Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Tuesday, 16 Apr 2019

Written Answers Nos. 135-154

Insurance Industry

Ceisteanna (135)

Tony McLoughlin

Ceist:

135. Deputy Tony McLoughlin asked the Minister for Finance the negative effects the insurance industry here is likely to face from climate change; his views on whether the changes to climate policy in accordance with the UN Paris Climate Agreement will mitigate against these concerns; if consideration has been given to the fact that persons may have to pay more for insurance policies due to climate change; the measures that can be introduced to address same; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17230/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The negative effects of climate change on insurers globally, in the form of more frequent and severe storms, floods and droughts, is well documented both in terms of increased payouts and the impact on insurers investment portfolios. In a recent presentation in relation to Climate Change and the Irish Financial System, the Central Bank of Ireland has noted that there has been a tripling of weather-related insurance events since the 1980s with annual average insurance payouts increasing from $10 billion to $55 billion.

Primary responsibility for Ireland’s response to climate change rests with my colleague, the Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment, Mr. Richard Bruton TD. Recently, the Government has given approval to Minister Bruton to develop an all of Government plan (the All of Government Plan on Climate Disruption) which will set out the actions which must be taken to make Ireland a leader in responding to climate change. Minister Bruton will work with colleagues across Government to develop new initiatives across a range sectors and my Department is likely to contribute to this exercise in relation to the issue of the availability and cost of property insurance cover.

It is important that all parties to the UN Paris Climate Agreement, including Ireland, tackle climate change in line with their commitments. Meeting these targets is critical as part of the global effort to limit the extent of climate change. My officials have consulted with Insurance Ireland in relation to the Deputy’s question and they share this view, highlighting the importance of mitigating the effects of climate change through public investment in improving infrastructural resilience, as weather events become more frequent and severe and more costly weather-related losses are being observed not just in Ireland.

In relation to improving infrastructural resilience, the Deputy should note that the current core strategy for addressing areas at potentially significant risk from flooding is the OPW Catchment Flood Risk Assessment and Management ("CFRAM") Programme. The CFRAM Programme focussed on 300 Areas for Further Assessment ("AFAs") including 90 coastal areas, mainly in urban locations nationwide, identified as being at potentially significant risk of flooding. The proposed feasible measures, both structural and non-structural, identified for AFAs are outlined in Flood Risk Management Plans. The Plans set out the flood relief schemes that have already been constructed and those that are currently underway. The Plans also provide the outline of 118 proposed schemes that can protect a further 11,500 properties and the evidence to prioritise their delivery to where its benefit is greatest. OPW have informed us that they and Local Authorities will work closely together on the all of the projects to ensure that they are all implemented in the lifetime of the Programme.

In conclusion, I believe the Government’s extensive flood defence programme demonstrates its commitment to trying to minimise future flooding and thus ensuring that insurance  cover remains available at affordable prices. However, you should be aware that the provision of insurance is a commercial matter for insurance companies, which has to be based on a proper assessment of the risks they are willing to accept. This assessment will in many cases include insurers own presumptions based on their private modelling and research. Consequently, neither the Government nor the Central Bank can interfere in the provision or pricing of insurance products or have the power to direct insurance companies to provide flood cover to specific individuals or businesses. This position is reinforced by the EU framework for insurance (Solvency II Directive) which expressly prohibits Member States from doing so.

Tax Reliefs Availability

Ceisteanna (136)

Charlie McConalogue

Ceist:

136. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Finance if there are changes foreseen in the applicability of the provision regarding the cumulative lifetime cap of €70,000 on the amount of tax relief that can be availed of by young farmers as enacted in the Finance Act 2018 in view of the fact that there is a need to increase the number of young persons choosing farming as their professional career; if there is flexibility in the implementation of the relevant European state aid agriculture regulation for member states; if he has raised this matter and the state aid regulation with the EU Commission; when the €70,000 limit in the Finance Act 2018 will begin to accumulate; if it applies to relief obtained from the day the Act came into operation; if not, if it is retrospective; and if stamp duty relief received by a farmer who inherited land previously counts towards the €70,000 limit. [17275/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Supporting young farmers and generational renewal continues to be a priority for both the Government and the EU, and will form an important part of the CAP post-2020.  I understand that my colleague, the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine, and his Department, are actively engaging with other Member States and the EU Commission on these issues during the current negotiations on the new CAP proposals.  

I am advised by Revenue that Commission Regulation (EU) No. 702/2014 of 25 June 2014, commonly known as the Agricultural Block Exemption Regulation (ABER), is the Regulation under which certain categories of State aid can be granted for the agricultural and forestry sectors.  

Article 18 of the ABER sets out the specific requirements for the granting of aid for young farmers and the development of small farms.  It stipulates, inter alia, that the amount of aid per young farmer is to be limited to €70,000.  This limit is a lifetime limit that applies to the cumulative aid received under all schemes covered by Article 18.  The relevant schemes are:

- stock relief under section 667B Taxes Consolidation Act 1997;

- farm succession partnerships under section 667D Taxes Consolidation Act 1997; and

- transfers of land to young trained farmers under section 81AA Stamp Duties Consolidation Act 1999.

The ABER entered into force on 1 July 2014 and has had direct effect in all Member States since that date.  The Finance Act 2018 contained provisions in respect of this €70,000 limit. This limit applies to claims for relief made in relation to stamp duty for transfers or conveyances of land executed on or after 1 January 2019, and for the year of assessment 2019 and subsequent years of assessment for stock relief and succession farm partnership relief.  Anyone submitting a stamp duty return for conveyances or transfers of land executed on or after 1 January 2019, or income tax returns for the 2019 year of assessment onwards, must have regard to the amount of relief claimed since 1 July 2014. The total amount claimed over the period must not exceed €70,000.  

I am also advised by Revenue that the inheritance of a family farm does not attract a stamp duty charge and, thus, is not affected by the €70,000 limit.  In addition, Revenue is currently revising its published guidance manual on the stamp duty element of the relief to confirm that, where a young trained farmer receives or buys farmland from certain relatives and is eligible for ‘consanguinity relief’, this relief can be applied before the ‘young trained farmer’ relief on the transfer of the land.  As consanguinity relief operates by charging a reduced 1% rate of stamp duty (instead of the usual 6% rate on farmland), the amount of relief allowed (i.e. State aid granted) would be significantly reduced for many young trained farmers and ensure that they don’t breach the €70,000 ceiling.  The following example illustrates how this would apply: 

A young trained farmer gets a gift of farmland from his father in January 2019 which for stamp duty purposes is valued at €1m. Consanguinity relief reduces the stamp duty liability from €60,000 (6% rate) to €10,000 (€1m @ 1%). Young trained farmer relief will then reduce the stamp duty liability of €10,000 to nil. €10,000 is the amount of State aid claimed.

