Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 23 Nov 1989

Vol. 393 No. 6

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - EC Membership.

2.

asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs whether he intends using the Irish Presidency of the EC to expand membership to other countries such as Austria and Turkey.

36.

asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on the Austrian application for membership of the EC; and if the Austrian conception of neutrality will allow it to enter fully into the commitments inherent in the political dimensions of full economic and monetary union.

I propose to take Questions Nos. 2 and 36 together.

The Treaties establishing the European Communities set out the procedures for dealing with membership applications. These provide that the Council shall act unanimously on an application after consulting the Commission and after receiving the assent of the European Parliament.

These procedures were invoked following the Turkish application in April 1987 and the Austrian application in July this year. In the case of Austria, the Council stated that the considerations raised by Austria regarding its status of permanent neutrality would be examined by the Community bodies in the framework of the existing provisions governing the institutions.

Pending the outcome of these procedures it would not be appropriate for the Government to express a view on possible future membership of the Community by Austria or Turkey.

In so far as the Irish Presidency is concerned we are prepared to take up the membership applications in the Council in accordance with the Treaties when the Commission's opinions are received.

Is the Taoiseach concerned at the seriousness of Belgium's reservation about the letter of application written by the Austrian Government? I know this will mean there will be interference in reaching a unanimous decision but will Belgium try to block their entry into the Community?

I did not quite understand the question.

The Austrian Government's application was accompanied by a letter which declared their permanent status of neutrality and the importance of that to them. The Belgian Government expressed reservations about the application because of the content of the letter. Are those reservations shared by the Irish Government? Should this reservation lead to a blocking motion that this will interfere with the enlargement of the Community?

We have not taken any such action and, therefore, the Deputy can take it that we wish to have both these applications processed through the normal procedures as laid down by the Community.

Does the Taoiseach see Belgium's reservation about Austria as not allowing Austrian membership of the Community.

I do not wish to comment on that. However I would say that all factors covering these applications, including at attitude by a member state would have to be taken into account in the processing of applications. These processes and procedures are laid down and that they will be followed.

Question No. 3, please.

May I ask the Taoiseach——

A brief question, Deputy.

In the event of the Austrian and Turkish applications being successful or given the green light, would the Taoiseach foresee during the Irish Presidency overtures being made to some of the eastern European countries, who are no longer as tightly tied to the Soviet Union as they once were, such as Hungary and Poland, to apply for membership?

I do not think so. That area was explored during the recent meeting in Paris and the view was that the Community will certainly have to consider its relationship with these countries, particularly if they are successful in establishing full democratic freedom and free elections and so on, but this was considered to be something that is down the road. As the Deputy knows, there are various degrees of relationships which can be offered to third countries, such as the eastern European countries, varying from a simple straightforward trade agreement to some sort of association. Nobody is ruling out any such formula in the case of the eastern European countries and indeed I do not think there would be any wish by the member states to even rule out full membership at some stage but I would have to say that the general view, as I interpret it, of the member states at this stage is that these considerations are fairly far down the road. That is not to say there could not be an interim limited type of arrangement made with these countries.

Question No. 3.

Would the Taoiseach——

Next question, please.

May I ask one brief supplementary?

I have allowed the Deputy to ask some questions. I also want to dispose of the other questions, Deputy.

Would the Taoiseach agree that an indication to these emerging countries should be given that if they adopt a full democratic process then an application for membership would be welcomed by member states, particularly by us?

I cannot speak for the Community but I would certainly foresee some such development.

Would it be helpful if such an indication were given.

Top
Share