violence.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Thursday - 7 December 2006

Thursday, 7 December 2006

Ceisteanna (5)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

5 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will guarantee that funding to the National Domestic Violence Intervention Agency which works to maximise victim safety and offender accountability will be increased or maintained at the very least to allow the project in the pilot areas of Dún Laoghaire and Bray District Courts to continue fulfilling its mission; and if he will make provisions to roll out the intervention model across the State. [42178/06]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí ó Béal (7 píosaí cainte)

The organisation in question is a registered charity and non-governmental organisation which received substantial grant assistance from my Department to undertake a locally based one-year pilot domestic violence intervention project. The purpose of the pilot project was to develop an integrated programme co-ordinating the work of the civil and criminal judicial systems and other key agencies such as the Garda, women's support groups, perpetrator programmes and the probation and welfare service in the Dún Laoghaire-Bray area. The project arose from research undertaken into the development of an intervention model which it was suggested had operated successfully in other jurisdictions.

The project originally received funding of €118,024 to undertake this pilot project within a year. Requests for additional funding were made by the organisation on a number of occasions to enable it to complete the pilot project. In the years 2004 and 2005 the NDVIA received additional funding of €320,000, bringing the total funding made available for the pilot project in the Dún Laoghaire-Bray area to almost €440,000. This is a considerable amount of taxpayer's money in my view for a pilot project.

My Department commissioned an external evaluation of the pilot project and while the findings of the consultants were reasonably positive, they identified a number of elements of the original project proposal which had not yet been satisfactorily completed. It was deemed important by my Department that these elements be completed and that the procedures developed by the NDVIA, under the domestic violence intervention project would be formally recorded so that the possibility of their replication in other areas might be fully considered.

My Department agreed to make a further and final amount of €90,000 available to the domestic violence intervention project to facilitate the completion of the final elements of this pilot project and the documentation of the procedures which had been developed as the key outcome of the project. It was agreed with representatives of the project that this work will be completed by the end of January 2007. I will not commit myself or my Department to any further funding activity arising out of this project pending receipt of a full report on its completion and an internal review by my officials of its outcome and conclusions.

The National Crime Council, the Law Reform Commission and the Law Society have all recommended at various stages dating back to 1999 that the probation and welfare service have a role in the family courts providing reports and advice for the Judiciary around barring orders and the like. Why has the Minister, to date, not made provisions for this to happen? If he is planning provisions, when are they expected?

The NDVIA has piloted a positive scheme in the Dún Laoghaire and Bray court districts involving a set of work practices that seek to maximise victims' safety. Independent evaluation of the pilot has shown that crucial supports from the NDVIA have encouraged victims to stick to the legal process rather than drop out and suffer the consequences, as victims have done in this society. The NDVIA monitors and tracks offenders' behaviours and provide risk assessments to the courts. Does the Minister of State agree that the role and work of the NDVIA has been vital in the pilot area and that such a role is absolutely vital into the future and should be rolled out nationally, particularly in the absence of this role being undertaken by the probation and welfare service?

The NDVIA also engages in bilateral work with key agencies such as the Garda, the Courts Service, the probation and welfare service, the HSE and the Judiciary through training, promoting and standardising recording procedures in the scandalous area of domestic violence. The Minister of State said he cannot guarantee funding into the future because he is awaiting a report which he expects to receive in January. Will the Minister of State ensure that on receipt of the last report, there will be a quick turnaround — because funding for the project ends in February — to ensure there is no stalling of this scheme, if he agrees to go ahead with it and that victims of violence are not left without the supports of this vital service? Will the Minister of State meet with the intervention agency or arrange a meeting between it and officials from his Department as soon as possible to discuss the options for the extension of this pilot scheme to ensure that funding and the project can continue beyond February 2007?

I agree with the Deputy that the probation and welfare service has done a good job as part of this pilot project, as have the Garda and the other support agencies. However, until such time as we receive the final report, it would not be appropriate for me to make any comment on what the outcome of our considerations would be. I must await the final report and its consideration by my officials before I can say anything further in respect of the future of the project.

Does the Minister of State not agree that such a project is hindered because of the uncertainty of future funding? Could interim funding be provided after the report is handed in and pending the decision on the funding to ensure this agency continues to operate for the few months it takes the Minister of State, his officials and the Department to come to a judgment on the operation of this in order that there would be some continuity? It would be terrible to lose the expertise because of a lack of interim funding. There might be a gap of six months or a year while the Minister of State and his officials make up their minds as to whether this project should be continued as a pilot or rolled out nationally.

There has been no lack of funding for the organisation and considerable funding has been made available. As I said, it started out as one-year pilot project and has now been operating for over three years, with almost €440,000 spent on it. We must take stock and look at the actual outcomes of the work being carried out and the value for money we have received. We will then certainly look at how we go forward in terms of victim support and greater co-ordination among agencies into the future.

Will the Minister of State meet representatives of the agency?

I have already met them. Therefore, there would be no purpose in meeting it until such time as we have considered the situation following the submission of the final report.

Barr
Roinn