Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Tuesday, 15 Sep 2020

Written Answers Nos. 272-291

Tax Data

Ceisteanna (272, 275)

Gerald Nash

Ceist:

272. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Finance the revenue accrued or spent from reversing the current applicable tax rate for benefit-in-kind, BIK, for company cars in order that an increase in business kilometres driven is matched by increased taxation, that is, 0 km to 24,000 km at 6% and 24,000 km to 32,000 km at 12% and so on in 2021; the way in which this compares with the existing system in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23736/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Gerald Nash

Ceist:

275. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Finance the estimated saving to the Exchequer in 2021 from reducing the cap on BIK relief for electric cars from €50,000 to €35,000; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23739/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 272 and 275 together.

I am advised by Revenue that while some employee-level taxable benefits are recorded separately in employer tax returns, the information required to estimate the Deputy’s proposals are not available.

For the Deputy's information, a revised method for calculating vehicle BIK, based on the CO2 emissions of the vehicle, was enacted in the 2019 Finance Act and will commence with effect from 2023.

Tax Data

Ceisteanna (273)

Gerald Nash

Ceist:

273. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Finance the estimated savings to the Exchequer from ending relief to conventional hybrids in 2021; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23737/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by Revenue that the estimated savings to the Exchequer from ending the current Vehicle Registration Tax (VRT) relief on conventional hybrid electric and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in 2021 is estimated to be in the region of €13 million. This estimate is based on activity to date in 2020 and as such is subject to a higher degree of uncertainty than most years, with the volume of car registrations in 2020 negatively impacted by COVID-19.

Tax Data

Ceisteanna (274, 276)

Gerald Nash

Ceist:

274. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Finance the estimated impact on the Exchequer in 2021 from the introduction of the worldwide harmonised light vehicles test procedure, WLTP, as cited in 2019; the additional revenue accrued or expended as a result of the change; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23738/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Gerald Nash

Ceist:

276. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Finance the estimated cost or saving to the Exchequer in 2021 from applying alternative tax regime for VRT that would see the number of VRT bands increase from 11 to 14 as set out by the Tax Strategy Group 2020; if he will provide a comparison with the existing VRT system in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23740/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 274 and 276 together.

The emissions basis for calculating VRT will transition to WLTP in 2021 and this will require changes to VRT legislation. As the Deputy will be aware, it is a longstanding practice of the Minister for Finance not to comment, in advance of the Budget, on any tax matters that might be the subject of Budget decisions.

Question No. 275 answered with Question No. 272.
Question No. 276 answered with Question No. 274.

Tax Yield

Ceisteanna (277, 278, 279)

Gerald Nash

Ceist:

277. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Finance the additional revenue raised from a reduction in the threshold on the value of Irish property owned to €2 million from €5 million; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23741/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Gerald Nash

Ceist:

278. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Finance the additional revenue raised from a reformed domicile levy of €400,000 per year on Irish domiciled persons who have a worldwide income greater than €1 million, own Irish property greater than €2 million and pay €300,000 or less in Irish income tax; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23742/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Gerald Nash

Ceist:

279. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Finance the additional revenue raised from a doubling of the domicile levy from €200,000 to €400,000 under the existing criteria; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23743/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 277 to 279, inclusive, together.

The Domicile Levy is applicable to Irish domiciled individuals whose worldwide income exceeds €1m, whose Irish property is greater in value than €5m and whose income tax liability in a year is less than €200,000.

I am advised by Revenue that there is no basis from the data available in tax returns to estimate the yields which might arise from re-configuring the Domicile Levy in the ways suggested by the Deputy. The individuals who could come under the scope of the Levy in the Deputy’s proposals are not currently required to file tax returns to indicate their relevant incomes or property.

I am further advised by Revenue that €2.3 million was collected under the Levy in 2019. This revenue may be doubled if the Levy charge was increased from €200,000 to €400,000, assuming no change in behaviour.

Question No. 280 answered with Question No. 255.

