Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 28 Jun 2023

Vol. 1041 No. 1

Environmental Protection Agency Water Quality Report 2022: Statements

In its latest water indicators report, the Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, has found that, overall, there was no significant improvement in the biological quality of our rivers or lakes in 2022. While it is welcome to see that improvements are happening in some areas, these are being completely offset by declines elsewhere. This EPA report highlights that too much nitrogen and phosphorous is getting into our waterways. Nitrogen is coming mainly from agricultural fertilisers and manures, and phosphorus is coming mainly from agricultural run-off and wastewater discharges.

What is now clear is that if there is to be clean, fresh water to support nature’s biodiversity, we need to work closely with farmers to reduce the loss of these nutrients from land into our rivers, lakes and coastal areas. If there is to be clean water to swim in year round, we have to continue to invest in improving our wastewater collection and treatment systems. If there is to be clean water to drink, then we need especially to protect those catchments and aquifers that supply people with drinking water. Clearly, if we are to succeed in resolving these issues and others, we need to be there for water by protecting catchments and restoring those areas where damage has already occurred.

The recent UN water conference has brought a renewed focus onto the area of water resources on the international stage and progress towards UN Sustainable Development Goal 6. The discussion was unequivocal: our world is facing a global crisis in water. The demand for clean, fresh water will outstrip supply by 40% by 2030 according to the Global Commission on the Economics of Water. Earlier this year, we saw devastating floods in the Emilia-Romagna region of northern Italy, an area with which I am very familiar. Water supplies are at risk in many areas of southern and western Europe, affected by an exceptionally dry and warm winter. The snow water levels in the Alps are far below the historical average. These impacts will be seen in the resilience of water supplies, in lower food production yields and in energy generation.

In Ireland, while we are not yet facing the same extreme crisis that has affected other parts of the world and Europe, we do have some difficult and deepening issues, such as nutrient pollution, but also issues with the resilience of our water supplies, wastewater collection and treatment, the loss of high-status water bodies, and restoring the natural functions of our rivers to support biodiversity and for flood protection. We may have comparatively abundant water resources but I share the deep concern expressed by the EPA regarding the overall trends in water quality. As a society, we can face these concerns and work towards putting the country on a sustainable pathway for water resource management. The Government is committed to tangible and ambitious action to address these problems.

To address the many challenges, there are three overarching conditions we need to put in place. First, we need to work to integrate our responses to water, climate change and biodiversity loss across all policy areas and across public agencies and authorities. Second, we need to focus on collaboration, not conflict. Third, we all need to focus public and private organisations on taking action to protect, improve and restore water quality. Environmental policy encompasses a wide range of separate but interlinked policy areas, including climate, biodiversity, water and the marine environment. A proposed national statement of environment policy is being prepared by the Minister, Deputy Ryan, and is due to be published by the end of this year. It will result in better co-ordination between these different policy areas and a more effective implementation process across all Departments.

Leadership and commitment is required at all levels to move the debate on climate, biodiversity and water to one of collaboration and co-creation. I recognise it will not be an easy discussion but people want us to act for nature. They want us to be responsible, to show leadership at a political level and, above all, to be honest regarding the challenges we face. Certainly, in recent weeks, we have not seen a lot of honesty when it comes to the restoration of nature. Taking a collective and collaborative approach may take longer, but I believe it produces better and more robust policy. In recent weeks, we have seen how divisive approaches can be used by some to create fear and misunderstanding in an attempt to pit farmer against environmentalist, and I am clear this is an artificial divide. We all know we cannot have good agricultural production without healthy nature and clean water, and we cannot restore nature without our farmers, without grazing animals or without productive use of our land. All sides of the conversation have a role to play in finding viable and effective solutions to the problem.

To ensure ownership and integration of water actions, I have requested that the Department draws up proposals for a programme delivery office to support the implementation of the next river basin management plan across all Departments, local authorities, the EPA and other key agencies and stakeholders. This will provide clarity and direction to the various implementation bodies responsible for ensuring the protection and restoration of our waters to good ecological status.

The EPA report is clear that one of the most significant stressors on our water quality and ecosystem health is high nutrient levels, such as nitrogen and phosphorous. These nutrients enter our waters as a result of human activities, such as agriculture, wastewater treatment and forestry. Nitrogen levels, which are mainly from agricultural sources, such as fertilisers and manures, have increased, while phosphorous levels, which are mainly from agricultural run-off and wastewater discharges, are generally stable but are still too high in many rivers and lakes.

We have a long history of taking a collaborative approach to farming, including the establishment of the agricultural sustainability support and advisory programme, ASSAP, the discussions with An Fóram Uisce and, most recently, the Minister, Deputy McConalogue, has established the agriculture water quality working group to work directly with farmers and the industry to identify and commit to demonstrative actions that will facilitate the agricultural sector to address pollution and improve water quality. Nutrients lost to water represent a cost to farmers and to society. The focus must be on using less and losing less by improving nutrient efficiency and precision farming. Ireland’s CAP strategic plan, which is worth nearly €10 billion to farm families for the period 2023 to 2027, includes measures to protect water in conditionality and across schemes. However, let us not shy away from the scale of the challenge. To look at an area that I am familiar with, one example is the Barrow Estuary in County Kilkenny, which is 83% above the required nitrogen threshold value in the estuary. Four of the top five highest concentration areas were in the south east.

To protect water quality, the Government cannot act alone and individual farmers will need support from their own industry and from retailers. The Irish agrifood sector markets itself on Ireland’s clean, green image. Our dairy processors, in particular, enjoy the benefits of a derogation facility within the nitrates directive. Our tillage farms supply food and drink industries which are selling to international markets. Environmental sustainability also needs economic sustainability, but industry needs to provide farmers with a reasonable economic return for operating sustainably within the limits of their land. Farmers will need programmes that include both economic returns for doing the right thing and ready access to practical farm-level advice.

I recognise also that this is not a one-issue problem. In terms of addressing the impacts of wastewater, the programme for Government has committed to funding Uisce Éireann’s capital investment plan for drinking water and wastewater infrastructure on a multi-annual basis. The national development plan commits almost €6 billion in capital investment by Uisce Éireann from 2021 to 2025, of which more than €4.5 billion will be voted Exchequer funding in respect of domestic water services. In budget 2023 alone, almost €1.6 billion of funding was made available to Uisce Éireann. Uisce Éireann is delivering and the pressure on water from wastewater is improving but, yes, it needs to improve its rate of delivery of these projects and eliminate delays. Major projects, like the upgrade of the Ringsend wastewater treatment plant and the Cork lower harbour main drainage project, will safeguard the environment, protect public health and facilitate development and the provision of new housing.

Rural Ireland is not being left behind when it comes to providing assistance on improving the quality of water. The multi-annual rural water programme provides capital funding aimed at improving the quality, reliability and efficiency of water services in parts of Ireland not served by Uisce Éireann. Again, I stress that I have great admiration for the National Federation of Group Water Schemes and the work it does in terms of catchment management and nature-based solutions. Under this programme, there are four individual, demand-led grant schemes to provide assistance to householders in respect of domestic wastewater treatment systems and individual private wells. There are three grants available for the replacement, repair or upgrading works of a domestic wastewater treatment system for areas listed in the EPA's national inspection plan, or a prioritised area for action, or a high-status objective catchment area.

The rural water working group will shortly complete a review of the composition of the measures to be included for funding under the upcoming multi-annual programme. Details of the programme and its priorities, along with an invitation for local authorities to submit applications for funding, is expected to be announced in the coming weeks. Investment such as this will deliver significant improvements in our public water and wastewater service and support a range of programmes delivering improved water quality in our rivers, lakes, groundwater and coastal areas.

Without an urgent and well co-ordinated mechanism for the implementation of substantial and persuasive measures, it is unlikely Ireland will achieve significant progress in delivering good water quality status for all its water bodies in the longer-term. The EPA report is quite clear that further action needs to be taken to reduce the losses of both nitrogen and phosphorous into the environment. My Department is working on a number of capital investment projects, initiatives, programmes and national plans that will contribute to meeting these challenges.

My Department is currently preparing a new revised and strengthened river basin management plan, which covers the third cycle of river basin planning for Ireland up to 2027. The plan will contain programmes of measures to address the water quality in rivers, lakes, estuarine and other coastal waters. The identification and implementation of the right measure in the right place will be the key driver behind the plan. The river basin management plan is a commitment in the programme for Government and will also show our commitment to abide by the principles of the UN sustainable development goal 6 to ensure safe access to water and sanitation by protecting and restoring our water bodies and by providing sustainable management of our water resources.

Building on the work of previous cycles, and by incorporating the integrated catchment management approach, the plan will again describe the main pressures on our water status and set the environmental objectives and measures to protect and restore our water bodies. The integrated catchment management approach will be underpinned through the development and launch of 46 local catchment management plans. Communities will also have a say in the management of their local waterways and lakes with increased public participation through new catchment community forums. A lot of important and really good work is going on around the country through river trusts already. They are doing fantastic work on invasive species and taking care of our water courses and I pay tribute to them.

Where there are encouraging water quality improvements it shows that measures targeted in priority areas for action are working. This targeted approach is to be significantly enhanced under the new third river basin management plan. The plan has been carefully prepared in consultation with multiple stakeholders, including An Fóram Uisce, the national water stakeholder forum. I thank its members for the really important work they have done in recent years.

Addressing the negative effects of agriculture brings benefits to both the quality of our waters and for climate change. The plan will seek to address these pressures through a balance of education and knowledge alongside enhanced inspection and enforcement requirements. The main measure for addressing the pressures on water quality from agriculture is the introduction of a new nitrates action programme, which gives effect to the requirements of the EU nitrates directive and whose purpose is to prevent pollution of surface waters and groundwater from agricultural sources and to protect and improve water quality. The new nitrates action programme includes necessarily stronger measures to reduce nutrient losses to improve water quality and will work with the new CAP strategic plan which has brought ecosystem protection and environmental management to the fore in a positive and constructive manner from a water quality perspective. Measures introduced under the nitrates action programme include tighter controls on the application of chemical fertilisers and slurry, stronger emphasis on risk-based inspections and enforcement, with up to 16,000 farm inspections to be undertaken by local authorities during the lifetime of the plan, and an industry-led initiative to reduce agricultural impacts on water quality.

Another significant measure to help address water quality will be the upcoming water European innovation partnership, EIP, project which will be managed by the local authority water programme, LAWPRO. The initiative is co-funded by my Department and the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine and will invest funding of €60 million over five years. This is a strategically important project for tackling agricultural source water pollution over the third cycle and is specifically focused on reducing losses of phosphorus, nitrogen, sediment and, where relevant, pesticides to water from agricultural lands by promoting the adoption of innovative best practice in nutrient management through the application of nature-based natural water retention measures and other suitable measures. The water EIP provides a valuable opportunity to complement actions under the new nitrates action programme and other programmes such as ACRES, thereby addressing a critical gap in measures to protect and restore water quality. There will be numerous other measures set out in the plan, such as those that will commence in tackling the interruption to river continuity from river barriers. A programme to assess and remediate obsolete river barriers such as dams and weirs which impact on fish and other migratory species is being developed.

