Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 13 Dec 1995

Vol. 459 No. 7

Adjournment Debate. - Westport (Mayo) Water Scheme.

Westport water augmentation scheme commenced its initial planning ten years ago to meet the projected needs of the Westport area, Louisburgh town and the rural area between these locations which are 12 miles apart. Substantial progress on the technical phases of this large capital scheme was made from 1990 to the summer of this year, when a recommended tender was submitted to the Department of the Environment.

While the substantial growth of Westport's population and tourist appeal paints an image of prosperity, underlying this is a serious threat to the future growth of the town, despite the mounting pressures for further physical development with record numbers of planning applications being considered on a monthly basis by the local authority. Westport has been the only town in Mayo to show consistent growth in its population for the past three censuses. In 1991 a growth rate of 7 per cent was reported and this will be further increased in the next census.

Even without the designation of the town as a seaside renewal area, in 1993 and 1994 substantial numbers of new houses were built and, increasingly, a significant number of people who work in Castlebar choose to live in Westport. As a town it has a long tourist history but with careful attention to environmental concerns in the planning process, a substantial investment in amenity works and millions of pounds of local investment in hotels, guesthouses, bed and breakfasts and restaurants, the town has gained a national and international reputation as a quality destination to visit.

This summer was the most successful tourist season to date but it brought to the forefront the serious crisis that faces the town in its ability to cater for existing needs and to cope with future requirements. However, the prolonged dry spell this summer further accentuated the crisis management operated by the local authority over recent years. The present system can only treat 700,000 gallons per day but peak demand has exceeded 800,000 gallons on occasion. In these emergencies untreated but disinfected water is put into the system.

The growth in demand for water has shown a continued upward spiral and this will be further exacerbated in 1996 with a minimum of 75 new hotel bedrooms being built in addition to the extra accommodation provided in 1995, new guesthouses and bed and breakfasts and continued industrial expansion.

In a water system requiring renewal, leaks of a minor nature can have serious consequences. Our largest industrial employer makes sterile ophthalmic solutions which are water based. It employs 700 employees and the local authority is constantly operating on a knife edge to cope with increasing demands.

The tender from reputable contractors has been with the Department since August of this year. It has been examined by Department officials and I am led to believe that matters are in order. The new scheme, costed at approximately £16 million, is intended not only to augment the supply to Westport town but with a capacity to treat 1.5 million gallons per day it will be sufficient to meet the future needs of Westport town, the large rural area to and beyond Louisburgh to group water schemes which have a poor supply. The scheme also envisages an extension north of Westport to Kilmeena where the present source of supply is best described as dire.

My constituency has shown an overall loss of population but with growth centres such as Westport, designated by the Minister for Tourism and Trade as an area of urban renewal, and that challenge having been successfully clasped by the people of the area over recent years, it now requires an early decision from the Minister to commit the funds necessary to allow a contractor to come on site. I have the support of my constituency colleagues in raising this matter. Unless a Government decision is made immediately industrial, commercial, farming and residential interests will look to the summer of 1996 with trepidation.

A £1.5 million leisure complex which opened in Westport in August of this year was grant-aided to the extent of £250,000 by the Department of Tourism and Trade. The leisure complex incorporated a 20 metre swimming pool which was not allowed by the local authority to be filled with water from the town's supply. Water had to be transported by tanker from Castlebar for the purpose. I hope this indicates clearly the seriousness of the case.

I wish to share my time with Deputy Ring.

Is that agreed? Agreed.

I thank the Minister of State for sharing her time; I will be brief. I support my colleague Deputy Hughes and assure him this matter is a priority with me, the Minister for Tourism and Trade. Deputy Kenny, the Minister for the Environment, Deputy Howlin and the Taoiseach. We are concerned about this problem in Westport. I hope we will have a satisfactory outcome very soon. Deputy Hughes is right in describing Westport as a developing town and this scheme is important for agriculture, tourism and industry.

I thank Deputy Hughes for raising this important matter. Mayo is a large county requiring substantial investment in water and sewerage infrastructure to meet the needs of agriculture, tourism and industry. Deputy Hughes will know that County Mayo has fared very well in recent years in the provision of capital funding by my Department for these services. To date, more than £25 million of EU Cohesion Funds have been secured for major projects, which include the £10 million Ballinrobe sewerage scheme which is nearing completion and the extension of the Lough Mask regional water supply scheme to serve Claremorris. Cohesion Fund approval for the planning stages of the following major projects has also been secured: Westport sewerage scheme, costing £14.5 million; Claremorris sewerage scheme, costing £6.5 million; the extension of Lough Mask water scheme to Knock and Ballyhaunis, including a new distribution system for the town of Ballyhaunis, costing £15 million.

The Minister recently announced a new water supply scheme for Achill costing £1.9 million, a new water distribution network for Belmullet costing £350,000 and the upgrading of the Castlebar sewage treatment works to provide for a much needed reduction in nutrients entering the Castlebar river. Planning is well advanced for further large scale projects within the county and approval has issued to the county council to invite tenders for the construction of the Ballyhaunis sewerage scheme, costing an estimated £4 million.

While all the projects I have referred to so far are large scale ones and are urgently needed for the maintenance of the highest environmental standards as well as supporting tourism and industry, we are anxious that the needs of small towns and villages are not overlooked either. So far this year, small water and sewerage scheme grants have been approved for the towns of Shrule and Tourmakeady.

Mayo's single biggest industrial employer is located in Westport and the continued operation and expansion of the industrial base is fundamental to the future economic well being of the region. Tourism is also vitally important for Westport. Both Westport and Achill are included among the 15 designated resort areas under the 1995 resort schemes. We are confident that the tax incentives provided will further benefit tourism in the Westport area.

The proposed Westport water supply scheme is designed to serve an area of some 230 square miles. The supply zone stretches from just south of Newport to Louisburgh and Killary Harbour and inland to the Partry Mountains. The proposed scheme is very large and complex. It is comprised of some 3,500 metres of rising mains, more than 25,000 metres of trunk mains and about 22,000 metres of distribution mains. Four new reservoirs are proposed for Murrisk, Lochta, Old Head and Carrowmore; and the capacity of the water treatment plant will be boosted from 2,200 cubic metres per day to more than 7,000 cubic metres per day. Deputy Hughes has first hand knowledge and experience of the countryside through which the scheme will be laid. He will also appreciate that an ambitious scheme such as the one proposed will be costly to construct. The civil works alone would cost more than £11 million and the overall cost would well exceed £15 million.

In November last year, my Department submitted an application to the EU Commission for Cohesion Funds for the Westport scheme and a decision is awaited. We have been pressing the Commission for early decisions on this and other pending water and sewerage projects; we cannot however, give a definite commitment at this stage as to when financial approval can issue. I would like to assure Deputy Hughes that we are determined to seek a solution to the water supply problems which could affect tourism and industrial growth in Westport. My Department will explore every avenue to ensure that an improved water supply will be put in place at the earliest opportunity.

Top
Share