Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 8 Feb 1968

Vol. 232 No. 5

Committee on Finance. - Vote 27—Office of the Minister for Education (Resumed).

Debate resumed on the following motion:
That a supplementary sum not exceeding £10 be granted to defray the charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of March, 1968, for the Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the Minister for Education (including Institutions of Science and Art), for certain Miscellaneous Educational and Cultural Services and for payment of sundry Grants-in-Aid.
—(Minister for Education).

Education is one of the most important aspects of our everyday life and it would be a shame not to avail of this opportunity to speak on that subject. A few years ago the word "education" was a very dull word in the minds of most people but now it is one of the most live issues of our time. The public are fully aware of what is going on in the matter of education and there is constant dialogue on the subject.

It is absolutely vital that, irrespective of who does it, something must be done in the next ten years for the sake of the generation that will emerge from our schools at that time. In that context, we are doing what we believe to be right, irrespective of what other people may say. We are acting now for the benefit of the schoolgoing population.

I am very gratified, as I am sure every Deputy is, by what I will describe as the new inspector/teacher relationship. At one stage the visit of the inspector to the school was regarded almost as an interference, something that had to be endured. The anticipated visit of the inspector would have an effect on the entire school and the children would be told to have on their best bibs and tuckers for the occasion. That is no longer the position. In these days the teacher looks forward with enormous interest to the visit of the inspector and there is constant dialogue between teacher and inspector with a view to solving the common problem as to what is best for the children. I welcome this change of atmosphere for which the Minister is very largely responsible.

I was horrified to learn of the condition of certain schools, as I am sure was the Minister. Most people who saw photographs of these schools were equally horrified. I know the reaction of the Minister and most honest people here would agree that his reaction is that such schools will have his immediate attention.

The Minister, in regard to this matter, said in his introductory statement:

I will not rest content, however, until all our school children are housed in decent buildings with reasonable standards of hygiene, heating and general comfort.

He went on to say:

One step I have recently taken is to give authority to school managers to have the heating and sanitary systems in schools brought up to suitable standard, where this is necessary; and I have given an undertaking that, where a manager has such work done satisfactorily, a grant will be paid towards its cost.

The Minister cannot do more than that. If there are any schools in a similar condition to those that have been reported in the South of Ireland, the Minister is the first person who would want to know about them.

The grants for new school buildings are the most generous that anyone could ask for. If the cost of a new school is £100,000, the £100,000 is advanced and only 30 per cent of that would be repayable over 15 years. It is obvious, therefore, that every possible aid is being given for the extension of education facilities.

My colleague of Dublin South-West, Deputy Dowling, referred to a subject to which I should also like to make reference and I would ask the Minister to state his view in regard to the problem. I would suggest that a person who passes even one subject in either the intermediate certificate or leaving certificate should receive a certificate to that effect. The subjects in which the candidate passed could be listed. If this were done, the person would not be in the position of having to say that he had neither the intermediate nor the leaving certificate. I know that a form is issued indicating that a candidate passed in some subjects. If my suggestion were adopted, candidates would not have the terrible inferiority complex that might be involved in having failed mathematics, Irish or English. A candidate who reaches a standard in other subjects is entitled to have an appropriate certificate to that effect. If I were engaging a person and I wanted to know if that person had the intermediate certificate or the leaving certificate and if only those with the intermediate certificate or leaving certificate applied, I might be condemning a lot of people who had passed in a certain number of subjects and had no particular aptitude for certain other subjects. I would be most interested to hear the Minister's reply to that particular point.

Last night Deputy Lindsay referred to the so-called interference of Ministers in relation to university appointments. It is all very well to talk about Government interference and about the setting up of bodies for this and that. We all hear people saying that the country is being run by bureaucrats, that members of the Government are only rubber stamps and we hear of Ministers becoming rubber stamps. When Ministers show they are not rubber stamps, the criticism is that political influence and the like are resorted to.

The Government have the responsibility of spending the nation's money, the taxpayers' money, as wisely as possible. If millions of pounds of the Irish taxpayers' money is being spent on education, university and otherwise, it is essential, in my opinion, that the Minister and the Government should have an active interest in how this money is spent and in the people who are placed in positions of responsibility. They must ensure that the money is being spent wisely. It is all very well for the education authorities to take this money and say: "Thank you very much. Now get away from us. We will spend this as we think fit". Thank God, we have a Minister for Education who is interested in education and is enthusiastic about it. This is vital. He has never been afraid to take on anyone or anything in the interests of education. He is director of the policy on education. He is the one who will take responsibility for it in the final analysis. Here is a man who, in my opinion, if he is going to take responsibility for education in this country will seek the power to do so.

An enormous amount of criticism was aroused when the one-teacher schools were abandoned, but as we can see, this has died down. People have become educated to the fact that two-, three- or four-teacher schools are far better than one-teacher schools. They have seen that where one teacher has to take all the subjects for all the classes, any extension of the curriculum of that school was wellnigh impossible. It is all very well to talk about broader education if you have only one teacher in a school because he can do nothing about it. I am delighted to see that more and more people at last are aware of the tremendous advantage of modern schools in regard to better education.

Another point I should like to touch on before I conclude is the extension of the curriculum. A few years ago the great cry was for the teaching of civics. Now they are being taught and our children are being allowed to grow up knowing something about the institutions of this country and knowing something about manners. When I say "manners", I mean that they have respect for private property.

I consider that the outstanding feature of this whole Estimate is that ten years ago we were spending £16 million a year on education, whereas now that figure is £38 million. This is a phenomenal increase and I doubt if there are any other countries in Europe which can show such a sharp increase. I am also very pleased to see in the Minister's speech that he abolished the primary school certificate examination. As we all know, some children develop later than others. It is unfortunate that a child nine, ten or 11 years old, who is a late developer, was condemned in the past to work at something for which he was not particularly cut out because he had not developed far enough to pass a particular certificate examination.

I am delighted at the attention given to vocational education. Some years ago it was not considered respectable to attend the vocational school. That prejudice has certainly been eliminated. I know parents whose children wanted to pursue a vocational education and because they did not consider that this was suitable, they insisted upon their becoming clerks or something like that, with the result that about 20 years later they ended up in a mental home because they were forced into something they did not want to do.

I am delighted to see that the Minister's scheme in regard to the bus services has been so successful, particularly in view of the fact—I should not derive satisfaction from this but I do— that some people said that the scheme was impossible to operate. I always love to see something being achieved when there are comments saying we cannot do it. Nothing is impossible. I think this is the greatest philosophy of our Minister for Education, Deputy O'Malley.

I do not intend to delay the House much longer. I am delighted to see a decline in the number of children detained in reformatory schools. It obviously points to an improvement in the educational system. You have juvenile delinquency where you have not proper education. Now that our educational facilities are improving, I am sure that those figures will decline further.

I should like to hear if the Minister has any information as to whether paintings from the National Gallery which are not on view will be exhibited in other cities. I am all in favour of those cities contributing something either by way of insurance or in some other way towards the protection of those paintings. If they are insured here at Government level, the people in those cities and towns will not have the same respect for them as they would if they had a stake in their care. They will also be well looked after. We can boast of some wonderful treasures in the Art Gallery and it would be a wonderful thing if cities such as Cork and Limerick had an opportunity of putting those paintings on show for the public.

I am pleased to see that the comprehensive schools have been so successful and that a further two schools are being erected, one at Glenties and another at Raphoe, County Donegal. I am very conscious of the fact that the Minister has impressed on his Department the need to get modern aids in education, that is to say, audio-visual aids in schools for which I understand grants are being availed of by all schools, or most of them. They should be availed of by all schools. It would be most helpful.

People say that free education is not free. They forget one essential point, that is, that the students who obviously could not receive post-primary education because of their parents' lack of financial resources can now obtain it. As far as I am concerned, that is free education to a person who normally would not have been able to receive it and nobody can tell me that, in that respect, it is not free. Certainly, the taxpayer pays for it but it is free to the children and they know it.

I congratulate the Minister on his achievements. I wish him the very best of luck. May his path be as smooth as possible through the next year.

(Cavan): Since the Estimate for the Department of Education was introduced last year, the Minister has organised the financing of post-primary education so as to make it available to very many children who otherwise could not avail of it and he is to be complimented on that and thanked for his efforts.

Indeed, the organising of the financing of post-primary education so as to make it available to a much wider range of children was long overdue. While in no way belittling or endeavouring to detract from the Minister's efforts when I say it was long overdue, I wish to point out that it has been available in many other countries for very many years. We all know that free education, as it is called, has been available across the Border, in the Six Counties, for quite a considerable time. What I am saying is not meant in any way to detract from the Minister's efforts but I do not think we should create the impression or get the idea that this is something completely new, completely unheard of. It is something new in this country but it was something which was considerably overdue.

I have referred to the Minister's efforts not as providing free education but as organising the financing of post-primary education so as to make it available to a wider range of pupils. Really, through his Department and through the Government, the Minister has made a further redistribution of the national income so as to make post-primary education available to a wider range of students. That is not meant to belittle the Minister's efforts or to detract from them but it is an effort on my part to get things into their proper perspective. If it costs money it must be paid for. In this case, it must be paid for by the taxpayers in general.

Some time ago, a Deputy referred to the transport of pupils to post-primary teaching establishments and its cost. At the same time, he referred to a cut in the grants from the Road Fund towards the upkeep of county roads. It is, I suppose, significant that the cost of transport of post-primary students in this current year amounts to £840,000. I think the cut in what are known as the road grants to county councils throughout the country amounts to approximately the same figure. That shows that the money must come from somewhere. However, the Minister is to be congratulated and I do genuinely congratulate him, on taking this step which was long overdue.

Any new scheme is bound to have its teething troubles and undoubtedly this scheme has its problems and difficulties. The Minister said in his opening speech that students are required to attend the nearest post-primary school, whether that be a small technical school or a large secondary school, properly so called.

I would agree with Deputy Briscoe that a very sound education can be given and is given in technical schools. There is a lot to be said for technical education as opposed to purely secondary education as we have understood it up to the present time. It is an undoubted fact that some technical schools are not as well-equipped to provide a suitable post-primary education as other technical or other secondary schools. Therefore, the position at the moment is that some children are getting a post-primary education under this scheme of a lower standard than others—and I shall not put it any stronger than that.