Finally, any changes to the Regulation that gives rise to the lifetime cap can only be considered in the context of the CAP negotiations. In the meantime, the Government must seek to ensure, as with all EU Regulations, that the Regulation is enforced here, or we risk being in contravention of EU law.

Revenue Commissioners Data

Ceisteanna (137)

Thomas Byrne

Ceist:

137. Deputy Thomas Byrne asked the Minister for Finance the number of tax compliance auditors the Revenue Commissioners employ; the number of non-compliant tax cases which were both opened and successfully closed in each of the years 2014 to 2018; the yields obtained in the five principal tax regions in each of those years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17278/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by Revenue that it is an integrated tax and customs administration. Revenue had a total of 1,851 staff assigned to confronting non-compliance at end March 2019. This comprises of staff assigned to anti-smuggling, anti-avoidance, audit and other interventions, investigations and prosecutions.  In addition, Revenue had over 530 staff assigned to debt management at end March 2019.

I am further advised that Revenue always aims to match its intervention options to the compliance behaviour exhibited by the taxpayer. The intervention options range from light touch Aspect Queries through to Investigations for cases of suspected serious tax and duty evasion. Full details of Revenue’s suite of compliance interventions are set out in Chapter 2 Code of Practice for Revenue Audit and other Compliance Interventions.

The following tables set out the number of different interventions carried out by Revenue for 2014 - 2018. The information is broken down by intervention type and by the numbers/percentages that were found to have tax liabilities. The ‘total yield’ figures in the tables comprise of tax, interest and penalties.

2014

Total Closed

Total Yielding

% Yielding

Total Yield €m

Aspect Query

 

 

 

 

Border Midland West

28,589

5,897

20.6%

€24.1

Dublin

32,853

5,152

15.7%

€61.2

East South East

12,493

3,051

24.4%

€20.4

IPD

25

24

96.0%

€0.72

Large Cases Division

4,091

205

5.0%

€46.8

South West

12,137

3,243

26.7%

€32.6

Total

90,188

17,572

19.5%

€185.8

Audit

 

 

 

 

Border Midland West

2,127

1,563

73.5%

€64.2

Dublin

1,959

1,206

61.6%

€91.0

East South East

1,921

1,236

64.3%

€46.7

IPD

141

140

99.3%

€44.3

Large Cases Division

167

94

56.3%

€39.1

South West

1,321

850

64.3%

€53.5

Total

7,636

5,089

66.6%

€338.8

Profile Interview

 

 

 

 

Border Midland West

154

43

27.9%

€0.366

Dublin

415

67

16.1%

€1.6

East South East

201

44

21.9%

€0.288

Large Cases Division

175

45

25.7%

€51.0

South West

215

68

31.6%

€1.5

Total

1,160

267

23.0%

€54.8

Grand Total

98,984

22,928

23.2%

€579.4

2015

Total Closed

Total Yielding

% Yielding

Total Yield €m

Aspect Query

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

26,709

5,145

19.3%

€28.7

Dublin

28,556

4,485

15.7%

€69.1

East South-East

14,762

2,903

19.7%

€19.7

IPD

67

65

97.0%

€6.0

Large Cases Division

4,532

517

11.4%

€74.6

South-West

15,143

4,140

27.3%

€35.2

Total

89,769

17,255

19.2%

€233.3

Audit

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

1,834

1,321

72.0%

€60.9

Dublin

1,632

1,041

63.8%

€77.1

East South-East

1,738

1,109

63.8%

€62.7

IPD

13

13

100.0%

€50.8

Large Cases Division

149

81

54.4%

€32.8

South-West

1,246

835

67.0%

€43.6

Total

6,612

4,400

66.5%

€327.9

Investigation

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

3

1

33.3%

€0.19

East South-East

1

1

100.0%

€0.025

IPD

1

1

100.0%

€1.1

South-West

1

0

0.0%

€0.0

Total

6

3

50.0%

€1.3

Profile Interview

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

138

40

29.0%

€0.526

Dublin

171

52

30.4%

€5.3

East South-East

153

41

26.8%

€1.1

Large Cases Division

155

45

29.0%

€48.3

South-West

230

70

30.4%

€0.908

Total

848

248

29.2%

€56.2

Grand Total

97,235

21,906

22.5%

€618.7

 

2016

Total Closed

Total Yielding

% Yielding

Total Yield €m

Aspect Query

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

23,838

4,350

18.2%

€29.6

Dublin

24,391

4,116

16.9%

€57.9

East South-East

21,784

3,850

17.7%

€31.0

IPD

43

40

93.0%

€7.2

Large Cases Division

3,379

514

15.2%

€94.5

South-West

16,466

4,531

27.5%

€40.5

Total

89,901

17,401

19.4%

€260.8

Audit

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

1,479

1,078

72.9%

€37.7

Dublin

1,483

897

60.5%

€48.8

East South-East

1,653

1,019

61.6%

€46.8

IPD

5

5

100.0%

€2.1

Large Cases Division

158

90

57.0%

€70.1

South-West

1,395

919

65.9%

€42.3

Total

6,173

4,008

64.9%

€247.9

Investigation

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

2

2

100.0%

€0.093

Dublin

25

15

60.0%

€3.4

East South-East

5

3

60.0%

€0.191

IPD

2

2

100.0%

€7.0

Large Cases Division

1

1

100.0%

€23.0

South-West

3

2

66.7%

€0.007

Total

38

25

65.8%

€10.8

Profile Interview

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

243

57

23.5%

€0.566

Dublin

177

60

33.9%

€1.1

East South-East

278

66

23.7%

€1.4

Large Cases Division

106

6

5.7%

€7.0

South-West

284

81

28.5%

€3.3

Total

1,088

270

24.8%

€13.4

Grand Total

97,200

21,704

22.3%

€532.9

 