One of the key principles of the river basin management plan is to deliver integrated, multiple policy objectives for water, biodiversity and climate wherever possible. This integrated approach will deliver gains for our water quality. The plan will also focus on utilising innovative practices such as nature-based solutions to tackle urban run-off. As we have seen in recent weeks in Wexford, in my own home town of Kilkenny and in Tralee and Dublin, the impact of extreme rainfall events is significant and it is now becoming more frequent as we increasingly see the effects of climate change on the environment. In turn, this can significantly increase both the level of pollution entering water bodies from urban run-off and the risk of flooding. Nature-based solutions could sit very well with article 6 of the nature restoration regulation for urban ecosystems. As well as the cooling effect on urban areas, the well-being and liveable cities, there is an interconnectedness of all of these policies which can only benefit communities and urban development generally. My Department has published a best practice interim guidance document to assist planning authorities with implementing nature-based solutions to help mitigate the impact of extreme rainfall. This guidance identifies the need for a significant change in the way we plan, design, build and maintain our urban areas, and it helps to address flood risk, climate change and environmental impacts.

Another area of progress has been in the improvements in the quality of our bathing waters, as evident from the recent EPA bathing water report, which found that 97% of sites are meeting or exceeding the minimum standard. For 2023, 94 blue flags and 65 green coast awards were announced, which is a tribute to the tremendous work and dedication of many groups and individuals throughout Ireland who have worked tirelessly to improve the quality of their bathing waters. I pay tribute to all those groups. They have done fantastic work in their coastal areas and these awards are great testament to their work.

Our success in improving areas such as our bathing waters and putting wastewater on an improving trend shows that it is possible to make the necessary changes. Significant progress is being made in addressing the challenges we face and the Government will continue to deliver strongly on the ambitious commitments to water services contained in the programme for Government. I am pleased to have this opportunity to focus on the issues identified in the recent EPA report on water quality and to highlight the areas in which progress is being made. Water is a vital resource that contributes not just to our health, but also to the well-being of our natural environment and the security of our food supply. However, it is clear from the EPA report that there is a requirement for further action from some sectors of our society, action that will bring significant benefits to our nation as a whole. To address these issues, we must look to collaboration and common agreement rather than conflict and scaremongering. My Department and my respective colleagues will continue to engage in addressing these issues and work with those who are most affected to ensure the quality of our water is protected now and into the future.

I look forward to hearing from the House on this important issue.

I thank the Minister of State for his remarks. It has to be said at the outset that clean water in our rivers, lakes and estuaries is essential for public health, successful industry, agriculture and, crucially, the restoration of our natural environment and the ending of significant biodiversity loss in recent years and its recovery. I commend the EPA on its latest water quality report. Once again, it has produced very objective, independent and enormously important evidence which is informing this debate.

I have been a Deputy in this House since 2016. During those years the EPA has published its periodic water quality reports, wastewater reports, drinking water reports and, today, its latest report on septic tanks enforcement.

During all that time nothing has got better in the round. In fact, one of the headline comments in the conclusions of this month's EPA report tells us that for every area where progress has been made there have been negative outcomes elsewhere and that, therefore, in the round, we are in the same place as we were before. The difficulty with that is that we cannot be in the same place. If we are to give any meaning to my opening statement that clean water is essential for public health, industry, agriculture, and nature restoration and the tackling of biodiversity loss, water quality has to improve. I know the Minister of State passionately agrees with that. Unfortunately, the most recent water quality report is once again a very stark reminder from the Environmental Protection Agency that what has been done to date by the State and other actors I will come to in a moment is not addressing the core problem.

I will read into the record some of the key findings because they are enormously important. The first key finding states:

There has been no significant change in the biological quality of our rivers or lakes in 2022. The rate of decline largely matches the rate of improvements.

That is a damning indictment of decades of failure, particularly in respect of the outworking of the last two river basin management plans. The report goes on to state:

Nitrate concentrations are too high in 40% of river sites ... [Statewide] and in 20% of estuarine and coastal water bodies.

Those are very significant levels of nitrate concentrations. The EPA refers specifically to issues in the south and the south east. It states that they are "primarily attributable to intensive agricultural activities on freely draining soils in these areas" and makes reference to both organic and inorganic fertilisers. It goes on to state that average nitrate levels in rivers and groundwaters increased Statewide between 2021 and 2022 but, more generally, and significantly, since 2013, when this reporting series started. Phosphate concentrations, to which the Minister of State rightly referred in his remarks, are too high in 28% of rivers and 36% of lakes. The EPA talks about that coming primarily from wastewater discharges from a variety of sources, and the Minister of State's comments confirm that in respect of agriculture, forestry and, crucially, wastewater and urban wastewater, something that is very much in the gift of the Government as well as Irish Water.

The conclusions of the report are short and very significant. They say we will simply not meet our water quality objectives unless and until we reduce the emissions of nitrogen and phosphorous into our waters. They specifically mention Ireland's fifth nitrates action programme 2022-2025 for that to be fully implemented, and we are, as the Minister of State will know, fast running out of time. Also, Uisce Éireann has to prioritise and, in my view, accelerate its investment in addressing those outstanding urban wastewater discharges into rivers, lakes and coastal areas that are still the subject of enforcement proceedings from the European Commission.

I have no doubt whatsoever but that the Minister of State is absolutely committed to doing everything in his power, limited and all as it is as he is a Minister of State, although it is more significant than those of us in the Opposition, to have the issues in the EPA report addressed. I do not doubt that for a second. However, I also understand the mountain he has to climb to convince Government colleagues across a range of other Departments to travel that journey with him. However, unless there is a collective effort at the heart of Government to work in partnership with State agencies such as Uisce Éireann and Coillte, with private forestry interests and with agriculture and agrifood industry interest, and to reduce those phosphorous and nitrate emissions into our rivers, lakes and coastal areas, things will not get better. The worry that I have and that I think the Minister of State probably privately has is that in many areas things could get worse, with lots of consequences.

I absolutely echo one of the central points the Minister of State made, which is that addressing these issues is good for everybody. It is really important, and I think most of us who will contribute at this stage of the debate at least will take that same approach, which is that if we reduce the nitrate and phosphorous emissions, that is good for the general public. It is good for the health of people who use our water system for all its various uses. It is good for children. It is good for workers, good for green industries and good for nature and biodiversity. That message, that doing this and doing it right is in the State's interest and the public's interest, has to be emphasised over and over again. There will be some in this debate who, as we have said in other debates, will try to make this into one group of people against another: the Environmental Protection Agency against the farmers, or Green Ministers against the forestry industry. I want to put on the record that I fully support the Minister of State's comments that unless we start to tackle this issue along with the very important issue on which he will come back to us soon, that is, the marine protected areas, which is not dissimilar, and unless we win the argument that this is in the interests of all, we will be fighting an uphill battle.

The reason I say that is that on the Opposition benches we want to work with the Minister of State in this area of work. The Oireachtas housing committee in the previous Dáil and in this one has proved its worth. We have repeatedly brought in the Environmental Protection Agency alongside Government Departments and Irish Water when these reports have come out. We have used that as an opportunity first of all to allow the Environmental Protection Agency to give even more information to us and allow us then to interrogate what Irish Water will do to accelerate its improvements to those wastewater treatment plants and agglomerations that are in breach of the urban wastewater treatment directive. What will the Government and industry do to increase and accelerate meeting the objectives of the water framework directive? How can we ensure that that third river basin management plan is fit for purpose and does the types of things the Minister of State outlined, which I support, and which his two predecessors failed to do? Therefore, in a spirit of collaboration, I invite the Minister of State to work with our committee. Its Chair is here, as are other Members who share an interest in this. What we cannot allow, however, is for yet another Environmental Protection Agency water quality report to come and go, for the coverage they generate when they launch and for this debate to make headlines in the newspapers and then, in a year, two years or three years, when we are all back in this House and the next report is published, for us to have exactly the same conversation.

In the last minute I have I want to invite the Minister of State to give the House an update, if he is in a position to do so, in his concluding remarks and, if not, maybe by way of correspondence to our committee, on the ongoing enforcement action of the European Commission with respect to those wastewater treatment plants. This has been one of those issues which has dragged on for far too long. I do not think the State has any real authority to demand of other actors in society to do more if the State itself is not doing more. We still have far too many wastewater treatment plants spewing untreated raw sewage into rivers, lakes and coastal areas. I know some progress has been made and the Environmental Protection Agency when it reports on that is often keen to remind us that even where there is progress the number of wastewater treatment plants that fall into the at-risk category sometimes goes in the wrong direction. The Minister of State has the opportunity to maybe make some initial responses to the EPA report that was published this morning in respect of septic tanks because there is no doubt but that those people who are not connected to the public water system need more support and assistance. In some instances these are people who want to be connected to the public water system and find great difficulty doing so, and if the Minister of State has some initial observations on that, I would welcome them.

This is an important report. It needs to inform our work in committee and here in the Dáil and we want to work with the Minister of State to ensure its findings are properly acted on.

I welcome this report. It is a pity it is not more positive, but it outlines the facts, which is very important if we are going to do our work, and especially if the Minister of State and the Government are going to do their work. It outlines the work that needs to be done. I also have serious concerns, however, that this report does not reflect some of the lived experience of the people I have dealt with in Cork city over the past 12 months. We have had serious issues with water discoloration that has been ongoing for months in Ballyvolane, Gurranabraher and Bishopstown. It has left me contacting Irish Water time and time again. People contact me and the issue is resolved and then a few weeks later we are back to square one. That is not good enough. We are talking about water quality.

This is 2023. People should be able to expect a decent quality of water in their pipes. Other areas I represent are Blarney and Togher. In the past four days, the same water main has burst twice and no advance notification was given that this might happen.

There are concerns about whether the system is fit for purpose. The EPA needs to examine how often Irish Water only partially resolves issues, with the issues then recurring repeatedly. Irish Water has advised people I represent to run their taps to see whether the water is brown. What kind of suggestion is that? It does not address the issue of running washing machines or dishwashers. It certainly does not address what someone can do once those machines have been run with discoloured water. People should not have to do that in 2023.

In 2022, the EPA reported that it had found pesticide exceedance in a number of areas in Cork, including Glanmire, which I represent. From what we can tell from EPA reports, it was the fourth year in a row that Glanmire experienced this issue. While I understand that Irish Water might not have responsibility in this regard, pesticides in people’s water is an issue that needs to be addressed. These are the issues affecting people on the ground.

It is great to have the opportunity to speak on this good report. A number of bathing areas across Dublin Bay are often directly impacted by poor water quality and health notices to avoid swimming are frequently put out to the public. There have also been warnings against children playing with sand on the beaches due to health risks, mainly from dog fouling, which I understand is a significant problem. Recently, large volumes of raw sewage were released directly onto the shoreline in Sandymount with no warning to the community and no clean-up effort by Irish Water. The rivers feeding into Dublin Bay have been classed as some of the most polluted in the State. The large volumes of waste flowing into the bay down the likes of the River Liffey, the Grand Canal and the Tolka Estuary is worrying. We need to put in place projects like Mr. Jimmy Murray’s MV Liffey Sweeper. I am not sure as to whether the Minister of State has been made aware of it.

It is a positive project. An element of it involves the Irish Nautical Trust educating locals, including young people, in the art of navigation and boating. Such projects would have a major impact on reducing the flow of rubbish into Dublin Bay, would serve as educational tools for the local community and improve the environment. Projects like the Irish Nautical Trust's MV Liffey Sweeper should be funded centrally. Currently, it is getting money piecemeal from here and there. Google has been supportive in funding it. I attended the recent awards ceremony. Such projects need core funding so that they can do their job week in, week out all year round. That is what I would ask the Government to commit to.