Aer Lingus

Ceisteanna (281)

Gerald Nash

Ceist:

281. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Finance the indicative cost to the Exchequer to repurchase a shareholding in a company at percentage rates (details supplied) in tabular form. [23747/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The specific issue that the Deputy refers to is not under consideration by Government. Matters related to aviation policy, including the issue raised by the Deputy, are a matter for consideration by the Minister for Transport in the first instance.

Financial Services Sector

Ceisteanna (282)

Gerald Nash

Ceist:

282. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Finance the cost to the Exchequer relating to governance and regulation of the financial services industry; the potential estimated revenue accrued from a levy at 0.5% and 1% on turnover for the financial services industry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23748/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the deputy may be aware the Central Bank disclose the total cost of Financial Regulation (Net Annual Funding Requirement or nAFR) in the Central Bank Annual Report each year. The most recent report covers the 2019 cost of Financial Regulation and revealed a total cost of €204.5m (see link below). The cost of €204.5m is part funded by income from industry of €165.8m (which it is expected to raise from the issue of levy invoices in late September 2020) and the balance is subvented by the Central Bank, effectively reducing the dividend available to the exchequer.

As the levy methodology used varies across the different categories of firms, it is not possible to provide a response based on percentage of turnover. The overall recovery rate at 81% is calculated as a percentage of the nAFR divided by the cost of regulation (€204.5m).

I have been advised that in conjunction with the issue of levy invoices in September, the Central Bank will publish the 2020 Industry Funding Guide which contains significant disclosures on 2019 costs and levies.

https://www.centralbank.ie/docs/default-source/publications/corporate-reports/annual-

reports/annual-report-2019-and-annual-performance-statement-2019-2020.pdf?sfvrsn=12

Tax Reliefs

Ceisteanna (283)

Gerald Nash

Ceist:

283. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Finance the estimated cost to the Exchequer in 2020 and 2021 of the e-worker tax relief; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23749/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

E-Workers may incur certain expenditure in the performance of their duties from home, such as additional heating and electricity costs. An employer may make payments of up to €3.20 per day to e-working employees in respect of such expenses and this amount is not subject to deduction of PAYE, PRSI or USC. Where employers avail of this facility, they are not required to advise Revenue and therefore the number of employees reimbursed in this manner is not available. Where employers choose to pay in excess of €3.20 the additional amount is subject to deduction of PAYE, PRSI and USC.

Where an employee has suffered qualifying expenses that are not reimbursed by the employer, or where such reimbursement is treated as taxable income (i.e., the above €3.20 per week) the employee may make a claim to Revenue for a deduction from their taxable income in respect of these amounts. Qualifying expenses in this context are expenses incurred wholly, exclusively and necessarily in the performance of the duties of the employment.

I am advised by Revenue that where a deduction in respect of expenses in relation to working from home is claimed in a tax return, the amounts are included in a general ‘Expenses’ field. Therefore, it is not possible to provide the number or value of specific claims in relation to these expenses and there is no basis on which to produce a costing.

Legislative Programme

Ceisteanna (284)

Neale Richmond

Ceist:

284. Deputy Neale Richmond asked the Minister for Finance his plans to reintroduce the Investment Limited Partnership (Amendment) Bill 2019; when he expects to have it enacted; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23829/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The publication and enactment of the Investment Limited Partnership (Amendment) Bill is an important step to maintain Ireland’s place as a leading funds domicile in Europe. The commitment to progress the revision of the Investment Limited Partnership structure was recognised in the Programme for Government – Our Shared Future. It is also a strategic priority set out in “Ireland for Finance - Strategy for the development of Ireland’s international financial services sector to 2025".

The Investment Limited Partnership (Amendment) Bill 2019 passed all stages in Dáil Eireann, but significant amendments were flagged relating to beneficial ownership and transparency standards.

It is my intention to ensure that the same standards of transparency and beneficial ownership apply across all of Ireland’s investment fund vehicles. I will seek the approval of Government to publish a new Bill in the coming weeks which includes beneficial ownership requirements for Investment Limited Partnerships and Common Contractual Funds.