I quite realise that this is the first year of the scheme. I quite realise that everything cannot happen overnight. The point I want to make is that if the Minister intends to continue to provide post-primary education in the nearest post-primary teaching establishment— whether it be a technical school or one of the secondary schools as we have understood them up to the present— there is an obligation on him to see to it as quickly as possible that every technical and, indeed, every secondary school that is recognised for the purposes of this scheme is brought up to a minimum standard. Nobody in the House can seriously disagree with that request, that all students availing of the Minister's scheme should get equal opportunities from the contribution the Minister is making. The only way that can be done properly is to bring all the post-primary teaching establishments, especially the smaller technical schools, up to a minimum standard and to provide them with adequate teachers and adequate rooms.

While on the subject of teachers for technical schools, I am sure the Minister knows that very often it is difficult to get teachers and sometimes even more difficult to retain them in certain areas when they have been employed. The Minister and his Department will have to see to it that an adequate number of vocational teachers is available. He will have to consider granting incentives to vocational teachers to encourage them to remain in areas which might not be regarded as attractive as other parts of the country. That is one of the problems. In the poorer and more remote areas, vocational teachers are inclined to come and go. That is not good for education. It is not good for the pupils and it is bound to produce less favourable results than if the teachers remain for a long time.

I am glad to note that during the year the Minister allowed the scheme to operate in a flexible enough way. For example, I think it is correct to say that he allowed pupils who had been attending a school other than the nearest post-primary school before the scheme came in to continue to do so. That shows a reasonable approach to this problem.

If I might be parochial, the Minister knows there is a problem in Killeshandra, where a number of children, including some Church of Ireland children, wish to attend secondary schools in Cavan town and, indeed, have been attending those schools for some time. Due to some local difficulty, the Minister has not yet seen fit to agree to defray the cost of transport from Killeshanda to Cavan town. There is considerable anxiety in the area over this problem. A hardship is being inflicted on the parents of the children there. I would ask the Minister to cut through the red tape as he has been doing in so many other ways and provide this transport for the pupils concerned. I know it is under consideration in his Department but in the matter of education, every month that passes is a considerable period. The parents will not be satisfied until this matter is remedied.

We have had a lot of talk recently about the condition of our primary or national schools. I am glad to see that this problem has been brought to a head and that some action has been taken to focus public attention on the disgraceful conditions of these schools. This is not something that developed overnight. These buildings have simply been neglected for years. In my lifetime, I have seen some very attractive national schools built, but in some cases within a year or two after they were built they were allowed to deteriorate and become shabby and unsightly. The neglect of these buildings has been a gradual process. I do not know whose fault it is, and I do not very much care. But apart altogether from its being a waste of public money to allow these buildings to deteriorate, it cannot be good to educate children in such conditions and in such circumstances. It cannot be calculated to give children respect for buildings and to instil in them the need to look after their own property properly later on.

I honestly think that if sufficient grants are not being given to enable these schools to be properly maintained, adequate grants should be given. If adequate grants are given, then the Minister and his Department should exercise some control over these establishments to see they are properly maintained and looked after. Very many of the national schools on the sides of our roads are eyesores. Indeed, some of them could qualify for a grant under the derelict sights scheme, or at least if they were removed, the countryside would look much better.

I get the impression that the maintenance of these schools is nobody's responsibility. I understand that some grants are given by the Department but it is obvious these grants are inadequate. However, I do not think any blame attaches to the INTO for bringing this matter out into the open and making an issue out of it. Indeed, I think they are to be congratulated and I hope as a result these schools will be put in order and kept in order.

I was glad to note from the Minister that he has responsibility for the education of mentally retarded and physically handicapped children. In this field there is a lot to be done. I heard Deputy Mrs. Hogan O'Higgins dealing with this problem yesterday. It is a problem we find in all parts of the country. I do not know how much longer it will take to provide accommodation for mentally retarded children, but there is an obligation on the nation to tackle this job and to tackle it at once.

The Minister has been given considerable credit for the manner in which he implemented his post-primary education scheme, and it has been said that he cut red tape and got on with the work. I am appealing to him now to do something for the unfortunate parents who have the cross of having in their family one retarded child or perhaps more. There are very many families in which there is a retarded child, and that child is one of a family, maybe of three, four, five or six. As that child comes to be seven or eight years of age, it is still left at home, and it is the cause of continual mental anguish to the parents who cannot do anything about it. It is an embarrassment to the other members of the family. That is probably putting the claim on its lowest level. However, I do not know whether the Minister has ever had the experience of having these parents coming in frequently appealing to have something done and appealing to get this child away. I know one father and mother who refused to vote for anybody at the last election or at the election before that because they have a retarded child at home and because they believe that the Government and public representatives have let them down.

There are things that people can talk about and appeals that people can make, but this is something that should be tackled at once, if it has to be tackled by the erection of prefabricated buildings which can be used for something else later on. This situation leads to unhappiness among parents. It leads to the children of the family who are physically and mentally all right being held up to ridicule by the other children at school. The retarded child becomes like a ghost in the house that people are ashamed of; perhaps they should not be, but they are continually conscious of it.

I have some experience in my professional capacity of the relationship existing between the parents of a retarded child and the child, and I can tell the Minister that all through the life of the father of such a child, he is conscious of his obligation to it. He is living in continual anxiety as to what is going to happen to this child when he dies. I have had the duty on a number of occasions of making wills for people who have had this problem on their minds, and it is a very real problem.

I do not know how much money it would take to solve this problem, but by comparison with the money that is being spent and has to be spent in other directions, I think it must be relatively small, and I would ask the Minister to see to it that this problem is solved. At the present time there is a waiting list of years in every school in the country. You write to this convent or to that institution run by brothers, and they simply tell you there is nothing they can do and that they cannot give you any idea as to when they might be able to house the children on whose behalf I am appealing. It is a reflection on the Government; it is a reflection on the country and on everybody in it that we stand for this sort of thing.

Take people living in rural Ireland miles from a town. The mother of a family, a farmer's wife, has, perhaps, to give a hand in the farmyard. She has three or four normal, healthy schoolgoing children. She is living in a house with three or four apartments and she has the constant worry of this retarded, maybe badly retarded, child for 24 hours every day. Is it any wonder she would become distraught? Is it any wonder she would become sour with society? Is it any wonder she would think the Government had let her down and that the public representatives had let her down? Is it any wonder that as a protest she would say: "I refuse to vote for anybody." I am trying to speak as forcefully as I can about this in order to bring home to the Minister that it is a very real problem and one which cannot be put on the long finger.

So much for the mentally retarded children. There are physically handicapped children who present nothing like the same problem, but I am glad to know that there are many schools in the country which rehabilitates these physically handicapped children and try to provide them with the necessary skills to enable them to earn a living. I have come across a case recently of a girl who was sent to such a school to do a commercial course, and the only point I have to make here is that there should be a better effort made to place these young handicapped children in employment when they are trained.

I do not know how this could be done. I would suggest, for example, that the local authorities should be encouraged by the Department responsible to take on a number of these physically handicapped young people, even if it is only in a temporary capacity. The difficulty here is that these people are conscious of their physical handicap and the only way of getting over that consciousness and inferiority complex is to get them established in a job, even for a while. There are a number of charitable private employers who employ them. We have no control over such private employers but we can, as I said, encourage the local authorities, who have now become almost the biggest employers in the country, to take on these people in clerical positions or in whatever positions they have been trained for.

More or less in the same line of country, I am glad to note that the number of young people in reformatories and industrial schools is quite low. Deputy Briscoe thought that was due to the expansion of our educational facilities. I am sure that has something to do with it, but the very humane approach of the district court bench to juvenile delinquents is also responsible for the fact that there are not more young people in reformatories. I know that most district justices send boys to reformatories as a last resort, and only when there is no alternative. They are quite right.

I know one district justice who presided over a certain district court for about 20 years to my knowledge, and he was often blamed for being too lenient with young scoundrels as they are called, juvenile delinquents, but the answer was that in his area when he retired there was no serious crime. If he had been wrong in dealing with these young people with kid gloves, there would have been serious adult crime in the locality, but that was not so. That does not mean I am saying that in the courts district justices should not impose severe penalties when the necessity arises. I certainly think that young people should get every opportunity before they are locked up.

I do not know whether this comes under the Minister's Department or under the Department of Justice, but I think a more serious effort should be made to rehabilitate these boys who unfortunately have to be sent to reformatory schools, to keep in touch with them when they come out, through the probation officers or otherwise, and to try to find employment for them. Otherwise we know what happens. It is not too long before they are back in again.

I completely approve of the common inter cert course. That is a move in the right direction. It is excellent to give children the opportunity of using their hands and their heads up to a certain point before they decide whether they want to pursue a trade or to go on to other types of education. Under the vocational heading, I should like to appeal to the vocational section of the Department to cut the red tape and to cut out delays. It is frustrating for vocational education committees to put proposals to the Department and find they do not get a decision for months, and sometimes for years. Unnecessary delays should be cut out.

I was interested, indeed, to hear Deputy Briscoe appealing for a limited intermediate certificate certifying that a student had passed in Irish, English and maths or maths, history and geography. Fine Gael have been asking for such a certificate for many years. The Fine Gael Party have been advocating that a student should not be deprived of a certificate just because he fails to pass in Irish, for example, any more than if he failed to pass in maths. We have been advocating that he should get a certificate certifying that he has passed in the subjects he did pass in. On that I am in complete agreement with Deputy Briscoe.

I should like to deal briefly with the revival of the Irish language. I am glad to note that since the Fine Gael Party published their policy on this subject some time ago, there has been an improvement. The Fine Gael Party thought then and think now that the stick should be taken out of Irish, that fear should be taken out of Irish, and that the Government should cease trying to revive Irish on a purely commercial basis. In so far as the Buntús Cainte programmes are attractive and tend to encourage people to take an interest in Irish I wish to express my complete approval of them. The Fianna Fáil Party, as they have done so often in other spheres, have accepted the Fine Gael policy on the revival of Irish. They do not do this lock, stock and barrel overnight. They take it bit by bit, digest it over a long period, and eventually accept it, lock, stock and barrel.

Which of them?

The Deputy is joking this morning.

