Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Wednesday, 31 May 2017

Written Answers Nos 65-103

Construction Industry

Ceisteanna (65, 84)

Joan Collins

Ceist:

65. Deputy Joan Collins asked the Minister for Social Protection the estimated loss in employers' PRSI payments to his Department for the year ending 31 December 2015 in view of the amount of bogus self-employment within the construction sector, which has been identified in a report (details supplied), in which it has identified a loss of €83 million in tax and PRSI payments to the State; and the mechanism he or his departmental officials have put in place to end this PRSI avoidance measure by unscrupulous employers in the construction sector that only engage workers on a bogus self-employed basis. [25975/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Joan Collins

Ceist:

84. Deputy Joan Collins asked the Minister for Social Protection when the report on the intermediary type employment structures and self-employment arrangements will be released; and if this report is essentially bogus self employment in the construction industry. [25930/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 65 and 84 together.

I am aware of the report on ‘bogus self-employment’ that the Deputy refers to. It was submitted by TASC to the interdepartmental group on disguised employment as part of its public consultation. The interdepartmental working group, comprising officials from the Department of Social Protection, the Department of Finance and the Revenue Commissioners, has been examining the issue of disguised employment. To inform the work of the group, a public consultation was undertaken in 2016. The focus of the consultation was on the use of intermediary-type employment structures and self-employment arrangements, such as managed and personal services companies and their impact on income tax and PRSI. This includes situations where an individual establishes a company to provide his or her services to an employer, but who is dependent on, and under the control of, a single employer.

The consultation received 23 submissions from interested parties, including employers, trade unions, professional bodies and individuals. The working group is currently finalising its report. I understand that the report will be submitted to the Minister for Finance and I very shortly.

I look forward to seeing the report and I will then consider, along with my colleague the Minister for Finance, what steps may be required to address any issues arising.

With regard to the current methods used to identify and address misclassification of workers as self-employed, Department inspectors carry out visits to a wide range of businesses, (including but not limited to construction sector businesses) as part of their on-going compliance operations. In certain instances inspections are undertaken jointly with other State agencies such as the Revenue Commissioners and the Workplace Relations Commission. Such inspections are fact-finding visits as a result of which evidence of compliance or non-compliance may be detected. Where evidence of non-compliance or misclassification of employment status is detected this will be pursued. Where details of specific cases are supplied to the Department, they are investigated and the insurability of the person concerned is determined.

Arrears of PRSI are calculated and collected where incidences of misclassification of workers as self-employed are detected. Where an employee has been misclassified as self-employed, his/her social insurance record will be updated to reflect the correct rate of social insurance. Under the provisions of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act, there are specific offences in relation to employment contributions, their remittance and the maintenance of prescribed wages and employment records. On conviction, fines and or imprisonment can ultimately be imposed.

There are no quantitative data on the incidence of bogus self-employment. It is therefore not possible to estimate the loss in employers' PRSI payments to my department for the year ending 31 December 2015.

Employment Support Services

Ceisteanna (66)

Willie O'Dea

Ceist:

66. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Social Protection his plans to assist those that are long-term unemployed back into the workforce; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25711/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Government policy to reduce unemployment is twofold. First, through policies set out in the Action Plan for Jobs, to create an environment in which business can succeed and create jobs; and second, through Pathways to Work to ensure that as many as possible of these new jobs and other vacancies that arise in our economy are filled by people taken from the Live Register, and in particular the long-term unemployed.

Reflecting the impact of government policy, and the overall improvement in the labour market, the long term unemployment rate has fallen rapidly since it peaked at 9.5% in Q1 2012. The most recent figure is 3.6% in Q1 2017, and a strong downward trend continues.

The Pathways to Work 2016-2020 strategy continues to prioritise actions for the long-term unemployed. This includes the payment-by-results services of JobPath to engage more systematically with the long-term unemployed; providing targeted wage subsidies under JobsPlus; and reserved places for long-term unemployed jobseekers on employment and training programmes.

I am confident these measures, and continuing economic recovery, will support further reductions in long-term unemployment and add to the substantial improvements that have already been seen over the last few years.

School Meals Programme

Ceisteanna (67)

Mattie McGrath

Ceist:

67. Deputy Mattie McGrath asked the Minister for Social Protection the funding provided to schools in County Tipperary for the school meals scheme; if he will expand the scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24779/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The school meals programme provides funding towards the provision of food to 1,460 schools and organisations benefitting over 200,000 children at a total cost of some €47.7 million in 2017. As part of Budget 2017, the funding for the scheme was substantially increased this year by an additional €5.7 million (representing almost 14% over the previous year’s allocation) which will benefit over 50,000 children. For the 2016/2017 academic year, a total of some €1.2 million has been allocated to 43 schools in Tipperary benefitting over 4,360 children.

In recent years priority for new applications for funding had been given to schools which are part of the DEIS programme. From September 2016 additional funding is available to all DEIS schools to provide breakfast and lunch to the majority of pupils. Budget 2017 funding also provides for the inclusion in the scheme, from September 2017, of up to 240 new schools supporting 47,000 children. This includes support to those schools being brought into DEIS and the extension of the scheme to breakfast clubs in non-DEIS schools, which is the first time in many years that increased payments will be provided outside of DEIS. The 240 schools selected, following engagement with the Department of Education and Skills, have been contacted by my Department to join the scheme from September. Those selected include 19 schools in Tipperary with a combined enrolment of over 3,100 children, of which applications have been received from 13 schools to date.

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Question No. 68 answered with Question No. 38.

Drug Treatment Programmes

Ceisteanna (69)

Maureen O'Sullivan

Ceist:

69. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Social Protection the status of the specific community employment drug rehabilitation programmes in view of recent changes to community employment eligibility and so on; and if his attention has been drawn to the special skill sets required for the supervisors on those particular schemes. [25901/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I want to assure the Deputy that the status of the specific Community Employment (CE) Drug Rehabilitation Programme will not be affected by the proposed changes in CE eligibility. The Drugs Programme Framework, including the revised special conditions under which CE is delivered, will continue to apply. The CE eligibility conditions will continue to be waived for participants who are referred to a CE drug rehabilitation place. The entry age for a drug rehabilitation place is set at 18 years of age.