Once the Government has approved the publication of the Bill, it is my intention that the legislative process begin in the Oireachtas as soon as possible afterwards with the intention of enacting the legislation by year end.

Mortgage Schemes

Ceisteanna (285)

Seán Canney

Ceist:

285. Deputy Seán Canney asked the Minister for Finance if persons who entered into a mortgage break with a bank will have their credit rating negatively affected by this decision; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23888/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Central Bank of Ireland, which owns and manages the Central Credit Register, has indicated that there is no operational issue which prevents lenders putting in place Covid-19 payment breaks to assist their customers. Indeed, it has made it clear to all lenders (including banks, local authorities and other credit information providers) that either a full or partial payment break agreed between a lender and a borrower as a response to Covid-19 is not, in itself, an event that is reportable to the Central Credit Register. Furthermore, the Bank has also clarified that a payment break agreed between a lender and a borrower as a response to Covid-19 should not be reported to the Central Credit Register as either a “missed payment” or as a “restructure event”.

It should also be noted that the Central Credit Register does not produce credit scores; rather the information on a credit report provided by the Central Credit Register is factual in nature (and in turn it is based on information provided to the Central Credit Register by lenders). It contains no guidance, recommendation or prohibition for lenders on what decision they should make on an application for credit. Subject to complying with applicable law and regulatory requirements, it is a matter for lenders to make their own lending decisions in accordance with their own credit policies and risk appetites.

The Deputy may wish to note that borrowers may access their credit report free of charge (subject to fair usage) at www.centralcreditregister.ie.

Separately, borrowers may also wish to check with their lenders to see if they submit information on loans to any private credit bureaux which may produce credit ratings or credit scores. However, it should be noted that, unlike the Central Credit Register, private credit bureaux do not fall within the remit of the Central Bank.

Motor Insurance

Ceisteanna (286)

Richard Bruton

Ceist:

286. Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Finance if his attention has been drawn to the fact that some insurers are unfairly seeking to take advantage of the benefit-in-kind concession granted to encourage company car fleets to go electric and that some insurers are refusing to recognise no-claim bonuses accumulated by drivers on their private policies, thereby overcharging for the risk of cover. [23894/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

At the outset, I am conscious of various issues which have arisen in relation to the insurance industry over the past number of years. Specifically, the pricing and availability of non-life insurance has been subject to considerable volatility. Accordingly, reform of this sector has been, and remains a key priority of Government as is recognised in a considerable number of Programme for Government commitments.

However, the provision of insurance is a commercial matter for insurance companies, which is based on a proper assessment of the risks they are willing to accept. Consequently, neither I in my role as Minister for Finance nor the Central Bank can interfere in the provision or pricing of insurance products. This position is reinforced by the EU framework for insurance (Solvency II Directive).

In the first instance if a consumer has a complaint with the service of their insurance provider, it is advisable that that they pursue this through the firm's internal complaint resolution process. The Consumer Protection Code requires that if, after 40 days, the complaint has not been resolved to the customer’s satisfaction, the consumer may refer their complaint to the Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman (FSPO). This provides an independent arbitration of disputes which consumers may have with their insurance company or other financial service provider. The FSPO can be contacted either by email at info@fspo.ie or by telephone at 01-567-7000.

In order to be helpful to the Deputy, my officials contacted Insurance Ireland on this matter who responded that they do not track data on pricing of classes of vehicles (such as electric vehicles) as pricing is a matter for each individual company to assess relative to their particular commercial strategy, risk appetite and claims experience. They indicated many of the major underwriters have specific products designed for electric vehicles, with bespoke features such as battery breakdown assistance. Insurance Ireland also noted that there are a number of specialist intermediaries entering into the electric vehicle market. They indicated that the specific issue outlined in the question is not one which has been raised by consumers to them through their Insurance Information Service. This Service is for those who have queries, complaints or difficulties in relation to obtaining insurance, and can be accessed at: feedback@insuranceireland.eu.