(Cavan): I understand there is new thinking in the Department on the leaving certificate. I do not know how well this information is founded but I understand that some sort of advanced leaving certificate is being talked about in the Department, and that when it becomes a reality it will be possible to get a leaving certificate without a pass in Irish. I do not know whether the Parliamentary Secretary has heard anything about this but it is being talked about. Since the appeal by the Fine Gael Party for an approach to the revival of the Irish language other than by methods of compulsion, there has been a change. When I came into this House first, when you rang up any Department you were answered in English, notwithstanding the fact that the Fianna Fáil Party were howling for the restoration of the Irish language. Since the Fine Gael Party came out with their policy and appealed for a more rational approach to the language, you are answered in Irish. That is as it should be.

If we are to revive the Irish language, we will revive it only by creating an atmosphere in which a man will not consider himself fully educated unless he knows the Irish language. Create that sort of atmosphere and you will revive the language but you will not revive it by encouraging students to cram Irish into their course for six, or 12 months or for two years until they can get an examination and then forget all about it. That has been the approach for far too long. In so far as the Buntús Cainte programmes display a civilised approach towards the restoration of the language, I welcome them completely. They are a move in the right direction and they are programmes which were inspired by the Fine Gael approach to the revival of the language.

To describe the Minister as being dynamic in his approach to education is, I suppose, a gross understatement. While appreciating what the Minister has done, we must also pay tribute to his predecessors, each of whom played a certain part. The Minister's greatest achievement is that he educated the people to think about education. Apart from providing the huge total of £36¼ million, which is double the expenditure of ten years ago, he has got the ordinary people thinking about education. He has made education a popular talking point. The people are prepared to make sacrifices by paying taxation and parents are prepared to make further sacrifices so that their children can go on from primary school, now with free secondary education, and eventually on to the university. Our greatest hope for full prosperity lies in the fact that an educated people will be prosperous. Then you will have a proper climate in which to create the society which the vast majority of people want to create.

At the same time, we must appreciate that the Minister has difficulties, as have all other countries, but be it said to the credit of the Minister and the Government that they have refused to cut back on educational services. Some so-called socialist countries are held up to us sometimes as being the very epitome of perfection in social services, yet when they experience financial difficulties one of the first things which they cut back is education. To my mind, this is deplorable and personally I would cut back on any service except education. If you educate people you can create a society which is as near perfect as you will ever get. If you do not have proper education then you are building a house which will not last.

I can recall the state of educational services in Dublin 30 years ago when there was an educational apartheid. If you went to a primary school only you were classed as being much lower than the boy who went to secondary school. If you did not wear a flashy schoolcap with a nice crest on it then that was your badge of apartheid and you were one of the untouchables. I want to pay tribute to the teachers and the Christian Brothers of those dark days when they provided a magnificent service and tried to do as best they could from the resources they had. They educated our boys and girls from the poorest homes. That was not fashionable then. It is fairly fashionable today. I should like to pay tribute to the primary teachers who followed in the footsteps of Pearse and to the Christian Brothers who rendered such a magnificent service to the country.

When we hear of teachers taking action today about insanitary schools, we may consider that this is not the best approach, but at the same time I have a certain sympathy with them, being aware of the conditions obtaining in this city years ago. At that time, perhaps we did not have the resources, or perhaps we did not think in this way, and little was done about such matters. Now the Government, the Minister and the people are thinking about education, which is the greatest guarantee that we will build a really prosperous society in which our people will be able to live full lives in full employment.

I mentioned snobbery earlier and there is another type of snobbery today where parents are inclined to send their children for commercial careers rather than to vocational schools where they would receive training of a manual nature. It is seldom I admire the Soviet Union but some time ago I read about the vast sums which they spend on vocational education. Someone said that they are too poor not to be able to afford this huge expenditure. That may appear contradictory but it is not, and I agree we are too poor also not to be able to afford all the money we can get for vocational education. With the advance in science it may be that in 20 years the computers may be doing most of the work but we should train our youths to make these computers, to service them and to operate them, because I am afraid that for the ordinary clerical worker the future is not very bright.

I should like to suggest that when the Minister is considering his final plans for setting up the new university in Dublin he should bring in technical schools like Kevin Street and Bolton Street. The new Kevin Street school is a magnificent building and it will play a great part in the educational services. Speaking as a layman, I wonder if we could not have a university complex with UCD and TCD and also, as types of constituent colleges, Kevin Street Technical School as well as Bolton Street and the new school in Ballymun. Then you would have a complete run from primary school to secondary school and on to the constituent colleges then to take, say, an engineering degree in UCD or TCD. There is a great opportunity for us to do something really new in this line. The Minister's courage in tackling the proposed merger between UCD and TCD took the breath from many of us but it is well worth considering and it will remove the last vestige of snobbery in the university in that boys will be able to go on right up to university level.

Deputy Fitzpatrick made an eloquent plea for better facilities for handicapped children. I do not think there is anybody in the House who will disagree with him in this regard. Each one of us as a public representative or otherwise meets people who have mentally or physically retarded children and we find that the story Deputy Fitzpatrick tells is true, that it is impossible to get some of these children into a school. When they try they are told there is a waiting list. There are several associations doing tremendous work with the help of the Government and by their own efforts, such groups as the Parents and Friends of Mentally Handicapped Children and the Polio Fellowship. These people are doing a tremendous job but they just cannot do the whole job. The whole resources of the State must be thrown behind them. In the world today there are lots of people with funny ideas about people who are deformed or handicapped in any way. The more materialistic nations do not consider them worth bothering about. We must set a headline on this. Where there is a handicapped child, let there be a school he can go to get some training. If he has very little mental power, it may be difficult to give him training but we can relieve the parents of the terrible anxiety of having a handicapped child with nowhere to go. Deputy Fitzpatrick says that they say: "What will happen to him when I die?" This, of course, is what is on the minds of the parents.

If we can say: "We, the State, will train him to the best of our ability and at least he will not be on the street when you die. He will have a home and he will be educated all the time", it will not be so bad. Some years ago, just after the Minister was changed to Education he opened a Polio Fellowship house at Goatstown, County Dublin and I would suggest to any Deputy to go out there and see the work those people have done. Thank God, polio is dying out because of the advance of science by way of serums but this is only one disease which is dying. I feel that the mentally handicapped child is even worse off than the physically handicapped because the physically handicapped can be given some training. It may be difficult with the mentally handicapped but still we must not just throw him aside. I hope when the Budget comes and in next year's Estimates that we will make a much greater contribution towards schools and the training of those children.

It is very heartening to read that the numbers going to industrial reform schools is declining. I do not know if this is a sign of betterment of our social life—we hear a lot about delinquency. I should like to ask the Minister to try to ensure that where possible boys should be sent to a school near their home, say, within ten or 15 miles of it. Boys from this city are sent to County Galway. I suppose a number of those boys come from people who are in the lower income group, not the majority of them but a number of them, and the parents just cannot afford to visit them. Therefore, I feel we lose a certain amount of parental help with these children. If a boy is away from home for 12 months perhaps and does not see his parents, it is very unlikely when he returns home that he will accept their control. While he is in the school, he is being trained in different ways by good people who are teachers, but he will not have had the affection that he would have had at home. I feel the Minister might well consider arranging that a boy should be sent to the nearest school and in the case of Dublin the nearest school should be much nearer than Letterfrack. People may say: "These children must be punished." It is not so much a question of punishment, but they must be shown that this is not the right way to live. However, I suggest that the parents' influence is a tremendous factor and if a Dublin boy is sent to Letterfrack he is out of touch with his parents. I feel that frequent visits by the parents would help tremendously. I would ask the Minister to remember this when he receives the report on the matter.

Before concluding, I should like to mention one other thing. I know that some allegedly clever people now think that it is the "in" thing to do to attack religious orders. While they may have had their faults in the past, we should not forget the great service they provided for our people, at one time the only service open to the mass of the people. I want to go on record as saying that while I have had my reservations about secondary schools of 30 years ago when we had educational apartheid in this city, at the same time I want to reiterate again my admiration for the primary school teachers and the Christian Brothers.

I want to again congratulate the Minister who is doing a magnificent job. Not alone has he got the Government and his Party behind him, but I believe he has got the whole country behind him.

At the outset I would like to thank Deputies on all sides of the House for their constructive suggestions, and while I may not refer to every point dealt with in the debate, I would like to assure the Deputies in question that if I do omit anything in my reply now, I shall write personally to them in the course of the next two weeks when I look further into some of these matters which could not be dealt with today.

The first question that might be asked of a Minister for Education is what is the principal thing that animates him in seeking better education for the people of his country. My answer would be that it is to enable every citizen to lead a full life. We cannot expect a citizen to lead this full life unless his education is such as will enable him to develop his potential to the greatest possible extent and having reached that stage, he can then expect to derive a high degree of satisfaction from work and pleasure.

In our present age a high level of education is essential not alone for any worthwhile position but for any real enjoyment of many of the modern vehicles of entertainment. Whatever else we might say, for example, about television, it does provide us from time to time with first-class educational programmes which can be fully appreciated only by those whose own education is adequate. Not only will the educational requirements for various posts continue to rise but all human activities will become more and more sophisticated. A man or woman who has not acquired a good education cannot hope to live a full life in the circumstances which will obtain in the future. Therefore, education is important, not only for its own sake but for the sake of the social man. I make these opening statements in winding up the discussion on this Estimate so that people will appreciate, I hope, that I know not only where I am going as Minister for Education, but why I am going.

There is one aspect of education referred to by some of the speakers which I feel does not get the attention it deserves when we come to debate education in general. I refer to adult education. Of course, there are very many bodies engaged in adult education. The work being done in the vocational schools and by the various voluntary bodies comes readily to mind. Excellent work is being done in many centres through the development, for example, of youth clubs. It has been suggested to me that many more such clubs might be formed if accommodation were available. This brings me to the thought that we have very fine assembly halls and large rooms associated with many primary, secondary, and vocational schools, the use of which is limited to a few hours every day. Indeed, you, a Leas-Cheann Comhairle, could cite instances where some of these large halls are utilised only a few times a year. This, of course, is a great tragedy. We cannot let this position continue much longer while these clubs are crying out for accommodation and when we would just not be in a position to supply the millions and millions of pounds to fulfil this need.

I would again refer to one of Ireland's outstanding sociologists— perhaps he might not so entitle himself —Father Liam Ryan of UCC and his social document Social Dynamite. Those of us who have read this document recall with feelings of regret the lack of community centres in our housing schemes throughout Ireland. Father Ryan quoted families being taken from the old Georgian cities and put into other cities and into fine new houses and then the local authority saw the lovely plan coloured green called “open space” and now all that is there are boulders, rocks and wandering horses and the housing scheme is there and the young people are at the street corners and the old people have nowhere to go because of that lack of a community centre. One cannot take this problem in isolation. It is very much associated with education of the young and adult education.