I am delighted to have the opportunity to speak on the EPA water quality report. The first message I would send is that we should not be alarmist when debating it. It states that 97% of the 148 identified bathing waters met the minimum standard required, so there are positive stories. There are other positive developments, including the new "See It? Say It!" app, where members of the public can report pollution where they see it. I welcome these initiatives. However, there are also serious problems. Urban wastewater incidents, agricultural run-off, fouling from dogs and algal blooms were factors that impacted negatively on beaches last year.

We are all familiar with the no-swim notices circulated and displayed in places like Seapoint and the Forty Foot in Dublin and around the country where there are issues with water quality. This is an issue across the country. My colleague, Deputy Duncan Smith, speaks with me about issues with the bathing water quality in Balbriggan. It is certainly an issue for my constituency of Dublin Bay South. I regularly hear from constituents, many of whom are associated with the great Sandymount and Merrion Residents Association, SAMRA, who tell me about the discharges they see of raw sewage directly onto Sandymount beach and Merrion Strand. As a regular sea swimmer at Poolbeg on the South Wall, I have seen evidence of large volumes of raw sewage deposited onto the beach. It is a public health issue for swimmers, dog walkers and walkers generally. It is nothing short of wholesale pollution, which if done by a commercial company would result in immediate closure. The official bathing season starts on 1 June and runs until 15 September. Many of us swim year round, however, and there are reports of people becoming ill after swimming in the sea outside the official bathing season. Just last week, swimmers were advised to steer clear of Seapoint due to heavy rain. It is well known that you see the no-swim notices going up when there is heavy rain. It is because of sewage. It is appalling and extraordinary that, in a city that is lucky to have such an incredible coastline, swimming spots and public amenities on our doorstep, we do not take greater care of these amenities. In October 2022, in reply to a question put by me in the Dáil, the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Deputy Darragh O'Brien, committed to year-round testing of water, but we still await a commitment in respect of treatment, a proper vision and proper implementation of controls for swimmers and others who wish to use the bay.

I will refer to my proposed vision for Dublin Bay, but I will also acknowledge the immense work that has been done by local organisations, for example, the Half Moon Swimming and Water Polo Club, which has a strong presence and long history on the South Wall at Poolbeg. It does a large amount of work. Mr. Murray's MV Liffey Sweeper and the Irish Nautical Trust are well known to everyone in and around the Ringsend and Irishtown area. A significant amount of local effort is going into keeping the amenity on our doorstep well cared for, but we need to see better joined-up thinking and co-ordination from the Government. That is why I introduced the Dublin Bay Bill 2021, which was debated on Second Stage last December and passed Second Stage with cross-party support. That Bill was drafted with the intention of providing a stronger framework for the protection of our great amenity of Dublin Bay and ensuring democratic accountability through a statutory authority with the mandate and remit to provide for the protection and enhancement of the environment and to ensure co-ordination of strategic planning and sustainable development around the bay. There was Government support for the idea of a statutory authority. I acknowledge that there are existing structures, but they are not statutory.

There is a task force that looks at Dublin Bay and seeks to protect this UNESCO site, but because of its lack of teeth and statutory basis, we have seen Dublin Port Company playing a dominant role in deciding the bay’s future. I made a lengthy submission to the Dublin Port Company in recent weeks on its 3FM plans for the expansion and development of its facilities at Dublin Bay. It is fair enough that the company has such plans, given that it is an entity with a clear vested interest in developing the port, but it is not good enough that no one else can oversee the port’s development and how it will fit into the plans for greater public amenities. For example, the company has plans to stack containers in what will be a deeply intrusive area of the Poolbeg Peninsula, impacting visually and in every other way on walkers on the strand and people who are using the lovely nature reserve at Irishtown. It is not good enough that there is no entity that has a democratic oversight of the Dublin Port Company’s plans. I have engaged directly with the company, met its new management and said this to it along with making my submission. The Minister for the Environment, Climate and Communications has uttered a public critique of the Dublin Port Company’s role. Let us do something about it. Let us see how we can improve governance, accountability and oversight structures in respect of the development of Dublin Bay. Other countries have seen good synergies between ports and local communities. In Barcelona, the port has been greatly improved as a public amenity.

We have seen the public development of swimming areas or lidos. As we are talking about swimming and bathing water, let us have a public lido. There is a strong campaign here in Dublin for a lido at George's Dock. The idea is for a lido with public access to replace the ill-fated proposed white water rafting facility. This would be an enormous amenity for us. I am old enough to remember the public baths in Blackrock. It is such a loss that we no longer have any sort of public baths along the sea line. I know there has been some development in Clontarf but nothing like those municipal baths facilities that we used to see. My mother recalls Sandymount baths on the strand and Dún Laoghaire baths. We have lost out hugely on the sort of public municipal civic amenities that we should have. Passage of the Dublin Bay Bill would enable much greater enhancement of the environmental and marine biodiversity of the bay but also the public amenity that should be our bay. I am delighted to put that on the record and am grateful for the opportunity to contribute to the debate.

Our fresh water is in limited supply and is complex to manage but it is critically important for our health and well-being. Out of all of the water supply in the world, only a couple of per cent is fresh water. Most of it is salty seawater. Of the 2% or 3% of the water on the planet that is fresh water, most of that is tied up in polar ice caps. As a result, we have a very small percentage of fresh water that we need to manage. Everything that we flush out of our houses, down our sinks or into our drains ends up in rivers, lakes, in surface run-off and, ultimately, back in the sea, where the hydrological cycle continues and that comes back into our groundwater, lakes and rivers. That is really complex and difficult to manage. Some people would oversimplify it and say that we get lots of rain so we have plenty of water but we all know it is much more complex than that, in terms of managing it. I credit the local authorities and Irish Water for their management of our water. It has been very difficult to manage over the years because not enough resources were ever put into water. Putting pipes into the ground or adding extra capacity to a wastewater treatment plant were never vote getters. Things were allowed to fall into disrepair and not to function properly. Were it not for the skills and abilities of the local authority staff who managed the drinking water plants and wastewater treatment plants, we would be in a far worse situation. I want to pay credit to those people who struggled in the past to keep those plants going.

I studied water about 20 years ago when I was in the Dublin Institute of Technology. Much of what I was working on centred on water quality, water management and the impact of wastewater discharges on receiving waters. I have been reading these EPA reports for about 20 years now. The researchers names that always come up, McGarrigle, Lucy and so on, are very familiar to me because in 20 years of reading those reports, they have more or less been saying the same thing. They have been saying that we have excessive nitrates and phosphates in our waters. The sources of those excessive nitrates and phosphates are very well known and very well documented. They are from point sources, namely, wastewater treatment plants and from diffuse sources, namely, agricultural run-off. We need to be honest and say that there are the two main sources. There is some from forestry and some from erosion or turbidity issues, but we need to be honest with people about the two main sources and state it clearly. We have known for so long that the free-draining soils down in the south east coupled with excessive cattle numbers means that animal waste and fertilisers are running off into our water supply. That is what causes the excessive nitrates. Phosphates come from wastewater treatment plants. We can invest in wastewater treatment plants and are doing so. Quite a lot of money has been set aside to improve those plants. I was looking through some EPA reports recently on remedial works that are going on. It takes a little bit of time but we will get there.

Lots of people do not want to state the obvious which is that in certain areas we have too many cattle creating too much animal waste, we have too much fertiliser and too much run-off into our waters. That is a problem. I often wonder why this is not something that people raise with me on doorsteps. They do not raise it. When I knock on doors while canvassing, not many people ask me what I am going to do about water quality. A lot of people look at the water that comes out of their taps and in the main in Ireland it is good quality drinking water. I know there are boil notices in many parts of the country and many people do not have good quality drinking water but in the main, that is what we see. If one looks at a river or a lake, unless it is really overgrown, nutrified and malodorous, one will think that the water is just water and that is it. I do not know how we make the leap to show people the really significant impact on human health that this can have. When one looks at the remedial action lists for our drinking water, one must remember that our drinking water comes out of those same rivers, lakes and groundwater supplies into which the discharges from wastewater treatment plants and the excessive run-off from agricultural sources flows. All of that ends up in the rivers and when we extract and treat that water, which is a complex process, much depends on what we are feeding into those drinking water supplies. Where we have excessive organic loading from land that has been excessively drained, land that is eroding or from forestry and we treat that with chlorine in a drinking water plant, we create trihalomethanes, THMs, which are potentially carcinogenic. That is what we have to bear in mind when we talk about improving water quality. We could be creating carcinogenic products in drinking water. On the remedial action list, we can see the plants that suffer from excessive THM levels.

We are also talking about nitrogen going into the water. Excessive nitrates in the water can have a really serious impact, especially on young children and infants who are fed formula made with that water. Methemoglobinemia, known as blue baby syndrome, is a condition whereby oxygen is dragged out of the blood because of excessive nitrates in the water. That is a significant health issue. We see around the country every now and again that nitrate levels are exceeded and boil notices are issued. That is another health aspect of this. E. coli are another concern. Coliforms are natural, they happen; they are in everybody's gut, in the soil. They are everywhere. There are two particularly bad ones, 157 and 026, both of which are a very strong indicator, if not proof, that there is contamination in the water from the human gut, animal gut, animal waste or human faeces. That shows that there are inputs in the water system which can make people incredibly sick. I am sure everybody here has had food poisoning but E. coli poisoning can make one incredibly sick, and if one is vulnerable and in poor health, it can do a huge amount of damage. They are known as VTEC coliforms and they can have a really significant impact on the kidney function of young children.

We need to change the narrative here. We have lots of water in this country, we have lakes and rivers which look nice and there is greenery around them but we need to get down, have a look and say that we need to look after this water. As already stated, it is a finite resource that is delicate and fragile and which can be damaged very quickly. If we damage groundwater aquifers, they can take decades to recover. A fast flowing river may be able to deal with discharge into it through dilution and flow but if we start damaging ground water we are in trouble. Cryptosporidium is another concern. It arises where there is excessive grazing by sheep on a low soil base with karst limestone underneath. Cryptosporidium outbreaks are another health issue that we need to consider.

When I think about water quality reports, having been reading them for over 20 years, that is what I think about. I think about the impact it has on our health and what we need to do to address it. We need to reduce the organic loading into our water. In forestry, for example, we need to have greater setbacks and to ensure that the buffer zones are there when we are clear felling. In fact, we should do away with clear felling and move towards continuous cover to protect soils, bind them and stop that excessive discharge of sediments.

Investment in wastewater treatment plants is very important. We have an old system in this country involving combined sewer overflows, CSOs. This means that when we get huge downpours of rain, the surface water combines with the foul water and it can overload our wastewater treatment plants. The plants overtop and cannot handle the water. Engineering interventions need to be made to separate the foul water from the surface water and those works are ongoing.

For decades, not enough has been invested in this and, as a result, there are those combined sewer overflows. There will be more high rainfall events in future. Wastewater treatment plants will be overloaded and there will be those discharges to receiving waters of water that has not been treated properly or for long enough. We need to address that.

