I propose to take Questions Nos. 212 and 226 together.
One of the most significant educational developments planned to take place over the next five years will be the implementation of a new science programme in all primary schools.
In the revised curriculum, science holds equal standing with history and geography for all classes and is to be given an appropriate weekly time allocation.
The implementation of the revised curriculum will be on a phased basis over four to five years and will be supported by a comprehensive programme of in-career professional development for teachers.
In order to encourage schools to incorporate science in their curriculum, I have recently announced a new grants scheme for the teaching of science in primary schools.
At second level concerns have been expressed on the uptake of physics and chemistry at leaving certificate. I have initiated a number of measures in response to these concerns. These measures which will be put in place over 1999-2000 and 2001 include: upgrading of resources in Science laboratories in second level schools; in-service training of teachers; development of new syllabuses and review of assessment procedures, including examinations.
Funding for the programme has been estimated to be of the order of £15 million.
New syllabi in chemistry and physics will be introduced in 2000 and syllabi in biology, agricultural science and physics and chemistry, combined, are being finalised. In addition a review of both science and the technology subjects at junior cycle and revised syllabi for construction studies and engineering together with a new syllabus for technology at leaving certificate are being prepared by the NCCA.
At third level, the 1999 annual competitiveness report of the National Competitiveness Council notes that while we have a satisfactory ranking in terms of science and engineering graduates and the number of people active in research, the gap in the past has been in funding for research and the maintenance of a strong knowledge-based infrastructure.