Training in the use of leisure for our young people in their formative years is absolutely imperative. The Minister for Education, the Department of Education and the Government cannot do a great deal but they can give indications, can provide guidelines; they can try to initiate co-ordination of the activities of these excellent voluntary bodies. That brings to mind the boys' clubs and the tremendous work they are doing and all these other bodies comprising the National Youth Council.

I am glad to say that I got a letter from the Minister for Finance last evening authorising a small grant to the National Youth Council to help them in their problems. It is not so long ago that all these various bodies dealing with the youth of the country—Macra na Tuatha, Boy Scouts, Girl Guides, Muintir na Tire, came together. Perhaps I should not have mentioned those four because I have left out about 20. An interesting development is that the Federation of Catholic Boys' Clubs have now received approval that these youth clubs be comprised of both sexes. This is forward thinking by the Hierarchy or whoever is dealing at a high level with the organisation of these clubs. It is mature thinking. There is now approval that in these youth clubs boys and girls can come to gether in an environment under suppervision. They will have somewhere to go. It is a wonderful step forward.

Perhaps someone in the public gallery listening to me might ask what this Estimate is about. We all appreciate that we cannot divorce the problem of leisure from the question of education. The type of community centre to which I have referred and the utilisation of schools for this purpose will help our young people and those not so young to build up their character, develop their talents, increase their physical well-being, will give them an opportunity to exchange views and, as I said earlier, enable the individual to develop his full potential.

Our schools are not concerning themselves sufficiently with the out-of-school recreation activities of our children. We have very long holidays in Ireland. Perhaps I might digress for a moment. I have an idea at the present time in regard to which many school authorities do not agree with me although there are a few who do. I would like to see the schools in Ireland close down at the end of May and come back in what is the autumn, August. Tourism immediately comes to mind but before we come to that, I want to say that I think everyone who contributed to this debate said that the children are our prime concern. June, with the long days, even if there is not much sunshine, would enable families, as we know most of us would like to do, to go to the seaside or take their holidays in June, but due to the set-up at present, some of the schools go on to the end of June and I think some of them go into early July. This just is not right.

Let us come to the tourist industry. I have had a very strong case made to me by the Minister for Transport and Power to look at this problem of summer holidays. Again, I have had some interesting correspondence from some children. One of the most heartening things about Ireland today is the number of children who write to me on many of their problems. It is very encouraging that young people are able to express themselves. I do not think we would have done that in our day. This is a good trend. One of the most interesting comments from a letter I received recently was that as things are at present they are at school until the end of June or early July. They do their leaving certificate or the matriculation examination and they are waiting for results which do not come out until the first week in August. If the child had to repeat some subjects, which is quite normal, he would have to continue studying. If the schools closed at the end of May and the children sat for the leaving certificate and had to repeat some subjects, they could have a rest of a month or so before studying for those extra subjects.

May I say this? I do not know whether we will be able to achieve this. As I say, it is difficult to upset our institutions and their ways. They will tell you 101 different reasons why they should not be upset. If this thing is basically sound, we will just have to adapt ourselves accordingly in the best interests of our children and in the national interest as well. We do not want to do anything that will cause upset to anybody or any organisation. We will have discussions. We will not wake up some Monday morning and find a statement saying that this big change has been made. We know that there are three, four, five or even ten sides to every story. Possibly there might need to be a transitional period.

I know this is rather revolutionary but I think it will come. I have discussed this matter with Deputies. I am glad to say that I do not think any week passes that I do not meet Deputies of all Parties. Education is not a political matter in the sense in which we use the word "political": it as far above that. We are all agreed that as time goes on, our educational policy will have to improve year by year. We are all united on that, thank God. Deputies on all sides of the House seem to feel very strongly on this holiday aspect.

We should organise on this whole question of holidays. I was talking about the non-utilisation of our schools and I want to say that we are alive to that because we know that during the holidays our children have just nowhere to go. We should utilise our schools for those children. I often quote Kevin O'Higgins who said: "You, me and the fellow around the corner, that's us." It is the Irish tax-payers who pay for those schools in the final analysis. We are pouring millions into schools and here are magnificent buildings which are not fully utilised and some of our children have not any accommodation during the holiday periods.

Every Deputy knows of the different organisations who will come to him asking him to subscribe to a particular club so that they can provide facilities for those kids. An opportunity should be given of using this leisure time by attending lectures or something else in those schools. There is a tremendous exciting potentiality in this regard. Career guidance and things like that could be given and it could be followed up with adult education. We have not supplied enough community centres or recreational facilities either in built-up areas or in rural areas. It is all right to be talking about the flight from the land, but with television and everything else, it is the old story of "how you goin' to keep them down on the farm now that they've seen Paree." It is all right saying that there is a living on the land, but night must fall.

There are parts of Ireland where there are some fine factories but there is all female employment in some of them. If you have not the boys, the girls will go. They will go and settle where the men are. We want an Ireland more than anything else where industry is geared to a high male labour content. Then, take the modern family house. In some of our houses, it is not possible to bring in friends. The parents like the children to bring their friends back but they like to have a party and this has to be organised for them. A lot of children would like to buy those modern records but they are too expensive for them. They all like to be together but there is not any place for them.

The reason I dwell on this so long is that we all feel so strongly about it. God knows in relation to some of our modern dance halls the less I say about them with regard to the spiritual and physical health of our people the better it is. We also know that young persons are not supposed to go into dance halls if they are under 18 but children throughout the world are maturing earlier and and the rule is openly flaunted. I would not blame the proprietors because you would not know sometimes what age some of those individuals are. You would not know whether they were dwarfs or old men.

There is no organised recreation for our children between the ages of 14 and 18. I do not apologise for spending all this time on this matter on the Education Estimate. I hope at the end if it this will sink in and I hope it will excite comment, discussion and debate by Deputies in all the rural areas because it can do so much good. Then you have people hitch-hiking to these dances. Some of the girls over 21 think their chance has gone and that all the dance halls are filled with young people. Bearing in mind adult education, I do not confine the utilisation of these school buildings to young people alone. I would have some rooms for the old people where they could watch television and meet their friends so that there would be a preservation of the community and parish spirit and a coming-together.

It is like the philosophy of industry in rural Ireland, particularly in the West. I think I cited on one occasion going down to Cornamona to visit an all Irish-speaking vocational school. In the evenings, they had adults taking classes: everything was through Irish. In the daytime, they had may be 30 boys and girls together there in a beautiful school with equipment, and so on. Then, when they reached 16 years of age, or so, off with them to Chicago, New York, and London. I remember coming back to Dublin in the car that night. I do not think any single thing agitated my mind as much as the thought, "Could we not get an industry there, a little place built on to that school, where the children from the vocational school, in co-operation with the trade unionists, could become apprenticed and, when they had their apprenticeship served in the factory attached to that school, the family could be preserved and the principle of building-up the family unit in rural Ireland could be developed." That was the thought that was all the time in my mind that evening.

It is all right to talk about the Irish language and all these other most commendable things but these are facts, and realistic facts, and I think the answer is there. The Leas-Cheann Comhairle knows of a city close to parts of which are small holdings. People from those small holdings go into the city on bicycles, motorcycles, scooters and in cars and get employment at Shannon and other areas— thank God, although it is not enough —and they come home in the evening to the small holdings. They are living at home and bringing in a few pounds every week. If they were not doing that, the holdings would be uneconomic. They are preserving the unity of the family. The boys are working and so are the girls and they are bringing money home. This is the philosophy which hinges on education and leisure. There are people emigrating from Ireland today, we all know it, throwing up good jobs, because there is nothing to do in the evenings— nothing to do.

Some clubs have been started— what they call "clubs"—but they are grossly overcrowded. I would say to every Deputy, every elected representative and all those wonderful people who do voluntary work that if any of them who are interested in fostering youth activities feel that my Department might be reluctant to sanction the use of halls, they need have no fear in that regard. If any of them fear that my Department might be reluctant to do so—and I say this to the school managers, to the vocational education committees, to the owners of schools and I say it to everybody from the highest down—they need have no fear in that regard. It would achieve a great deal for our youth, our young people. I see these halls lying idle for so long. They could be utilised for concerts, films, indoor amusements, billiards. They could have a little tea and mineral bar. There could be a lounge with television. Sports grounds are attached to almost all our schools. Frequently, there are playing-fields close to such halls. I am thinking of the desirability of facilities for boxing, physical training and so on.

There was just one other point. I did not mention it to anybody. However, as we are looking into this whole matter, it is no harm to consider it also. Look at our boarding-schools throughout Ireland and consider the long months they are closed. We have all paid for those, too. The Irish taxpayer has paid. I do not deny at any time that great sacrifices were made by religious orders down through the years to provide education for our people. As a matter of fact, we should not have the educational system we have today were it not for their sacrifices and the sacrifices of others. I have had my clashes with them. They were very necessary. I had some "reluctant debutantes." But, by and large, I cannot speak too highly of the work the religious have done in the country for our education.

However, on the question of the non-utilisation of schools, I would point out that there are children in Ireland who never have a holiday. I know there are children who have never seen the sea but there are children in Ireland who have never had a holiday. Everybody does not have to go to the sea. His Lordship of Ossory, Dr. Birch, has made considerable strides in a limited way. With the voluntary committee, he has helped to give some children a little holiday.

From an educational point of view, an urban bias is a most dangerous thing in Ireland: it would be bad that our youth should think only in terms of life in the city. We must educate our children, through civics and otherwise, to realise that children from urban areas and children from rural areas are complementary. Children from rural Ireland come to Dublin to visit the National Museum, the National Gallery, and other places of interest. The process should work in reverse, too, and city children should be enabled to visit rural areas. Consider the tremendous impression that would be created in the formative minds of children from Dublin on going to the West and visiting these historic areas and having a holiday in the beautiful boarding-schools which are now closed-up for the long hot summer and some of which have not alone playing fields but swimming pools. Can Deputies imagine the excitement that would be created in the minds of some of the kids from the cities, and the thrill they would experience, when they found themselves having a holiday in the country in beautiful conditions? Above all, it would give our Irish urban children an opportunity of seeing what rural Ireland is really like, what makes it tick, its problems.