2017

Total Closed

Total Yielding

% Yielding

Total Yield €m

Aspect Query

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

22,000

3,711

16.9%

€27.7

Dublin

24,149

4,011

16.6%

€57.1

East South-East

20,363

4,167

20.5%

€39.9

IPD

91

84

92.3%

€7.6

Large Cases Division

3,793

250

6.6%

€66.4

South-West

16,944

4,223

24.9%

€48.5

Total

87,340

16,446

18.8%

€247.2

Audit

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

1,221

800

65.5%

€33.8

Dublin

1,335

804

60.2%

€39.3

East South-East

1,426

969

68.0%

€55.1

Large Cases Division

119

72

60.5%

€32.4

South-West

1,119

723

64.6%

€35.7

Total

5,220

3,368

64.5%

€196.3

Investigation

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

5

1

20.0%

€0.048

Dublin

14

7

50.0%

€0.413

East South-East

37

26

70.3%

€4.4

Large Cases Division

5

5

100.0%

€2.7

South-West

5

0

0.0%

€0.0

Total

66

39

59.1%

€7.5

Profile Interview

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

772

139

18.0%

€8.2

Dublin

668

185

27.7%

€2.3

East South-East

1,387

250

18.0%

€2.6

Large Cases Division

138

14

10.1%

€4.0

South-West

978

243

24.8%

€3.1

Total

3,943

831

21.1%

€20.2

Grand Total

96,569

20,684

21.4%

€471.2

 

2018[1]

Total Closed

Total Yielding

% Yielding

Total Yield €m

Aspect Query

 

 

 

 

Border   Midlands West

16,986

3,453

20.3%

€29.0

Business   Division

3,340

479

14.3%

€3.1

Customs   Division

193

26

13.5%

€0.149

Dublin

23,408

4,523

19.3%

€56.3

East   South-East

20,578

4,624

22.5%

€44.8

IPD

296

274

92.6%

€15.4

Large   Cases Division

2,486

269

10.8%

€88.3

Large Corporates   Division

270

11

4.1%

€3.2

Medium Enterprises   Division

347

40

11.5%

€0.622

Personal Division

117

11

9.4%

€0.108

South-West

15,245

3,706

24.3%

€37.5

Total

83,266

17,416

20.9%

€278.5

Audit

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

938

609

64.9%

€45.5

Business Division

90

59

65.6%

€1.9

Dublin

1,141

662

58.0%

€44.8

East South-East

1,094

746

68.2%

€36.9

Large Cases Division

148

92

62.2%

€79.9

Large Corporates   Division

7

3

42.9%

€0.578

Medium Enterprises   Division

33

20

60.6%

€2.0

South-West

1,152

748

64.9%

€34.7

Total

4,603

2,939

63.8%

€246.3

Investigation

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

7

5

71.4%

€0.238

Business Division

2

1

50.0%

€0.01

Dublin

46

29

63.0%

€1.8

East South-East

47

32

68.1%

€3.9

Large Cases Division

16

12

75.0%

€2.1

South-West

14

5

35.7%

€1.3

Total

132

84

63.6%

€9.4

Profile Interview

 

 

 

 

Border Midlands West

1,138

172

15.1%

€3.2

Business Division

146

27

18.5%

€0.147

Customs Division

4

0

0.0%

€0.0

Dublin

1,170

299

25.6%

€3.7

East South-East

1,215

273

22.5%

€3.8

Large Cases Division

175

19

10.9%

€2.1

Large Corporates   Division

28

3

10.7%

€0.148

Medium Enterprises   Division

19

5

26.3%

€0.366

Personal Division

2

0

0.0%

€0.0

South-West

1,181

370

31.3%

€5.7

Total

5,078

1,168

23.0%

€19.2

Grand Total

93,079

21,607

23.1%

€553.4

 [1] Revenue’s structure was realigned 2018 and new National Divisions were established.

EU Investigations

Ceisteanna (138)

Billy Kelleher

Ceist:

138. Deputy Billy Kelleher asked the Minister for Finance the number of Irish cases investigated by the anti-fraud office of the European Commission in each of the years 2010 to 2018; the number of fines that subsequently issued; the number of prosecutions for each such case investigated; the type of fraud identified in Irish cases investigated; the amount recovered to the Exchequer or the EU budget from Irish cases investigated; and the number of recommendations for judicial, financial, disciplinary and administrative action taken by the competent authority here and in the EU in each of the years 2010 to 2018. [17313/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Under the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (Article 325) the European Union and its member states must combat fraud and any other illegal activities affecting the EU's financial interests. In 1999, the European Commission set up the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), as an independent office, to investigate fraud and any other illegal activity affecting EU financial interests, and to help EU member states fight fraud.

The exercise of OLAF's mandate is governed by Regulation No. 883/2013 which refers to the Commission's investigatory powers: fighting fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity affecting the EU's financial interests.

In relation to the investigation of fraud in Ireland, my Department’s role is as a high-level contact point for OLAF in undertaking its work – we put OLAF in contact with the relevant domestic authorities to assist OLAF in undertaking their investigations. My Department does not have any powers to investigate or to prosecute fraud related to EU funds. Addressing fraud is a matter for each individual authority, and their accounting officer who reports to the Oireachtas.

OLAF publishes annual reports on its activities on its website https://ec.europa.eu/anti-fraud/about-us/reports/olaf-report_en. As an independent agency, the release and publication of further detailed information on investigations are an issue for that office.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (139, 140)

Robert Troy

Ceist:

139. Deputy Robert Troy asked the Minister for Finance his views on deferring the additional 1% betting duty tax until such time as he has completed a review of this tax proposal. [17320/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Frank O'Rourke

Ceist:

140. Deputy Frank O'Rourke asked the Minister for Finance if he will consider a deferral of the implementation of the additional 1% betting tax duty until the review of the alternative proposals put forward by businesses within the betting sector is concluded; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17321/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 139 and 140 together.

The increase in the betting duty rate from 1 per cent to 2 per cent, and the betting intermediary duty rate from 15% to 25%, came into effect on 1 January 2019. The last time that the betting duty rate was increased was in 1975 and at 1% betting duty was at an all time low.

Receipts from betting duty represented less than 1 per cent of all excise receipts in 2018 as in previous years. In addition, unlike other excisable commodities, there is no VAT applied on betting transactions. I have outlined why I consider the betting sector needs to make a fair contribution to the Exchequer.

