Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Disadvantaged Status.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 27 January 2009

Tuesday, 27 January 2009

Ceisteanna (1485, 1486, 1487)

Mary Upton

Ceist:

1570 Deputy Mary Upton asked the Minister for Education and Science the changes in funding and resources that will apply to DEIS schools; if it is the case that schools with DEIS status will retain their full pupil teacher ratio as existed prior to budget 2009 announcements; if it is the case as described by him on a number of occasions that schools in DEIS areas will not be disadvantaged by the budget announcements and that all allowances previously available to the schools will be retained; if the DEIS schools will receive the full book grant as applied prior to the budget announcements; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [1749/09]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

DEIS (Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools), the action plan for educational inclusion, provides for a standardised system for identifying levels of disadvantage and an integrated School Support Programme (SSP). DEIS brings together and builds upon a number of existing interventions in schools with concentrated levels of disadvantage.

The process of identifying schools for participation in DEIS was managed by the Educational Research Centre (ERC) on behalf of my Department and supported by quality assurance work co-ordinated through the Department's regional offices and the Inspectorate. There are 876 schools in DEIS. These comprise 673 primary schools (199 Urban Band 1,141 Urban Band 2 and 333 Rural) and 203 second-level schools.

In line with my focus on retaining resources in the most disadvantaged areas, it is important to note that following Budget 2009, all DEIS supports in DEIS schools are not being affected. Those DEIS schools which benefit from reduced class sizes will not be affected by the general increase in the pupil teacher ratio. All DEIS Urban Band 1 schools enjoy a lower Pupil Teacher Ratio (PTR). In addition some 53 DEIS Urban Band 2 schools enjoy a lower PTR from pre-existing schemes. These reduced pupil teacher ratios are explicitly protected under DEIS and are not affected by the Budget.

While the funding for the book grant scheme has been reduced, the enhanced capitation paid to DEIS schools will be increased to offset the loss of book grant funding to DEIS schools. This additional funding will be paid to DEIS schools in the coming year and will be calculated in accordance with the mechanism used to calculate the existing disadvantage grants.

For schools other than those that benefit from lower PTR under DEIS, the mechanism used to allocate classroom teachers to primary schools is the staffing schedule and, with effect from September 2009, the enrolment bands will be based on an average of 28 pupils per class rather than the current 27 pupils per class. My Department will be advising individual schools in the normal way in relation to their staffing allocations.

The ceiling of two on the number of language support teachers per school is being re-imposed, with some alleviation for the position of those schools where there is a significant concentration of newcomer pupils as a proportion of the overall pupil enrolment. This will be done on a case by case basis.

In primary schools there will be substitute cover for teachers on uncertified sick leave other than on the first day of absence. In a school where more than one teacher is absent on the first day of uncertified sick leave, substitute cover will be provided for the second and subsequent teachers that are absent. In schools with two teachers or less cover will be provided where any classroom teacher is absent.

The 2009 Budget required difficult choices to be made across all areas of public expenditure. These decisions were made to control public expenditure and to ensure sustainability in the long run. In this respect Education while protected to a much greater extent than most other areas of public expenditure could not be totally spared.

Prudent management of the Government finances is particularly important at this time of global economic uncertainty when tax revenue has fallen so significantly and when world economic conditions are so serious. Even with the Budget measures in place there will still be a significantly increased borrowing requirement in 2009.

While I appreciate that the abolition of certain grants will make it a challenging year ahead in terms of the day to day funding of schools, I have prioritised funding for primary schools. The Education Budget for 2009 has provided for improvements to capitation and ancillary grants for primary schools which will increase from €167 million in 2008 to almost €190 million in 2009. The budget improvements involve an increase of more than €21 to bring the rate to €200 per pupil and the ancillary services grant for primary schools will also be improved by €3.50 to €155 per pupil. My Department will be advising individual schools in the normal way in relation to their grant allocations.

We are committed to investing in education but we have to invest at a level that is consistent with what we can afford and what is sustainable at the moment given economic circumstances. Targeting resources at the most disadvantaged schools that are working to counteract educational disadvantage will continue to be a priority for the Government.

Mary Upton

Ceist:

1571 Deputy Mary Upton asked the Minister for Education and Science if the funding and resources for second level schools in DEIS areas and the persons who provide the leaving certificate applied courses will be affected by budget 2009 announcements; if the full pupil teacher ratio and special allowances for these courses will remain in place; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [1750/09]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Teacher allocations to all second level schools (non DEIS and DEIS) are approved annually by my Department in accordance with established rules based on recognised pupil enrolment. In accordance with these rules each school management authority is required to organise its subject options within the limit of its approved teacher allocation. It is a matter for the school to employ teachers up to the limit of its approved allocation and at its discretion to deploy those teachers to the subject areas that the school chooses to provide.