I remember speaking to one of the heads of a certain school. I shall not tell the House where the school is but, if I did, Deputies would appreciate the look on the face of the person to whom I was speaking when I answered his question. He had asked me: "What would it please you most to do with our boarding-schools?" I replied: "You have a very big boarding-school which is very highly thought of throughout the country. If I had my way, I would put itinerant children into it during the long hot summer— with the consent of their parents." That was the end of that conversation.

We are all aware of the itinerant problem and of the plight of our itinerant children: it agitates our minds. In a certain area a local committee helped tremendously. Then one of the Wards died down in Galway. The children had been at school for five weeks. The children had been the funeral. The funeral took another two weeks. The children had been doing very well. They were remarkable children, capable of picking up points very quickly. They were taught for another seven weeks but then there was a fair below in Kerry, and off they were again. That took another three weeks.

Those are the difficulties. It is all right for people to speak about this on television. I would love to see some of those children attend a type of boarding school with the consent of their parents. You have to have an opportunity of getting to them. Schools nowadays are not playing the big part they did in the past. Family environment now counts more than anything else—television, the home, the parents themselves. It all goes back to Father Ryan's Social Dynamite— family environment, bright children going back to appalling conditions in the home. It is very hard to educate in a caravan, going back there in the night.

This problem of the education of itinerant children is not one I am trying to avoid. I acknowledge the efforts being made by the clergy and other members of the public to improve the lot of these children. My Department will give all the help it can and co-operate in any way possible. I am afraid the progress is slow. There is no single solution to the problem. We just have to continue to examine the position in each area. It is one case where ad hoc arrangements will just have to be made to suit local circumstances.

There was reference to the question of free books for post-primary schools. I pointed out in my opening speech that the number of pupils coming within the scheme of free education was greater than we thought. We thought it would be 75 per cent but in the event 92 per cent have come in. Furthermore, the percentage of pupils who qualified for free books was higher than had been expected. Therefore, it has been necessary to make additional sums available for the scheme. This is being done by way of Supplementary Estimate to be moved later, with the permission of the House.

Deputy Lindsay criticised me and said that as the percentage of children getting free books was so high, why not go the whole way and give them to everyone. This is not necessary. The national average is 25 per cent of the children. Indeed, there will have to be improvements in the administration of the scheme. I do not think my decisions as to the working of it were entirely sound. I appreciate the extra burden I have thrown on many of the principal teachers in trying to do the very difficult task of assessing who is entitled. But this is a growing pain. The basis has been laid and I hope next year the position will improve. When Deputy Lindsay wants free books for all, I would like to remind him that in the Fine Gael scheme he quoted, they forgot about books altogether.

There is one group of pupils I did not refer to in relation to the scheme of free education, that is, pupils whose homes are situated in areas outside the range of transport. These pupils are not large in number. They can only avail of post-primary education in boarding schools because no post-primary schools are available in their area and they are outside the transport range of 15 miles. I promised special assistance in those cases and I will announce the details of this assistance shortly. This refers to children in the islands and other isolated areas. It would be uneconomical to bring schools to them and it is far more sensible economically to help them go to boarding schools. I believe only about 1,000 children are involved.

With regard to this question of old, unsuitable substandard schools, I mentioned that in my opening statement. Undoubtedly, it is a problem and I have referred to it previously in no uncertain manner. But it is a problem that can very easily be exaggerated into enormous proportions. If we all got it into our heads for a start that in relation to the requirements of modern education small schools are just doomed, we would be a long way towards solving our problems. That does not mean I have adopted this policy of scrubbing the lot across the board. Deputies know there are extenuating circumstances in certain cases, transition periods and so forth. But if we do appreciate that small schools are out, the first result will be that all the interested parties will stop dragging their heels and we can get on immediately towards enlarging what will be in fact central schools and providing them with basic amenities. Given these conditions, a programme can be mounted which will break the back of this problem.

In regard to the dialogue between the INTO and the Managers Association going on in the papers at present, in fairness it must be said that in the final analysis it is the Minister for Education who is responsible to ensure that these insanitary hovels are made good. This is a big task. It is all right to say the managers are responsible for this. I have certain rights when I see a manager is not doing his job. If this position were to obtain and continue without any likelihood of the 700 or 800 schools being repaired and brought into proper condition within a reasonable period, then I would have to take drastic action myself. What I am trying to say is that, in the final analysis, the Minister for Education is responsible, and if he does not do certain things, then he is shirking his responsibilities. The success of such a programme which I mention here will depend on the full co-operation of all concerned. I seek in that regard the co-operation of Deputies from all sides of the House, and I would ask them not to lend themselves to agitation to have outmoded one-and two-teacher schools retained.

When I say that, I am not criticising Deputy Mrs. Hogan O'Higgins' very eminently sound speech which she made last night, or the speech of Deputy Donnellan. People are quite entitled to talk on something in which they genuinely believe. I have in mind the agitation to retain outmoded one-and two-teacher schools, and in that connection I should like to remind Deputy Treacy who waxed so eloquently on Mullinahone and its associations with Charles Kickham and on other schools in his area, that his own Party expressed itself in full agreement with the policy of securing larger national school units. I am surprised that he should be running around Tipperary associating himself with a shortsighted agitation to keep some of these small schools open. I can assure him that in the long run the parents will not thank him at all. They will learn very quickly—we have evidence that they have learned where it has happened—the value and the benefits of the larger school to the educational needs of the child.

There were Deputies advocating the granting of extern degrees by our universities here and their suggestions merit full consideration.

I did not refer to it here because I have not much to say about it, but it is a very important issue which we cannot ignore indefinitely, that is, the non-utilisation of our national television service for educational matters. I think I said some time ago that I had evidence of some countries who rushed into utilising their national television service for educational purposes without any examination in depth, and those countries, European countries, were the first to admit that they were wrong and they should have given a lot of consideration to it. Both from the point of view of our schools and the great potential for god in education that RTE could do, we are examining this very assiduously and in detail, and when we have certain recommendations I shall give the House an opportunity of discussing them. We had some programmes——

"Into Europe" last Wednesday week.

The "Late Late Show" last Saturday.

Mr. O'Malley

We had certain programmes beamed on the schools. For a school to get a programme from television, the first prerequisite is a television set. That sounds infantile, but there was a large percentage of schools in this country that up to some time ago did not have television sets at all, and there are some still in that position. Then again if we are going to beam educational programmes to the schools, the curriculum will have to be so organised that if you have, say history, French, Irish, English or science, from 11 to 12 o'clock on television, all the schools throughout Ireland will have to have that on the curriculum from 11 to 12. That did not happen always. Then of course, the individual giving a lecture on the film will have to be a first-class person, but when the film is over on the television, the work really only starts. It is then the elaboration and the enlarging of these things by the teacher takes place.

Deputy T. O'Donnell and Deputy Mrs. Desmond spoke about a pupil-teacher ratio of 30 pupils per teacher, saying we were aiming at having no more than 35 pupils in any class. We are, in fact, aiming at a position in which the average number of pupils per class will not exceed 30. Deputy Gilhawley's suggestion that the teachers be consulted has already been adopted. Representatives of the teachers have from time to time had discussions with officers of my Department and officers of the Board of Works, and they have been very helpful.

Deputy Lindsay made the point that in my Department educational planning is confined to administrators. This is a suggestion which has been made not only by Deputy Lindsay but many other people who are interested in education and who write on the topic. This is not true. My inspectors are not administrators. They have been recruited from the teaching service and are of high academic qualification. The same can be said of our psychologists. Every project relating to purely educational matters as distinct from educational administration has been formulated after the fullest consultation with the teaching bodies. The latest example—I just give it because it is the latest—is the recommendation in regard to the structure of the leaving certificate course. These recommendations were drawn up by a committee consisting of six members of the teaching bodies and three officers of my Department, two of whom were inspectors. Moreover, the revision of the syllabuses for the intermediate and leaving certificate courses—and these are at the heart of our post-primary education—has been carried out by committees composed of the representatives of the teaching bodies and not more than two inspectors of my Department. I hope that people who base their policy documents on false suppositions will not continue to remain in blinkers and ignore facts, but for the record that is the position.

I was asked by Deputy T. O'Donnell and Deputy Mrs. Desmond to define exactly the functions of a vocational school, a technical college and a college of technology. That is a reasonable and valid question. A vocational school provides continuation education and education suited to pupils proposing to enter into trade apprenticeship. In recent years the vocational school has expanded its activities and can now undertake the preparation of pupils for intermediate certificate and subsequently to leaving certificate. A technical college will accept pupils who have completed the intermediate certificate course and who wish to take apprenticeship courses, junior technician courses, to follow secretarial courses or to follow the leaving certificate courses in technical, scientific and commercial subjects with a view to proceeding to higher education. Some of the technician courses would cover a period of three or four years. By and large, the technical college offers a concentration of technical courses at junior level and preparation for higher technician and technological courses.

A college of technology offers technical courses of third-level quality. The entry standard will be leaving certificate or its equivalent, and this standard will be the take-off point for all courses in the college. The entry level to the vocational school is completion of primary education, to the technical college completion of intermediate certificate, and to the college of technology completion of leaving certificate course.

The definitions I have given are theoretical to some extent, because of the sharp division between the technical college and the college of technology. In our circumstances, it would be difficult to insist on such sharp divisions. Certainly in our regional technical colleges, it is my intention that these colleges will, where circumstances warrant it, provide higher technician and commercial as well as the courses I have indicated as appropriate to a technical college.

One thing that has disturbed me greatly since I became Minister is the lack of emphasis on agriculture as a subject in our schools——

Hear, hear.

Mr. O'Malley

——outside the cities. I am upset to think that the courses in rural Ireland in our vocational schools, and in other schools in rural Ireland, are not sufficient to cater for children who will live on the land for the rest of their lives. I want to tell the House that we hope that the curricula will be brought into line with modern thinking, and that agriculture in all its facets will be adequately catered for, which it is not at the moment. In that connection I should like to say that it appears to me from looking into the matter that the school day in our national schools is about the shortest in Europe, which is disturbing. This is a matter which will arise in connection with the proceedings of the salary tribunal which has now started. This is an important matter. The committee of inspectors are at present engaged in re-allocating the school day and preparing revised curricula preparatory to their submission to the various school bodies for their opinion.

The fact that our school day in the national schools is one of the shortest in Europe is tied up, too, with possible rethinking on the five-day week for our schools in Ireland, which will come some time. It is just one of those things.