In any discussion on betting duty, we must acknowledge the raised public consciousness of the problem of gambling in society. While problem gambling can result in the problem gambler, and their family, bearing the severest of economic and of course personal costs, the social costs of problem gambling can extend to their employers and to public institutions in the health, welfare and justice systems, such costs ultimately being borne by taxpayers. I have outlined my view that this needs to be better reflected within the betting duty regime.

In the course of last year's Finance Bill process, I acknowledged that small independent bookmakers may have difficulty competing with larger bookmakers with retail and/or online operations. At the time I agreed to review an alternative proposal put forward by the betting sector. My officials are currently considering this proposal, including the compatibility of a core element with EU rules, and will set out analysis and options in relation to betting duty at the Tax Strategy Group (TSG) meeting in July. The TSG Papers will be published on the Department's website shortly afterwards.

Ultimately many taxes on goods or services are passed through to the end consumers and bookmakers will need to make commercial decisions on such matters in their pricing decisions. Betting duty will be given further consideration in the next budget and in that context my decision will be informed by the outcome of the review into the alternative proposal put forward by the betting sector as well as the other considerations which I have set out.

Insurance Data

Ceisteanna (141)

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

141. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if the Central Bank gathers data on the number of SMEs refused insurance quotes from a company for public and employer liability; the number of SMEs that have been refused in each of the years 2013 to 2018 and to date in 2019; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17323/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

At the outset, it is important to note that while as Minister for Finance, I am responsible for the development of the legal framework governing financial regulation, my Department does not collect the type of information being sought by the Deputy.  I am advised by the Central Bank of Ireland that it does not collect this type of information either.

While the Deputy is aware that neither, I as Minister for Finance nor the Central Bank can interfere in the provision or pricing of insurance products, it was recognised that the State could play a role in improving the environment within which insurers operate, thus explaining why the Cost of Insurance Working Group (CIWG) was established in July 2016.

The CIWG has produced two reports and various quarterly progress updates on the various recommendations made by CIWG and endorsed by Government.  The difficulties facing the consumer, voluntary and small business sector from the high cost of insurance premiums are recognised.  In addition, it is also acknowledged that in some cases the survival of a business as a viable entity is being put at peril because of insurance pricing.  One of the key areas raised by various stakeholders to the CIWG is the level of awards in this country compared with elsewhere.  As a result, the Working Group established the Personal Injuries Commission (PIC) and commissioned it to examine this issue amongst other things.  The PIC reported in September 2018 and concluded that soft tissue injuries are significantly higher here than in England and Wales and recommended that action be taken to address this disparity through the establishment of the Judicial Council.  The PIC recommended that this body would become responsible for preparing the guidelines on personal injury award levels, and would replace the Book of Quantum.  In doing this, the PIC believes that the Judicial Council will, in compiling the guidelines, take account of the jurisprudence of the Court of Appeal, the results of its benchmarking exercise etc. 

The current position with the Judicial Council Bill is that the Minister for Justice and Equality has advised of his intention to further this Bill with a view to having it in place as soon as possible.  In this regard, it recently completed Committee Stage consideration in the Seanad.  Alongside this, the Law Reform Commission has included the subject of capping damages in personal injuries litigation in its draft 5th Programme of Law Reform and this work will begin shortly.  It is hoped that if there was a significant move in this area, it could have an impact on insurance pricing and could also help attract new entrants into the market.  Such outcomes would be of benefit to all concerned and in particular to small businesses.

Tax Reliefs Abolition

Ceisteanna (142)

Billy Kelleher

Ceist:

142. Deputy Billy Kelleher asked the Minister for Finance the estimated amount of revenue that would be generated if the abolition of tax relief for private health insurance premiums and the capping of such relief at 12% were introduced. [17414/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by Revenue that, based on 2016 data, the latest year for which a complete set of data are available, the annual yield to the Exchequer from the abolition of tax relief for private health insurance premiums is tentatively estimated to be of the order of €325 million.

The estimated yield to the Exchequer from reducing the current rate of tax relief from the standard rate of 20% to 12% would be of the order of €130 million per year.

Disability Act Employment Targets

Ceisteanna (143, 144)

Brendan Ryan

Ceist:

143. Deputy Brendan Ryan asked the Minister for Finance the number or percentage of employees in his Department and in the agencies under his aegis with intellectual disabilities; his plans to increase this number to promote and support the employment of persons with intellectual disabilities as outlined in the Disability Act 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17487/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Brendan Ryan

Ceist:

144. Deputy Brendan Ryan asked the Minister for Finance if his Department and the agencies under his aegis track the numbers of employees they have with an intellectual disability; his plans to do so in order to help set targets and increase workplace opportunities for those with intellectual disabilities such as those outlined in the national disability inclusion strategy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17504/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 143 and 144 together.

The Disability Act 2005 sets out the legal obligations of public service bodies and includes:

- the promotion and support of the employment of people with disabilities

- compliance with any statutory Code of Practice

- meeting the target of 3% of employing people with disabilities and

- reporting annually on the achievement of these obligations.

The Department of Finance adheres to its requirements as set out by Disability Act of 2005. The Department does not possess information regarding employees who are registered disabled. Staff can volunteer to self-declare a disability.

The Department has a Disability Liaison Officer (DLO) in place who works closely with the National Disability Authority (NDA) to ensure that the Department is fully compliant with its obligations under the Act. All new entrants complete a confidential disability survey which is forwarded to the DLO for actioning, where appropriate. These declarations are amalgamated with an annual survey and forwarded to the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform as part of our annual returns who collate centrally Department/Office annual returns for forwarding to the National Disability Authority (NDA) for publication on their website.

Bi-monthly Disability Liaison Officer Network meetings are held to share knowledge and assist other DLOs across the Civil Service, as well as engaging with staff in accessing training and learning events, where needed.

I wish to advise the Deputy during 2017, the Department satisfied the 3% target of employing staff with disabilities and the Department is aware of the increase in the targets to 6% to be achieved by 2024 and is committed to achieving this revised target.

The following table sets out the percentage of employees with a disability for the years 2014 to 2017. Disability statistics for 2018 are currently being compiled.

