Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 2 Feb 1995

Vol. 448 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - Kenmare (Kerry) School.

I thank you and the Ceann Comhairle for allowing me to raise the question of the proposed primary school for Bonane, Kenmare, County Kerry. I take this opportunity to congratulate the Minister of State, Deputy Bernard Allen, on his appointment as Minister of State at the Departments of Education and the Environment. I wish him success.

No greater case could be made for a new primary school in County Kerry than that at Tulloha, Bonane, County Kerry. This is a two classroom school with two teachers and 37 pupils. The school building is in a state of disrepair. The roof is leaking and caving in. The school's facilities fall far short of the standard expected in this decade. The playground facilities are practically nil. This building could be described as a dangerous structure for pupils and teachers alike. It is particularly dangerous during storms because of the defective roof.

I am convinced from investigations I have carried out in the area that it is not a practical proposal to close the school because it would be necessary to transport some pupils 12 or 13 miles away to the nearest primary school. This would be to the parish of Glengariff of which Bonane is a sub parish, despite its Kenmare postal address.

Top priority must be given to replacing this school in 1995. There will be no problem with the local contribution.

Also a site is available at a reasonable cost. Will the Minister of State give this matter priority in 1995 and do everything in his power to have a new school built in Tulloha, Bonane, County Kerry?

I thank Deputy O'Leary for his generous comments which I appreciate.

I am glad the Deputy has given me the opportunity to clarify the position in relation to Tulloha national school, Bonane, Kenmare, County Kerry. This is a two teacher school with 37 pupils presently on roll.

I assure the Deputy at the outset that my Department's officials are keenly aware that this school is seriously substandard and that as far back as 1985, it had been proposed to replace the existing school with a new school. However, the chairman of the board of management refused to offer a site as at the time he felt a new school was not required due to falling enrolments.

At the suggestion of my Department's schools' inspector the chairman again applied to the Department in June 1990 for grant-aid to carry out repairs to the roof and windows of this school building. The matter was referred to the Department's professional advisers for a report on the feasibility and cost of the proposed renovations. It was the opinion of my Department's professional advisers that it would be uneconomical to carry out any major repairs to the school due to its design and layout and that only minimum repairs should be carried out. On the basis of this report, it was felt by my Department that the best option would be a new school on a new site and the chairman was informed accordingly.

Nothing further was heard on this matter by my Department until January 1994 when the chairman again requested grant-aid for repairs to the school building. The case was again referred to my Department's professional advisers for an up-to-date report on the condition of the school building and to elicit funds for the minimum repairs which needed to be carried out. By this time the situation had become very urgent as the school's insurers had stated that liability cover on the premises would not be maintained on the school building from the beginning of the 1994-95 school year unless the defects in the school's playground, heating system and roof were attended to. My Department's professional advisers in their report last July again strongly recommended that the school be replaced and that only minimum repairs be carried out. I understand that the chairman has had some repair work carried out to the school and that his insurance company has given liability cover for this school year.

Having considered the report from my Department's technical advisers, the school's inspector was asked for a detailed report on the future enrolment trends at the school. This indicates that the school will remain a two teacher school for the next few years. On the basis of this report I have asked my Department's architect to prepare a comprehensive report on the existing school building and site and to consider the options of building a new school on the existing or new site.

Until this report has been received and considered in my Department a final decision on this matter cannot be made, but I assure the Deputy that I fully appreciate the school authorities' desire to have this matter resolved. My Department's officials assure me that every effort will be made to facilitate the school in this regard. Indeed every effort has been made since 1985 by my Department to provide a new school at Bonane, County Kerry. The best available advise has always stated that expending money on the existing school would not be an economic proposition and that a new school on the existing site or on a new site was the preferred and more economic option.

Top
Share