Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 26 Nov 1998

Vol. 497 No. 4

Written Answers - Garda Discipline.

Liz McManus

Question:

59 Ms McManus asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the disciplinary action, if any, taken against a member of the Garda (details supplied) who was convicted of serious offences arising from an incident in Portarlington, County Laois, in which a pedestrian was killed and the driver left the scene of the accident; the plans, if any, he has to implement the recommendations of the Law Reform Commission on the introduction of non-statutory guidelines on sentencing in view of public concern in relation to the decision of the Circuit Court to lift the prison sentence imposed by the District Court on the garda in question; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25081/98]

I am informed by the Garda authorities that a disciplinary investigation in the case in question, under the Garda Síochána (Discipline) Regulations, 1989, is nearing completion. When the report is available, it will be submitted to the Garda authorities for consideration of the appropriate action to be taken.

So far as the introduction of non-statutory guidelines on sentencing is concerned, the House will, of course, be aware that the courts are, subject only to the Constitution and the law, independent in the exercise of their judicial functions and I, as a member of the Executive, am precluded from intervening directly.

This year, I made £50,000 available to the Judicial Studies Institute, which was established by the Chief Justice for the purposes of judicial training. I understand that the issue of sentencing has been examined by the institute in the context of its training programme. In addition, I understand that the benches of the various courts hold meetings to discuss, inter alia, the avoidance of undue divergence in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the court and the general level of fines and penalties.

I might also say that under our legal system, the law provides generally for maximum penalties for criminal offences. The law enables the judge to exercise his discretion, within the maximum penalty, by reference to the conclusions he or she has reached after trying the case, hearing all the evidence and assessing the culpability and the circumstances of the accused. Our system of recruitment to all levels of the Judiciary is based on the concept of bringing in experienced and trained legal practitioners and, consequently, judges, on appointment, have a wide knowledge of the law and its application.

The complex question of sentencing policy was addressed at length by the Law Reform Commission. Action has already been taken on a number of its recommendations — for example, the Criminal Law Act, 1997, abolished the penalties of penal servitude and imprisonment with hard labour. The Law Reform Commission report specifically recommends against the introduction of statutory sentencing guidelines. Other recommendations contained in the report are being considered at present. Any proposals which may emerge from this examination will be announced in the usual way. Finally, the report pointed up a number of differences of opinion among members of the commission which tends to underline the obvious complexities which arise in relation to sentencing policy.

Top
Share