Year

Staff employed

No of employees with disabilities

% of employees with disabilities

2014

321

11

3.42

2015

304

15

4.93

2016

301

9

3.00

2017

320

13

4.06

During 2016/17, a major refurbishment project was undertaken by the OPW here in Government Buildings on Merrion Street. As part of that project, for example, electronic doors were installed to assist the movement of staff across our campus.

In terms of communicating with persons with disabilities who need assistance with accessing information, the Department has an Access Officer for Information and contact details are available on the Department's website (www.gov.ie/finance).

The National Disability Act 2005 notes the following:

- A person who has a disability is fully competent and capable of duties if he or she would be so on provision of reasonable accommodation

- The employer is obliged to provide reasonable accommodation – “appropriate measures”

- Appropriate measures should be provided unless there is a disproportionate burden on the employer

The Department of Finance has taken appropriate measures to provide reasonable accommodation to staff in their undertaking of their duties.

The Department’s website, (www.gov.ie/finance ) internal intranet and the Build to Share programmes (ePQ, eSubmission, eCorrespondence etc), which are used to by staff in the course of their work, all have software to aid the visually impaired. The Department's Press Office has worked closely with the IT function on a redesign of the Department's Website in order to be more user friendly and no requests for information have been received, outside of the standard written format, for example through Braille, in the period 2016 or 2017.  

A ‘loop’ system’ is in place in the Department’s Whitaker Conference Room for the hearing impaired.

In four of the eighteen bodies under the aegis of my Department, employees can volunteer to self-declare a disability. These bodies do not categorise the type of disability declared by employees and therefore do not have specific data on the number of staff employed with intellectual disabilities. The following are the proportions of employees who have volunteered to self-declare a disability:

- Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General – 3.57%

- Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman – 5.4%

- Office of the Revenue Commissioners – 5.32%

- National Treasury Management Agency - 4.28%*

*This figure includes staff of the National Asset Management Agency, Home Building Finance Ireland and the Strategic Banking Corporation Ireland. Staff are seconded to these bodies under an administrative agreement with the National Treasury Management Agency.

Four bodies under the aegis of my Department do not directly employ staff, namely the Disabled Drivers Medical Board of Appeal, the Credit Union Advisory Committee, the Credit Union Restructuring Board and the Irish Financial Services Appeals Tribunal.

A further five bodies have indicated that none of their employees have declared a disability:

- Credit Review Office

- Irish Bank Resolution Corporation

- Irish Fiscal Advisory Council

- Social Finance Foundation

- Tax Appeals Commission.

The Central Bank does not currently categorise the type of staff disability and therefore does not have specific data on the number of employees with intellectual disabilities.  Staff of the Investor Compensation Company Limited are seconded from the Central Bank.

Plans received from the bodies under the aegis of my Department to increase the number of staff employed with disabilities, to promote and support the employment of persons with disabilities and increase workplace opportunities for those with intellectual disabilities are outlined in the following table.

Body

Plans

The Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General

Similar to other Departments / the Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General follows civil service recruitment routes and as such has limited possibilities in encouraging people with disabilities.

The office plans to carry out a disabilities survey among employees in due course (to ensure that people that may like to update their disability status are given additional encouragement to do so).

Central Bank State Board (CB)

The Central Bank continues to take action to increase workplace opportunities for persons with disabilities including:

- Proactively attracting persons with disabilities to work with us. Examples of actions include participation in targeted programmes such as the Willing and Able Mentoring (WAM) Programme and a work placement programme with the National Council for the Blind.

- Physical environment: The Central Bank embedded universal design principles into our headquarters on North Wall Quay.

- Reasonable Accommodations: The Central Bank provides a variety of supports for staff who join us with, or acquire, a disability

- Awareness: Including a dedicated Access Officer and disability awareness training programmes to assist frontline staff. We also have an employee led network called the BankAbility Network which aims to ensure that there is a strong and supportive network in place for colleagues impacted by disability and to raise awareness among all staff.

Credit Union Advisory Committee (CUAC)

No direct employees, consists of a 6 member committee set up to advise the Minister

Credit Union Restructuring Board (ReBo)

Ceased operations on the 31 July 2017 and is awaiting formal dissolution.

Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman (FSPO)

The FSPO’s Strategic Plan 2018 - 2021, includes the following commitment:

“Throughout the period of this strategic plan, we will seek to exceed the target that at least 6% of our staff should represent persons with disabilities in line with the Comprehensive Employment Strategy for Persons with Disabilities”

Investor Compensation Company Limited (ICCL)

Staff from the ICCL are on assignment from the Central Bank of Ireland

Irish Bank Resolution Corporation (IBRC)

The IBRC is in wind-down and therefore has no plans to hire any further staff.

Irish Financial Services Appeals Tribunal (IFSAT)

IFSAT does not have any employees.

National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA), National Asset Management Agency (NAMA), Strategic Banking Corporation Ireland (SBCI) and  Home Building Finance Ireland (HBFI)

1) Partnering with the Trinity Centre for People with Intellectual Disabilities (TCPID). In 2018, they placed a Graduate through TCPID for an internship and they look forward to welcoming another Graduate this year.

2) In conjunction with Down Syndrome Ireland the NTMA offered one person a position to work in their IT Department during 2018.

3) The NTMA have also engaged with Specialisterne and AHEAD and filled three positions in 2018 with candidates from these organisations.

4) Finally, the NTMA has also set up as Disability Awareness Team (DAT) in 2016 and the DAT is actively creating greater awareness of the different types of disabilities and a number of talks and training sessions have been delivered on how best to support employees with different abilities.”

Office of the Revenue Commissioners

Revenue has succeeded in reaching the public service employment target of people with disabilities.

Tax Appeals Commission (TAC)

The Tax Appeals Commission is a relatively new agency with 18 employees. The Tax Appeals Commission is committed to supporting and promoting the employment of people with disabilities and will continue to work towards reaching the 3% requirement.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (145)

Róisín Shortall

Ceist:

145. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Finance the supports available for second time buyers who wish to downsize to a smaller more affordable home; if there are restrictions in place under Central Bank rules for second time buyers who wish to downsize; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17615/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Upon selling their primary residence, the vast majority of owner-occupiers are entitled to the full Principal Private Residence Relief to Capital Gains Tax (CGT), provided they meet the conditions of the relief. The relief allows owner-occupiers to retain the proceeds made from liquidating the equity in their home, without being liable to CGT. Downsizers can use the proceeds from the sale of this property to purchase more appropriate accommodation.

