Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Wednesday, 26 Sep 2012

Written Answers Nos. 157-164

Beef Industry Issues

Ceisteanna (157)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

157. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine the degree to which he has become aware of the fact that beef producers in other jurisdictions generally receive more for their product than in this country; if any comparisons have been made with the prices paid to producers in the UK and in this jurisdiction; if any analysis has been done as to the reason for discrepancy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41016/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am aware that returns to beef producers in individual EU markets reflect not only the local supply / demand balance but also overall trading conditions within the internal market and trade flows to third countries. Buoyant European cattle prices in 2011 and 2012 are attributable to a supply deficit throughout the EU and to strong global demand. In fact, Irish cattle prices have exceeded the EU average level for most of the year to date, with the Irish price for the benchmark grade only dipping below the EU producer price in August when countries such as Germany and Italy experienced supply shortfalls which had the effect of driving up prices substantially in those markets.

I am cognisant of the export dependence of the Irish beef industry which means that external market developments largely determine Irish cattle prices. Ireland is a small, peripheral market producing an average of 570,000 tonnes annually, of which some 90,000 tonnes is destined for domestic consumption. Over the past decade, the profile of Irish beef exports has changed from a reliance on volatile international markets to a focus on higher value consumer markets in the UK and Continental Europe. Irish beef is now listed with more than 75 high-end retail chains across Europe. Securing and retaining such a wide portfolio of customers has contributed significantly to higher returns for Irish beef in recent years.

The UK is approximately 80% self sufficient and is, by a significant margin, the main market of Irish beef accounting for around 50% of exports in volume terms. Irish beef comprises over 70% of total UK beef imports on account of our close proximity to the market and our strong customer profile which includes most of the leading retail, manufacturing and foodservice companies. In terms of sensory attributes, Irish beef tends to closely resemble the UK's domestic offering because of similarities in our production systems (i.e. grass-fed steer and heifer cattle with moderate carcase weights, fat cover and marbling). Trade with the UK is impacted by fluctuations in the euro/sterling exchange rate and the extent of Britain's import requirement which is forecast to increase in the short run consequent on a continuing decline in domestic beef production. With consumption expected to remain stable and a continuing reduction in the size of national cattle herd, British beef imports are predicted to grow from 381,000 tonnes in 2011 to 417,000 tonnes in 2013.

A number of factors have been identified to account for the differential between Irish and UK cattle prices. These include a British consumer preference for indigenous beef product. In any analysis of comparative prices, it must also be recognised that UK cattle prices are currently among the highest in the EU. Moreover, a price differential makes Irish beef products competitive in the UK market such that Ireland supplies the bulk of the UK's import demand notwithstanding additional logistical and processing costs incurred in shipping to that market. When comparing Irish and UK cattle prices, it be noted too that there is a significant exchange rate effect making the UK price appear even higher. For instance, the current GB R4L grade steer price, averaging Stg £350.9 pence/kg (deadweight), is equivalent to 439 cent/kg (deadweight). If converted at the rate prevailing a year ago, there would be a reduction in euro terms of almost 40 cents.

In the longer term, the industry aims to maximise returns for Irish beef through its Repositioning and Differentiation strategy that focuses on the key attributes of Irish beef: environmentally sustainable, grass-based production systems, full traceability, Quality-Assurance at all stages and superior eating quality.

School Absenteeism

Ceisteanna (158, 159)

Charlie McConalogue

Ceist:

158. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if she will provide a breakdown of the most recent truancy rates for Dublin broken down on an area basis. [40929/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Charlie McConalogue

Ceist:

159. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if he will provide a breakdown of the most recent truancy rates broken down on a county basis. [40930/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 158 and 159 together.

Under the Education (Welfare) Act, 2000 all recognised schools are obliged to submit an Annual Attendance Report to the National Educational Welfare Board (NEWB), which operates under the remit of my Department, on the levels of school attendance each year. The data collected on non-attendance in primary and post-primary schools through the Annual Attendance Report are collated, analysed and published on an academic year basis by the NEWB. This data can be used to monitor the levels of attendance, exclusions and suspensions across all of the country's primary and post-primary schools.

A county breakdown of the attendance rates up to the 09/10 school year, this being the most recent period for which published data is available, is provided within these reports. The Board advises that data are not collated in such a way as to allow all the breakdowns requested by the Deputy. The series of reports is available in full on the website of the NEWB at www.newb.ie.