As the Deputy will be aware, the focus of the CE drug schemes is on rehabilitation, education and training and personal/social development. Multi-agency co-operation – with the HSE and Local Education and Training Boards (LETBs) - is essential for the achievement of successful outcomes of participants. The inter-agency DSP CE Drug Advisory Group (DAG) works to ensure that the programme meets the needs of the referred target group and remains relevant and effective. In addition to participation on the dedicated schemes, referred clients may also take up places on mainstream CE schemes.

The skills set for a CE Supervisors on the drug rehabilitation programme have been reviewed and updated in recognition of the competencies required to deliver a drug rehabilitation programme. The revised skill set was agreed with the DSP CE DAG. Furthermore, as part of the revised conditions and to ensure the effective delivery of the drug programme, the “support worker” element of programme delivery has been strengthened and the role expanded to enable mainstream CE participants, with an interest in addiction, to apply to join a rehabilitation scheme and pursue relevant training and development.

The Deputy should note that at the end of Dec. 2016, there were 1,125 participants on drug rehabilitation places on CE. This includes 987 participants referred for rehabilitation and 138 support workers who support the delivery of the places.

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Child Benefit Eligibility

Ceisteanna (70)

Shane Cassells

Ceist:

70. Deputy Shane Cassells asked the Minister for Social Protection his plans to extend child benefit entitlement to parents of full-time students in second level education that are over 18 years of age; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25837/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Child Benefit is a monthly payment made to families with children in respect of all qualified children up to the age of 16 years. The payment continues to be paid in respect of children up to their 18th birthday who are in full-time education, or who have a disability. Child Benefit is currently paid to 623,135 families in respect of some 1.2 million children, with an estimated expenditure of over €2 billion in 2017.

Budget 2009 reduced the age for eligibility for Child Benefit from 19 years to less than 18 years. A value for money review of child income supports, published by the Department of Social Protection in 2010, found that the participation pattern of children in education supports the current age limit for Child Benefit.

Extending Child Benefit entitlement to parents of full time students in second level education that are over 18 years of age would not be a targeted approach given the universality of Child Benefit. The adoption of such a proposal would have significant cost implications and would have to be considered in an overall budgetary context.

Families on low incomes can avail of a number of social welfare schemes that support children in full-time education until the age of 22, including:

- qualified child increases (IQCs) with primary social welfare payments;

- family income supplement (FIS) for low-paid employees with children;

- the back to school clothing and footwear allowance for low income families (paid at the full-time second level education rate).

I am satisfied these schemes provide targeted assistance that is directly linked with household income and thereby supports low-income families with older children participating in full-time education.

Question No. 71 answered with Question No. 63.

Child Benefit Eligibility

Ceisteanna (72)

John Brady

Ceist:

72. Deputy John Brady asked the Minister for Social Protection his Department’s definition of a "child" in view of its interpretations under qualified child and child benefit payments; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25898/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The legislation underpinning the definition of a child for the purposes of Child Benefit are contained in Sections 219 and 220 of the 2005 Social Welfare Consolidation Act.

As a universal payment Child Benefit provides assistance to eligible families in recognition of the extra costs associated with raising children.

Increases for a Qualified Child (IQCs) are paid as child-related supplements to most weekly social welfare payments in recognition of the need for greater incomes among benefit-dependent households with dependent children.

IQC payments do not of themselves constitute a specific social welfare scheme and entitlement to the appropriate primary adult payment must be established in the first instance.

The legislation is scheme specific because each scheme has a different set of objectives and qualifying criteria.

Extending Child Benefit entitlement to parents of full time students over 18 years of age would not be a targeted approach given the universality of Child Benefit. The adoption of such a proposal would have significant cost implications and would have to be considered in an overall budgetary context.

Families on low incomes can avail of a number of social welfare schemes that support children in full-time education until the age of 22, including:

- qualified child increases (IQCs) with primary social welfare payments;

- family income supplement (FIS) for low-paid employees with children;

- the back to school clothing and footwear allowance for low income families (paid at the full-time second level education rate).

I am satisfied these schemes provide targeted assistance that is directly linked with household income and thereby supports low-income families with older children participating in full-time education.

State Pensions Reform

Ceisteanna (73)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Ceist:

73. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Social Protection if, in view of his interest in those who get up early in the morning, he will give a commitment to ending the pension inequality that has emerged due to cuts to the State pension in previous budgets and is experienced by many who spent many years getting up early in the morning; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25954/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The overall concern in recent years has been to protect the value of weekly social welfare rates. Expenditure on pensions, at approximately €7 billion, is the largest block of expenditure in my Department, representing over 36% of overall expenditure. Due to demographic changes, my Department’s spending on older people is increasing year on year. Maintaining the rate of the State pension and other payments is critical in protecting people from poverty.

Each year more people are living to pension age and living longer in retirement. As a result of this demographic change, the number of State pension recipients is increasing by approximately 17,000 annually. This has significant implications for the future costs of State pension provision which are currently increasing by approximately €1 billion every 5 years. The purpose of changes to the State pension is to make the pension system more sustainable in the context of increasing life expectancy.

Accordingly, the conditions for the State pension (contributory), which is the pension based on PRSI contributions, are reviewed on an ongoing basis. A number of significant reforms to State pensions were introduced in recent years which has allowed my Department to maintain the value of the State pension, and indeed increase it in the last two Budgets.

Where people who were unattached to the labour market during most of their adult lives cannot qualify for a contributory pension in their own right as they have paid few or no contributions, or cannot qualify for a full rate as a result of an intermittent PRSI record, the social protection system provides alternative methods of supporting such pensioners in old age. If their spouse has a contributory pension, they may qualify for an Increase for a Qualified Adult amounting up to 90% of a full rate pension, which by default is paid directly to them. Alternatively, they may qualify for a means-tested State Pension (non-contributory), amounting up to 95% of the maximum contributory pension rate. The rate of payment does not include rent allowance, household benefits or fuel allowance, which would be paid as additional payments where applicable.

Where the pensioner is widowed, there is a pension which is based on either their spouses’ PRSI record or their own, and generally at the maximum contributory pension rate.

It should be noted that the average personal payments made by my Department to men and women of this age are close to parity, with a differential of 2%, and this is reflected in CSO figures which show women over 65 are 0.3% more likely to be at risk of poverty than their male counterparts (10.8% compared to 10.5%), and men over 65 are 0.3% more likely than women of that age to be in consistent poverty (2.9% compared to 2.6%). Most people will understand that such small differentials are statistically insignificant, and when it comes to the main domestic social indicators of poverty, men and women over 65 are at parity.