Downsizers are ‘Second and Subsequent Buyers’ (SSBs) under the Central Bank’s macro-prudential mortgage measures. As such, the same rules that apply to all SSBs also apply to downsizers. Specifically, a generalised Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio of 80 per cent and Loan-to-Income (LTI) of 3.5 times income is applicable.

In the case of downsizers, the required equity stake for access to an SSB mortgage is likely to be significantly more attainable than would be the case for First Time Buyers (FTBs), or other purchasers. The new accommodation is likely to be purchased at a price below the sales price of the existing dwelling, obviating the need for significant savings as would be the case with FTBs.

The most effective way to support downsizers is to increase the supply of housing and, in particular, smaller units such as apartments. In that respect, recent indicators are very positive. The number of apartment completions doubled between 2016 and 2018, from 1,169 to 2,372. Similarly, planning permissions granted for apartments increased by 137 per cent over the same period and accounted for 46 per cent of all planning permissions in 2018.

I will continue to work with my colleague, the Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Government to support increased supply of all types of housing.

Exchequer Revenue

Ceisteanna (146)

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

146. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the dividend paid to the Exchequer by each commercial State company in each year since 2010, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17635/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I attach a table listing the dividends paid to the Exchequer by commercial State bodies in the years 2010-2018 inclusive.

-

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Aer Lingus

0

0

4,023,271

5,364,361

5,364,361

Bord Gáis Éireann

30,250,981

33,090,793

23,813,960

49,871,305

0

Irish Aviation Authority

0

0

0

5,015,000

4,833

Electricty Supply Board

89,718,346

73,166,534

68,840,492

139,463,125

269,117,188

Bord na Móna

3,295,512

4,115,286

2,375,000

5,000,010

10,612,450

Dublin Port Company

5,500,000

16,500,000

10,200,000

15,000,000

8,000,000

Coillte Teoranta

0

10,000,000

2,000,000

0

6,000,000

Dublin Airport Authority

0

0

0

0

0

Port of Cork Company

0

634,315

358,976

407,094

503,861

Galway Port

0

0

0

30,000

0

Irish Life

0

0

0

40,000,000

0

Eirgrid

0

0

0

4,000,000

0

Ervia

0

0

0

0

171,000,000

Shannon Foynes Port

0

0

0

0

0

Total

128,764,839

137,506,928

111,611,699

264,150,895

470,602,693

Table cntd.

-

2015

2016

2017

2018

Aer Lingus

6,705,451

0

0

0

Bord Gáis Éireann

0

0

0

0

Irish Aviation Authority

6,535,000

7,430,000

9,248,000

19,458,000

Electricty Supply Board

258,717,081

82,165,397

109,967,773

33,056,621

Bord na Móna

10,140,565

3,763,137

2,331,254

0

Dublin Port Company

8,800,000

10,912,000

11,712,000

12,173,000

Coillte Teoranta

4,000,000

7,200,000

8,000,000

15,000,000

Dublin Airport Authority

0

18,300,000

29,100,000

37,400,000

Port of Cork Company

650,435

672,879

693,091

714,000

Galway Port

0

0

0

0

Irish Life

0

0

0

0

Eirgrid

3,000,000

3,500,000

4,000,000

4,000,000

Ervia

151,032,700

134,659,000

148,440,000

139,089,000

Shannon Foynes Port

100,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

Total

449,681,233

268,802,413

323,742,118

261,190,621

During this period, dividends were also paid to the Exchequer by privatised or semi-privatised organisations which were once commercial State bodies. These additional receipts are also included in the table for the Deputy's information.

Information on such dividends and receipts paid to the Exchequer are published on a monthly basis by my Department in the Fiscal Monitor which is available at https://www.gov.ie/en/collection/bf14dc-fiscal-monitors/.

Mortgage Interest Rates

Ceisteanna (147)

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

147. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the weighted average interest rate on all new mortgages agreed, drawn from the retail interest rate statistics published by the Central Bank, for each quarter end since 1 January 2014, in tabular form (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17638/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Central Bank has provided the following data which is indicated (in tabular format) are the calculated weighted average interest rates for new house purchase agreements.

Loans to households for house purchases: 

 -

 of which - new lending incl. renegotiations

 of which - new lending excl. renegotiations

 Mar-14

 3.36

n/a

 Jun-14

 3.27

n/a

 Sep-14

 3.58

n/a

 Dec-14

 3.75

n/a

 Mar-15

 3.60

 3.95

 Jun-15

 3.46

 3.84

 Sep-15

 3.40

 3.76

 Dec-15

 3.42

 3.65

 Mar-16

 3.30

 3.62

 Jun-16

 3.34

 3.55

 Sep-16

 3.26

 3.43

 Dec-16

 3.22

 3.38

 Mar-17

 3.16

 3.44

 Jun-17

 3.22

 3.30

 Sep-17

 3.20

 3.30

 Dec-17

 3.07

 3.18 

 Mar-18

 3.02

 3.20

 Jun-18

 3.06

 3.12

 Sep-18

 2.97

 3.07

 Dec-18

 2.95

 3.01

(Source: Table B.2.1 Retail Interest Rates and Volumes - Loans and Deposits, New Business).

  Notes:           

1. The interest rate and volume data refer to euro-denominated loans vis-à-vis households resident in Ireland and other Monetary Union Member States.  Rates reported are weighted averages for each instrument category. 

2. Data refer to resident offices of banks and building societies.  Credit union data are not included in the interest rates tables. 

3. See Retail Interest Rate explanatory notes for further detail.

Banking Licence Breaches

Ceisteanna (148)

Mattie McGrath

Ceist:

148. Deputy Mattie McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if companies (details supplied) operated in each of the years 1999 to 2008 without a banking licence; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17722/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am informed by the Central Bank that KBC Bank Ireland plc is a public limited company incorporated in Ireland under the Companies Acts 1963 to 2006 (no. 40537) on 14 February 1973 under the name Irish Inter-Continental Holdings Limited. On 25 April 1973, it changed its name to Irish Intercontinental Bank Limited. On 10 January 2000, it changed its name to IIB Bank Limited. On 29 March 2006, it re-registered as a public limited company under the name IIB Bank plc. On 24 October 2008, it changed its name to KBC Bank Ireland plc. The Transferee carries on a banking business in Ireland from its registered office at Sandwith Street, Dublin 2 and is the holder of a licence in relation thereto granted on 17 May 1973 under Section 9 of the Central Bank Act 1971.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (149)

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

149. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding the review of betting duty which is being undertaken; his plans to make changes to the betting duty to take effect in 2019; the timeline for the review; if his attention has been drawn to closures in the sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17726/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The increase in the betting duty rate from 1 per cent to 2 per cent, and the betting intermediary duty rate from 15% to 25%, came into effect on 1 January 2019. The last time that the betting duty rate was increased was in 1975 and at 1% betting duty was at an all time low.   

