Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 28 Sep 2023

Vol. 1043 No. 1

Labour Exploitation and Trafficking (Audit of Supply Chains) Bill 2021: Second Stage [Private Members]

I move: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

I am pleased to speak on the Labour Exploitation and Trafficking (Audit of Supply Chains) Bill 2021 in the names of my colleagues Deputies Ó Ríordáin and Sherlock. I am sharing time with Deputy Sherlock.

This is Ireland’s first legislation on regulating corporate activity in respect of labour exploitation and trafficking. As an internationalist party, and as part of the wider international labour movement, it is the Labour Party’s historic and moral obligation to ensure, always, that the power imbalance between capital, with all its attendant abuses and indignities, and labour is rebalanced. That inequality is at its most stark when it comes to the predations of the global supply chain. As one of the most open and globalised economies in the world, heavily reliant on global supply chains in a complex and interconnected world, Ireland has a particular responsibility to introduce a legal framework on mandatory due diligence and business accountability as defined by the UN, the OECD and other important multilateral agencies to prevent negative impacts on human rights, labour rights and the environment.

The purpose of this Bill is to provide for transparent reporting by firms about the risk of labour exploitation and human trafficking in their supply chains. The Bill would require businesses to report annually on what measures they have taken to ensure that production of the goods or services they sell does not involve such exploitative practices. This area is already the subject of voluntary codes. Voluntary codes, to nobody's surprise, are simply not working. So far voluntary implementation by businesses has been neither widespread nor effective. Legislation would help to ensure greater compliance and it would put in place a level playing field that rewards good businesses and those which adhere to the rules.

The French duty of vigilance law of 2017 was the first time an EU member state established a legal duty on companies to act to prevent human rights abuses, domestically and abroad, and to publicly account for the steps taken. Since then, Germany and Norway introduced similar laws in 2021 and parliamentary processes are under way in Austria, Finland, Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg.

There is no overarching legal or regulatory regime to make mandatory due diligence and reporting on human rights and labour rights for businesses in Ireland. There should be no Irish exceptionalism. This needs to change and I am interested to receive from the Minister of State in his response to our opening statements an update on progress in regard to the proposed corporate sustainability due diligence directive.

A number of years ago Ireland committed to implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, through the National Plan on Business and Human Rights 2017-2020. However, the national plan proposes a voluntary regime, whereby the role of the State is to encourage and support rather than to ensure compliance. The programme for Government made a commitment to "ensure that the Action Plan is further developed to review whether there is a need for greater emphasis on mandatory due diligence". There is such a need and we need to go beyond voluntary codes and legislate.

According to a June 2021 Ipsos MRBI opinion poll conducted for the Irish Coalition for Business and Human Rights, 81% of Irish people would want an Irish company that is acting unethically in a low-income country to be subject to legally binding regulations in Ireland. Only 11% believe Irish companies operating unethically in low-income countries should be able to self-regulate and apply their own standards. Irish citizens are behind reform in this area. We also know consumer purchases are increasingly informed by principle as well as price.

The Bill applies to labour exploitation and trafficking, which is defined as any activity that constitutes an offence under the Child Trafficking and Pornography Acts 1998 to 2004 or the Criminal Law (Human Trafficking) Act 2008, and making use of work done by a person under the age of 18 where that work is liable to harm the health, safety or morals of the child. Work liable to harm the health, safety or morals of a child would include, for example, work that exposes the child to physical, psychological or sexual abuse, work in an unhealthy environment or for long hours or during the night, or work where the child is unreasonably confined to the premises of the employer.

The International Labour Organization says that more than 25 million people across the world are in forced labour. To our shame, this includes millions of children who are still making goods and providing services across the supply chain. They are used by Irish companies that are household names. These are companies based here, making products we too easily take for granted. The Bill applies to any undertaking that is engaged for gain in the production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of services which, in the course of business, imports goods into the State or receives services from outside the State, the cost of which exceeds 5% of the undertaking's input costs.