The Citizens' Assembly on Biodiversity Loss prepared an exceptionally good report and presented it to Oireachtas Members today. It includes a full section on freshwater. That citizens' assembly is made up of 99 ordinary members of society selected at random to give a good cross-section of Irish society, from across the rural and urban divide and all sectors. We can work to implement that request. As politicians, we can have confidence it is on what people want us to work. They want us to work on protecting nature and water. Politicians are often afraid to stand up and criticise a particular sector or state that more needs to be done in the sector. This work needs to be done, however, and the citizens' assembly shows us that if we, as politicians, are brave enough to stand up and take those difficult decisions, the people will be behind us. In fact, they are ahead of us on this. We in this House are often very slow to react and only do so when we realise the people are behind us. This, however, is what they are asking for. A copy of the report of the citizens' assembly was issued to each Oireachtas Member. It is an easy read and I urge people to read it. The EPA report is also an easy read. It is too easy to read such reports, put them back on the shelf and not take action. We need urgent action. We needed it 20 years ago but, to protect people's health, we need action and investment and measures to be put in place right now to stop us destroying a finite and valuable resource that is critical to human health.

I welcome the opportunity to speak on this important report. Its results, like those of previous EPA reports were, unfortunately, greeted with a sigh of resignation across north County Dublin. It is nothing we have not seen before. For many years, people have been raising their voices to highlight the dire quality of bathing water in Balbriggan. The State and Fingal County Council have turned a blind eye to the deterioration of water quality. In 2017, water quality in Balbriggan was declared to be vulnerable but, rather than the situation being addressed, it has been left to fester and has deteriorated further. One of the main water quality problems lies in the contamination of the Bracken river with animal and human waste, as well as oil spills and dumps. Immediate action is needed if we are to improve the waters at Balbriggan beach for locals and tourists alike.

It is important to state that this is a local issue. Local people are invested in and concerned about it. Part of the reason they are concerned is that those who search for news on Balbriggan will find a report referring to poor bathing water quality, rather than one that says it is a wonderful, vibrant and thriving town with a gorgeous beach and amenities and is a brilliant place to bring one's family for an afternoon. Unfortunately, it is bad news that is to be found. Those contemplating a day trip would cross Balbriggan off their list. They should not do so, of course. Anyone listening to these proceedings should come to Balbriggan; it is a lovely place. It is really unfair that the town, which is constantly struggling to better itself and be as good as it can be, is being crossed off people's lists on that basis. Groups like Thrive Balbriggan, residents' associations and others have come together to make the town better, yet people from outside looking in see something negative, such as no-swim notice or a report of poor quality water.

At a recent protest, there was a very clear message for the Government, Fingal County Council, the EPA and Uisce Éireann. In order to tackle the water quality issues, four things have to happen. A bund needs to be constructed for the surface water drainage network before it enters the river. The sewage overflows, leaks and misconnections that are causing effluent to enter the river and sea must be fixed. That will require investigation, as well as the powers that be acknowledging that these are not isolated incidents. There is a pattern here. Treating every spill or incident as though it is an isolated one will not get to the root of the problem. Oil and diesel spills into the Bracken river need to be investigated and the habitats along the river must be restored in line with the council's restoration targets under the biodiversity action plan. These are the changes that are needed to address the water quality failings at Balbriggan beach. The reactive approach that has been the hallmark of the response to date is unacceptable. The people of Balbriggan and north County Dublin want transparency and a workable plan for immediate action. For many years, they have endured these bathing restrictions. It is a wonderful resource and should be safeguarded and nurtured by the council, EPA, Government and Uisce Éireann. As I stated, it has serious potential to attract visitors to what is a vibrant town that, unfortunately, gets a bad press.

A previous speaker indicated that he knocks on doors - I am sure he does - but that nobody ever raises the issue of water with him. Well it is raised with me in Balbriggan all the time. We have a regular stall in Balbriggan every Saturday morning and we canvass there at least once a week and the issue of water quality comes up all the time. I was very proud to march with the people of Balbriggan on 17 June in support of safe bathing water. Let the Minister of State be under no illusions: they are extremely angry, and rightly so. This is a wonderful resource that is being denied to them. I thank the swimming groups, namely, the Selkies and the Balbriggan Swimming Socks, as well as the Tidy Towns and all the organisations that came together to shout with one clear voice. They were clear that if this issue is not resolved, they will be back on the streets. They will take their protest to county hall, Government Buildings and the Custom House and they will keep shouting. They value their water resource, namely, the bathing water and beaches in Balbriggan. They want their commitment to be matched by the Government, Fingal County Council, the EPA and Uisce Éireann.

As regards freshwater quality, as the Minister of State is aware, Ireland has more than 84,000 km of rivers and streams and more than 12,000 lakes. This is a significant resource but we are going backwards as a country. As he would know, the number of near-pristine river sites has declined from more than 500 in the 1980s to just 32 today. As a result, we risk losing several native species forever. I attended the presentation by the Citizens' Assembly on Biodiversity Loss this morning, as did the Minister of State. At the presentation, Dr. James Moran stated that Europe risks becoming a Continent of spoofers when it comes to biodiversity. Given that Ireland is not going forward on freshwater quality but, rather, going backwards on a lot of the measures, it risks being a country of spoofers when it comes to water quality and freshwater quality. We have multiple reports from the EPA, year after year, showing the situation getting worse.

I will provide context in that regard. The EPA report shows there has been no significant improvement of water quality of rivers and lakes and states that is largely attributable to excess nitrogen and phosphorous. Nitrogen and phosphate loadings in the marine environment have, in general, been increasing since 2013 and only 38% of estuaries have "good" status. There have been ten years of decline, when we have been going in the wrong direction. Loads of both nutrients were higher in 2022 than they were in 2021. The EPA acknowledges that although there have been improvements in some areas, they have been offset by declines in other areas. Last year, 617 river water bodies were assessed. Of them, 84 had improved but 77 had declined. Nitrogen levels are too high in 40% of rivers and 20% of estuarine and coastal water bodies, mainly in the south and south east. The EPA stated that intensive agricultural activities, including organic and inorganic fertilisers, are contributing to that. Phosphate levels are too high in 36% of lakes and 28% of rivers. This has potential effects other than those on human health and it getting into water supplies.

In our watercourses, it means an overgrowth of plants, an algae that builds up which clogs up our watercourses, uses up oxygen, harms fish and other aquatic life, and kills off life in our river courses. This is extremely serious. This is happening in the context of our water supplies and watercourses being under intensive pressure, especially with climate change. Research by Maynooth University has indicated that by the 2050s, we will see summer reductions of between 20% and 28% in precipitation in Ireland that will particularly affect the southern and eastern coasts, and which by 2080s could increase to 30% to 40%. That is going to have a particular impact on our hydrology, soil moisture, storage, ground water recharge and storage and our fresh watercourses. It will have a profound effect. It is in that context and under that level of pressure that it is extremely serious for us not to be going in the right direction in terms of our fresh watercourses. We are also seeing the issues around rising sea temperatures, the real concern and worry it is causing for people working in fisheries and the impact that is having on their livelihoods.

What we need to do is take much more robust action on nitrates. We need to rely on science to determine what level of nitrates are acceptable in each water body. That is a must. We need to have a very strong river basin management plan. It has been mentioned that the draft plan is very weak and that it lacks the ambition, measures, and targets required to restore our waters to good health. How can we have all our waters protected and restored to good status by 2027, as we are required to do under the EU's water framework directive, when we do not have proper targets and timelines to get there in our river basin management plan? That is absolutely essential.

Sewage is the main source of pollution in 208 water bodies and yet the proposed river basin management plan does not include measures to fix that by the 2027 deadline. That shows a lack of seriousness and a lack of will to tackle water quality issues. It is time for this to be addressed with the seriousness that is needed.

What we also need to have is a change of mindset and to get way from thinking of these things simply as standards we need to meet because we are required to do so under our obligations or by the European Union. We need to make these changes because it is very much in our interests to do so. Strangling our waters and taking a wrecking ball to biodiversity in nature is against our interests. To protect ourselves, we must protect nature, the environment and biodiversity. In addition, we must have very strong support and incentives for farmers and food producers. They are at the front line in terms of biodiversity and in helping to manage our watercourses. Incentives and policy, which in the past have driven agricultural intensification in the wrong direction, need to be urgently re-orientated towards sustainable practices. Good practices must be rewarded, and not punished. The primary responsibility to do that lies with the State and the Government. It cannot simply be a case of saying that farmers need to do more. Food producers have a role to play but all the incentives have been pushing them in the wrong direction and the State has a key responsibility in that.

This Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, report must be a wake-up call. We need to act urgently if we are going to have any chance of meeting the directive by 2027.

The first thing we have to recognise is that one of the biggest causes of pollution is municipal wastewater systems that are totally inadequate. It is much easier to sell to a lot of people the idea of investing money over the ground than under the ground. However, we need to radically step up our investment in Uisce Éireann in order to upgrade our wastewater systems that are deficient and provide wastewater systems where we do not currently have them. A new system was put in in Clifden. Ordinarily, the system is more than adequate for the town. However, the problem is that the storm water also goes in where the wastewater goes in and when you get very heavy rains, the system cannot cope and there is an overflow. The same thing that is happening in Clifden happened in Ringsend in Dublin. Sooner or later we are going to have to face up to the fact that we have to divert as much storm water as possible away from the sewerage systems or the wastewater systems.

The report out today is by the EPA. It was a bit misleading how it was reported in the media because it was said that half of the houses failed the septic tank inspections. Of course, this was done on a risk-based analysis where it tried to target the places where it thought there was a problem, so it is not representative of the total number of houses. Wastewater systems in private houses can be a problem but the Government penny pinchers were spending less than €100 million a year for the 500,000 houses in the country. If you figure out what is being spent on Uisce Éireann, for the other 1.3 or 1.4 million lucky houses, you suddenly realise there is only one group that gets no investment and that is the people who have to provide their own systems. One simple change that could be made is that if a person had a defective system, they would be eligible on a once-off basis for a grant and they could ask for an inspection. This would be instead of the present situation, where a person could have a terrible wastewater system but if they are not selected due to not being near another agglomeration, they are not able to get the grant. This is totally counter-intuitive.

Another issue is the number of small villages that are unsewered. I mention Cill Rónáin on the Aran Islands, Cill Chiaráin, Carna and Corr na Móna. I could go on and on, mentioning other villages such as Clarinbridge and Craughwell. The reality is there is a small amount of money being given for new systems in towns and villages which are unsewered. We need to immediately multiply that money at least tenfold to make any impression across the country in all these unsewered towns and villages. All of this is just practical action rather than writing more and more reports when we are dealing with the obvious.

Another issue I will mention in the very short time I have does not relate to cleaning water, but to access to clean water. Some 10% of houses in this State are dependent on private systems of various quality, such as wells and streams. I cannot understand why the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage refuses again and again to accept the premise that the same approach should be taken towards this as was taken towards broadband. The approach taken to broadband was that it was a fundamental necessity, as is electricity and a road to one's house. Electricity is a fundamental to modern living. The State should develop a policy that every house in the country would be given the option of connecting to a public municipal supply of water unless they were already connected to a satisfactory quality-approved group water scheme. When that kind of job is done, it is done. Uisce Éireann made it very clear at the Irish language committee that if the investment was made, it would maintain those systems. They would need very little maintenance because they would be brand new and would connect into the existing Uisce Éireann pipes.

