Is féidir liom comhgháirdeachas a dhéanamh leis an Aire ós rud é go bhfuil Seirbhísí na Gaeltachta ag éirí comh maith agus atá siad, go bhfuil fostaíocht cainteóirí Gaeilge ag dul i méid agus go bhfuil an obair atá ar siúl ins na monarchain agus sna h-ionaid eile ag dul i méid freisin.
The Minister has stated that there is an increase of £6,100 in the provision for incidental expenses, due to arrangements being made to revise completely the accounting methods and accounting machinery used in connection with the rural industries in order to bring them more closely into line with modern practice. It is not stated whether it is likely to effect any economy or any saving in staff.
I should like the Minister to state the position about the stocks of materials in hands. As far as I can make out, the trading accounts which are placed on the Table of the Dáil—the accounts for the year 1954-55—were placed on the Table of the Dáil only in April. That means that we would not have the trading account for the year which the Minister has just dealt with in his statement for another year. Looking at the figures, it would seem to me that the stocks are very substantial though I think there has been some reduction, as, for example, in connection with the tweed industry. While there is a reduction in the amount of the stocks of material by about £10,000—from £188,000 to £177,000—there would appear to be a large increase in the amount of finished products in hands, amounting to nearly £60,000—say, £88,500 at the end of March, 1954, which seems to have increased to £146,000. That would represent the amount of the increase.
The terminology in these accounts may not always be susceptible of exact interpretation without the Oireachtas Handbook. It would appear that there were about £123,000 worth of stores on 31st March, 1955. I wonder if the Minister would be able to tell the House the normal amount of the total stocks, finished or unfinished, in respect of the different headings— tweed, knitwear and toys—which the establishment carries.
It is satisfactory also that the sales have increased. I should have been glad if the Minister had given us some more figures indicating the amount of production during the coming year. On this Vote, the Dáil is really in the position of examining what should be a commercial account, which is published in Irish and is not therefore easily available to Deputies, and, in default of getting the information from the Minister at this moment, we have to ask the question: what is the total amount of production under the three headings I have mentioned which it is expected will result from the expenditure of the sums which the Minister is seeking in the different sub-heads?
The Minister states that the requirements for new machinery for the tweed industry have been met to a large extent in previous years. Does that mean that, in fact, the £100,000 or so which I mentioned last year as having been envisaged as necessary for the development of Kilcar has largely been met and that all the requirements for machinery and tweeds are either already provided, or will be provided during the coming year? Perhaps the Minister would be good enough to say what is the amount spent last year and proposed to be spent this year in respect of new machinery in that factory.
I notice that the provision for paper and packaging materials has gone up very substantially from about £7,000 in the year before last to nearly £16,000 this year. Perhaps that is inevitable as packaging and proper design and finish of the package material for the market are of the greatest importance. Still, it is a very substantial increase.
The total receipts which the Minister hopes to receive from the rural industries are up by almost £20,000 over last year's Estimate. When I left the Department, it was anticipated that a figure of £500,000 would be reached fairly quickly in respect of the total sales. I think that, in fact, was the position last year. In his statement last year the Minister referred to a total of about £500,000 this year it is £520,000.