Bernard Durkan
Ceist:1212. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if he will review the decision to deport a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37931/12]
Amharc ar fhreagraTuesday, 18 September 2012
Ceisteanna (1212)
Freagraí scríofa
I refer the Deputy to my reply to Parliamentary Question No. 202 of 20th of October, 2011. The position is unchanged since then.
The person concerned arrived in the State on 2nd August, 2002 and applied for asylum. His application was refused following the consideration of his case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal.
Arising from the refusal of his asylum application, the persons case was then examined in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended), it was proposed to make a Deportation Order in respect of him. He was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a Deportation Order or of submitting written representations setting out reasons why he should not be deported. He was also advised of his entitlement to submit an application for Subsidiary Protection in accordance with the provisions of the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations 2006. The person concerned submitted an application for Subsidiary Protection and also submitted representations pursuant to Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended).
Following the consideration of his application for Subsidiary Protection, a decision was taken that the person concerned was not eligible for Subsidiary Protection.
The case of the person concerned was then considered under Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement before a Deportation Order was made in respect of him.
The case of the person concerned was then considered under Section 3(11) of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended). The outcome of the consideration was that the decision to make a deportation order in respect of him remained unchanged.
As mentioned in numerous replies to Parliamentary Questions, the above named person has been evading his deportation since 3 November 2009 and should he come to the notice of the Garda authorities, he would be liable to arrest and detention. He should, therefore, present himself to the Garda National Immigration Bureau without any further delay.
Queries in relation to the status of individual immigration cases may be made directly to the INIS by e-mail using the Oireachtas Mail facility which has been specifically established for this purpose. This service enables up to date information on such cases to be obtained without the need to seek information by way of the Parliamentary Questions process. The Deputy may consider using the e-mail service except in cases where the response from the INIS is, in the Deputy’s view, inadequate or too long awaited.