We need to tackle farm waste. There are many reasons for it and it is a slow one to tackle because even if the cause is reduced for a while, it does not reduce the pollution. However, we have a problem in the south and south east. One obvious solution is to start processing our slurry and produce biogas which would provide a biofuel that could replace and displace fossil fuels. It would also provide a bioproduct in pellet form which, once spread on land, would do a lot less damage than spreading raw slurry. Therefore, let us stop talking about the theory. I have given about six practical things that could be done. If they were all done, we would suddenly find that our rivers and lakes were in a lot better state than they are.

Thankfully, I live in one of the best areas in the country for beautiful clean lakes, in the north of Lough Corrib.

I commend the Minister of State on the fantastic work he is doing. It is much appreciated in my constituency where he has been supportive of a number of projects.

I have several issues I wish to cover in the few minutes I have. Orphan estates are obviously a big issue. We have a small estate in Longford called Radharc na Coille with six houses, all of which are privately owned. The residents are having to service and look after the treatment plant themselves. Irish Water has a plan for an adjoining estate, Woodland Park, but it is several years away and the five families are really struggling. It is something I will take up with the Minister of State later.

I welcome the continual improvement in water quality, but I take issue with the overemphasis on rural Ireland and especially farmers in the new third river basin management plan currently being finalised. However, I will use the few minutes I have to highlight the EPA's heretofore steadfast opposition to the harvesting of commercial peat. This has placed a stranglehold on our horticulture sector. Representatives from the sector, including the chair of the IFA's fruit and vegetable committee, Mr. Niall McCormack, will address this issue at the agriculture committee later. Mr. McCormack is one of the largest strawberry producers in Ireland and I am a valued customer of his. He is an environmentalist and enthusiastic about the land. Several of his neighbours have travelled with him to support him when he speaks at the committee, but also to emphasis that they appreciate the work he is doing as a farmer and custodian of the land.

Earlier this month we saw a significant development in the stand-off as the EPA lost a long-running court battle against three local peat producers. The case ran for three days and at no time was the EPA able to establish or indeed provide expert witnesses to prove that the three parcels of bog were technically and hydrologically connected. Time and again the EPA has depended on the flawed claim that bogland is hydrologically linked. At no time has it ever been able to produce this evidence and given the opportunity in a courtroom recently it was simply unable to provide it. The EPA has repeatedly made this statement about hydrological connection without any evidence in law or in fact. This is clearly not the case and the hydrological report prepared for the defence by Dr. Raymond Flynn in the recent court case clearly shows this.

This is less an issue for the Minister of State's Department than the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, but I am sure he will be aware Séamus Boland of Irish Rural Link recently addressed the agriculture committee on the challenges and the crisis in the peat harvesting sector. He provided a detailed and rational argument for allowing peat producers to operate on holdings of less than 30 ha. Armed with this recent court decision, there is now no known impediment to running with this pilot concept and I will be asking the Minister, Deputy McConalogue, and his Department to take it on board. I hope it finds equal favour in the Minister of State's Department as well.

I welcome the opportunity to speak on this report and the wide-ranging implications Ireland’s declining water quality has, from the devastation it is wreaking on our biodiversity to the deteriorating quality of life it is inflicting on our local communities. The significance of the problem is difficult to overstate and it should be treated with the absolute urgency it deserves.

I commend the EPA on preparing the report. Though the reports findings are far from welcome, we welcome efforts to highlight the gravity of the situation. A number of things are highlighted in the report. It states there has been no significant change in the biological quality of our rivers our lakes in 2022. The rate of decline largely matches the rate of improvement. Nitrate concentrations are too high in 40% of river sites nationally and in 20% of estuarine and coastal water bodies. Average nitrate levels in rivers and groundwaters increased nationally between 2021 and 2022. Phosphate concentrations are too high in 28% of rivers and 36% of lakes. This impacts on their biological quality. Phosphate levels in rivers and lakes fluctuate between rivers but have been generally stable in recent years. Nitrogen and phosphorus loading in the marine environment have been generally increasing since 2013. Loads of nutrients were higher in 2022 then in 2021 and this placed continued pressure on our marine water bodies. Importantly, the report confirms or reconfirms the number of near-pristine river sites in Ireland has declined from more than 500 in the 1980s to 32 today.

There was a presentation earlier in the AV room from Dr. Aoibhinn Ní Shúilleabháin on the Citizens’ Assembly on Biodiversity Loss and the Minister of State attended. Dr. Ní Shúilleabháin noted that despite covering many broad areas in their deliberations, assembly members found declining freshwater quality to be the issue that was most depressing and distressing. The Minister of State will recall Dr. Ní Shúilleabháin said there was silence at lunchtime.

I want to focus on water and wastewater infrastructure. It is really important and one of those areas that is fully within our control to address. We know just 51% of Ireland’s sewage was treated to the EU standards set to protect our environment, which is well below the EU average of 90%. There are 32 towns and villages still discharging raw sewage into our environment every day. This is very significant. In my constituency of Meath East we have regular issues with water and wastewater infrastructure, including in Ratoath, Kells, Stamullen, Duleek, Ashbourne and the list goes on. A well-attended public meeting was held last night in Ratoath. It was reflecting on at least three water outages in recent weeks. People with disabilities and businesses were present. At the root of it is bad planning, bad development, development without adequate infrastructure and developer-led development. This was an area that saw a huge increase in residences and homes but not the adequate and critical water infrastructure. That is something that could and should have been avoided but was not. Now we are in a situation where fingers are pointed at the local authority. Uisce Éireann has been under-resourced and impotent in its response. There are plans for Ratoath, but it is fair to say they have come late in the day and people are suffering the consequences of it. It is the same with Kells, where there are significant concerns about the capacity of the wastewater treatment and the need to have it upgraded and future-proofed. The Minister of State may be familiar with the Save the Boyne campaign in Meath. In each of these circumstances, local communities are coming together recognising the importance of their freshwater supply and the importance of water and wastewater infrastructure, but the State is failing in each case or even worse, is taking decisions that are having very negative outcomes. There is, therefore, significant work to be done. I look forward to working with the committee on the Citizens’ Assembly on Biodiversity Loss as there are a huge number of important recommendations there, but also working outside of that within politics, within Government and within these institutions to make progress. It needs to happen.

I am thankful for the opportunity to say a few words about this report. It is the latest in a trend of reports that highlight serious problems with the country’s water bodies. We know from this report that Ireland will fail to meet the most basic EU targets on restoring water bodies by 2027. We can add to that the list of failures on environmental and climate targets. The overall ecological health of the surface waters has declined across all body types since the last assessment period of 2013-2018 and the number of monitored water bodies in satisfactory condition has declined by 1% in rivers, 3% in lakes, 16% in estuaries and 10% in coastal waters. There are a number of reasons for this and urban wastewater and historic under-investment in water treatment and wastewater is one of them.

It is ironic this State spent more than €100 million on water meters in a failed attempt to move towards privatisation of water and charging people for drinking water. It was willing to spend up to €500 million on that disastrous policy with our network creaking and our water more polluted and while urban growth meant much of our water bodies suffered from severe issues with urban wastewater.

For me, the elephant in the room here is an issue that was raised earlier today when the Dáil debated a motion that sought to reduce nitrate use in this State. There is a direct link between the policies of Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael to grow the dairy herd and create markets abroad for dairy products and the deterioration of water quality as a result of the associated nitrate use. According to the National Dairy Council, Ireland exports almost 90% of its dairy output to 120 countries across the globe. Since 2015, when EU quotas were removed, the value of the exports has doubled from €2 billion to more than €4 billion, in line with a 50% increase in milk production. There is a direct link between the decline in water quality, particularly in the south and south east, and the profits of the very big agribusinesses. There is a direct link between the fact that the Goodman Group could post a profit of €150 million from its Luxembourg headquarters to avoid tax here and the decline in kingfisher and salmon numbers. It is the agriculture policy of Fine Gael especially that has led to this decline and the threat to wildlife and human health.

Milk production in Ireland jumped by 68% from under 5 billion l in 2008 to 8.3 billion l in 2020. There is a direct link between the 40% increase in the dairy herd over the past decade and the damage it has done to our estuaries and rivers. As the profits of the big dairy sector and the industries around it have risen, the health of our rivers and water has fallen. We need to end this unsustainable model of agriculture. It is damaging to the majority of ordinary farmers, our water bodies and the climate. It means challenging those vested interests that have driven the agri-policy here and the narrative that we are somehow feeding the world, ignoring the truth that we are feeding the profits of Goodman, Dawn and a small number of other wealthy cohorts at a huge cost to the environment and our rural communities.

I welcome the debate on this because the debate to date has been unequal, unfair and, indeed, targeted at rural dwellers, including farmers. They want to play their part. There have been very minor incidents and it is right that these be investigated. The causes of pollution are many. A large proportion of the blame is attributable to many decades of Government policy failure. Farmers have done what the markets and policymakers have asked of them but are ever more aware of the need to do things differently. Some young farmers have invested millions in state-of-the-art slurry operations, good animal husbandry and everything else. It is time that we took the monkey off their backs and allowed them to do what they are doing without demonising them. They are aware of the need. Increasingly, they embrace no-till farming, cover cropping and other methods that help the environment. They deserve support and not to be blamed.

The same applies to septic tanks, which matter has raised its head again today. Water treatment plants are an issue. I could name 30 in Tipperary. Villages like mine in Newcastle have no treatment plant. There is a sewerage plant for about 500 people and a big septic tank. I asked the EPA more than once whether it would come to the bridge to measure the water quality. I asked them to go 200 m downstream where raw sewage is belching in. That is happening. As Deputy Ó Cuív said, we need a tenfold increase in funding for the plants. There are places without a treatment plant and percolation; they just have a big tank from which everything flows out as it went in. That is disgusting and it is happening up and down Tipperary, in villages and everywhere else.

It is time that we stopped demonising the young and old farmers who practice good animal husbandry and work with the shovel to ensure drains operate and address run-off. They are playing their part. Everybody has to play a part.

People who sink their own well must bear the expense and they get no support. Are they going to allow their wells to be contaminated? No, they are not. Therefore, it is time we had fair and reasonable commentary here. It is time that the EPA ponied up to test and expose where the councils are falling down. As I said this morning, two farmer friends of mine were out on a boat, a pleasure craft, in Dublin Bay on a lovely Saturday morning about three weeks ago and they said the two lines of sewage belching out into the sea were quite disgusting. Despite this, we blame the farmers the whole time. The county councils and Government need to act and not blame the rural communities.

Especially in light of the events of the past 24 hours, I have to note the total demonisation of rural dwellers. I say “rural dwellers” because predominantly people with a septic tank are rural dwellers. We are told the majority of septic tanks, or perhaps one in three, are not functioning properly. The main polluter in any county is the local authority of that county. This is because of inaction, not just of the current Government but also of past Governments. They have failed to provide the local authorities with enough funding to upgrade their existing sewerage network or, as in many cases, deal with the many villages and communities that do not have any form of wastewater treatment whatsoever.