Why did the Minister wander off that topic?

Mr. O'Malley

Which topic?

A comparison between the school hours. Is there any difference in the system?

Mr. O'Malley

All schools vary. I got a document recently which I will send to the Deputy. In it there is a breakdown of the subject matter of different subjects: religious knowledge, mother tongue, writing, foreign language, arithmetic, physical science, natural science, geography, history, civics, singing, drawing, handicraft, physical education, and so forth in the different countries: Germany, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Spain, France, United Kingdom, Greece, Ireland, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey. This is such a basically essential matter that possibly the time will come when we will have a discussion in depth on it. As I say, we are looking at the curricula. On the question of the Irish language, there is this emphasis on grammar which I deplore for our young children, and there will have to be rethinking on that score.

The Minister was on the comparative tables.

Mr. O'Malley

In that connection I should like to say to Deputy Dillon that we are not always comparing like with like. When we have defects, as we have, in our system the best thing is to face up to them and discuss how we are to correct them.

There has been some correspondence in the evening papers and in some of the daily papers about the leaving certificate and the people who do the course at night. Deputies are aware that the structure of the leaving certificate is under consideration, and one of the matters proposed for consideration is the awarding of the leaving certificate on cumulative results for people who are at work and must study part-time. They cannot be expected to take the full range of subjects at one sitting. They should be allowed to take one or two subjects at a time and so build up to the full leaving certificate over a period of years. That is common justice. I think that the schools committee will accept it. After all, there are many people who could not avail of post-primary education due to their financial circumstances and who had to go out and work. Some of them are clever, and some are indeed brilliant. This will be an opportunity for them. When we talk about adult education, let us be consistent.

There were letters in the papers which agitated and disturbed people taking the courses in the leaving certificate at night throughout the country. There was an outcry of disappointment. I do not want to identify anyone but I had one letter which read:

Dear Mr. O'Malley,

I wrote to you only the other day about secondary schools, now I find I must write to you at once about this awful situation.

I do not know this lady at all, but, however, she continues—

now I find I must write to you at once about this awful situation. It was only after reading—

a certain paper last night—

that I learned about it, it is about the night student and the leaving certificate, what a dreadful state of affairs to say that they do not get a proper Certificate after all they do to achieve this. I am sure Mr. O'Malley that I know you are a very just man and it is only with this thought that I write to you to plea with you to do something at once to remedy this state of affairs as soon as you can.

I can only speak with the knowledge seeing my eldest son who is 19 years old doing a job all day from 9.30 to sometimes 7.30 at night and then going three nights on from work to a night school the other nights studying also Sunday all day until about 9 o'clock Sunday night, to get his leaving certificate, he hopes this year please God to get it, last night he was very disappointed to learn that he will not get a proper leaving certificate and to my mind Mr. O'Malley this is dreadful, here you have children that are trying their very best to get on to better themselves and to help to make this a better country and what do they get for their efforts, they could just as well be filling the dancehalls, the bars and what else have you, mind you I am not saying there is anything wrong with these places but surely you can see the injustice in this.

Please, Mr. O'Malley, do something soon or else these wonderful people shall be completely lost to society, as my son on going to bed last night said after a day of hard work, nine hours work and 2½ hours studying, "it is so unfair." So please, Mr. O'Malley, hear their voices and do something for them.

I should like to say——

Where is that letter from? Is it from Dublin?

Mr. O'Malley

It is.

The Minister should send the lady a copy of the debates and point out that he has quoted her letter in the House. She would be very pleased.

Mr. O'Malley

That is a good idea. The reason I read the letter is that it is indicative of the feeling of a lot of people.

What is the burden of the lady's complaint?

Mr. O'Malley

The burden of the lady's complaint is that here is her son——

Studying for his leaving certificate.

Mr. O'Malley

What he thought was his leaving certificate and now he finds on coming home at night, working by day, and then studying for what he thought was his leaving certificate——

What is it?

Mr. O'Malley

It is some kind of photostat copy, a statement——

What value will that certificate be to him?

Mr. O'Malley

Not a great deal. I would not say that it would be of no value for it will at least enable an employer to say: "Well, I see he got x per cent in such-and-such a subject, x per cent in such-and-such a subject," and so on. It means there are certain of our people who through financial circumstances can only take education at night and we should do everything we can for them. They are to be commended for what they are doing. All I am saying is that one of the matters proposed for consideration in the awarding of the leaving certificate is that we will have it on cumulative results.

Like the GCE in England? That would be very desirable.

May I ask the Minister this? You portray this lady's deep disappointment in regard to her son going for the leaving certificate. We all know that a great many businesses in the country have as one condition that the applicant should have the leaving certificate. Can you not put this to rights by a simple order? If you said that this diploma is "the educational equivalent"? Is it not perfectly easy to make an order saying that, in public appointments for instance, the Department's diploma will rank as a leaving certificate?

If it does, what is the trouble?

Mr. O'Malley

At present it does not rank as a leaving certificate.

Make it rank then, for the purpose of appointments in the public service, if it is as good.

Mr. O'Malley

This is one of the topics being discussed by those who are reviewing the whole field of the leaving certificate and the possibility of an advanced leaving certificate. They are looking at the problem of these young people studying at night time, at the possibility of doing the leaving certificate on a basis of cumulative results for people who are not now at school. I have not yet examined the recommendations on the leaving certificate structure because I have not got the views of all the school bodies, but the recommendation on cumulative results has appealed to them and appeals to me. When the new certificate is decided on, reasonably soon, I hope to issue to all Deputies a comprehensive statement showing exactly what is envisaged. When we are talking about adult education this is one of the key problems. So many people now have what we call post-primary education which was not formerly available to them and they are to be commended for trying to better themselves and we must give them every assistance.

Following my introductory speech on the Estimate, a number of Deputies referred to the ideal of comprehensive education at post-primary level for all our children. I feel that the House might be interested if I set out in rather broad terms what we are seeking to achieve in the comprehensive schools, those we have set up in Cootehill, Carraroe and in Shannon. The comprehensive school offers full post-primary education to all pupils of the school area who have completed their primary education. The pupils come from all sections of the community, regardless of socio-economic groups. They have a wide range of ability and differ considerably in the matter of educational achievement.

The essence of the comprehensive idea is the development of educational interests and aptitudes of the individual pupil. On entry to the school a pupil might be backward in educational achievement. The causes of his backwardness might vary: lack of interest at home, illness during earlier years, a certain weakness of teaching perhaps—let us face this—in a primary school or a private primary school. But that pupil might have a potential far in excess of his achievement. There is no doubt about this. He will realise that potential, given the proper stimulus. Screening at entry to the school would be disastrous for a pupil of this kind. In the comprehensive school, individual pupils are assigned to classes at random and there are no screened classes.

The Minister does not mean that they are assigned to classes at random but assigned to a sort of entrance class for determination of aptitudes.

Mr. O'Malley

I mean to convey they are not put in with grade A or grade B. Non-screened classes demand more preparation for the teachers as well as greater versatility. If screening is avoided, no pupil will be designated second-rate from the beginning of his post-primary career, with its psychological reaction. The curriculum must be wide and it must offer a choice of subjects in languages, science, social sciences and technical subjects and every pupil must take a common core of subjects: religious knowledge, Irish, English, mathematics, environmental studies and a hand and eye subject. The hand and eye subject could be metalwork, woodwork and art. This common core takes up about two-thirds of the pupil's time and the remaining one-third of his time is devoted to subjects of the pupil's own choice.

I am satisfied that there is further scope for a revision and an improvement in the curriculum of particularly our comprehensive schools. May I say also that while these schools I have cited, the new comprehensive school in Ballymun and the new one in Glenties will be physical entities, the conception of comprehensive schools does not depend on the physical building per se. The conception can be brought into being by, as in certain areas in the west of Ireland where convents have gone co-educational or sent their pupils to the vocational schools for such and such a subject and in turn, the vocational pupils come to the secondary school to get other subjects, the best utilisation possible of teachers and premises and the bringing together of all our children. We just cannot overnight build comprehensive schools all over Ireland but I would like to see, once this tendency of comprehensive education is there and as it grows, those comprehensive schools as educational workshops covering the widest field of education where a child in respect of this one-third for subjects of his own choice, if he wanted to do nothing would be trained to do that. There is an art in doing nothing.

That, of course, would become a very popular course.

Mr. O'Malley

Not necessarily. It would be an exercise in logic.

At the age of 14.

Mr. O'Malley

Well, there is of course John McGahern.

What was that?

Mr. O'Malley

That was just an aside. This question of doing nothing looked at in depth is an interesting experiment.

Oh, very.

Mr. O'Malley

From doing nothing you will achieve something.

So says the guru. Gurus of 14 years of age are rather dangerous young men and female gurus have extraordinary potentialities.

How does the Minister make out that by doing nothing you achieve something?

Mr. O'Malley

What I want to convey is that two-thirds of the time will be devoted to core subjects and that the remainder of the time is devoted to subjects of the pupil's choice.

Hear, hear.

That is better.

Mr. O'Malley

Supposing he wanted to bring in a book or read the paper or go out in the fields.

"Subjects of the pupil's choice" is, I think, a wide field. To elaborate further leads one into very stormy waters.

Mr. O'Malley

Anyway, in order to develop the pupil's aptitude and interest, the three-year period leading to the intermediate certificate is regarded as a period of observation and guidance.

Hear, hear.

Mr. O'Malley

Guidance makes necessary a continous detailed observation of the pupils by the teachers, supported by the Department's psychologist; it demands regular consultation with the parents so that they may know where the pupil is strong and where he is not so strong. The parents will have the information available to them to enable them to reach the right decision in regard to the pupil's future career, whether he proceeds to the leaving certificate course or takes his place in society. The observation and guidance of pupils from the time of their entry into the school and consultation with parents are essential features for comprehensive education. I would say then that these are important features of the comprehensive schools. One of the most important features of the comprehensive schools is that they accept all the pupils of the area, whatever their background or achievement. Pupils from the time of entry are observed and guided towards the development of their aptitudes and interests; there is regular consultation with the parents; and screening on entry is avoided.

