Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Garda Operations

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 17 November 2010

Wednesday, 17 November 2010

Ceisteanna (4)

Alan Shatter

Ceist:

37 Deputy Alan Shatter asked the Minister for Justice and Law Reform if he has received a report from the Garda Commissioner on the policing of the student demonstrations that took place outside Leinster House and in the vicinity of Leinster House on Wednesday 3 November 2010; the number of gardaí injured as a result of objects being thrown at them and the nature of the injuries sustained; if he has received or is aware of any complaints made by students who participated in the demonstration and if he has any concerns regarding the approach taken by An Garda Síochaná in dealing with some demonstrators; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42917/10]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí ó Béal (7 píosaí cainte)

In the policing of demonstrations, the Garda Síochána, while respecting the right of legitimate protest, has a duty to ensure as far as possible that peace is preserved and public order maintained, and that lives and property are protected. The safety of the gardaí involved is also an important consideration. In preparing for demonstrations, the Garda Síochána must take into account a number of important factors, including the anticipated numbers, the profile of those likely to be involved and any intelligence relating to the event. Once a protest starts, the Garda Síochána must constantly monitor and evaluate the situation and be ready to make tactical decisions based on the prevailing circumstances.

Public order training forms part of normal training and additional specialised training is provided for members selected for duty with divisional and regional public order units. Further training is provided for officers in the management of incidents requiring the deployment of public order units.

The Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission is the statutory body charged with the independent oversight of policing in this jurisdiction. To date, it has received 36 complaints regarding the policing of the demonstrations. Of those 36 complaints, 20 have been determined to be admissible, 15 have been determined to be inadmissible and one complaint has been withdrawn. Admissibility is simply a neutral determination that a complaint meets the statutory criteria for investigation but has no other significance. A senior investigating officer has been appointed to oversee the investigation of these complaints. The Ombudsman Commission is fully independent in the exercise of its functions and it would be inappropriate for me to make any further comment at this stage.

As regards injuries sustained by gardaí during the protest, I am advised by the Garda Commissioner that one member required treatment in hospital for a broken nose, while a second member was hit in the face with a bottle.

Does the Minister agree the maintenance of peace and public order when demonstrations take place is of crucial importance? Does he agree that any person who injured a garda at a demonstration deserves condemnation? It is of particular importance that respect is shown to members of the Garda Síochána exercising their policing duties on behalf of the public. Does the Minister acknowledge that the overwhelming majority of students participating in the demonstration behaved perfectly properly, demonstrated in a peaceful manner and made known their views on the subject matter of the demonstration? Does the Minister acknowledge that some of the events that occurred that day are reason for genuine public concern? Some of the incidents and events are contained on images accessible on YouTube and are cause for concern.

I concur with Deputy Shatter in his views regarding the duties and responsibility of the Garda Síochána to police events such as this in a reasonable way. I also concur that they represent the greater good in maintaining order in marches such as this. I concur with the point that the majority of students were well behaved. The president of the Union of Students in Ireland, Mr. Gary Redmond, said on the day that he was saddened by the actions of a minority of protesters. It is clear there was a strong effort by a number of people who are not students, or if they are, were associated with a number of groups there to cause trouble. I completely concur with Deputy Shatter.

Does the Minister agree that in demonstrations such as this, where there appears to be a minority intent on creating trouble, it is of enormous importance that the Garda Síochána is conscious of who these people are, that there is no overreaction and that innocent individuals behaving correctly do not find themselves confronted in an aggressive manner so that they feel threatened or are unnecessarily manhandled? It is of great importance that the Garda Síochána, in maintaining order, is not a cause of disorder and fear on the part of those lawfully demonstrating. In the context of the manner in which this event was policed, aside from the issues investigated by the Garda Ombudsman, is a review of policing methods being carried out and is further consideration being given to a different approach to future demonstrations? Has the Minister sought such a report from the Garda Commissioner?

There is ongoing training of Garda personnel, normal personnel and specialised units with regard to public order. The Garda Síochána reviews and learns from the situation every time an event such as this takes place. Each situation dictates the type of response from the moment it occurs. Due to a number of incidents, the Garda Síochána had to engage with those causing trouble but it did a great disservice to those who were there legitimately and peacefully to protest.

I discuss these issues on a regular basis with Garda Síochána management. I will be liaising with the Garda Commissioner when he has an overview of the incident that took place.

Will there be a report on this event?

Barr
Roinn