It might also be noted that both of these indicators show that men and women over 65 are far less likely to be in poverty than working-age people, who are the ones funding pensions on a pay as you go basis through current PRSI deductions, as 16.9% of the general population are at risk of poverty, and 8.7% are in consistent poverty.

The National Pensions Framework (2010) proposed that a “Total Contributions Approach” (TCA) should replace the yearly average approach, for new pensioners from 2020. The aim of this approach is to make the rate of contributory pension more closely match contributions made by a person. Officials of my Department are currently working on the development of the TCA with a view to making proposals for consideration later in the year. This is a very significant reform with considerable legal, administrative, and technical elements in its implementation. An important element in the final design of the scheme will be the position of people who have gaps in their contribution records for various reasons, and this factor is being considered very carefully in developing this reform. Following completion of the Actuarial Review of the Social Insurance Fund later this year, a refined proposal will be developed. My Department will conduct a period of consultation with relevant stakeholders including interest groups, representative bodies and the Oireachtas. Following the consultation period, I will submit a proposal to Government seeking approval of the new approach.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Social Welfare Appeals Waiting Times

Ceisteanna (74)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

74. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social Protection if he has satisfied himself that adequate resources are in place to ensure minimum waiting times in respect of decisions on appeal in respect of various payments; if every effort is being made to reduce such waiting times to the minimum; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25969/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The average appeal processing times for all appeals determined from 2015 to date in 2017 broken down by all social welfare scheme types is outlined in the tables below. My Department, like all Government departments and agencies is required to operate within a staff ceiling figure and a commensurate administrative staffing budget, which for this Department has involved reductions in staff. The staffing needs for all areas within the Department, including the Social Welfare Appeals Office and all areas involved in the processing of appeals, are continuously reviewed, taking account of workloads, management priorities and the ongoing need to respond to new increasing demands in a wide range of services. This is to ensure that the best use is made of all available resources with a view to providing an efficient service to those who rely on the schemes operated by the Department.

Appeal processing times are kept under constant scrutiny by the Chief Appeals Officer. The Deputy will be aware that significant effort and resources have been devoted in recent years to reducing the length of the time taken to finalise an appeal and that as a consequence processing times have improved quite considerably.

The overall average processing time, across all schemes, for appeals requiring an oral hearing reduced from 52.5 weeks in 2011 to 25.5 weeks in 2015, 24.1 weeks in 2016 and 24.4 weeks to date in 2017. The overall average time taken to finalise appeals decided by way of a summary decision has also improved in recent years from a peak of 25.1 weeks in 2011 to 18.1 weeks in 2015, 17.6 weeks in 2016 and 18.1 weeks to date in 2017.

The quasi-judicial nature of the appeals system means that there are inevitable time-lags involved. The time taken is proportionate to the complexity of many of the issues under appeal which require a high level of judgement, and the need to ensure due process and natural justice. The system is designed to be flexible and fair and allows for review and submission of further information at all stages which is to the benefit of the appellant.

The Chief Appeals Officer has advised me that appeal processing times will continue to be a priority for her office.

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Appeals processing times by scheme 01/01/2015 – 31/12/2015

Average processing times (weeks) Summary Decisions

Average processing times (weeks) Oral Hearings

Blind Person’s Pension

21.1

30.7

Carers Allowance

20.6

25.9

Carers Benefit

19.7

21.8

Child Benefit

24.8

34.7

Disability Allowance

15.8

21.4

Illness Benefit

26.3

33.1

Partial Capacity Benefit

25.7

43.4

Domiciliary Care Allowance

21.7

28.7

Deserted Wives Benefit

19.7

26.2

Deserted Wives Allowance

-

16.2

Farm Assist

21.0

28.6

Bereavement Grant

65.7

26.0

Death Benefit (Pension)

-

22.6

Family Income Supplement

19.4

27.7

Invalidity Pension

26.2

28.4

Liable Relatives

22.8

31.2

Maternity Benefit

22.6

17.5

One Parent Family Payment

22.9

33.9

State Pension (Contributory)

26.0

46.0

State Pension (Non-Contributory)

20.4

30.8

State Pension (Transition)

80.1

53.4

Occupational Injury Benefit

20.3

35.0

Disablement Pension

23.7

35.3

Incapacity Supplement

41.2

51.5

Guardian's Payment (Con)

18.2

27.5

Guardian's Payment (Non-Con)

18.7

31.0

Jobseeker's Allowance (Means)

15.8

26.0

Jobseeker's Allowance

15.2

21.9

JA/JB Fraud Control

-

46.1

BTW Family Dividend

14.1

-

Jobseeker's Transitional

12.9

21.3

Recoverable Benefits & Assistance

21.0

30.3

Jobseeker's Benefit

14.3

21.2

Pre-Retirement Allowance

15.0

-

Treatment Benefit

17.9

-

Carer’s Support Grant *

21.2

23.6

Insurability of Employment

47.6

69.4

Supplementary Welfare Allowance

13.1

23.5

Survivor's Pension (Con)

24.1

46.6

Survivor's Pension (Non-con)

23.7

38.3

Widows Parent Grant

18.4

-

All Appeals

18.1

25.5

* Previously called Respite Care Grant

Appeal processing times by scheme 01/01/2016 – 31/12/2016

Average processing times (weeks)

Summary Decisions

Average processing

times (weeks)

Oral Hearings

Blind Person’s Pension

18.2

33.8

Carers Allowance

17.6

21.6

Carers Benefit

20.7

22.4

Child Benefit

22.1

38.2

Disability Allowance

14.6

20.1

Illness Benefit

27.2

34.3

Partial Capacity Benefit

27.3

33.6

Domiciliary Care Allowance

24.3

30.6

Deserted Wives Benefit

13.0

32.8

Farm Assist

21.9

26.0

Bereavement Grant

23.1

-

Death Benefit (Pension)

19.7

-

Liable Relatives

14.0

16.9

Family Income Supplement

20.4

25.5

Invalidity Pension

21.3

28.2

Maternity Benefit

18.9

21.7

One Parent Family Payment

21.7

31.9

State Pension (Contributory)

25.6

45.9

State Pension (Non-Contributory)

22.7

32.9

State Pension (Transition)