I do not want to name towns and villages with no sewerage system but have them at the top of my tongue. The local authority has pipes that come directly out of the houses, pubs and shops and go down the street and into the nearest river. It is the State that has done this; it is the local authority that has done it. Deputy Noonan is a Minister of State and I want him to say what he thinks about that. If the culprits were individuals, families, pubs, shops or businesses, they would be ridiculed and taken the next Friday to the local court, where a judge would fine them.

They would be to the front of the local newspaper and bellragged the length and breadth of the country, yet it would be regarded as all right for the State to do what they did. That is not fair or right; that does not suggest an equal playing field. This minute, people are being grilled in the Oireachtas over what RTÉ did. I want the Minister of State to consider what the Government is doing. Why is it blaming individuals again? If they have to upgrade their sewerage system, they might not be able to afford it. The State surely can; it does not know what to do with money.

At the very beginning of the Minister of State’s speech, to which I listened in my office, he mentioned honesty. Of course, everybody else here decided to talk about agriculture afterwards. Honesty is the best policy.

Irish Water, which is responsible for public water services, has not provided clear action plans or timeframes for improving treatment in approximately one third of priority areas identified by the EPA. In light of the recent EPA report on declining water quality, it is crucial to address the Government’s finger-pointing at agriculture while neglecting its own responsibility to upgrade sewerage schemes across the country. Basically, it is pointing the finger at agriculture the whole time to take the pressure off itself.

I have been involved in a community council since 1999, Goleen & District Community Council. Raw sewage has been going into Goleen waters since 1999. There were landowners on whose land it was possible to get work done. Goleen & District Community Council paid for the flying in and worked at that time with the county council before Irish Water took over. Since 1999, we have been waiting to upgrade the system. This State has let the people down 100%, not agriculture or anything else.

I was at a public meeting the other night at which the people of Shannonvale asked me to name it. It is a picturesque, beautiful community that got a beautiful community garden but raw sewage is pouring up around that garden. It is pouring down into the mains water scheme in Clonakilty. The Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Deputy Darragh O’Brien, came down last year. The community was on a list last year; it is off a list this year. It is absolutely astonishing to think that raw sewage is going into the Clonakilty mains water scheme and the members of the community cannot have their children play in the community garden they were given. The scheme is outdated. The community needs a new sewerage scheme but it is not even on a list now; it is coming off a list. Therefore, somebody needs to be held responsible. I am sorry but someone must put his or her hand up in the air and say he or she is creating a cock-up because communities that need to be listed are not being put on a list such that they will know when their sewerage will be sorted and not have to wait for 25 or 30 years without anything happening.

With regard to the water quality report, the people of Kerry, with its connection to the sea and rivers, rely on water for work, food, health and well-being. That is why we have been keeping an eye on the EPA reports over recent years.

Water quality can, of course, be impacted by a number of different factors. One statistic in the report that jumped out at us was concerning, namely, that there are two river water bodies in bad condition. There was in a place in County Clare and the Laune in County Kerry, where it says that urban wastewater is a pressure. The Minister of State knows the area well. Does he believe the Killarney sewage treatment plant is fit for purpose, especially during the summer months with all the extra tourists who visit Killarney? The report refers to Lough Leane and that a great deal of damage has been done there. At the moment, the toxic algae bloom signs are up, which is very disappointing in a premier tourist destination like Killarney.

Around the county, it has already been referenced about the lack of wastewater treatment plants in such places as Castlegregory, Abbeydorney and in Fenit where I recently dealt with people living in Lighthouse Village. Even though a system was made by the developer, they cannot connect to the system because two houses cannot be built in Fenit, as there is no system in place. It does not look like one is coming anytime soon. Despite a blaze of publicity a number of years ago which said it was coming, there is nothing happening there yet. Uisce Éireann also needs to carry out assessments around Cromane, in the Magharees, in Tralee Bay, and into the Kenmare River. Closer to home there is the big river which flows right down through the north side of Tralee and goes directly through the centre of the town, and there are septic tanks going into that river. Permission was granted by the local authority. No funding has been allocated towards a river going right through the centre of Tralee town. It is within a few hundred yards of county council buildings. If there was ever a priority, that should be it.

It is clear that water quality needs to be maintained and improved upon. Here again farmers have their role to play in relation to this. Like many others, I have spoken to many farmers who have agreed with that. The challenge for us in this House is to put in a workable framework to facilitate them in meeting their part and their responsibilities.

I am going to deal with the nitrates action plan, and there are a couple of issues. In the first instance it is important that we are honest with farmers and that the water quality review on which the derogation depends was hidden from them for months after the plan was approved. This showed a certain level of bad faith. There is also an issue with the review mechanism itself in that comparing two years side by side can provide a wholesome overview of how the situations are changing, especially on a local level when various factors, including inclement weather, can have a dramatic impact. There is also the level of supports available over this CAP period generally. While supports have been maintained in 2023, based on the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine's indicative application across 2023 to 2027, this would suggest a reduction in the latter years. We cannot continue to ask farmers to do more while the Government delivers less. This is something that definitely has to be addressed.

I would find it hard, coming from Dundalk, to talk about water quality without dealing with the particular issues that relate to our water supply and the issue of manganese. We have been told it would take a number of years for Uisce Éireann to deal with this particular issue. I call for action to be taken now. I even hear of flushing that is happening in my own area back in Bay Estate and that, again, people are looking at brown water, which we have been dealing with for a considerable amount of time. There is an issue in regard to legacy pipes in old housing estates as well that needs to be dealt with and sometimes serious pressure is put on individuals that have public lines through their land.

As humans, access to clean water is essential for our livelihoods, our economy and our well-being. Our rivers and lakes are home to hundreds of freshwater species while our estuaries and coastal waters remain a rich source of marine biology biodiversity, so clean water is also essential for nature to thrive. The water framework directive was adopted by member states throughout Europe, including Ireland in 2000. A requirement of the directive is that all waters are protected and restored to at least good status by 2027. This means waters in moderate or worse status must be restored to at least good status by then. Sustained and focused action is needed to achieve sustainability not only across sectors such as agriculture, energy, transport and industry but across the whole of society. The assessment highlighted our most recent four-year assessment of Ireland’s environment, finding that the outlook was not good. It reflects the transformation needed so that we all live sustainably and urged the need for a decade of action and transformation, particularly in the context of the escalating climate and biodiversity emergencies. To achieve an environment which supports our health and well-being, our natural environment must first be valued and then protected by all, and this will require action on the part of the Government and every household, business, sector and community.

With regard to drinking water, since the establishment of Irish Water, 263 boil water notices have been lifted, benefiting approximately 1.8 million people. Where risks to water quality are identified through rigorous sampling and testing, boil water notices are issued to safeguard public health. In all instances, immediate action is undertaken to address the underlying causes of the issue to enable the lifting of the notice as soon as it is safe to do so. While progress has been good, recently there has been a decline in water quality, with the number of at risk supplies on the EPA’s remedial action list increasing to 57 in mid-2022 from 52 in 2021. This underlines the fact that drinking water treatment in many supplies is still not as robust as it needs to be to ensure the supply is resilient and safe into the future. I am glad to report that the EPA drinking water report shows that the quality of Ireland’s drinking water supplies continues to improve. Compliance with the microbiological and chemical standards for drinking water remains greater than 99.7%, which means the water in our public water supplies is safe to drink. Despite this, drinking water treatment in many supplies is not as resilient as it needs to be to ensure the supply is safe into the future. While the quality of drinking water in public supplies remains high, delays in delivering public water improvements continues to put water quality and the public's health at risk.

We have increased investment in our drinking water services year on year. This is reaping benefits for customers nationwide, giving them the assurance they can enjoy clean, safe drinking water. This needs to continue. However, the environmental group has pointed out that it will be 24 years before the lead pipes under Uisce Éireann's control are replaced. The progress rate on replacing them is unacceptable. This is serious in the context of people's health. People can become ill from drinking inadequately treated water, especially severe in vulnerable people such as the young or elderly. The EPA report on water quality found that significant incidents during 2021 at at least two water treatment plants put the health of approximately 885,000 people at risk, and represented significant failings by Uisce Éireann. The EPA is calling for stronger leadership at a national level on the lead strategy, especially given the forthcoming reduced limit in the new drinking water directive. Significant improvement in the collective efforts of all stakeholders is required.

I am happy to say that in County Louth we have built new drinking water infrastructure in five towns throughout the county, improving the water quality and benefiting local communities in Dundalk, Tallanstown, Clogherhead, Omeath and south Louth-east Meath. By building this new infrastructure, we have improved drinking water for more than 73,000 people and facilitated the removal of Clogherhead, Omeath and south Louth-east Meath water supplies from the RAL.

The scale of investment, the level of national planning and the ongoing delivery of projects and programmes by Uisce Éireann is demonstrated in the report. Key programmes such as the national disinfection programme and the removal of the risk of trihalomethanes, THMs, and cryptosporidium in water supplies are ongoing and are vital to ensuring clean, safe drinking water throughout the country. The report is clear, however, that while a lot has been achieved, the outlook for Ireland’s environment is not optimistic unless we accelerate the implementation of solutions across all sectors of society to secure water supplies into the future. In boil water notice cases, capital investment is required to address a treatment deficiency so that the average duration of all subsequent notices continues to decrease. The security of supply is dependent on the risks to the supply, adequacy of the water treatment infrastructure and the management and operational controls in place. Investment in these areas is crucial.

The ecological health of our surface waters is assessed by studying the different types of plants and animals living in them. Elements such as oxygen, nutrient concentration and physical alterations, and the hydromorphological condition of a water body are also assessed. This information tells us how healthy our waters are. The chemical status of our surface water is also determined by measuring the concentration of different chemical pollutants such as metals and pesticides that are known to be harmful to aquatic organisms and the environment.

Since Covid-19 there has been an increase in people sea swimming for health and mental health purposes. On top of this, sunshine means that more people are accessing our beaches outside of the traditional bathing season.

During 2022, the EPA participated in the national bathing water expert group, which is chaired by the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, to help identify potential options to better protect bathers who swim year round. Happily, five beaches in Louth and Meath have been found to have an excellent bathing water supply. Laytown, Bettystown, Port-Lurganboy beach, Clogherhead-Seapoint, and Shelling Hill-Templetown were all named as having excellent bathing water. However, the EPA's report, Water Quality in Ireland 2016-2021, published in October, highlights the further decline of water quality in Ireland, and that at the current level of progress, Ireland will fail to meet the EU and national goal of restoring all water to good or better status by 2027. The assessment showed that only just over half of the surface waters, which is rivers, lakes, estuaries and coastal waters, are in satisfactory condition, that is, they are achieving good or high ecological status and can sustain healthy ecosystems for fish, insects and plants. There has been a significant deterioration in the number of estuaries and coastal waters in satisfactory condition, mostly along the south-east and southern seaboards.

There are still, therefore, some issues impacting bathing water quality to address. Agriculture, urban wastewater and fouling from dogs on beaches all impact on the quality of bathing water. Urgent and targeted action is required to reduce nitrogen emissions from agriculture in these areas. Ongoing improvements in bathing water quality is attributed to improved management of bathing water over many years, together with investment in the treatment of urban wastewater. Irish Water, therefore, needs to improve the operation, management and maintenance of treatment plants and networks which impact on bathing water.