Finally, I believe the issue raised in the question demonstrates why it is important for consumers, including businesses, to shop around on their insurance policies. The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC), on its website, recommends that consumers get quotes from a number of insurance companies, including their current one. I believe that this advice applies to businesses as well as individuals. The CCPC website also includes a motor insurance shopping around checklist and other tips on cutting motor insurance costs which may prove useful to consumers and businesses.

Energy Efficiency

Ceisteanna (287)

John Lahart

Ceist:

287. Deputy John Lahart asked the Minister for Finance if he is considering incentives for households in view of the success of the home renovation incentive for persons to upgrade the energy efficiency of their homes in budget 2021; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24032/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Home Renovation Incentive (HRI) was introduced by Section 477B of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 in 2014 and was terminated in accordance with its statutory sunset clause on 31 December 2018.

With only four weeks to go, it would be inappropriate for me to comment on what may or may not be contained in the annual Budget.

However, it is the case that the re-introduction of such an incentive, even for a modified purpose, could be very costly. I must be mindful of the public finances and the many demands on the Exchequer; tax reliefs, no matter how worthwhile in themselves, lead to a narrowing of the tax base. Under my Department's Tax Expenditure Guidelines, the introduction of new tax incentive measures, or the continuation of measures which are due to terminate, should only be considered in circumstances where there is a demonstrable market failure and where a tax based incentive is more efficient than a direct expenditure intervention.

Departmental Projects

Ceisteanna (288)

Gerald Nash

Ceist:

288. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Finance the number of Exchequer funded projects over €1 billion overseen by his Department; the expected rise in cost in both numerical amount and percentage terms in tabular form, and delays as result of Covid-19; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24309/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I wish to inform the Deputy that my Department did not have oversight of any Exchequer funded project over €1 billion.

I wish to note that my response refers only to the Department of Finance and the bodies under its aegis.

Equality Proofing of Budgets

Ceisteanna (289)

Gerald Nash

Ceist:

289. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the status of the new timeline to deliver on the recommendations of the OECD for the publication of an equality budgeting statement alongside the budget; if an equality budgeting statement will be forthcoming in budget 2021; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23729/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Built on the performance budgeting framework that has been progressively embedded into the budget cycle, Equality Budgeting in Ireland has been developed over recent years with a view to enhancing the role of resource allocation policies in advancing equality, reducing poverty and strengthening economic and social rights. The National Strategy for Women and Girls 2017-2020 also contains a related commitment.

Equality budgeting should not be regarded as something separate from the budget process; the intention is to embed equality perspectives across the whole-of-year budgetary process.

The pilot programme of equality budgeting was introduced for the 2018 budgetary cycle, anchored in the existing performance budgeting framework. Following the achievements of the pilot programme, Equality Budgeting was expanded in 2019 to further develop the gender budgeting elements and to broaden its scope to other dimensions of equality including poverty, socioeconomic inequality and disability.

Responsibility for proofing expenditure programmes, the selection of indicators, and making progress towards achieving the high-level goals articulated remains a matter for the individual line Departments in the first instance. The role of the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform is to facilitate and advance this initiative and provide support for Departments to clarify and to fulfil their equality-related objectives.

To further guide the rollout of equality budgeting, an Equality Budgeting Expert Advisory Group was established, holding its first meeting in September 2018. This group is comprised of a broad range of relevant stakeholders and policy experts to provide advice on the most effective way to advance equality budgeting policy and progress the initiative.

All public bodies in Ireland have responsibility to promote equality, prevent discrimination and protect the human rights of their employees, customers, service users and everyone affected by their policies and plans. This is a legal obligation, referred to as the Public Sector Equality and Human Rights Duty, and it originates in Section 42 of the Irish Human Rights and Equality Act 2014. The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (IHREC) are members of the Expert Advisory group and the Public Sector Duty is reflected in all Equality Budgeting policies as appropriate.

