Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 9 May 2001

Vol. 535 No. 5

Written Answers - Rent Supplement.

John Gormley

Question:

182 Mr. Gormley asked the Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs if his attention has been drawn to the impact of the April 2000 Guidelines on Rent Supplement retained by those participating in community employment schemes, in that a person who is working for 19.5 hours per week and is participating in training faces a decreasing after-rent income, and if confronted with a rent increase, may have to choose between becoming homeless or returning to the dole; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13070/01]

The supplementary wel fare allowance – SWA – scheme is administered on behalf of my Department by the health boards and neither I nor my Department have any function in deciding entitlement in individual cases. Under the terms of the SWA scheme, payment of a weekly or monthly supplement may be made in respect of rent or mortgage interest to any person in the State whose means are insufficient to meet their needs.

SWA is subject to a means test. Rent supplements are normally calculated to ensure that a person, after the payment of rent, has an income equal to the rate of SWA appropriate to their family circumstances, less £6. This £6 represents the minimum contribution which recipients are required to pay from their own resources. Most recipients pay more than £6 towards their rent because applicants are required to contribute any additional assessable means that they have over and above the appropriate basic SWA rate towards their rent.

People on approved schemes, such as community employment – CE – can retain part of their rent or mortgage interest supplement, subject to a gross household income limit of £250 per week and certain other conditions. Following discussions with the social partners, under Partnership 2000 substantial improvements in the conditions relating to the retention of rent and mortgage interest supplements were introduced from 6 April 2000.

The £250 per month limit on the amount of rent supplement payable was abolished and the sharp withdrawal of support at the end of the third year was removed, the supplement now being withdrawn on a tapered basis over a four year period, that is, 75% in year one, 50% in year two and 25% in year three and 25% in year four. As a result, many participants in CE schemes now retain a greater amount of rent supplement than they would have done under the earlier arrangements. This is particularly the case for families.

In no circumstances should the new rules result in a lower rate of rent supplement than is payable under the standard rules of SWA. All recipients are entitled to either the gradually reducing amount that can be retained under the transitional arrangements described above or the amount that is normally paid under the standard rules of SWA described earlier, whichever is the greater.

If the Deputy has a particular case in mind my Department will have the case examined on receipt of the relevant details to ensure that he is receiving his full entitlement.
Finally, the conditions for receiving and retaining rent and mortgage interest supplement will be examined as part of the review of the SWA scheme which is currently being undertaken as part of my Department's series of formal programme evaluations.

John Ellis

Question:

183 Mr. Ellis asked the Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs if his Department will grant free travel allowance to both carers and those for whom they care under the free travel scheme in cases where persons being cared for do not qualify for social welfare payments. [13119/01]

Deirdre Clune

Question:

184 Ms Clune asked the Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs if his attention has been drawn to the fact that those who carry a social welfare travel pass cannot travel on buses before 9.45 a.m. in Cork city, the plans he has to address this situation and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13146/01]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 183 and 184 together.

The free travel scheme is generally available to all people living in the State aged 66 years or over, and to carers and people with disabilities who are in receipt of certain social welfare payments.

In 1998, I extended the free travel scheme to carers in receipt of carer's allowance, to recognise that carers may incur additional financial costs in caring full-time and to augment the low incomes of those who are in receipt of a means-tested payment. Further extensions could be considered only in a budgetary context and taking account of the financial and other needs of those not covered by the existing arrangements

With regard to the time restrictions on the free travel scheme, these have been a feature of the scheme since its inception. They apply at peak times on city bus services in Dublin, Cork and Limerick. They do not, however, apply in the case of mentally handicapped people, people attending long-term rehabilitation courses or certain work experience programmes and certain other disabled or blind people. These people are issued with an unrestricted free travel pass, which enables them to travel during the normally restricted travel times.

The central issue in regard to time restrictions relates to capacity constraints. Where restrictions apply, it is at the request of the transport companies because the transport system is under severe pressure from commuters travelling to and from work and school in the morning and evening. There are no peak time travel restrictions on DART, suburban rail services, and on services provided by private transport operators in other parts of the country.
A review of the free schemes was published by the Policy Institute, Trinity College Dublin, in April last year. The review notes that the demands for the easing of time restrictions are, without exception, based on the fact that people have difficulty attending hospitals for appointments that fall within the restricted peak times. The review recommends that the Department of Health and Children and the health boards should examine this problem with a view to introducing more convenient and flexible appointments for free travel pass holders. My Department has written to the Department of Health and Children, bringing this recommendation to their attention.
Top
Share