I have already dealt with the substance of this question in my reply to the priority question put down by Deputy Jim Mitchell. I have not yet received a report from the Central Bank into the events in question, on the lessons to be learned from this episode and what legislative changes, if any, might be appropriate to strengthen the regulatory system as it applies to credit institutions.
So far, the Central Bank has told my Department that it has sent two officials to Baltimore head office of Allfirst Bank. These officials have been working with officers of the Federal Reserve, the primary regulator of Allfirst Bank, to confirm the scale of the losses involved, to identify how these losses were run up and why procedures failed to detect them in good time.
The role of the Minister for Finance is to bring forward legislative proposals for the regulation of the financial sector. Once the necessary legislative framework is in place, day-to-day responsibility for the supervision of credit institutions is a matter for the Central Bank. The Central Bank is statutorily independent in the exercise of its supervisory and regulatory functions. When the details of the events in question are known, the Central Bank will take all appropriate action, such as, no doubt, the strengthening of internal control arrangements and closer monitoring of subsidiaries.
Doubtless, AIB Bank itself will inform the public as to the outcome of its investigation. The Deputy will be aware that AIB Bank has appointed an eminent person with appropriate experience to report on what happened at Allfirst Bank.