Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 27 Nov 1946

Vol. 103 No. 11

Committee on Finance. - Vote 69—Damage to Property (Neutrality) Compensation.

Tairgim:—

Go ndeonfar suim breise nach mó ná £12,000 chun íoctha an mhuirir a thiocfas chun bheith iníoctha i rith na bliana dar críoch an 31ú Márta, 1947, chun Cúitimh agus Iocaíocht eile i leith Díobhála do Mhaoin arna ndéanamh de dheascaibh buamaí a scaoileadh anuas í aer-árthaí coigríche agus teagmhais dá shambhail le linn an Stát a bheith gan a bheith páirteach i gcogadh (Uimh. 24 de 1941).

That a supplementary sum not exceeding £12,000 be granted to defray the Charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending 31st March, 1947, for Compensation and other payments in connection with Injuries to Property caused by the dropping of bombs from foreign aircraft and by kindred incidents while the State is not engaged in war (No. 24 of 1941).

When the original Estimate for 1946-47 was being prepared—about this time last year—it was thought that, even though the war was over, some further incidents might occur in which property would be damaged by the explosion of drifting mines on the coast and so forth and, to meet any claim for compensation arising from such incidents, a provision of £250 was included in the Estimate—sub-head A. (2). Needless to say it was not anticipated that damage on the scale caused by the mine explosion at Dalkey on the 12th March, 1946, would have to be reckoned with. From 200 to 250 houses were injured to some extent or other and the indications are that the total compensation payable under the Act to make good the damage will reach about £15,000. Some of this, however, will probably not have to be paid until after the 31st March next. Allowing for that and for an element of saving on other items in the Estimate, a sum of £12,000 should be adequate to cover all payments on foot of Dalkey claims failing to be met within the current financial year.

Arising out of the Dalkey incident, 149 claims for compensation under the Act have been received to date. Of 109 offers of compensation already made, 100 have been accepted; so far, no offer of compensation has been refused. Eighty-three cases have been finally disposed of by payment of compensation and in six further cases where the offer of compensation was subject in part to a reinstatement condition, the unconditional portion of the compensation has been paid. Other accepted offers are subject to conditions that the total amount of the offer shall be expended on reinstatement and payment will be made on the submission of evidence that the condition has been fulfilled. To date, the Dalkey payments total £3,279 10s. 7d. Claims may be made up to the 12th March, 1947—the anniversary of the date of the incident.

The Minister has stated that this Estimate is due to damage to property in Dalkey caused by a mine explosion. I do not know whether the Minister has received any offer of compensation from any outside ource or whether we are just to regard that incident as an act of God. I take it that other explosions have occurred around the coast due to drifting mines. I do not know if the Minister is in a position to tell us if they resulted in further damage.

There is another question which I should like to ask the Minister—I do not know whether it is appropriate on this Estimate. It refers to losses suffered by people in this country due to loss of property that had been sent to foreign countries for repair. That is now gone and the Government have also called upon these people to pay debts which were due to that country so that the people concerned have suffered the loss of their property and have had to make good to the Government accounts which were due to those foreign countries. I think in all fairness the Minister should consider the case of people who suffered a double loss of that kind. I am certain that people in England similarly circumstanced were not asked to suffer a double loss. They would have had their claims against foreign countries collected in reparations or under some other heading. I should like to ask the Minister how far he considers it just that our people should have to suffer a double loss in such circumstances.

The answer to the first question put by Deputy Dockrell is that this is the only incident which caused damage in this financial year for which we have got any claim to date. In regard to the other question, as to the alleged double loss suffered by people who sent goods abroad to be repaired, who lost the goods and then had to pay certain accounts in here to the Exchequer, I have not heard of any such case. First of all, the matter does not come under this Estimate, but I just want to say that I have not heard of any such claim. No such claim has ever come to my attention and if the Deputy has received such a claim I shall look into it.

Does this Estimate cover all the damage?

We estimated that the total damage would be about £15,000 but on account of savings, and payments going into next year, £12,000 will meet the present bill.

Vote put and agreed to.
Vote reported and agreed to.
Top
Share