Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Friday, 28 Feb 1947

Vol. 104 No. 12

Committee on Finance. - Vote 35—District Court.

Mr. Boland

I move:—

That a supplementary sum not exceeding £4,560 be granted to defray the Charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending 31st March, 1947, for such of the Salaries and Expenses of the District Court as are not charged on the Central Fund (No. 27 of 1926, secs. 49 and 50; No. 15 of 1928, sec. 13; and No. 48 of 1936, secs. 51 and 77) and for a Capitation grant.

This Vote is required mainly to meet extra expenses due to increased salaries and also to the fact that during the year six justices were ill. At the present moment there are four ill. That meant that we had to pay double salaries in these cases—the salary of the justice who was ill and the salary of the substitute. Another justice, District Justice Price, kindly took up the work of finishing the rules of the District Court. As he is giving his whole time to that, we had to relieve him of his judicial duties. That and increased bonuses explain the necessity for bringing in this Estimate.

What was the percentage increase granted to district justices?

Mr. Boland

Increases in the case of district justices' salaries can be granted only by legislation. Something is being done in that direction but the legislation is not ready yet. The increases cannot be granted in the same way as those granted to civil servants or guards.

Will the increases be retrospective?

Mr. Boland

I cannot say. It must be done by legislation. We cannot increase the salary of a judge without a special Bill.

Has the Minister given any consideration to the plight of widows of officers and men of the Garda Síochána and does he intend to grant them an increase in their allowances at an early date?

This Vote deals with the District Court.

May I ask the Minister what progress has been made with the pension scheme for District Court clerks? There is no provision in this Estimate for it.

Mr. Boland

We have not got very much further. The question is still under consideration by Finance. It is a question that must go with the general question of temporary civil servants. They are not confined to the Department of Justice. Every Department has a number of them, and the Minister for Finance is not prepared to deal separately with those who are attached to the Department of Justice.

Surely the Minister appreciates that there is considerable urgency in the case of some clerks who are about to retire, and who will be on a very small pittance unless something is done? I would ask him to press Finance to expedite the scheme.

Vote put and agreed to.
Top
Share