67.7

61.3

Occupational Injury Benefit

25.0

31.9

Disablement Pension

25.8

26.8

Incapacity Supplement

27.7

50.9

Guardian's Payment (Con)

15.8

24.5

Guardian's Payment (Non-Con)

18.4

23.3

Jobseeker's Allowance (Means)

16.7

25.5

Jobseeker's Allowance

16.0

20.9

BTW Family Dividend

21.0

-

Jobseeker's Transitional

19.0

22.3

Recoverable Benefits & Assistance

32.5

31.6

Jobseeker's Benefit

16.0

27.2

Treatment Benefit

17.1

-

Carer’s Support Grant *

18.1

23.3

Insurability of Employment

36.6

85.7

Supplementary Welfare Allowance

15.0

24.1

Survivor's Pension (Con)

16.6

28.8

Survivor's Pension (Non-con)

18.4

23.4

Widows Parent Grant

23.5

63.8

All Appeals

17.6

24.1

* Previously called Respite Care Grant

Appeal processing times by Scheme 01 January 2017- 30 April 2017

Average processing times (weeks) Summary Decisions

Average processing times (weeks) Oral Hearings

Blind Person’s Pension

16.2

30.1

Carers Allowance

19.6

22.7

Carers Benefit

16.3

21.2

Child Benefit

21.2

26.1

Disability Allowance

15.6

20.9

Illness Benefit

23.4

29.9

Partial Capacity Benefit

40.9

35.4

Domiciliary Care Allowance

23.7

29.9

Deserted Wives Benefit

-

13.7

Farm Assist

21.9

22.1

Bereavement Grant

15.1

-

Death Benefit (Pension)

102.1

-

Family Income Supplement

17.7

34.9

Invalidity Pension

15.2

20.6

Liable Relatives

18.0

24.1

Maternity Benefit

17.6

13.2

One Parent Family Payment

25.9

30.8

State Pension (Contributory)

25.7

36.2

State Pension (Non-Contributory)

22.1

35.0

State Pension (Transition)

-

81.4

Occupational Injury Benefit

14.5

32.4

Disablement Pension

18.2

29.4

Incapacity Supplement

54.2

56.9

Guardian's Payment (Con)

19.1

19.1

Guardian's Payment (Non-Con)

12.9

-

Jobseeker's Allowance (Means)

16.2

24.5

Jobseeker's Allowance

15.5

23.6

BTW Family Dividend

17.6

41.1

Jobseeker's Transitional

15.2

29.4

Recoverable Benefits & Assistance

31.9

-

Jobseeker's Benefit

15.7

18.8

Carer’s Support Grant

15.8

23.7

Treatment Benefit

14.0

-

Insurability of Employment

38.1

115.5

Supplementary Welfare Allowance

18.1

24.5

Survivor's Pension (Con)

17.8

21.6

Survivor's Pension (Non-con)

18.2

20.6

Widowed Parent Grant

14.1

-

All Appeals

18.1

24.4

* Previously called Respite Care Grant

Pension Provisions

Ceisteanna (75)

Martin Heydon

Ceist:

75. Deputy Martin Heydon asked the Minister for Social Protection if he will review the pension provisions for foster parents that have to be in the home when carrying out this vital role but are only entitled to credits while the children in their care are under 12 years of age; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25940/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The home-makers scheme makes qualification for a higher rate of State pension (contributory) easier for those who take time out of the workforce for caring duties. The scheme, which was introduced in and took effect for periods from 1994, allows up to 20 years spent caring for children under 12 years of age (or caring for incapacitated people over that age) to be disregarded in the calculation of the yearly average of the pensioner. This will generally have the effect of increasing the yearly average of the pensioner, and may result in a higher rate of pension, depending on their circumstances. Claims continue to be subject to the standard qualifying conditions for State pension contributory also being satisfied, including the requirement that 520 contributions be paid.

Foster parents are entitled to the benefits of the homemakers scheme, on the same basis as other homemakers, and will qualify if the carer is in receipt of Child Benefit. If the foster parent is not in receipt of Child Benefit they can still qualify for the home-makers scheme if the caring periods are confirmed by TUSLA (these are cases where caring is for a short period of time).

The scheme is limited to the age of 12 (except where the child is incapacitated), and most children over that age will be in secondary school until mid-afternoon. This should facilitate such foster parents returning to the workforce, either on a part-time basis, or by availing of a few hours after-school childcare each day. Expanding the scope of the scheme would have a financial cost which would have to be considered in the context of the budgetary process.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Question No. 76 answered with Question No. 54.

Social Welfare Benefits Waiting Times

Ceisteanna (77)

Bobby Aylward

Ceist:

77. Deputy Bobby Aylward asked the Minister for Social Protection the average waiting time for decisions on carer's allowance and domiciliary care allowance applications; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25765/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Carer's Allowance (CA) is a means-tested social assistance payment, made to persons who are providing full-time care and attention to a person who has a disability such that they require that level of care.

This means that the care recipient requires from another person continual supervision and frequent assistance throughout the day in connection with normal bodily functions or continual supervision in order to avoid being a danger to him/herself and is likely to require such full-time care for at least 12 months.

Domiciliary Care Allowance (DCA) is a monthly payment to the parent/guardian of a child, aged under 16 with a disability so severe that the child requires care and attention and/or supervision substantially in excess of another child of the same age. This care and attention must be provided to allow the child to deal with the activities of daily living, and s/he must be likely to require this level of care and attention for at least 12 months.

My Department is committed to providing a quality service to all its customers. This includes ensuring that applications are processed and that decisions on entitlement are made as quickly as possible.

The current processing times for CA applications is 12 weeks and for DCA applications is 16 weeks. Both schemes have seen a considerable increase in applications in recent years. Applications for CA in 2016 were 20% higher than in 2015, while applications for DCA were 16% higher than in 2015. These increases, together with the need to introduce new revised decision making processes in early 2014, to demonstrate compliance with a High Court decision, have impacted on the volumes of applications processed within the set target.

Reducing these waiting times is a priority for my Department and we are working hard to make this happen. As part of its programme of service delivery modernisation, a range of initiatives aimed at streamlining the processing of claims, supported by modern technology, have been implemented by my Department in recent years. Operational processes, procedures and the organisation of work are continually reviewed to ensure that processing capability is maximised.