In 2019 my Department, in liaison with the Department of Justice and Equality, commissioned the OECD to undertake a Policy Scan of Equality Budgeting in Ireland. This was published in tandem with Budget 2020. The report reviews Ireland’s equality budgeting programme and provides recommendations on its further development, in light of international experience.

Implementation of the OECD recommendations has already commenced. This work is being informed also by the views of the Equality Budgeting Expert Advisory Group, and work is well underway on the various recommendations in the OECD report.

One example is recommendation 9, which calls for the development of an equality data strategy to further bolster the impact of equality budgeting. Monitoring and reporting from a given dimension of equality is only possible if the necessary disaggregated data is available. With this in mind, the CSO have conducted a data audit to evaluate the quality of existing administrative datasets from an equality perspective. This audit has been guided by a sub-group of the Equality Budgeting Expert Advisory Group, and a report will be published in the coming weeks. Having a comprehensive understanding of the data landscape is a necessary prerequisite to implementing the remaining recommendations of the OECD report.

In the Programme for Government, the Government has also set out its commitment to develop a set of well-being indices to create a well-rounded, holistic view of how Irish society is faring; use these well-being indicators, as well as economic indicators, to highlight inequalities and ensure that policies are driven by a desire to do better by people; and ensure that the well-being framework will be utilised in a systematic way across government policymaking (at local and national levels) in setting budgetary priorities, evaluating programmes and reporting progress (as an important complement to existing economic measurement tools).

The introduction of wellbeing budgeting will also bring a framework, which will inform equality budgeting development to areas of most need, and link departmental action to national and international equality goals, in line with OECD recommendation 1.

At present, officials in my Department are developing the programme of work that will support the Government in meeting this commitment with regard to well-being. This work programme will be progressed on a cross-Governmental basis in liaison with the Department of the Taoiseach, Department of Finance and other government departments as well as key stakeholders and experts in this area.

Once developed, the Government will promote the use of a well-being framework in a systematic way across the spectrum of public policy-making in Ireland, including in setting budgetary priorities, evaluating programmes and reporting on progress. This will be an important complement to existing economic measurement tools that are in place to support well-being and outcomes-based approaches to policy making.

One such existing tool is the ESRI’s SWITCH Model, which will continue to be utilised to help Government understand the impact of proposed reforms on households. Moreover, initiatives such as the Spending Review process, which is a key platform for evidence-informed policy making across the Civil Service, will continue to produce evidence relevant to the wellbeing and outcomes of people, households, businesses and sectors of the economy.

Taken as a whole, a broad range of initiatives are under way to advance the objectives of equality budgeting, deliver on the OECD recommendations step-by-step, and in particular to promote transparency and accountability in reporting across the budget cycle.

Earcaíocht san Earnáil Phoiblí

Ceisteanna (290)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

290. D'fhiafraigh Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh den Aire Caiteachais Phoiblí agus Athchóirithe an mbíonn aon dualgas ar Ranna rialtais daoine a earcú ón bpainéal d’Oifigigh Feidhmiúchain le Gaeilge, seachas leas a bhaint as an ngnáthphainéal d’Oifigigh Feidhmiúcháin; agus cén iarrachtaí atá á ndéanamh aige chun cinntiú go dtiocfaidh méadú ar líon na státseirbhíseach a bhfuil cumas sa Ghaeilge acu. [23822/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Mar is eol don Teachta Dála is earcaitheoir neamhspléach é an tSeirbhís um Cheapacháin Phoiblí (SCP) d’iarrthóirí nua atá tagtha isteach san StásSeirbhís.

Go tréimhsiúil SCP na hiarrathóirí le Béarla agus le líofacht sa Ghaeilge ar phainéil na Státseibhíse.

Tuigim ó SCP go bhfuil 25 duine sánnaithe agus earcaithe acu sa bhliain 2019 ó bpainéil tiomaithe na Státsheirbhíse atá líofa sa Ghaeilge agus sa Bhéarla do na Roinne/Oifigí éagsula.

Tá an cinéal sonrach don phost seo ina raibh na daoine sánnaithe faoi churam an Ceannasaí Achmhainní Daonna i ngach suíomh do na Roinne agus oifigí.

