I hope he has not set aside the good information he obtained as a mere Deputy. It is important to identify anomalies and the costs involved and raise them at the Committee on Family, Community and Social Affairs. There are anomalies which are not sustainable and cannot be resolved because of regulations. For example, if somebody is working part-time, in receipt of a certain amount of unemployment assistance and FIS and receives an income which could be declared as means, it is counted twice as means — when they are being assessed for unemployment assistance and again for the family income supplement. That is not reasonable.
We must bear in mind we are talking about people on the margins — those on low incomes. A change of £10 per week in their income is important. Will the Minister take up my colleague's good suggestion and bring forward a list of anomalies which we could discuss at the Committee on Social, Family and Community Affairs, with the costs?