Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 3 May 2001

Vol. 535 No. 3

Ceisteanna–Questions. Priority Questions. - Media Mergers.

Pat Rabbitte

Question:

2 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment when she intends to bring forward legislation to implement the recommendations of the Competition and Mergers Review Group dealing with newspaper and media mergers and cross-ownership of the media; the plans she has to expedite the enactment of the legislation, especially having regard to recent reports of competing bids to acquire a company (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [12177/01]

I have now cleared all policy aspects of a general scheme of a Bill to give effect to certain recommendations of the Competition and Mergers Review Group, including those arising from the report of the Commission on the Newspaper Industry. I expect to circulate the scheme to other Departments during this month with a view to obtaining an early Government decision to authorise drafting of the Bill and I expect to be in a position to publish the Bill later this year. It is my intention that the new legislation will strengthen existing arrangements in relation to newspapers/media mergers, in particular, first by extending the scope of enterprises to be covered beyond those which at present are covered by the newspapers order to include enterprises in the wider media field. Merger control will apply to these enterprises irrespective of size; second, by introducing public interest criteria specifically geared to the media sector; and third by extending merger law to cover acquisitions of control of an undertaking by means other than the acquisition of shares or assets.

It is not clear at this stage whether the individual case to which the Deputy refers will result in a notification to me under the Mergers and Takeovers (Control) Acts, 1978 to 1996, or to the European Commission under the EU merger legislation. If it is the former, I point out that the Mergers and Takeovers (Control) Acts, 1978, to 1996, in their present form do provide for considerations relating to the common good as well as to competition.

Under EU law large-scale mergers and acquisitions which have a Community dimension as defined by the EU merger regulations are subject to pre-notification to the EU Commission. While my Department and the Competition Authority can make their views known to the Commission on these cases, as indeed can other interested parties, it is the Commission which makes the final decision.

Does the Tánaiste agree that diversity in the media is essential to the quality of our democracy? Given the changing nature of the media and the phenomenon of converging technologies, the prospect of takeover of Eircom's fixed line business by any group that is already predominant in the print industry might have adverse implications for the reasons I have indicated. I ask the Tánaiste not to favour one bidder against another – I certainly do not favour one bidder against another – but am merely concerned that there is a competition angle to this. I ask the Tánaiste to indicate her thoughts on this given the importance of diversity in the media.

Without commenting on any individual applications that might come before me, which would be wrong to do on this occasion, I agree totally with Deputy Rabbitte. We must take a holistic view and the maintenance and preservation of our democracy means that media mergers in particular have a hugely significant role to play. We want to see as much diversity as possible and that is why all media mergers have to be referred to the Minister but in addition to that we need to go further in the context of the new legislation and deal with what is commonly called cross-media ownership. The definitions of the past were made in a very different environment and technology today has the capacity to do a lot more. It is important to bear that in mind. If two merging companies have an asset base of £10 million or an annual turnover of £20 million the merger has to be referred. If they are on a substantial, large scale and they are involved in two or more countries within the EU – if the turnover is over 5 billion, for example – then that is a matter for the European Commission. I am not yet certain which body may consider any formal bid involving the proposal referred to in the Deputy's question but it would either be to the Irish authorities or the European Commission.

Without referring to any particular case, does the Tánaiste agree that in respect of cross-ownership of the media there is a manifest issue in respect of concentration of ownership of the print media on one hand and acquisition of the fixed line capacity of Eircom on the other? Given the nature of converging technologies, that link into the households of Ireland could be critical for the development of a number of multimedia projects.

Yes, I agree with the Deputy that that is the case. The new legislation will provide for that. Under the existing legislation if there is an asset base of £10 million in either of the merging companies or a turnover of £20 million, which are relatively small thresholds, it has to be referred, so the existing law covers any situation that could arise in the Irish context as far as I can see. We need to go further on cross-media ownership and to define that more clearly or with more flexibility in the context of today's circumstances.

Do I understand the Tánaiste to say that while she is preparing new legislation in this area she is satisfied the existing legislation will adequately cope with any situation that emerges while that new legislation is being awaited? In respect of the Competition Authority, the essence of a story in today's Business and Finance seems to say that following a public row last year the cheque is still in the post.

The Deputy is over the time.

Does the Tánaiste consider that the Competition Authority may have a role here and whether it is adequately resourced to deal with that? Is she aware of public statements made on his resignation by the director of enforcement about resources to cope with cartels? Is she aware of any investigations of cartels which did not proceed because of that lack of resources?

Regarding the first question, I am quite satisfied that if there is any takeover bid for Eircom it will either be referred to the Minister in Ireland under the existing law or the European Commission and that it will be something that is referrable and therefore covered by existing powers. That is not to say the powers in relation to the media generally are strong enough; they are not. They must and will be updated.

Regarding the Competition Authority I am not aware of anything that did not happen because of a lack of resources but I am aware that it has worked under a considerable restraint in recent years and that that is why it is important it gets the resources. That is why, in order to get those resources, we had an independent analysis carried out by Deloitte Touche. When the interim report was presented we gave it additional resources and further resources are to be made available shortly.

Top
Share