Sa cháis an painéil Oifigeach Feidhmiúcháin fograíodh an comórtas Oifigeach Feidhmiúcháin i Mhí na Nollag 2019 do lucht labhartha na Gaeilge. Tuigim go raibh thart ar 130 do na hiarrthóirí cáilithe d’agallamh agus a críochnaigh an scrúdú i Mhí an Mhárta.

Tá painéil curtha i bhfeidhim anois ionas gur féidir le postanna trí mhéan na Gaeilge a chur in áit.

Má tá Oifigeach Feidhmiúcháin dátheangach ag teastáil ó Roinn nó Oifig, tá an painéil seo ar fáil. Tá tascanna ginearálta ag leanúint ar aghaidh ón bpainéil Oifigeach Feidhmiúcháin ginearálta.

Tuigim go bhfuil sé i gceist ag an tSeirbhís um Cheapacháin Phoiblí comórtas dátheangach Oifigigh Chléireachais eile a chur i bhfeidhim go luath.

Tá dúshlán ag baint le hearcaíocht lucht labhartha na Gaeilge. Tá tionchar shuntasach ar an méid bheag daoine atá ag chur isteach ar na comórtaisí. Sa chomórtas Oifigigh Chléireachais dheireanach chur 15,000 isteach air ach níor chur ach 205 duine do lucht labhartha na Gaeilge isteach ar an gcomórtas oscailte na hOifigigh Chléireachais dheireanacha.

Appointments to State Boards

Ceisteanna (291)

Marc MacSharry

Ceist:

291. Deputy Marc MacSharry asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform his views on whether, for optimum corporate governance, all organisations and agencies under the competent authority of the State should adhere to the practice of term limits for key personnel including the positions of CEO, chairperson and board members; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23979/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Code of Practice for the Governance of State bodies sets out guidance to enhance the governance of state bodies, which includes issues relating to the term limits for members of State Boards. It is expected that all State bodies abide by this guidance, or should explain reasons for any deviation. However, it should be noted that the issue of term limits may also be addressed in any legislation setting up or governing State bodies. The Code provides that “Existing legislative provisions applying to a State body on matters that are also the subject of this Code, continue to apply and for the avoidance of doubt, in the event of any conflict or inconsistency, the legislative provisions prevail”.

My Department has recently provided for some amendments to the Code, which inter alia deal with the issue of Board term membership, and which are designed to advance the Government's priority of promoting gender balance, diversity and inclusion in State bodies. The relevant provision, as now updated, sets out that:-

“Consistent with best corporate governance practice it is recommended that no member of a State Board should serve more than two full terms of appointment on that Board, or should hold appointments to more than two State Boards, at the same time, unless the specific statutory provisions relating to the particular State body enable such service. The State Board or, where necessary, the relevant Government Department should vary the terms of Board appointments to between three and five years. A period of appointment may be renewed for a further period, to a maximum of eight years in total. If exceptionally it is decided that a Board member should serve a further additional Board term, or that a renewal of appointment would bring the total period of service to above eight years, this requires Ministerial approval. All of the above provisions are however subject to compliance with the Body’s establishing legislation, where relevant.”

In respect of the role of Chief Executive, my Department has published separate guidance on this issue (the "Guidelines for Appointments of CEOs of Non-Commercial State Bodies" of April 2019 refer). Those guidelines provide as follows:-

“In general, CEOs are appointed for one five year fixed-term contract, unless otherwise provided for in the Body’s establishing legislation.”

Furthermore, the guidelines provide that in any instance where a Board wishes to reappoint a CEO to a further term, a business case should be submitted to the parent Department and if approval is proposed, then submitted to my Department. Similar arrangements apply in relation to Commercial State Bodies where the template contract of employment for CEOs of Commercial State Bodies provides for appointment for a single seven year fixed term contract and any proposal for reappointment or contract extension requires submission of a business case as described above.

Barr
Roinn