Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

School Staffing.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 23 March 2010

Tuesday, 23 March 2010

Ceisteanna (630, 631)

Róisín Shortall

Ceist:

753 Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Education and Science if in view of his decision to abolish the supply teacher panel, he will provide details of the findings of the Talbot report in respect of the percentage of teachers’ time used to cover sick leave in each of the panel areas; the cost of operating each panel per annum; the projected savings in each panel area following abolition of the panel and the basis for these calculations; his views on whether abolishing the panel is unlikely to result in savings in view of the costs of casual substitutes cover; and if he will reconsider this decision. [12665/10]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Róisín Shortall

Ceist:

754 Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Education and Science if he will publish the Talbot review on the supply teacher scheme. [12666/10]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 753 and 754 together.

The supply teacher scheme was initially set up at primary level over 15 years ago at a time when schools had difficulty getting substitute teachers. The supply scheme operates on the basis of an additional full-time teacher being allocated to a school to cover certified sick leave absences in that school and a cluster of neighbouring schools. If the teacher is not required on a given day to cover sick leave absences they generally assist with other work in their school such as administrative duties. There are 60 posts allocated to the scheme.

A value for money review was published in July 2006 and is available on my Department's website. The review found that approximately 60% of these teachers' time was used to cover sick leave absences with the balance on various other school duties. This reflects the unpredictable nature of sick leave absences. While there are benefits for schools in having these full-time teachers it is considered more cost effective to use the normal substitution arrangements that apply to all other schools to cover sick leave absences instead of having a cohort of full-time teachers ‘‘on call'' all the time in these schools to cover sick leave absences that may or may not arise.

The supply teacher scheme will cease from the start of the 2010/11 school year. The teachers concerned will be redeployed in accordance with the existing redeployment arrangements to other schools that have vacancies. It is expected that this measure will save €0.4m in 2010 and €1.1m in a full year. Due to industrial action on the part of some staff in the Department of Education and Science, I am not in a position to give the full details sought by the Deputy.

Barr
Roinn