Treating wastewater to make it clean and safe is essential in protecting our environment and public health. Improvements in wastewater treatment are evident, with the number of priority areas reducing by almost 40% over the past five years, from 147 to 91. There is still a long way to go to bring deficient treatment systems up to standard and provide for future needs. It will take a multi-billion euro investment, based on current investment levels, and at least two decades to get all of the treatment systems up to standard.

Overall, the EPA report outlined how groundwater continues to be under pressure from human activities, such as wastewater discharge, agriculture and forestry. These have an impact on water quality across the country's water bodies, whereby excessive levels of nutrients can cause an overgrowth of plants and algae, clogging up watercourses, using high levels of oxygen and harming aquatic life. Higher levels of phosphorus are particularly concerning with regard to the water quality of rivers and lakes, while nitrogen is more of a concern for estuaries. Ireland relies heavily on its clean and green image, both for its food production and for its tourism industry, yet the reality is the very opposite. Investment, co-ordination and action are required now.

I am going back to the Government now, and in the interest of people knowing, Deputy Leddin is next, followed by Deputy Murnane O'Connor. They have two 11-minute slots, and they are followed by Deputy Joan Collins.

We are sharing one 11-minute slot.

You are, but it is up to yourselves now. You seem to have got yourselves an 11-minute slot each.

Deputy Leddin can take as long as he wants.

I thank the Leas-Cheann Comhairle. Exactly two weeks ago, the Environmental Protection Agency published the report, Water Quality in 2022. It provides an update on the water quality of Ireland's rivers, lakes, estuaries, coastal and groundwaters for that year. The report presents a crucial insight into the state of our watercourses and highlights significant and alarming environmental concerns that require immediate attention. I thank the Business Committee for accommodating my request to debate the EPA's report on water quality in this House today.

The findings of the report, while astounding, were not surprising. Overall, last year, there was no significant change in the biological quality of our rivers or lakes. Any improvements we are seeing in some areas are being obliterated by declines elsewhere. The report finds that the main pressures on water quality are agriculture and discharges from urban wastewater. Nitrate concentrations are too high in 40% of river sites nationally and in 20% of estuarine and coastal water bodies. These elevated levels are found mainly in the south and south east, and this is primarily attributable to intensive agricultural activities on freely draining soils in these areas.

The issuing of the EPA's report coincided with the annual water conference that brought together policy experts, scientists, farmers, politicians and many other stakeholders, including Dr. Aoibhinn Ní Shúilleabháin, who was the chair of the Citizens' Assembly on Biodiversity Loss. Just as with the Environmental Protection Agency, the citizens' assembly also identified that our rivers and water bodies have deteriorated around the country, especially in the south and south east. Dr. Ní Shúilleabháin was in Leinster House today with her colleagues, Dr. Micheál Ó Cinnéide and Dr. James Moran, to present their report. From reading it and from listening to the presentation this morning, we cannot argue with the compelling work they did and the work of the 99 randomly chosen citizens who formed that assembly.

The members of the assembly identified the poor condition of our freshwater systems as an urgent problem that requires an immediate and co-ordinated national response. They made strong recommendations around that. What is clear from their work is that the people consider this to be a high priority and they want us in this House to fix it. With regard to citizens' assemblies, I might comment that despite initial scepticism, we can see they have been a missing piece in our democracy. The work of the Citizens' Assembly on Biodiversity Loss shows that. They do not usurp or undermine the political system we have. Rather, they are a refinement or an evolution of our political system. The experience to date shows now how important they are to us.

As the chair of the Joint Committee on Environment and Climate Action, I believe I speak on behalf of the members when I say we are honoured to have the opportunity to engage with the assembly's report. In the autumn, the committee will thoroughly examine that report, deliberate on its recommendations, analyse the progress already made, and identify actions that still need to commence. We will report back to this House and the Upper House before Christmas. We are not going to go over the same ground that the Citizens' Assembly on Biodiversity Loss went over. We do not have time for that in any case, first, because it is an emergency, but also because the timescale we have been given is just until the end of the year. Our objective is to bring the consensus of that citizens' assembly to a political consensus.

We have a strong and successful precedent with the citizens' assembly on climate change, and that hugely informed the current programme for Government which is turning this country in a very positive direction, notwithstanding how difficult it is. We can trace climate policy all the way back to the citizens' assembly on climate change a number of years ago. It is not going to be easy, and I think everyone in this House needs to understand that and be honest about it. We will fail if we do not seek to include all voices and embrace the diversity of views in the Oireachtas, because there is division and polarisation. That is the nature of politics and, sadly, it is increasingly so. However, politics is also the art of the possible, and the Joint Committee on Environment and Climate Action has a strong record of hard work and collaboration. We have a lot of work ahead of us, but I can say that we have already begun, and I am confident we will do justice to the extraordinary work of those 99 citizens and the lead team that presented to Members of the Oireachtas this morning.

Coming back to today's topic, the nitrates directive is also an essential part of protecting water. It is designed to prevent nitrogen and phosphorus from polluting our water, and Ireland has secured a derogation to the directive freely since 2007, allowing farming at more intense levels. Approximately 7,300 farmers now farm at this higher intensity, and in light of the recent worrying trends in water quality, this time the European Commission granted us the derogation on the basis that water quality would improve. We can be in no doubt whatsoever that the writing is on the wall here for the future of that derogation because water quality is going in the wrong direction. The same could be said about the Arterial Drainage Act 1945, legislation that allows for the ongoing destruction across thousands of kilometres of waterways in Ireland. We can no longer allow the State to actively encourage behaviour that leads to water pollution and the decline in quality of our water bodies. We must pull the brakes now and reverse this worrying trend across our rivers, lakes and marine environments. I hope future generations will look back and see that this was the point where we saved nature and, indeed, saved ourselves.

I want also to talk on this subject today, and I am sure the Minister of State will be aware of the concerns I have.

I am sure he has heard them as well, being a Deputy from my constituency. I will discuss water quality. I recently visited someone in the hospital in Kilkenny. Ninety per cent of the time I was there, the patients were getting bottled water. I do not know whether it is because of Covid, health and safety or a water issue. I have not heard anything about it. This is happening at a time when we are trying to eliminate the use of plastics and there is a cost issue as well. Are we using bottled water in a lot of places? Is this part of the Government plan? Will the Minister of State check that out for me? I do understand if it is a health and safety issue, particularly in hospitals.

Turbidity issues are affecting treatment processes at the water treatment plant in Kilkenny, which has resulted in a very long boil water notice in Castlecomer recently. Residents wrote to me complaining that the water quality is still no better after the lifting of the notices. One couple who told me they had built a new home within the past two years have paid roughly €5,000 for water and wastewater connection along with all associated contributions to the local authority but have not yet had a consistent clean supply of water during that time. My understanding is that Irish Water is not providing clear updates and it appears that the current supply has eroded pipes as the colour of the water can sometimes be musty. The parents of a newborn baby who had to bottle feed for medical reasons told me they had to buy bottled water because they felt there was an issue with the water. They also told me that when they were bathing their baby, they thought the water colour was a bit off.

When we talk about water quality, we must talk about septic tanks. I have brought forward an important Bill for householders who are excluded from the support for the maintenance and repair of septic tanks because they did not register the septic tank, which costs €50. A good few people from Carlow contacted me about this. Originally, when a person had to contact the local authority, he or she had to register his or her septic tank. I know it went on for months. I think it was originally €25 and ended up being €50, which on the scale of things, is doable for people. However, I know of a lot of people who, through no fault of their own, did not register. Perhaps they did not get the information. They did not see it in the newspaper. I have constantly gone to the local authority but I cannot blame it because this must be changed through legislation. I got a Bill together, brought it to the House and am still waiting to take it further.

I will discuss two cases with which I have dealt. In the first case, I really felt for the couple. A mature couple came to see me about six months ago. Again, they had not registered so I went to the council. Again, I cannot blame the council because legislation needs to be passed here. The man got a price for his septic tank of in or around €9,000. I cannot quite remember because it was a few months ago. He told me he would have to sell his car because he did not have the money to put in a new septic tank because he would not get the grant because he did not register with Carlow County Council. That is criminal. It is unacceptable when we are in a climate emergency, when we are trying to encourage people not to pollute and telling them always to be mindful of where they are and what they do, that I have this case. Another case involves a lovely lady who only has one income coming in. Again, she did not register. She had to borrow the money from the credit union and her family to get a new septic tank and all the works associated with it. It is unacceptable that we cannot get a grant for people who have not registered with their own local authority. I am sure this is the case throughout the country.

The Minister of State is in the same constituency as me - Carlow-Kilkenny - and I am sure he has cases in Kilkenny. Every week, I try to put the legislation in to get it moving faster but I feel we need to do things locally. When we want climate action, we must do it locally for the people we represent. Genuine good people in my constituency are trying to do everything by the book but they cannot afford a new septic tank and cannot get a grant for it. Will the Minister of State make this a priority? I know he will. I will have a meeting with him next week on that because it is important.

My understanding is that means testing is not used when it comes to upgrades to septic tanks in high-status water body areas. This is another thing that needs to be looked at. We have all seen the report last week. It is a concern for us. Water is so important. I welcome the fact that, last week, we got word of different areas that got funding for wastewater. Tullow, Killerig and Grange in County Carlow got €3.5 million, which I was delighted about. That was really good for them. We are doing good work.

In addition to agriculture, poorly functioning septic tanks have been found to be a main pressure on water quality. In 40 areas, they were considered to be the only cause of water pollution, so this is not just a once-off house with one problem. Local authorities inspect septic tanks and, every year, roughly half of those inspected fail according to the figures from the EPA. In the scheme that needs to be brought in, there needs to be a maximum grant of up to €10,000 or 85% of the cost for all householders with defective septic tanks or in a private wastewater system, and this should apply to all grants. I am here to see what we can do with these issues. Again, I am sure they are found throughout the country but I seem to see more cases in my constituency recently. It is a concern for me. I will come back to the Minister on this. Climate is so important for all of us but water quality has to be an issue. We all depend on water. In recent months, we have seen so much change in the weather. I am sure the Minister of State has seen it as well. June has been such a warm month, and when we have rain, it is nearly torrential, so you can see things starting to change. I have seen it and I am sure the Minister of State and other Deputies have seen it as well. I will come back to the Minister of State on this. I really believe we need to do something here. There must be grace for those who did not register their septic tanks with the local authorities and they must be allowed to receive the grant because, if not, we will be causing bigger problems down the line.

I wish to draw attention to two events in the news this week. First, I express my solidarity with the water services workers all over the country, in particular those of them belonging to Unite who will be going out on strike this Friday. We need to make sure these workers keep their pay, conditions and public service status. Guarantees around conditions such as allowances, regular and rostered overtime and the on-call allowance must be red-circled as they are pension-deductible. Their livelihoods are under threat, which is why those workers are going out on strike on Friday.

The second issue is the collapse of Thames Water in England. Thames Water is sitting on more than £16 billion worth of debt and a history of massive problems not just with leaks and sewage contamination but its very high executive pay and shareholder dividends. In 1989, water was privatised in England under Margaret Thatcher. The industry had its debt paid up before privatisation. Since 1989, private water companies have racked up more than £55 billion in debt and yet have paid out £66 billion in shareholder dividends.