Reference was made to the place of art in our schools. I think it was Deputy Lindsay who said that I betook myself down to see the Ursuline nuns in Waterford and expressed myself fully on art, and that here was an Estimate and I said nothing about it. I did not say anything about it because I have not anything much to report unfortunately, except, to put it mildly, that I am not satisfied, any more than anyone else is, with the progress of art. I am engaged now in examining the primary school curriculum and consultation is proceeding with all the interests concerned. I hope that a timetable will evolve which will allow reasonable time for drawing and art as well as studies of the local environment. In the post-primary schools, less than half of the pupils study art or drawing. The figures look reasonable enough but closer examination reveals that only 1,491 students out of 19,000 took the full art course at the intermediate examination in 1965 and only 597 out of 11,600 at the leaving certificate examination. This low participation has a number of causes. The subject is not recognised for matriculation and on that account is not of high standing with schools and pupils. This is extraordinary to me. I had personal experience the other day that not only in matriculation but in the leaving certificate, too, if one is to go on for architecture, art in the leaving certificate is not accepted. I know possibly the reason is that the standard of the art is not deemed to be sufficiently high by the university people dealing with admission. Anyway this participation rate is appallingly low. The subject is not recognised for matriculation and therefore the schools and the pupils do not pay much attention to it.

Then there is the shortage, of course, of fully qualified teachers and this is a problem which we are looking at. There is no point in talking about what we will do about art, without solving the teacher training problem. You cannot have teachers trying to teach our children for examinations which they have not passed themselves, brilliant and capable as they might be. I am looking also at the courses offered in the Colleges of Art in Dublin, Cork, Limerick and Waterford, and I am looking for a complete reappraisal of the work of these colleges, of their function and their purpose, because these colleges must give the lead to the country in general, must provide teachers for our schools.

What we really want in Ireland is an overall policy on art. That cannot be dealt with in isolation. We want to know where we are going from the primary school up to the College of Art. The report of the Higher Commission on Education in regard to art cannot be ignored. The schools of architecture in University College and Bolton Street, the College of Art and all down to the primary school are complementary in that respect.

It is true that the conditions in the College of Art are very primitive. There is a fine studio there. Exhibitions of outside work take place there. I asked them not to have exhibitions there. They made representations to me that they should have them there. I do not know whether they should or they should not. All I know is that there is very valuable studio space taken up for a great deal of time with exhibitions and students are deprived of that space.

In the corridors there are old plaster cast sculptures and old presses. The College of Art was part of the stables of Leinster House in the old days. I was talking to some of the students there the other night. A new building is essential and we cannot wait for that. It is standards that we must look to. In the case of all matters appertaining to education in Ireland—art, technology, the universities, the primary school— our ambition should be to make Ireland the one country, not only in Western Europe but in the world that could be cited in years to come as the country having the best approach to the perfect education system. A perfect system is impossible to attain because it would be a question of interpretation of the word "perfect" but it should cover the widest possible scope with the highest standards. In my opinion standards and quality are everything in Irish education. Mediocrity is an appalling concept.

I have often said that if in the merger of University College and Trinity College we were under any circumstances to have a lowering of our standards then it would have been better never to have thought of it or to have dropped it from the start. Degrees of the National University and of Trinity College are regarded in the academic world as of a high standard and anything that would detract from that would be appalling.

Crudely speaking, we must get from the primary school to the highest education establishment full value for the money expended and must ensure that we use the best possible methods of teaching and employ the best possible teachers, that we keep in touch with modern developments and adapt what is interesting and useful for our circumstances and discard the irrelevant.

It must be borne in mind that in the realm of technology a country of our size could not afford the millions of pounds necessary for technological research. Therefore we must keep in touch with developments in other countries. There will be changes and there must be flexibility. If someone were to ask me now what subjects would be taught in the regional technical colleges I would have to say that I could not say absolutely. I would know that certain basic things would be taught. We do know that by the 1970s there will be a shortage of 70,000 junior technicians. There will be 70,000 jobs going abegging if we do not train children at junior technician level, which is not a very high degree of education. We are observing developments. For instance, I send some of my people out to observe the stockyards in Chicago and study techniques from the killing of the beast right up to the production of by-products and the 101 other facets of this industry. All this information can be made available in our technical colleges. That is one facet of agriculture. We know the developments that are taking place. We know the emphasis that is laid by Denmark on agricultural education in all its spheres. We think that even at the lower level children are not being taught effectively how to keep farm costings, whether on a large or small farm. They require to be taught simple things such as how to repair a tractor. Perhaps I should not stray but I think small things are really the big things.

Surely the essential element in that is the provision of sabbatical leave for teachers who may go and acquire these technological skills in the United States of America and bring them back? You cannot send all the pupils all over the world. What you want to do is to provide sabbatical leave for the teachers to pick it up and bring it home.

Mr. O'Malley

I agree with the point the Deputy makes. In fact, he is backing me up when I point out that Ireland could not possibly afford all this technological research and the vast buildings that would be necessary for study of these facets of agriculture and that we would have to have association with other countries either through visiting lecturers or professors or by sending out our own teachers.

Professors.

Mr. O'Malley

I agree that this would have to come.

You know, the Department of Agriculture has been doing that for the past 15 years under the Marshall Plan and under the Kellogg Foundations.

Mr. O'Malley

Yes. I do not decry or deride in any way the experience and the work and the information obtained by these people but we must admit that the numbers have been small.

The more you do of it the better.

Mr. O'Malley

Correct. The information has not been disseminated to our children in the schools. What I am trying to say in my usual ponderous fashion is that in rural Ireland from the primary school up along the ladder agriculture has not taken its proper place.

I fully agree. We had an agricultural Reader prepared 15 years ago and you have not adopted it in the Department of Education yet. It is sitting beyond in the Department of Agriculture. It was prepared by Professor Hussey of Glasnevin.

Is not the basis of the whole problem the fact that the Department of Education has no responsibility for agricultural education? Is that correct?

Mr. O'Malley

No. We must not confuse this with the work of bodies like An Foras Taluntais and the Faculties of Agriculture in our universities. I am talking about what my responsibility is. My responsibility is to ensure that the best interests of our children are served by the curriculum in the primary, secondary and vocational schools. For instance, in secondary schools in Ireland agricultural science is on the curriculum but out of 5,800 boys, only 486 took agricultural science in the leaving certificate in 1965. I have not got the other figures. There were 486 out of 5,800 pupils who took agricultural vocational schools for the group certificate. Out of 9,600 approximately 2,500 took rural science.

That is 25 per cent. Does that include the vocational schools in Dublin?

Mr. O'Malley

It is all those who took the group certificate.

That includes the urban pupils as well as the rural ones.

Mr. O'Malley

When I say rural science as such, it could be a misnomer. That is what we have to satisfy ourselves about, that it will mean something.

It can be improved.

Mr. O'Malley

There are certain aspects which could be disregarded and there are certain aspects which are crying out for inclusion. We are meeting Muintir na Tíre next week and other bodies to try to evolve a course for pupils who will leave school at 14 years of age and go back to the farms of their parents. There are some such children who, unfortunately, do not continue on. The best thing I can say is that we are looking at this. May I say that it might be possible to have a crash course in building or improvements of schools but it is impossible to have a crash course in education? In educational thinking everything has to be gone into. I have heard the views of people who are experts in the schools and they have made recommendations to me which are sound. I have also heard views of teachers who specialise in English, Irish and so on.

This is not easy of solution. Then, of course, there is the notification of any drastic changes. All those matters have to be gone into. For instance, we are always asked why we have Macbeth and why not have it changed. Then you have the teachers who would be mentally disturbed if they had not Macbeth for the rest of their lives. At least Macbeth lasts for two years, then you have Henry IV and the Merchant of Venice and then you start the cycle again. You also have the textbooks. All those things would be worthy of debate here for a couple of days. This is a great tragedy. This educational matter is of such great moment that I would have preferred to see greater discussion on it. I am rather disappointed that we did not have the views of many more people on it.

I intended to make a contribution but I was delayed.

There will be another day.

Mr. O'Malley

The idea that we are going to put the Irish educational system right in one year or two years is completely wrong. In 100 years time there will be another Minister for Education.

No, you astonish me.

Mr. O'Malley

In 50 years time there will be another Minister for Education here and Deputies in this House at the moment will all be gone. That Minister for Education will be worrying about the curriculum of the schools and he will have to answer questions about the schools helicopter services being inadequate. Those developments are inevitable. What I am trying to convey is that no one can ever be satisfied at the progress made in regard to education in a country. The Minister for Education and those interested in education will always have to be grasping at the moon and the stars.

Per ardua ad astra.

Mr. O'Malley

I just mention it because some people might not have the grasp of Latin and Greek roots Deputy Dillon has.

It was originally said about 2,500 years ago.

Mr. O'Malley

We are not going to solve our educational requirements next year or the year after. I am particularly concerned by the fact that in relation to our textbooks particularly so many of our children can come in and go out of our schools without knowing anything about the history of their country or any history. Some of the Irish textbooks which I have read are very disappointing. There is also the appalling price of our Irish textbooks. They are most unsatisfactory.

Does the Minister not agree that very often the wrong slant is put on history? Children are taught that the English are our enemies and all that sort of thing. It is time to cut that out and let us be a little bit more broadminded. They are our neighbours and friends and we hope to live happily with them.

Mr. O'Malley

Generally speaking there is an approach towards maturity but this thing takes time. In fact, if we could get those educational and historical programmes on our national television, if we could have facilities for showing our national treasures, our National Gallery and the one hundred and one other things, it would be very good. It is frightening that there is so much which has to be done in education. I would say that my predecessors in all Parties who were Ministers for Education played their part in a noble way too. They laid the foundations for any development which we are all taking part in at present. Nobody ought ever be satisfied with our educational achievements. There will always be so much to do.

Deputy Flanagan mentioned Great Britain and I endorse thoroughly what he said. It is only fair to say that on television and radio and all the other programmes there is a lot said about the British educational system but I am sure my friend, Mrs. Shirley Williams, the Minister of State for Education in Britain, will not mind me saying that it is not the best system in the world. Ours is not the best either. but we have a far better basic system than we possibly appreciate. It is only when one compares the position in other countries and when one goes to international conferences and examines in depth the educational systems in other countries that one sees we have a lot to be proud of and thankful for. Do not let us be too anxious to copy Great Britain in certain aspects of their educational system. There are certain matters, such as the 11 plus and other forms of screening and tests which upset certain generations. Scotland is a different matter. The Scottish educational system is a very exciting one in my opinion. However, that is another day's work.

The Minister is aware of the part which Ireland played in formulating that system.