In addition, staffing needs are regularly reviewed, having regard to workloads and the competing demands arising, to ensure that the best use is made of all available resources. Where additional staffing is deployed to a scheme, there is a time-lag involved while those staff are trained and build up expertise. My Department has seen a significant reduction in average CA processing times from 22 weeks at the end of May 2016 to 12 weeks at the end of April 2017 and expects the processing times for both schemes to reduce further over the next few months, as recently assigned staff get up to speed with the work involved in claim processing.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Question No. 78 answered with Question No. 52.
Question No. 79 answered with Question No. 31.

Social Welfare Benefits Waiting Times

Ceisteanna (80)

Denise Mitchell

Ceist:

80. Deputy Denise Mitchell asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason for the increase in processing times for payments in his Department, including maternity benefit, carer's allowance, illness benefit, invalidity pension, occupational injuries benefit and domiciliary care allowance; his plans to improve performance in this area; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25763/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

My Department is committed to ensuring that claims are processed as expeditiously as possible. Each scheme area is continuously monitored and reviewed to ensure customers are responded to and claims are processed as quickly as possible. However, the Department has experienced some difficulty in recent times with the maternity benefit scheme, where it has not been possible to process all claims in advance of their maternity leave commencement date. Corrective actions have been taken and good progress is being made, with the number of expectant mothers who are impacted reducing significantly week by week.

Schemes such as those referenced in the question that require medical and other supporting documentation can take some time to properly assess, particularly as the opinion of one of the department’s medical assessor’s is routinely required. Increasing numbers applying have also been a feature of these schemes in recent years. As an example, in the 4 year period from 2013 to 2016 the number of applications for domiciliary care allowance has increased by 54%, from under 5,000 to almost 7,500 per annum. In addition to the increased volumes, there has recently also been a significant increase in the complexity and length of time required to process applications.

Efforts continue across all schemes to improve processing times, with a noticeable improvement in processing times for carer's allowance over the last twelve months, the average time to award reducing from 22 weeks in May 2016 to 12 weeks in April 2017.

As part of its programme of service delivery modernisation, a range of initiatives aimed at streamlining the processing of claims, supported by modern technology, have been implemented by my Department in recent years. Operational processes, procedures and the organisation of work are continually reviewed to ensure that processing capability is maximised. Staffing levels are also kept under continuous review to ensure the best use of available resources.

Departmental Reports

Ceisteanna (81)

Denise Mitchell

Ceist:

81. Deputy Denise Mitchell asked the Minister for Social Protection the status of the report into the effects of the cuts to jobseekers' payments on those aged under 26 years of age; when he expects the report to be published; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25764/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The National University of Ireland, Maynooth (NUIM) is undertaking a piece of research at the moment which is examining the effectiveness of the reduced rates in encouraging young jobseekers to avail of education, training, employment programmes and opportunities. My Department has not commissioned the NUIM to undertake this research, rather, as part of an effort to encourage and promote research my Department has facilitated the NUIM access to the data from the Jobseeker’s Longitudinal Database in order to undertake this research. Initial results of the research were published as a working paper in April 2017 and this is available on the NUIM website.

Under Pathways to Work 2016-2020, my Department is committed to review and report on the impact of the reduced payment rates for jobseekers aged 18 to 25. This review will be finalised this year, and will take account of the results of the NUIM research.

Should a young jobseeker on a reduced jobseeker’s allowance payment participate on an education or training programme they receive a higher weekly payment of €160, which is increasing to €193 per week from September 2017. With effect from March 2017, rates of jobseeker’s payments were increased for claimants of all ages as a result of measures I introduced in Budget 2017.

I am committed to ensuring my Department identifies effective measures to incentivise and support young people in finding and securing sustainable jobs. The best way to do this is through engagement processes and by incentivising them to avail of educational and training opportunities, thereby enhancing their employment prospects.

Departmental Reports

Ceisteanna (82, 99)

Bríd Smith

Ceist:

82. Deputy Bríd Smith asked the Minister for Social Protection when the report on the contributory pension scheme will be ready; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26006/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Gino Kenny

Ceist:

99. Deputy Gino Kenny asked the Minister for Social Protection when he plans to report on the pension inequality that has emerged post-changes to the way the State contributory pension is calculated; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26040/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 82 and 99 together.

I understand that the Deputies’ questions relate to a comment I made in the course of the recent Social Welfare Bill 2016, when I announced that the issue of homemaker periods would be considered in the context of the Total Contributions Approach (TCA) reform that is being planned, and would feature in the consultation document produced as part of that process. The aim is to implement the TCA, to replace the current yearly average approach, with effect from January 2020, subject to the required legislative and technical changes.

I have stated that I expect a paper regarding the TCA to be available later this year, following receipt of data from the independent actuarial review of the Social Insurance Fund, which will be used to cost options in this reform. This data is expected in the coming months. Following its receipt that paper will be prepared, outlining and costing various options, including, as promised, options regarding homemaker periods.

It should be noted that there are several payments that are made to people over 66 by my Department, and the average personal payments made by my Department to men and women of this age are close to parity, with a differential of just 2%. This is reflected in CSO figures which show that women over 65 are 0.3% more likely to be at risk of poverty than their male counterparts (10.8% compared to 10.5%), and men over 65 are 0.3% more likely than women of that age to be in consistent poverty (2.9% compared to 2.6%). Most people will understand that such small differentials are statistically insignificant, and when it comes to the main domestic social indicators of poverty, men and women over 65 are at parity. It might also be noted that both of these indicators show that men and women over 65 are far less likely to be in poverty than working age people, who are the ones funding pensions on a pay as you go basis, as 16.9% of the general population are at risk of poverty, and 8.7% are in consistent poverty.

Similarly, EU figures show that Ireland has significantly smaller gender pension gaps and gender poverty gaps for over 65s than is the norm among our EU neighbours, even though some of those have longer periods of higher female participation in the labour market. In Ireland, unlike other countries, the State pension benefits received by a very high paid worker with significant PRSI deductions are identical to those of a part-time worker on the minimum wage in otherwise similar circumstances. It is not the case, as is sometimes suggested, that people with 20 or so years of contributions can expect a full contributory pension, and in most countries, even those with significant homemakers schemes, such a record will generally result in a significantly lower pension than they would be paid had they not had such gaps in their records. A challenge with the Total Contributions Approach, therefore, will be to ensure that the outcomes for women under the new scheme are at least as good as has been achieved to date.