The 2009 Budget required difficult choices to be made across all areas of public expenditure. Decisions were made in order to control expenditure and to ensure sustainability in the long term. In this respect Education, while protected to a much greater extent than most other areas of public expenditure, could not be entirely spared, and I acknowledge the impact of funding restrictions in a number of areas, including at school level. However, these are the inevitable result of the challenging economic environment and the need to manage Exchequer resources prudently.

Specific information in relation to the detailed staffing allocations that individual schools will have for the commencement of the academic year 2009/10 cannot be determined until the allocation processes have fully concluded. There is nothing exceptional in this. The allocation processes include appellate mechanisms under which schools can appeal against the allocation due to them under the staffing schedules. This is particularly relevant at post-primary level where the appellate process considers in particular any specific curricular needs of the school concerned. Up to now there has not been an effective system wide redeployment scheme at post-primary but discussions on the arrangements for redeployment that will apply in the case of teachers that become surplus in situations other than school closure will re-commence shortly and the parties have agreed that these discussions will be finalised by end March 2009. Discrete allocations are made to post-primary schools for example to cater for pupils with Special Educational Needs and those with Language difficulties and these allocations can alter the ultimate position of the school in relation to any over quota position.

In relation to recognised pupils on the Leaving Certificate Applied programme (LCA) the first group of 20 participating pupils in all schools in the free education scheme, irrespective of the programme year, will attract an allocation of 1.4 whole-time teacher equivalents. The allocation will apply in the case of the first group even where the actual take-up of approved places is fewer than 20. Each additional group of 20 participating pupils will attract an allocation of 1.18 WTE.

The first group of 20 participating pupils in all fee paying schools, irrespective of the programme year, will attract an allocation of 1.3 whole-time teacher equivalents. This allocation will apply in the case of the first group even where the actual take-up of approved places is fewer than 20. Each additional group of 20 participating pupils will attract an allocation of 1.11 WTE.

As a result of Budget 2009, the Leaving Certificate Applied grant has been abolished with effect from 1 January 2009. It is estimated that savings in the order of €1.2 million will accrue as a result of its abolition.

The Leaving Certificate Applied (LCA), taken by approximately 6% of students, is subject to review, and appropriate revisions are made to ensure that needs of all students in the intended target group are met in the best possible way. This will continue to be the case, and I am confident that the Leaving Certificate Applied will continue to be a viable option for students whose needs are not catered for by the other Leaving Certificate options.

The capitation received by post primary DEIS schools has not been affected by Budget 2009.

Mary Upton

Ceist:

1572 Deputy Mary Upton asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason a school (details supplied) in Dublin 8 is graded as DEIS band two in view of the fact that all other primary schools in the locality have DEIS band one status; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the catchment is broadly the same for all of these schools and that the same social disadvantages apply to this school as to the other schools in the area; his views on whether it is fair or satisfactory that because pupils enrolled in this particular school they are being penalised through not having the same resources available to them as apply to the other neighbouring schools; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [1751/09]

Amharc ar fhreagra

DEIS (Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools) the action plan for educational inclusion, provides for a standardised system for identifying levels of disadvantage and a new integrated School Support Programme (SSP). DEIS brings together and builds upon a number of existing interventions in schools with concentrated levels of disadvantage.

The process of identifying schools for participation in DEIS was managed by the Educational Research Centre (ERC) on behalf of my Department and was supported by quality assurance work co-ordinated through the Department's regional offices and the Inspectorate.

A review mechanism was put in place in 2006 to address the concerns of schools that did not qualify for inclusion in DEIS but regarded themselves as having a level of disadvantage which was of a scale sufficient to warrant their inclusion in the programme. The review process operated under the direction of an independent person, charged with ensuring that all relevant identification processes and procedures were properly followed in the case of schools applying for a review. The review was concluded and the results were notified to schools who applied for the review in August, 2006. There was an application for review received from the school to which the Deputy refers. Regrettably, the school was unsuccessful in that process.

The next identification process is scheduled to be held at the end of the current DEIS programme which runs from 2006-2010. There will not be an opportunity before this to be included in the current DEIS programme of supports.

Barr
Roinn