It pays €1.5 billion in interest on that debt every year. Customers water bills have increased by 40% above the rate of inflation and England's rivers and beaches are plagued with pollution and sewage, with a massive loss of biodiversity and marine life. They have significant problems with leaks and ageing water systems. The industry has become a monopoly. In the context of Thames Water alone, the British Government is looking at having to pay out billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money to save a collapsing water company that has done nothing but rip off customers, price gouge, chase profits and leave the water system in disrepair.

This was the path that Fine Gael and the Labour Party wanted to bring us down with water charges and the formation of Irish Water. That was the popular movement that the Right2Water campaign fought against. The Government is trying to get us back on that track with the stealth privatisation of Irish Water through private contracting and outsourcing.

Costs are going up, our waterways are getting worse and the EPA report states that the number of near-pristine river sites in Ireland has declined from over 590 in 1980 to 32 today. This whole project is a failure. I have heard reports about Irish Water paying people three times as much to carry out work that used to be done by local authority workers. These EPA reports will look a great deal worse if this trend continues. I would very much welcome it if the Committee of Public Accounts investigated some of these practices in Irish Water.

The Government has been running from a referendum on the public ownership of water for years. The majority of this House voted for that. Two of the parties in government supported that vote. We need to scrap Irish Water and put water properly back in public hands for the sake of our citizens, our biodiversity, our rivers and our waterways.

I welcome the opportunity to speak on this report. I agree with Deputy Murnane O’Connor about septic tanks. If one did not register, one had to pay a fiver to do so at a later date. If late registration costs €20 now, that is fine. However, we should look at water quality. I ask the Minister of State to do so because it is stupid for a county council to do the 5% they are doing each year, where they ask if a person has this or that done and if the fiver has been paid. If neither has been done, then it is good luck because it will not be done. There is no point in saying that it will be done. We should look at the end and how we solve the problem. I ask the Minister of State or the Department to look at that. If it is four times the €5, that is fine. We will not be jumping up and down about it.

I live in an area that has one of the most pristine rivers in Ireland. The river runs through agricultural land, which everybody gives out about, and through bogs, which everybody gives out about. Ironically enough, the part of the river that runs through Ballymoe, where Irish Water has the sewerage scheme, is the section where there is a problem. In fairness, Irish Water is doing an upgrade. However, it is sad that this little stretch of 100 yards is damaging the reputation of the rest of the river, which is miles long. It is there in any report that the river is one of the most pristine in Ireland.

We have trouble with some rivers and there is no point in saying that we have not and we need to have good quality water. I am the chairman of a group water scheme. One has one’s buffer zones around it and one ensures that one gets water in as clean a way as possible. One thing which needs to be addressed, however, is that there are many small villages in this country in which Irish Water does not have a presence. If villages do not have Irish Water or a sewerage scheme, they cannot get grant aid now. What is in the septic tanks will be flowing down into rivers. There is no point in us codding ourselves; that is happening.

In some of the larger middle-sized towns in the west of Ireland - Deputy Ring will know them as well as I do - Irish Water needs to speed up the putting in of the infrastructure for sewerage treatment plants. They are a quicker job now than they were at one time. One can add sections on to tanks. What happened in some areas is that when we had the boom, more houses were built. Because of the number of houses built, the treatment plants were not fit to cater for them. One only has to add sections on to the treatment plants. It is straightforward work but it needs to be speeded up. That is how to satisfy the EPA.

The EPA seems to come out with bad reports all of the time. I saw it with the bogs when it stated that bogs were hydrologically connected. When it went into the courts last week and when scientific evidence needed to be shown, it had to go away with its tail between its legs. The EPA said something but it had nothing to back that up when it was required. It needs to have its facts right.

Everyone in here would be in favour of having better quality water, but there are things the Government needs to do. I am not giving out; I am saying that we need to solve that registration issue in order to help improve water quality. If people put up their hand and say that their septic tank is not working right, there is no help from there at this minute. If someone puts up their hand and says that their septic tank is not working right, they should get the grant and have it done. This is because what one is doing in the overall context is good for the country.

I will try to respond quickly to some of the points raised by Deputies. I thank everybody for their valuable contributions.

Deputy Ó Broin raised the issue of septic tanks, as did a number of other Deputies. We are working on the issue of the registration issue around septic tanks. It is critically important and I agree with all that has been said there. Certainly, there is an inspection regime. What I also received this morning from that is that the follow-up relating to the inspections seems to be quite poor.

Deputy Ó Broin also referred to urban wastewater discharges. On that, a report has been submitted to the Commission and we expect to meet it to brief it on progress in the coming weeks.

The Deputy and Deputies Andrews and Bacik referred to bathing water. Quite significant work has been done in that regard in the context of Dublin Bay. We are continuing to make substantial progress. We had a very good project: Acclimatize, which was run between Dublin local authorities and UCD and the University of Aberystwyth in Wales whereby we looked at where we can partner in. The MV Liffey Sweeper, which sounds like he could be playing for Bohemians, sounds like it could be could be a good candidate for the local biodiversity action fund by way of funding support.

I appreciate the comments from all Deputies where we will work together on this and I believe that this is critically important.

Deputy Matthews referred to THMs. Again, Uisce Éireann is working to resolve issues relating to THMs across the country. Many Deputies have spoken about nitrogen and about agricultural run-off. This is something that we want to work on and address in partnership with the farming community.

Deputy O’Reilly raised the issue of Balbriggan bathing water quality and the deterioration there. I will be working with my colleague, the Minister of State, Deputy Joe O’Brien, on that. By way of update, the Uisce Éireann's drainage area plan for Balbriggan was to progress works in 2023 to identify the problems in the sewer network and to fix them. There will be an upgrade of the Quay Street pumping station and Fingal County Council have carried out misconnection investigations in 2022, as well as working on issues of dog fouling. Quite a significant amount of work is going on there.

Deputy Cian O’Callaghan raised the issue of the draft river basin management plan. The plan is not weak. We are ensuring that it is going to be as strong and as collaborative a plan as it can be.

Deputy Joan Collins raised the issue of Thames Water in the UK. I agree wholeheartedly with her. What happened there certainly highlights the complete folly of privatisation. Uisce Éireann is a wholly publicly owned utility and will remain that way. There will be a referendum on water and I want to give that assurance here.

Deputy Murnane O’Connor raised the issue of St. Luke's General Hospital and of bottled water. I do not know what the reason is for that. The municipal water supply in Kilkenny is excellent. I do not know what the rationale is for that.

The boil water notices in Castlecomer put in place on 16 December 2022 were lifted in January and reimposed on February 27 as a result of turbidity issues. Uisce Éireann is working to resolve those issues. As I have said, we are in the process of addressing the issues relating to registration of septic tanks.

A number of Members also raised the Citizens’ Assembly on Biodiversity Loss. It is in the context of the interrelatedness of all of these actions and of this work that we are trying to move forward.

There are many challenges faced by water quality and these are getting more challenging in the context of a changing climate where high rainfall and flooding can lead to the mobilisation of pollutants, and droughts can change the mechanism for loss of contaminants into water bodies. This Government shares the concerns of the EPA regarding the overall trends in water quality and is committed to addressing the issues it has highlighted. Both the national CAP Strategic Plan 2023-2027 and the Fifth Nitrates Action Programme 2022-2025 have very significantly strengthened the requirements on farms to manage nitrogen and phosphorous fertilisers and organic manures. The new nitrates action programme is significantly strengthened in comparison with the previous programme with reductions in chemical fertiliser use, the introduction of banding for cattle excretion rates and increased compliance assurance and inspections.

This programme is currently undergoing a mid-term review.

The new European Innovation Partnership projects under the CAP strategic plan will also help support farmers, while the continuation and expansion of schemes such as ACRES will provide expert knowledge and assistance in water management and protection.

The Government’s substantial and sustained investment in water services is vital to: ensure the continued operation, repair and upgrade of Ireland’s water and wastewater infrastructure; improve water quality; ensure compliance with EU directives; and build resilience in the face of climate change.

Uisce Éireann manages all aspects of water and wastewater services planning and is responsible for the planning, delivery and operation of all public treatment plants. I agree with Deputy Fitzmaurice that the Government is eager to see faster progress on the delivery of important wastewater projects wherever this is possible. Budget 2023 provided for €1.56 billion for Uisce Éireann to meet the cost of domestic water services. This includes €878 million of capital funding, which is critical to enhance the ongoing significant improvements in our public water and wastewater services, and to support the delivery of housing as committed to in Housing for All.

The overall pressure on water from Uisce Éireann’s treatment plants has been improving with positive performance reported on EU directive compliance and on EPA priority areas for action, as recounted in the EPA’s most recent urban wastewater report published in 2022. The Government is committed to supporting the capital funding of Uisce Éireann and the continued evolution of the company into a world-class utility. However, I agree that the pace of delivery here needs to continue to improve.

The rural water working group will shortly complete a review of the composition of the measures to be included for funding under the upcoming multi-annual rural water programme. Details of the programme and its priorities, along with an invitation to local authorities to submit applications for funding, are expected to be announced in the coming weeks.

In April 2022, funding for a new measure for the wastewater collection and treatment needs of villages and settlements that do not have access to public wastewater services was launched. A total of 23 applications were received from 13 local authorities by the closing date in September 2022. The independent expert panel produced a report on completion of the evaluation process and it is expected that recommendations for funding will be made shortly.

A review of the rural water sector is also being conducted by the rural water working group. The review is considering issues such as governance, supervision and monitoring of the sector. In addition, it is considering investment priorities across all elements of rural water services. This review is intended to ensure equality of outcomes between Uisce Éireann and non-Uisce Éireann customers. Initiatives and programmes such as those I have outlined show that this Government is committed to investing in the improvement of water quality in rural areas.

The Government has also worked to introduce significant legislation in the area of water protection. The Water Environment (Abstractions and Associated Impoundments) Act 2022 was signed into law by President Higgins in December 2022. This Act modernises the legal framework governing abstractions and provides for a system for licensing large or environmentally significant abstractions, while also providing a system for their registration. Work has commenced on the drafting of the regulations associated with the Act, and engagement with the EPA on the technical requirements has begun. The regulations, which will be published towards the end of this year, will contribute to the quantitative and qualitative maintenance and improvement of our water environment.

The Government is also promoting the use of innovative practices, such as the implementation of nature-based solutions at a national scale to address the pressures from urban run-off, such as increased rainfall patterns due to climate change, a matter raised by a number of Deputies. Nature-based solutions bring diverse nature and natural features and processes into cities and urban areas, thereby benefiting biodiversity and supporting the delivery of a range of ecosystem services.

A pilot project funded by my Department commenced last year with Cork and Dublin City Councils to investigate how nature-based solutions can be used to address urban run-off pressures. This project will look at a number of sites where a 24-month monitoring study will be undertaken.

The EU’s proposed nature restoration law has been the subject of negative criticism in recent weeks, and the rewetting proposals in particular have been the subject of divisive commentary. Rewetting is not sterilising the land nor is it flooding the land. Agriculture can continue to be productive under rewetting. There are already really good examples across the country that show how such initiatives can have a positive impact on our environment. I know Deputy Fitzmaurice and I share this view.

As I have already emphasised, the issue of water quality should not be classed as a battle between the competing aims of the environmentalist and the farmer, or as a symptom of a divide between rural and urban, but rather as a rallying call to help us to refocus and redouble our efforts. We must build trust between opposing viewpoints so that we have a consensus upon which we can build to help protect and restore the quality of our water for this and future generations.

Top
Share