School Funding

Ceisteanna (160)

Peter Mathews

Ceist:

160. Deputy Peter Mathews asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if a decision has been reached in respect of funding for a school (details supplied) in Dublin 24; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [40874/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

My Department has received a proposal from Citywise seeking funding for a service in Dublin 24. The Citywise service involves the provision of a programme to children who are not participating in school. I have been advised by officials of my Department that this provision is not a recognised school within the meaning of the Education Act, 1998. The Minister for Education and Skills has overall responsibility under the Education Act, 1998 for the funding of recognised schools and education providers within the formal education system.

The Citywise education provision has not been funded by my Department. Furthermore, as a standalone project it does not come within the School Completion Programme funded by my Department which aims to support school attendance and retain children in the recognised school system. Some 31 recognised schools in Dublin 24 are involved in 6 local School Completion projects which are coordinated by the National Educational Welfare Board (NEWB). The basis of the Citywise proposal is complex and its consideration requires a collaborative approach by a number of my Department's key partners, including the Department of Education and Skills and the NEWB.

In July, officials of my Department arranged a meeting with Citywise which was attended by officials of the Department of Education and Skills and Officers of the NEWB including the Chief Executive. At that meeting, the model of education provision, the target group of children for whom the service would be provided and the resourcing and funding requirements were discussed. The need for compliance with the statutory obligations to ensure that children are registered with the NEWB as being in receipt of an education in a place other than a recognised school was discussed with Citywise management. The registration process will initiate an assessment of the education provision in question, which is an important requirement in line with NEWB's responsibility to ensure a child's right to an education. I am advised that the officers of the NEWB are available to advise Citywise on the application process in this regard. The NEWB is also examining the educational support services in Dublin 24 under its remit with a view to enhancing integration and collaboration between these established services and Citywise.

My officials continue to engage on this matter with the Department of Education and Skills, while drawing upon the expertise of the NEWB, with a view to exploring how the services provided by Citywise to children might be supported through the formal education system. I will advise the Deputy of the outcome of the case in due course.

Constitutional Amendment on Children

Ceisteanna (161)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

161. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if she is satisfied regarding the availability of sufficient personnel to ensure the full implementation of any legislation arising from the forthcoming referendum on the rights of children; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [40878/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

In conjunction with the 31st Amendment to the Constitution Bill I have produced the General Scheme of the Draft Adoption (Amendment) Bill 2012 the primary purpose of which is to set out legislative changes to follow on from the Constitutional Referendum on Children, if passed.

- The provisions of the draft Adoption (Amendment) Bill 2012 aim to amend the Adoption Act 2010 (the '2010 Act') to provide for the following:

- Non-voluntary adoption of a child where the parents have failed in their duty towards the child: The draft Bill will change the criteria, applicable under section 54 of the 2010 Act, under which the High Court may authorise the making of an adoption order without parental consent, in a case of a child who is in the care of the prospective adopters for a period of at least 18 months and where the child's parents have failed in their parental duty to the child for a period of at least 3 years and in circumstances where there is no reasonable prospect of the parent resuming care of the child.

- Voluntary placement for adoption of a child of marital parents: The draft Bill provides for the voluntary placement for adoption and the subsequent adoption of a child of married parents, in circumstances where both parents place the child for adoption. This is not possible under present law.

The resource implications of these amendments are under consideration.

Child Abuse Prevention

Ceisteanna (162)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

162. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if arising from the number of reports of child abuse received by her Department in the past year, she is satisfied that structures can be put in place to address such issues with particular reference to early intervention; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [40879/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The issue raised by the Deputy is at the heart of the Government's programme of reform of children and family services. The need to realign existing services and to provide earlier intervention is accepted and was emphasised in the recent Report of the Task Force on the Child and Family Support Agency (CFSA). The Task Force emphasised the importance of identifying problems and providing supports at an early stage. It recommended that in addition to child welfare and protection services, the core services into the new CFSA must include a broad based range of primary prevention, early intervention, family support and therapeutic care and preventions.

The HSE National Director, Mr. Gordon Jeyes, is leading a programme of reform consistent with this objective in order to ensure that there is:

- a closer integration across family support, child protection, and child and adult mental heath services;

- better integration of services and information;

- a model of managing referrals to ensure rapid response to welfare as well as child protection concerns, known as the differential response model.

This work will continue and will be an important feature of the remit in the new Child and Family Support Agency when established in early 2013.