In the meantime, where somebody does not qualify for a full rate contributory pension, they will generally qualify for an alternative payment, unless they have significant additional means. If their spouse has a contributory pension, they may qualify for an increase for a qualified adult amounting up to up to 90% of a full rate pension, which is based on their own means and is paid directly to them. Alternatively, they may qualify for a means-tested non-contributory State pension which amounts up to 95% of the maximum contributory rate, based on a household means test.

Most pensioners would satisfy the means tests for these two payments, and the very large majority of people paid them receive the maximum rate. Those alternatively in receipt of SPC payments at a lower rate, therefore, are among the better off pensioners who have significant additional means, over and above state supports.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputies.

Question No. 83 answered with Question No. 54.
Question No. 84 answered with Question No. 65.

Pensions Reform

Ceisteanna (85)

Thomas P. Broughan

Ceist:

85. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Social Protection when he proposes to publish his plans and costings for a universal pension for all persons; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25715/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I have made pension reform a priority for my term as Minister for Social Protection. To this end I can confirm my intention to publish and start implementing an Action Plan for the reform of pensions over the coming months.

The rate of supplementary pension coverage in Ireland is estimated at 35% of the working population when the private sector is considered in isolation. If measures are not taken to address this low rate of coverage, many future retirees will experience unwanted reductions in their living standards when they reach retirement.

To deal with this situation, as well as a range of other reform measures, this Action Plan will set out proposals for a transition from the current and purely voluntary supplementary pension system to one which will automatically enrol eligible employees into a quality assured retirement savings system. This reform, where the saver will maintain the freedom of choice to opt-out, will encourage long term saving and asset accumulation amongst those who may otherwise suffer a reduction in living standards at retirement and will increase the wellbeing, financial security, and independence of future retirees.

Following the publication of this Action Plan and in order to guide future Government decisions, the detailed evidence building and consultation required to deliver automatic enrolment will be undertaken over an initial project planning phase. This work is needed to inform fundamental choices regarding the preferred operational structure and organisational governance for the new system as well as design elements such as the required contributions, financial incentives and target membership. Correctly positioning/designing each of these will be critical to the success of any system. Decisions on each of these matters will be required to determine costings for the system.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

State Pension (Contributory)

Ceisteanna (86)

Brendan Smith

Ceist:

86. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Social Protection his plans to amend the legislation and regulations for eligibility for the State (contributory) pension (details supplied); if his attention has been drawn to the fact that many persons have been denied full rate of payment due to this method of calculation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25758/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

There are two State pensions related to reaching state pension age. Firstly, the State pension (non-contributory) is a means tested pension and is funded by general taxation. Secondly, the State pension (contributory) is not means tested and is paid from the Social Insurance Fund.

In Ireland, as in other countries, the State contributory pension is primarily aimed at people with sustained contributions towards the Social Insurance Fund which finances it, on a pay as you go basis, and rewards such contributions with greater entitlements and coverage for a range of benefits, including contributory pension entitlements. It is important to ensure that those qualifying for a contributory pension have made a sustained contribution to the Social Insurance Fund over their working lives. To ensure that the individual can maximise their entitlement to a State pension (contributory), all contributions paid or credited over their working life from when they first enter insurable employment until pension age are taken into account when assessing their entitlement and the level of that entitlement.

The home-makers scheme makes qualification for a higher rate of State pension (contributory) easier for those who take time out of the workforce for caring duties. The scheme, which was introduced in and took effect for periods from 1994, allows up to 20 years spent caring for children under 12 years of age (or caring for incapacitated people over that age) to be disregarded in the calculation of the pensioners yearly average. This may have the effect of increasing the yearly average of the pensioner, which is used to set the rate of their pension, and may in turn qualify them for a higher rate of payment. The disregard does not involve the award of credits, and entitlements are still subject to the standard qualifying conditions for State pension contributory also being satisfied, including a minimum of 520 paid contributions being paid before reaching pension age.

This scheme was not introduced retrospectively. My Department has estimated that the annual cost of extending the Homemakers scheme to allow people to avail of the full 20 years currently allowed under the scheme, encompassing periods prior to 1994, could cost some €290m in 2017, and this figure would rise at a faster rate than the rate of the overall cost of State pensions. This is a very significant cost, and the main beneficiaries would be people who already have significant household means, and who do not therefore qualify for an alternative means-tested payment.

Where someone does not qualify for a full rate contributory pension, they may qualify for an alternative payment. If their spouse has a contributory pension, they may qualify for an Increase for a Qualified Adult amounting up to 90% of a full rate pension. Alternatively, they may qualify for a State pension (non-contributory), which amounts up to 95% of the maximum contributory rate.

For example, a person with a yearly average of 20 contributions paid or credited per year may qualify for a reduced rate SPC of €202.80. However, they can instead be paid a higher amount through the non-contributory pension, unless their means are over €52.50 per week (or €105 for a married couple), at a minimum payment rate of €204.50 (maximum rate is €227), which would bring their total personal means (including their pension) to over €257 per week. Their household means test ignores their spouse’s state pension, the capital value of their home, and has generous income and capital asset disregards, where applicable. This minimum of €257 doesn’t include rent allowance, household benefits or fuel allowance. It is also higher than the €238.30 received by a person solely dependent upon a maximum rate State pension (contributory), who would receive no benefit from any change to the method of calculation of contributory pension entitlements, and they would experience a loss if such a change was financed by reducing the core rate of the State pension, or by moderating increases in the future.

The National Pensions Framework (2010) proposed that a “Total Contributions Approach” (TCA) should replace the yearly average approach, for new pensioners from 2020. The aim of this approach is to make the rate of contributory pension more closely match contributions made by a person. Officials of my Department are currently working on the detailed development of the TCA with a view to making proposals for consideration later in the year. This is a very significant reform with considerable legal, administrative, and technical elements in its implementation. An important element in the final design of the scheme will be the position of people who have gaps in their contribution records for various reasons, and this factor is being considered very carefully in developing this reform.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Disability Allowance

Ceisteanna (87)

Maureen O'Sullivan

Ceist:

87. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 195 of 3 May 2017, his views on whether it would be more beneficial to categorise various groupings of persons on disability allowance by type of disability or severity of disability in order that groups that work with persons with particular disabilities can plan resources on a needs-based approach; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25902/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Disability allowance (DA) is a payment for persons with a specified disability who are over 16 and under 66. As a result of that disability, which must be expected to last at least a year, they must be deemed to be substantially restricted in obtaining employment otherwise suitable to their age, qualifications and experience. Applicants must also satisfy a means test and be habitually resident in the State.

