Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Export Credit Insurance Scheme

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 25 January 2012

Wednesday, 25 January 2012

Ceisteanna (3)

Catherine Murphy

Ceist:

3Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Jobs; Enterprise and Innovation in view of the recent announcement of a foreign earnings deduction scheme for Irish-employed workers based in Brazil, Russia, China, India and South Africa, his plans to introduce a guaranteed export credit insurance scheme for Irish exporters to these countries; if not, his reason for not introducing such a scheme; if, with regard to such a scheme, he will favour a wholly State-backed model or a partnership with an existing private sector provider; if he will immediately make fully known the content and findings of the 2009 KPMG report commissioned by the previous Government into the issue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3942/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí ó Béal (7 píosaí cainte)

There are no proposals to introduce a Government guaranteed export credit insurance scheme for Irish exporters to these countries. The Government's position on this issue has been informed by the findings of the 2009 report commissioned by my Department from KPMG consultants. That report established that the introduction of such a scheme would be expensive, with significant ongoing costs arising for the State. Annual costs in respect of quite a low level of intervention in the export credit market would be about €1.7 million, and this cost would rise significantly if higher risk profile exports were covered. In addition, it was found that such a scheme would be of very limited impact and that a negligible number of jobs could be connected with such an initiative.

Under EU state aid rules, any such state scheme is not normally permissible for short-term credit insurance. Most Irish exports fall into this category. A temporary derogation was established in 2009 due to the financial crisis at that time. That is now under review and is very unlikely to be maintained. Even under this current exemption, the specific provisions of any scheme must be approved by the European Commission. Approval would include a condition that the level of insurance premia to be paid by companies should be higher than rates provided in the open market. This is a considerable deterrent to business, and some of the schemes introduced by other member states had poor uptake for this reason.

In the intervening two years, there has been an improvement in the market for short-term export credit insurance. Insurers have recovered their capacity for risk and the market has recovered significantly, with both new entrants to the market and new products being offered. This has greatly improved the availability of export credit insurance on the commercial market.

The publication of the detailed KPMG report is not possible. The forensic analysis on the operation of the market for this type of insurance was only possible through the provision of sensitive, confidential data and detailed company specific information to KPMG. This information was provided to KPMG on the condition of strict confidentiality. Given the commercial sensitivity of this material and the limited number of companies in the market, both KPMG and the Department signed legally binding agreements with the insurers that the information provided would not be released.

Additional information not given on the floor of the House.

While the background research and analytical elements of the KPMG report cannot therefore be released, the key overall findings were publicised at the time and supported the view that a State supported scheme of short-term export credit insurance should not be introduced. This remains the position but will be kept under ongoing review, including in light of advice and evidence from the appropriate agencies and business representative groups. As the Government has a responsibility to ensure efficient use of scarce resources, a commitment of large-scale funding to an initiative with marginal benefits for Irish industry and high level risks to the State would be unwise.

In our dealings with Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa - the BRICS countries - we do not have the natural advantage of the kind of relationship we enjoy with Britain, America or Australia, where there are large Irish communities. If we are to achieve the growth rates the Taoiseach talked about today, we must go outside our traditional markets.

It is disappointing that we cannot see the report. Can any element of the report be released? It would be very useful for us to see the benefit of the measure.

There are, possibly, opportunities that are eluding us. For example, at the end of February we will face both a threat and an opportunity. The threat is to our public services. There is also an opportunity in the 7,500 people who will be receiving a lump sum payment. Why do we not look at scenarios where there may well be opportunities for people to invest in a jobs-led initiative where there would be a guaranteed return on their money? The State must be involved. This is the kind of public private partnership that is worth exploring. Can the Minister of State clarify whether part of the KPMG report might be released?

I appreciate the point the Deputy is making. The strict confidentiality clause, which was one of the conditions that applied when people gave information during the compilation of that report, should be respected. We can provide the Deputy with the information that is available from Enterprise Ireland about export figures and the opportunities that are arising in the BRIC countries. The Deputy also asked about investment in jobs and the opportunities that will arise after February. A great deal of work is ongoing at Government level to compile the new action plan for jobs. More lateral themes are being explored as we do that. I hope the Deputy will take in good faith my assurance that we are trying to explore and mine as many opportunities as we can. I say that in response to the point she made about job creation. If I understood the point the Deputy was making correctly, she said we should avail of the intellectual capacity of people who will find themselves in a new situation after February of this year. The State needs to provide opportunities to such people, or engage with them at least.

Almost 7,500 people will leave the public service with a lump sum payment in the coming weeks. A substantial number of them will be looking for a safe place to put their money. We are aware that a substantial amount of money is being saved in this country. The patriotism that is out there can be exploited if there is a prospect of a guaranteed return on an investment in this country that delivers jobs. It is the kind of thing that remains untapped. The point I was making was that a safe location is needed.

I take the Deputy's point. The private investment decisions of an individual are matters for the individual in question.

I take the point that was made about finding a vehicle for a lump-sum investment. I respectfully suggest the Deputy should engage with the Minister for Finance with a view to exploring possibilities in that area.

Barr
Roinn