Education Welfare Service Provision

Ceisteanna (163)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

163. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if she will indicate arising from reports her Department may have received from school authorities throughout the country appertaining to the health and welfare of children, if she intends to take any particular or specific measures to combat issues arising; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [40881/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The National Educational Welfare Board (NEWB) was established under the Education (Welfare) Act, 2000. The NEWB is a statutory agency under the remit of my Department. It has responsibility to ensure that every child attends school regularly, or otherwise receives a certain minimum education, to support regular school attendance, tackle problems of absenteeism and to provide an educational welfare service. The NEWB receives information and referrals from, amongst others, school authorities relating to concerns for the educational welfare of individual children. The NEWB advises that when a young person is referred to the Board by a school, parent or another agency the initial work of the Education Welfare Officer is to assess the nature, scope and depth of the problem.

This action taken then falls into two distinct categories. The first is a brief intervention whereby low level intervention proportionate to the need of the individual and the family can often effectively resolve the issue, thus preventing attendance problems escalating. For example, this work includes assistance with finding a school place and advice and support around Section 29 Appeals, suspensions and expulsions. In 2011, the Board reports that it worked with 12,062 children and families in providing assistance at this level. Problems of poor school attendance that are the manifestation of more complex and deep rooted difficulties can take significant time, expert help and on-going support from the NEWB to make progress. Such work can involve developing a plan with the family, young person and school to address the various barriers identified. These intensive interventions are used when brief interventions have not been successful, or are not appropriate in the circumstances. In 2011 there were a total of 3,845 children who received an intensive intervention from the Educational Welfare Service.

The National Educational Welfare Board also convenes an Education Partners Advisory Group, which consists of representative bodies from within the education sector including management body associations, school principal networks and school staff representative groups. The terms of reference for this group include addressing issues that arise for schools and the NEWB in matters relating to the promotion of children's educational welfare.

Youth Services Provision

Ceisteanna (164)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

164. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs the extent if any, to which she and her Department have worked out the scale or extent of youth support services required to ensure that young persons can draw confidence from the existence of such support services; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [40882/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

My Department has a range of services in place for young people. Funding of some €56.806m is available from my Department in 2012 to support the provision of youth services and programmes to young people throughout the country through a number of schemes. These schemes include the Youth Service Grant Scheme, the Special Projects for Youth Scheme, the Young People's Facilities and Services Fund and certain other provisions including the Local Youth Club Grant Scheme, Youth Information Centres, the European Youth in Action Programme (administered by Léargas – the Exchange Bureau) and Gaisce – the President's Award.

The main objectives of the Youth Affairs area of my Department are to develop and implement coherent, coordinated and relevant youth policies and strategies to support the youth sector in providing effective non-formal education and developmental opportunities for young people through which they can enhance and develop their personal and social skills and competencies. These opportunities also equip young people with applicable and transferable skills and competences which can prove highly-valuable for young people and can help them address the various challenges, including socio and economic challenges, faced by them.

Under the Special Projects for Youth Scheme grant-aid is made available to organisations and groups for specific projects which seek to address the needs of young people who are disadvantaged due to a combination of factors e.g., social isolation, substance misuse, homelessness, early school leaving and unemployment. Projects focus on the personal and social development of participants to enable them to realise their potential. There are currently 181 projects funded under this scheme and funding of €17.042m has been allocated for 2012. The Young Peoples Facilities and Services Fund (Rounds 1 and 2) assists in the development of preventative strategies in a targeted manner through the development of youth facilities, including sports and recreational facilities, and services in disadvantaged areas where a significant drug problem exists or has the potential to develop. Funding of €21.332m has been allocated to these schemes in 2012.

Other support services for young people include the Local Drug Task Force projects and the Local Youth Club Grant Scheme. Local Drug Task Force projects provide a range of supports for young people by way of targeted drug prevention and awareness programmes as well as referrals. Funding of €1.34m has been allocated for this purpose in 2012. The Local Youth Club Grant Scheme supports youth work activities at a local level. These grants are made available to all youth clubs and groups through local Vocational Education Committees. €1.035m has been made available for youth clubs in 2012.

My Department is developing a new youth policy framework which my Department for publication in 2013 to enhance the development, participation and support of young people in youth services. The policy framework will facilitate and promote co-ordination and coherence across departments and front line youth services. It will set out the priorities to be achieved for effective and responsive support services for young people in the years ahead.

Barr
Roinn