In its assessment of a person’s medical suitability for DA, the Department does not dispute the diagnosis(es) of an applicant’s doctor(s). Rather, it considers the severity and expected duration of the condition(s) and the resultant impact on a person’s capacity to work, and assesses to what extent these match with the statutory conditionality of the DA scheme. It would not be appropriate to have a system of social protection where there is a specific benefit for a specific medical condition.

My Department keeps the data it collects under review to see how it might best serve the development of services and will consider the Deputy's suggestion in the context of our ongoing consultation with disability stakeholders.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Garda Vetting of Personnel

Ceisteanna (88)

Willie Penrose

Ceist:

88. Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Social Protection his plans to introduce a centralised Garda vetting system for community employment schemes similar to that operated by an organisation (details supplied) to address the additional cost this is imposing on community employment schemes. [25840/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

It is the responsibility of the Community Employment (CE) Sponsor to ensure that all CE participants working or training with children and/or vulnerable adults go through the Garda vetting process. Garda vetting of CE participants is primarily done through Volunteer Ireland.

The cost of Garda vetting can be recouped from the materials grant provided by my Department to CE Sponsors. I have no plans to introduce a centralised Garda vetting system for CE schemes.

I hope this clarifies the position for the Deputy.

Question No. 89 answered with Question No. 64.

State Pension (Contributory) Eligibility

Ceisteanna (90)

Brendan Smith

Ceist:

90. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Social Protection his plans to implement changes to the State (contributory) pension criteria to ensure that persons that had a break in their insurance contribution records while in receipt of farm assist due to periods of low farm income are not deprived of the full State contributory pension; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25759/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The farm assist scheme was introduced in 1999 to provide income support for low income farmers. It replaced the former smallholders’ unemployment assistance payment. In line with the then existing arrangements for unemployment assistance (including smallholders) and pre-retirement allowance, the income of farm assist recipients was exempt from class S PRSI for self-employed workers.

Recipients of farm assist who had previously paid Class S social insurance had the option of paying voluntary contributions to maintain their social insurance record, provided they satisfied the qualifying conditions. Since 1 January 2007, the exemption from class S PRSI has been removed and those receiving jobseeker’s allowance and farm assist are subject to Class S PRSI as self-employed contributors on their self-employed income, provided their annual income is €5,000 or more.

I have no plans to amend legislation regarding the State pension (contributory), to award a maximum rate payment to pensioners who had such a period during 1999-2006 when they were exempt from PRSI.

However, a person aged over 66 with limited PRSI contributions over the course of their life may claim a State pension (non-contributory) if they have an income need, and this entitlement is not based on payment of social insurance contributions. The maximum weekly rate is €227, i.e., over 95% of the maximum contributory pension rate. While it is means-tested, there are very significant disregards which are to the benefit of claimants, and over 70% of such pensioners are paid at the full rate.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Job Creation

Ceisteanna (91)

Maurice Quinlivan

Ceist:

91. Deputy Maurice Quinlivan asked the Minister for Social Protection the steps he is taking to provide jobs for unemployed young persons, which totalled 12.9% in April 2017, almost double the youth unemployment rate in Germany. [23031/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Government policy to reduce unemployment is twofold. First, through policies set out in the Action Plan for Jobs, to create an environment in which business can succeed and create jobs; and second, through Pathways to Work to ensure that as many of these new jobs and other vacancies that arise in our economy are filled by people taken from the Live Register, including young unemployed people.

To date, these policies have been effective in reducing youth unemployment. The Irish youth unemployment rate has fallen from a peak of 31.0% in Q2 2012 to 13.7% in Q1 2017, bringing this rate from well above the EU average in 2012 to well below the EU average of 17.3% at the latter date (latest EUROSTAT data available). This places Ireland as one of the best performing Member States in terms of reducing its youth unemployment rate. Irish youth unemployment has also been converging rapidly on Germany’s youth unemployment rate, which was about 8% in 2012 and is now just under 7%.

These trends indicate that together with improvements in the labour market and economic recovery, our approach to youth employment, which focuses in the first instance on enhancing processes and policies for assisting young unemployed people to find and secure sustainable jobs, has been relatively successful.

I am confident these measures, and continuing economic recovery, will support further reductions in youth unemployment and add to the substantial improvements that have already been seen over the last few years.

Question No. 92 answered with Question No. 63.
Question No. 93 answered with Question No. 52.
Question No. 94 answered with Question No. 41.
Question No. 95 answered with Question No. 31.

Labour Activation Programmes

Ceisteanna (96)

Willie O'Dea

Ceist:

96. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Social Protection if he is considering providing replacement schemes for JobBridge and Gateway; if so, the detail of such schemes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25708/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The JobBridge scheme was introduced in July 2011 in response to the sharp and dramatic increase in unemployment. A robust external evaluation of the scheme, conducted by Indecon Economic Consultants in 2016, found that it is one of the most effective labour market programmes – increasing participants’ employment outcomes by 32%. It also found that while participants rated the scheme positively on 18 out of 20 aspects measured, most were dissatisfied with the level of payment and a sizable minority rated the scheme negatively on some aspects, for example the quality of training offered. Based on the findings, and taking account of the improvement in labour market conditions, Indecon recommended that JobBridge be discontinued in its current form and replaced with a new scheme. A copy of the full evaluation can be found on my Department’s website (http://www.welfare.ie/en/Pages/JobBridge-Evaluation.aspx).

The Labour Market Council welcomed the report and noted the positive employment impact of the scheme. A majority of the Council similarly recommended that JobBridge be replaced. Having considered the evidence and the suggestions put forward by Indecon and the Labour Market Council, I announced the closure of JobBridge to new applications from 27 October 2016 and my intention to replace it later this year with a new work experience programme better suited to the much-improved labour market and that addresses criticisms of the scheme.

I am very conscious that any new scheme would need the support, trust and confidence of employers, jobseekers and the public. That is why I instructed my officials to consult with key stakeholders before making a final decision on any potential replacement scheme. That process has recently concluded and I will make an announcement after I have a chance to consider the feedback.