Receipts from betting duty represented less than 1 per cent of all excise receipts in 2018 as in previous years. In addition, unlike other excisable commodities, there is no VAT applied on betting transactions. I have outlined why I consider the betting sector needs to make a fair contribution to the Exchequer.

In any discussion on betting duty, we must acknowledge the raised public consciousness of the problem of gambling in society. While problem gambling can result in the problem gambler, and their family, bearing the severest of economic and of course personal costs, the social costs of problem gambling can extend to their employers and to public institutions in the health, welfare and justice systems, such costs ultimately being borne by taxpayers. I have outlined my view that this needs to be better reflected within the betting duty regime.   

In the course of last year's Finance Bill process, I acknowledged that small independent bookmakers may have difficulty competing with larger bookmakers with retail and/or online operations. At the time I agreed to review an alternative proposal put forward by the betting sector. My officials are currently considering this proposal, including the compatibility of a core element with EU rules, and will set out analysis and options in relation to betting duty at the Tax Strategy Group (TSG) meeting in July. The TSG Papers will be published on the Department's website shortly afterwards. 

Ultimately many taxes on goods or services are passed through to the end consumers and bookmakers will need to make commercial decisions on such matters in their pricing decisions. Betting duty will be given further consideration in the next budget and in that context my decision will be informed by the outcome of the review into the alternative proposal put forward by the betting sector as well as the other considerations which I have set out.

Community Employment Schemes Supervisors

Ceisteanna (150)

Dara Calleary

Ceist:

150. Deputy Dara Calleary asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if he will implement the 2008 recommendations of the Labour Court in respect of pension entitlements for community employment scheme supervisors and assistant supervisors; the reason the recommendations have not been implemented; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that strike action is impending; if a high level forum set up to discuss the Labour Court recommendation has not met since December 2017; if he will meet with representatives of the community employment scheme supervisors and assistant supervisors in an effort to avert this strike action; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17676/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

This issue relates to a claim by community employment supervisors and assistant supervisors who have been seeking, through their union representatives, the allocation of Exchequer funding to implement a 2008 Labour Court recommendation relating to the provision of a pension scheme.

The matter was the subject of extensive discussion at the Community Sector High Level Forum which was reconvened to examine certain issues pertaining to the Community Employment sector and in particular to ensure that the matter was fully examined having regard to both costs and precedent.

A detailed scoping exercise was carried out by my Department in 2017 in order to comprehensively examine and assess the full potential implications of the issues under consideration.

The scoping exercise clearly illustrated that this matter presents very significant issues for the Exchequer, with a potential cost exposure for the State of between €188 million per annum and €347m depending on the size of the sector which is difficult to ascertain, were consequential demands to be made to fund employer pension contributions for all similar State funded Community and Voluntary organisations. This excludes any provision for immediate ex-gratia lump sum payment of pension for those imminently retiring, as sought, which could, depending on the size of the sector, give rise to a further Exchequer cost exposure of up to €318 million.

The Forum met in the period subsequent to the conduct of the scoping exercise where relevant matters in respect of this issue were discussed in comprehensive detail with the members of the Forum. These discussions provided a clear understanding to each of the parties of their respective positions in relation to this matter and in this context the formal engagement process between the parties was accordingly concluded on this basis.

It continues to be the position that state organisations are not the employer of the particular employees concerned and accordingly it is not for the State to provide funding for occupational pension scheme provision.

Irish Government Economic and Evaluation Service

Ceisteanna (151)

David Cullinane

Ceist:

151. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the cost of the Irish Government Economic and Evaluation Service since its establishment to date; the staffing costs; the commissioned consultancy costs; the specific policies accepted or implemented as a result of the work of the service; the specific policy changes as a result of the work of the service; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17225/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Irish Government Economic and Evaluation service (IGEES), established in 2012, is an integrated, cross Government service that aims to support better policy formulation and implementation in the civil service through policy analysis and evaluation. IGEES is not a standalone service. IGEES staff are an integral part of each Department, adding their skill set to the varied expertise working on policy analysis and formulation as directed by Departmental business plans.

The number of IGEES staff increased from approximately 30 in 2012 to 160 in 2018. The majority of IGEES staff are employed at Administrative Officer (AO) grade. From 2012 to 2016, costs were almost entirely related to pay - for each Department’s existing and newly recruited analysts - and formed part of each Department’s overall pay allocation as presented in the Revised Estimates Volume.

In 2017, an IGEES budget line was established to support the implementation of the IGEES Medium Term Strategy 2016-19. Total expenditure for the IGEES programme line in 2017 and 2018 was €178,111 and €156,491 respectively, while the allocation in 2019 is €350,000. The IGEES programme line supports the delivery of:

- IGEES Learning and Development Framework (accounted for just under 50% of expenditure for the period 2016-17 and delivered a wide range of training courses such as cost-benefit analysis, statistical programming, counterfactual impact evaluation etc.)

- IGEES Research Fund, which supports cross-Departmental research projects (accounted for 30% of expenditure for the period 2016-17 and co-funded two projects on housing conducted collaboratively by the Department of Housing and Department of Finance, which involved commissioning of the survey field work)

- Civil Service analytical capacity building through IGEES recruitment and IGEES internship

- IGEES events including conferences and seminars.

To date, IGEES analysts produced and published over 200 policy analysis papers across all policy areas, strengthening significantly the evidence base for policy formulation in Ireland. The papers were produced by IGEES staff, not by commissioned consultancies. IGEES resources support the on-going work of Government Departments in relation to policy analysis, evaluation and economic appraisal.

IGEES is currently working on a new Medium Term Strategy 2020 -2023. As part of this work, the OECD is carrying out a review of IGEES. The results of the review, expected in Quarter 3 of this year, will inform the development of the new IGEES Medium Term Strategy.