Mr. O'Malley

I should like to just make a reference to Deputy Mrs. Hogan O'Higgins. She mentioned the Coolarne school. We cannot go into that fully today but in this Coolarne secondary school there are at the moment 82 pupils spread over three years intermediate certificate and it offers a fairly wide academic curriculum. It does not cater at all for pupils looking for any other type of education. The potential is about 45 to 50 pupils. Last year, 50 pupils left the national school in this catchment area and only 20 went to the Killarne school. The remainder chose schools elsewhere. The majority of the parents did not send their children there. I think they are looking for a form of education other than academic. The intake last year, 20 pupils from the catchment area and seven from outside, is just not sufficient to maintain an adequate post-primary school, that is, a school that would cater for the interests of all the children in the area.

Deputy Mrs. Hogan O'Higgins and Deputy Seán Dunne put up a case. I have seen the press cuttings. I accept responsibility for all of these decisions. I do not lightly make such a decision. However, I spoke to the school manager: I met him. He came to the Department and we went into the matter. I looked through the files. I believe that what we are doing there is the right thing. Always, in these decisions, there will be local upset.

In my speech introducing the Estimates, I did not expand on higher education, for the simple reason that the higher education area is one in which a number of Government decimates sions have still to be taken. Nevertheless, it would be remiss of me to wind up without some attempt to look ahead.

Hear, hear.

Mr. O'Malley

An inevitable outcome of the Government's decision in relation to the university problem in Dublin will be the dissolution of the National University. This will create a new situation for the Cork and Galway institutions, a situation which, in my opinion, will give them an opportunity of acquiring a status more in keeping with their dignity than is now the case—and I use that word in no derogatory way. Within the past few days I have received the views of the Governing Body of one of these two Colleges on how best that College might fulfil its academic functions and its obligations to the community for the future. The points they make are fully valid. For the moment, I cannot say any more than that about them because before any firm decision is arrived at, a great deal of consultation with the Governing Body will naturally be called for.

With regard to the current negotiations in Dublin, I am satisfied that the parties concerned are, with the fullest goodwill and sincerity, using every endeavour to find a suitable solution, and thus clear the way for a frontal assault on the entire problem of higher education in relation not only to Dublin, but to the country as a whole. The best help we can give the negotiators is, as I have already stated in Seanad Éireann, to add our goodwill and patience to theirs.

That there is necessity for a frontal assault on our higher education problems is evident in the recommendations of the Commission on Higher Education for several co-ordinating authorities in this field. One such authority which they envisaged was what they called a Permanent Commission for Higher Education. Such a Commission or Higher Education Authority would be charged with the co-ordination of the financial needs of the universities—and perhaps of other elements of the higher education spectrum. In such an Authority there might also reside, under the Government, the financing of a number of other higher education institutions.

Is this similar to the University Grants Committee in Great Britain?

Mr. O'Malley

Somewhat. It would be channelled through this body, examined and sifted.

In substance, they get the lump sum for university education and allocate it.

Mr. O'Malley

Other institutions might be concerned—the technological colleges or a section of them; the teachers' training colleges; the National College of Art; the Royal Irish Academy, and so on. I mention the matter merely to show what a lot of consultation and of very serious thinking is ahead. We are not filing the Report of the Commission on Higher Education and ignoring it. We are looking into it. It will be a great debate on the report of the Commission on Higher Education and on the implementation or the rejection of any of the recommendations in whole or in part.

While the Commission saw a higher education authority as carrying, under the Government, the ultimate responsibility for the co-ordination of the administration of higher education, it envisaged also an academic co-ordinating authority. These two recommendations of the Commission highlight an organisational defect in our higher education system which up to the present has greatly hampered progress, to put it mildly. That defect is that hitherto there has been no clear central locus of policy-making. Every institution tended to go its own way without much regard to the others.

With regard to these recommendations of the Commission, let me pay it a tribute on what I consider to have been a piece of vision on its part. Let me repeat what I said in Seanad Éireann, that from the point of view of the national interest, it is as much a "must" as any other section or level of our system and accordingly that investment in higher education, too, is called for—and on a massive scale. More buildings, more and better equipment, a better staff-student ratio and the lowering of the financial barriers which block access to higher education for many students of high ability— these are my four targets for the next few years.

Is the Minister not lucky that we bought Belfield on which all this can be done?

Mr. O'Malley

All these other facets, then, will be dealt with. With regard to the growing pains, you cannot say "so far and no further". Cognisance must be taken of the existence of Cork and Galway and the building-up of these equally important academic institutions in the State. Examination possibly may have to be taken of students coming from parts of rural Ireland to Dublin and over-taxing the capacity of the existing new University of Dublin. It might seem illogical for people from Munster or from the west of Ireland to come up here. Therefore, nothing must ever be done which would in any way downgrade the university colleges of Cork or Galway, or any of our institutions of higher learning, including technology.

There are matters which agitate my mind. We read a lot about the autonomy of university thinking and freedom of speech and some of these things which have become clichés. Nobody is stopping anybody in a university from saying anything he or she likes. This is a figment of the imagination of some individuals. Nevertheless, the Irish taxpayer, I am sure, and we, his representatives, must worry from time to time about what faculties and what courses are in the national interest. Surely we must be in a position to express ourselves from time to time as to how many graduates Ireland needs in a certain period, what is the tendency, are we lacking the courses and faculties in our universities which Ireland should have in the national interest. While we appreciate if our graduates wish to go abroad it is a good thing—and many of them, please God, will come back here and we will benefit from the fruits of their knowledge—but as time goes on, we must have discussions with the universities themselves.

Up to now I do not think we have had sufficient liaison or communication in my Department, certainly on such questions as admissions and examinations. Up to recently there have been discussions on the leaving certificate and these, I am glad to say, have been very helpful. But there are other fields. We will have to suggest that the State is entitled to express itself, and indeed must. I would be failing in my duty were I not to do so, if I did not say: "Right; we respect your freedom of action and your autonomy, but for goodness sake, try to conserve the money we give you and use it to the best national interest." I think that is a fair and reasonable outlook and not in any way dictatorial. From individuals I have spoken to I believe the universities themselves subscribe to this view and I am sure by exchange of view and discussion as time goes on we will achieve all those things.

In conclusion, I should like to thank Deputies for the constructive views put forward. My only regret is that while the discussion of local issues was of benefit to me—and very interesting because these issues are indicative of the system as a whole—nevertheless it is a disappointment that on education in 1968 we did not have a true discussion in depth of the subject and all its facets.

I should like to afford the Minister an opportunity of providing some depth to the discussion. He has spoken at great length this morning, and most properly so. But I see from the Estimates on the Order Paper that apart from Vote 27, which covers the Office of the Minister for Education, Primary Education, Secondary Education and Vocational Education are provided for. There is no specific Vote for the universities. I believe that Vote falls to the Minister for Finance. I took it that Vote 27 would cover the general broad question.

Mr. O'Malley

There is a further group of Supplementary Estimates to be dealt with.

At what stage am I to ask the Minister why he has not thought fit to give us further and better information as to the progress, if any, that has been made in the discussions between University College, Dublin and Trinity College, Dublin on the road to amalgamation or evolution to the new Dublin University? I am just as much in the dark now about what is happening in that sphere as I was when I began listening to the Minister for Education or when I finished reading with great care and attention his introductory statement. There is not a single reference, except of the most passing kind, in his introductory statement to this very important question. In his concluding observations, I think he will agree with me he has dealt with it in a very general way. Has there been any progress made and, if there has, can he tell us what in his opinion the ultimate end is going to be and when is it going to come?

Mr. O'Malley

This matter is, so to speak, academically sub judice and I do not think it would be fair or helpful for me to attempt to go into it in great detail or anticipate what the ultimate picture will be. I cannot say when agreement will be reached with regard to the representatives of University College and Trinity College. I cannot say there will be agreement. We would all hope that there are certain common basic grounds on which agreement will be reached, but today all I can report to the House is that six such meetings have taken place between the representatives appointed by the governing bodies or boards of both colleges. They are progressing. I understand that headway, although small, is being made; and I would hate to do anything which might hurry unduly matters of such tremendous importance to both these institutions. In fact, I gave an undertaking to the University Teachers Association, the body representing the teachers in both colleges, that before anything was a fait accompli, and even before my final recommendations went to the Government, I would at that stage appear before them both and say: “Now, gentlemen, this is the position as I see it and this is what I have in fact decided to recommend to the Government as a result of these discussions which have taken place.” Then of course that will come before both Houses of the Oireachtas and no doubt will be fully debated.

I think we are all agreed in hoping that the parties concerned will be in agreement. In reply to Deputy Dillon, it is not just possible for me to give him the information he seeks. All I can say again is that there seems to be goodwill on both sides, an anxiety to come up with an equitable solution and achieve what is aimed at.

The present position is then that the Minister desires in the interest of ultimate success that there should not be in Dáil Éireann for the time being a discussion in depth of university education, lest these delicate negotiations might be prejudiced thereby. I am not prepared to dissent from that view, but I am sorry that the Minister should go on to express his disappointment that such a discussion did not in fact take place here. We do not want to embarrass the Minister in these very delicate negotiations. However, the Minister cannot say in one breath: "I am disappointed there has not been a discussion in depth," and in the next phrase say "I urge you not to undertake it or you will make it very difficult to get a satisfactory issue in our present negotiations."

Mr. O'Malley

What I meant to convey was that I was disappointed that there was not a discussion in depth on education as opposed to schooling or different important local topics, of importance to the Deputies and their constituents, and so on. What I really want to convey—and I do not want to be impertinent in any way— is that it would have been of considerable assistance to me if Deputy Dillon and others had discussed this whole topic of education in depth.

The problem of University College and Trinity College is a single problem, and while certain decisions in regard to higher education must await its ultimate outcome by way of legislation in this House, nevertheless, higher education at university level was discussed the other day and in the previous session by the Seanad in very great detail. The nominees of Trinity College and the National University and graduates of the various colleges, all these Senators, discussed this problem from the point of view of Galway, Cork and both universities in Dublin. They did not discuss what they saw as the ultimate outcome, but they were helpful and constructive. The main thing is that we got an opportunity of talking about the subject. However, I cannot answer Deputy Dillon as to how I see the picture emerging and how the new University of Dublin will be shaped. All I can repeat is that I understand that the six meetings which have taken place have proceeded in a satisfactory manner, slowly, but with great deliberation on the different points, tremendously important to both institutions.

Vote put and agreed to.
Top
Share