The Gateway scheme is a work placement scheme designed to provide short-term work opportunities for unemployed people in Local Authorities. As the economic recovery takes hold and the overall level of unemployment continues to fall, the need to adapt employment programmes, such as Gateway to the changing circumstances, opportunities and the needs of jobseekers has become more apparent and urgent. This is necessary to ensure that the number and nature of schemes, as well as the conditions governing participation on these schemes, continues to be appropriate. It is recognised by Government that these activation schemes are positive initiatives that enable the long-term unemployed to make a contribution to their communities whilst up-skilling themselves for prospective future employment. It is also recognised that long-term unemployment and joblessness remain critical issues. The removal of barriers to employment for those furthest from the labour market continues to be a challenge, even in periods of economic growth. In advance of any possible changes, my Department will consult with key stakeholders.

Question No. 97 answered with Question No. 45.
Question No. 98 answered with Question No. 55.
Question No. 99 answered with Question No. 82.

Brexit Documents

Ceisteanna (100)

Brendan Howlin

Ceist:

100. Deputy Brendan Howlin asked the Taoiseach if he will provide an update on proposals to be published by his Department to address the economic and trade implications of Brexit. [25625/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

On 29 April, the European Council adopted Guidelines establishing the framework for negotiations with the UK on its exit from the EU. On 22 May, the Council of Ministers of 27 adopted a decision authorising the beginning of the negotiations, which are expected to start soon after the UK general election.

The negotiating directives under which the talks will be conducted reflect Ireland's unique concerns - support and protect the achievements, benefits and commitments of the peace process; avoid a hard border; and protect the Common Travel Area.

Now that the terms on which the negotiations are to be conducted have been established, the Government has stated its intention to intensify its focus on the economic implications of Brexit, including on domestic policy measures to reinforce the competitiveness of the Irish economy; to protect it from potential negative impacts of Brexit; and to pursue all possible opportunities that might arise.

Work is underway on a paper, which will be published in due course and which will draw on the extensive work already being undertaken across Departments, including sectoral analyses, and will reflect the core economic themes of my speech to the Institute of International and European Affairs of 15 February, including:

- sustainable fiscal policies to ensure capacity to absorb and respond to economic shocks, not least from Brexit;

- policies to make Irish enterprise more diverse and resilient, to diversify trade and investment patterns, and to strengthen competitiveness;

- prioritising policy measures and dedicating resources to protect jobs and businesses in the sectors and regions most affected by Brexit;

- realising economic opportunities arising from Brexit, and help businesses adjust to any new logistical or trade barriers arising;

- making a strong case at EU level that Ireland will require support that recognises where Brexit represents a serious disturbance to the Irish economy.

Policy decisions in support of these objectives will be reflected in, inter alia, the annual Budgetary process; the forthcoming National Planning Framework 2040; the new 10-year National Capital Plan; the review of Enterprise 2025; and sectoral policies and investment decisions in areas such as agriculture, enterprise, transport, communications and energy.

In taking this important work forward, the Government will continue to engage with stakeholders, including through the All Island Civic Dialogue process.

Departmental Strategy Statements

Ceisteanna (101)

Micheál Martin

Ceist:

101. Deputy Micheál Martin asked the Taoiseach the way in which his Department is delivering on its own strategy statement on planning for the future, particularly on delivery of key infrastructure. [25947/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

My Department's Strategy Statement sets out the key objectives for the Department for the period 2016 to 2019.

The Strategy Statement is aligned to the Government's key priorities and policies, and sets out six strategic priorities, including Planning for the Future.

The Strategy Statement recognises the role of my Department in ensuring that polices are developed to support the delivery of key infrastructure, in particular through the work of the Cabinet Committee on Infrastructure, Environment and Climate Action. My Department also contributes to this objective through the preparation of the annual National Risk Assessment and the work of the National Economic and Social Council. My Department also monitors and reports on delivery across all Departments of commitments in the Programme for a Partnership Government.

My Department publishes an Annual Report on progress towards all the objectives in its Strategy Statement, and the Annual Report for 2016 will be published very shortly.

Brexit Negotiations

Ceisteanna (102)

Brendan Howlin

Ceist:

102. Deputy Brendan Howlin asked the Taoiseach if he will report on the engagements between officials in his Department and sherpas in the governments of other EU member states on Brexit. [25624/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Second Secretary General in the Department of the Taoiseach acts as Ireland's Sherpa and, in this capacity, meets and engages regularly with his EU counterparts.

Since the triggering of Article 50 on 29 March, there have been two formal Sherpa meetings under the Article 50 format - one on 11 April, and another on 24 April. Ireland participated fully in both of these. The discussions focused on the EU negotiating guidelines, which were subsequently agreed by the European Council on 29 April.

Brexit Negotiations

Ceisteanna (103)

Micheál Martin

Ceist:

103. Deputy Micheál Martin asked the Taoiseach if his officials have commenced work on reviewing the necessity of the technical and legal disentanglements that will be required between the north and south of the island in the context of the Brexit negotiations; and the other Departments that are involved. [25945/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Northern Ireland remains a key priority for the Irish Government.

The interests of the island as a whole and protecting the gains of the peace process remain a priority for the Government in the upcoming Brexit negotiations, as we have stated clearly all along.

There has been on going engagement between North and South on Brexit however this has been difficult in the absence of a functioning Northern Ireland Executive. It is critically important to see devolved Government restored and working effectively in the interests of the people of Northern Ireland, in particular in the context of Brexit.

There is ongoing analysis of all Brexit related issues across Government Departments on the full range of impacts including potential impacts on North/South including technical & legal aspects. This work is being co-ordinated through the Cabinet Committee on Brexit and the Interdepartmental Group on Brexit.

The EU guidelines for the negotiations include very strong acknowledgement of our unique circumstances and the need to protect the peace process and the Good Friday Agreement. They provide that existing bilateral agreements and arrangements between the United Kingdom and Ireland, which are compatible with EU law, should be recognised.

The Irish Government wishes to see the closest possible relationship between the EU and the UK as an outcome of the negotiations and is fully committed to membership of the EU while maintaining close bilateral relations with the UK and protecting all parts of the Good Friday Agreement, including North/South Co-operation.

Ireland is not leaving the EU and remains fully committed to our membership of the EU. We will be very much part of the EU team in negotiations ahead. The negotiations on withdrawal of UK from the EU have not yet started therefore we cannot pre-empt the outcome at this stage.

Barr
Roinn