Civil Service Staff Data

Ceisteanna (152)

Dara Calleary

Ceist:

152. Deputy Dara Calleary asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the number of civil servants to date who have applied to transfer from Dublin zone 46 to another county in Munster, Leinster, Connaught and Ulster, respectively, by grade in each Department under the service wide mobility scheme launched on 13 November 2017, in tabular form; the number of civil servants who requested a transfer to Dublin zone 46 by grade based in each province and county outside of Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17264/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As outlined in the reply to Question No.53934/18 of 18/12/2018, the location choices in the Civil Service Mobility scheme are divided into mobility zones rather than county or province. An applicant may express a preference for mobility for a maximum of 3 zones from the list of 46 zones with a choice of any or all organisations in each zone. Staff members can apply for mobility within their current zone (excluding Phase 1B, Zone 46 Dublin) as well as other zones. A number of mobility zones also have an option to include or exclude a choice of satellite towns.

There are currently 822 staff members (439 COs and 383 EOs), based in Zone 46 (Dublin), with applications for Mobility to organisations located outside of Dublin. This equates to 12% of the c.7,000 participating staff members in Dublin (55% CO: 35% EO), while 88% wish to remain in their chosen location.

There are 61 staff members (43 COs and 18 EOs), based in locations outside of Dublin, with applications for Mobility to organisations located in Zone 46.

It should be noted that the Mobility scheme launched following an era of moratorium and low levels of staff transfers in the Civil Service and these factors would contribute to the initial high surge of interest in the scheme.

Phase 1B for the general Civil Service grades of CO and EO for mobility within the zone of Dublin and Phase 2 for the general Civil Service grades of HEO and AP will launch at a later date. Further information on the Mobility scheme is available to view at http://hr.per.gov.ie/civil-service-mobility/.

Disability Act Employment Targets

Ceisteanna (153, 154)

Brendan Ryan

Ceist:

153. Deputy Brendan Ryan asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the number or percentage of employees in his Department and in the agencies under his aegis with intellectual disabilities; his plans to increase this number to promote and support the employment of persons with intellectual disabilities as outlined in the Disability Act 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17492/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Brendan Ryan

Ceist:

154. Deputy Brendan Ryan asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if his Department and the agencies under his aegis track the numbers of employees they have with an intellectual disability; his plans to do so in order to help set targets and increase workplace opportunities for those with intellectual disabilities such as those outlined in the national disability inclusion strategy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17509/19]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 153 and 154 together.

My Department is committed to supporting initiatives that increase and promote the employment of persons with disabilities. The percentage of employees with disabilities in my Department in 2017 was 3.4%, as recorded in the Report on Compliance with Part 5 of the Disability Act 2005 for 2017 published by National Disability Authority.

A 2018 figure of 4.25% for my Department has been returned to the central Monitoring Committee. However, the 2018 report has not yet been published. A disability census is carried out within my Department on an annual basis which allows for anonymity. It does not ask staff to specify if the nature of any disability details submitted pertains to physical, intellectual or mental health conditions and as such an overall figure is recorded. The 3% target for the employment of people with disabilities in my Department will rise to 4% in 2019, 5% in 2021 and 6% in 2024.

A collaboration between AHEAD and the Civil Service on the Willing and Able Mentoring Programme (WAM) has been in place for over 12 years, in which 170 graduates have gained valuable work experience. In turn, the Civil Service has gained much from the graduates contribution to and participation in our workforce.

The central Monitoring Committee in my Department monitors the 3% target for employment of people with disabilities in public bodies staffed by civil servants. Public bodies under the aegis of Government Departments where the majority of staff are not civil servants have a separate Monitoring Committee that will report directly to the National Disability Authority.

Finally, I am advised that the position regarding the bodies under the aegis of my Department is as follows.

Office of Public Works

The Office of Public Works employs a number of staff members who have chosen to self-disclose a disability. The precise nature of their disability is not required to be disclosed and therefore the number of OPW employees with intellectual disabilities, as distinct from other types of disability, is unknown. Overall survey figures show that 3.5% of civil servants in the Office of Public Works have a disability. The OPW intends to carry out a comprehensive disability census across its whole workforce in 2019, with a view to establishing a new baseline figure which will inform its plans to reach the 6% target of employees with disability by 2024. It is envisaged that these plans will include the identification of roles within the OPW that may be suitable to targeted recruitment campaigns for people with intellectual disabilities.

National Shared Service Office

The number of employees declaring a disability is monitored regularly within the NSSO. However, the disability type is not recorded and therefore the NSSO cannot provide the number of employees with an intellectual disability. The overall figure for staff with a disability for 2017 was 4.22%. The up to date figure is currently being collated and will be available shortly. The NSSO will continue to be an equal opportunities employer ensuring diversity in the workforce.

Public Appointments Service

The number of PAS employees declaring an intellectual disability is not regularly monitored. In the last census, 4.12% of staff self-declared a disability. PAS remains an equal opportunities employer pursuing diversity in the workforce.

State Lab

The number of employees declaring an intellectual disability is not regularly monitored. Currently the percentage of employees with a non-specified disability is 4.2%. The State Lab remains an equal opportunities employer pursuing diversity in the workforce.

Office of the Ombudsman

The Office of the Ombudsman do not collect data on the type of disability a member of staff may have. The office currently has 10 staff members (7.6%) which have anonymously disclosed that they have a disability, with 1 person disclosing an intellectual disability. This annual anonymous staff census survey is carried out by the Disability Liaison Officer. The Office of the Ombudsman participates in the WAM programme and have in place an Access Office and had a Diversity and Equality Officer appointed in 2018.

National Lottery Regulator

The National Lottery Regulator Code of Business Conduct prohibits discrimination of any kind against people with disabilities, regardless of the nature of the disability. This applies to the process of the recruitment and appointment of new staff and to the retention of staff who may have acquired a disability. The induction policy specifically sets out the procedure to be taken into consideration on the appointment of new staff with a disability and additional supports that may be required to assist into the organisation. The office has a complement of 10 staff and the functions of the office require very specific skillsets and all posts require the post holder to have associated skills and expertise. All vacancies are filled via open competition and recruitment is based on ability to meet the requirements of the post. All applicants, whether with or without a disability, are engaged on that basis. Currently, there is no record of any staff member with an intellectual disability.

Barr
Roinn