Section 3 requires the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment to make regulations that would require undertakings with a turnover greater than a prescribed amount to prepare and publish annually a labour exploitation and trafficking statement. This is a statement of the steps the undertaking has taken in the previous year to ensure labour exploitation and trafficking is not taking place in any of its supply chains or in any part of its own business, or else a statement that the undertaking has taken no such steps. This statement may include information about the undertaking's structure, its business and its supply chains; its policies on labour exploitation and trafficking; its due diligence processes on labour exploitation and trafficking in its business and supply chains; the parts of its business and supply chains where there is a risk of labour exploitation and trafficking taking place, and the steps it has taken to assess and manage this risk; its effectiveness in ensuring labour exploitation and trafficking is not taking place in its business or supply chains, measured against such performance indicators as it considers appropriate; and the training about labour exploitation and trafficking available to its staff.

The Bill enables the Minister to issue guidelines on the duties imposed on undertakings by this measure and requires the Minister to publish any such guidelines on the Minister's website. The guidelines may include further provision about the kind of information which may be included in a labour exploitation and trafficking statement. An undertaking that contravenes regulations under the legislation will be guilty of a summary offence and liable to a fine. This is a measure that is not available in some of the legislative provisions available elsewhere. Section 6 provides that the Minister must cause a review of the legislation to be carried out before its fifth anniversary and must cause the review to be laid before both Houses of the Oireachtas.

The time is right for legislation of this nature. As the evidence in the Ipsos MRBI poll pointed out, there is public demand for this type of legislation and for a move from a situation where we have voluntary codes that have not been effective to a situation where legal mandates will now be imposed on business accountability and due diligence in respect of child labour, labour more generally and human rights.

I note the Government is not opposing the Bill. I look forward to an update from the Minister of State on progress on the directive to which I referred earlier.

What we want to try to achieve in bringing forward this Bill is the end of exploitation, particularly the exploitation of children, where we know it is happening and where there is strong evidence of its existence, and to put on companies or corporate entities a responsibility to ensure their supply chains are such that they are procured or attained ethically. This is why the legislation is timely. We are trying as an Opposition party to promulgate the legislation and put pressure on the Government to meet its obligations in respect of the need to ensure, where there is evidence of the exploitation of workers along the supply chain, that it is seen not only as a moral issue but also as an economic issue.

I will quote from correspondence to The Guardian on 26 December 2022 from Simon Steyne, a former senior adviser on fundamental rights at work at the International Labour Organization. He wrote:

In 1998, the declaration on fundamental principles and rights at work of the International Labour Organization clarified the obligations binding on its 187 member states to protect, respect and realise the rights to freedom from forced labour, child labour and discrimination at work and, above all, the rights to organise and bargain collectively, and their essential purpose: "to enable those concerned ... to claim a fair share of the wealth they have helped to generate".

It is interesting to note the addition of occupational safety and health, which has also become a category in these fundamental rights.

What we have witnessed in recent decades is global brands transferring their production to low-cost economies in countries that are not democratic, although some of them are, and which are do not have a suite of workers' rights. As we know, this has allowed massive exploitation to take place. It has also created these wonderful corporate social responsibility and social auditing industries that allow people to substitute or swap out proper rights for workers.

In this legislation, we want to embed and enshrine within law the need to ensure there is a proper audit of supply chain change that prevents labour exploitation and trafficking from taking place. The point could be made, and this point is also made by Mr. Steyne in his article, that had businesses not wasted decades and billions of dollars constructing corporate social responsibility facades and had they invested in a suite of workers' rights to ensure against exploitation, proper trade union organising and proper governance, then there possibly would not be the need for this type of legislation now. It is a good legislation. I am proud to stand over it and am glad that the Government is not opposing it.

I thank the Deputy. The Minister of State, who has 15 whole minutes, may go ahead.

I will and with the Chair's indulgence, I will not need them.

I start by thanking Deputies Ó Ríordáin, Nash and Sherlock for bringing forward this Private Member's Bill, which the Government is not opposing on Second Stage. The Government recognises the importance of tackling human rights issues, including human trafficking, exploitation and child labour, and considers that combating these issues is an important and fundamental part of the business and human rights agenda. The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment is active in fostering good corporate conduct, enhancing the reporting requirements of enterprise and ensuring that enterprise is held to account if engaged in or benefiting from harmful practices.

I wish to emphasise that much has happened in this area since the Private Member's Bill was first published in April 2021, in particular, with the publication of a number of EU legislative proposals intended to promote responsible business conduct in respect of environmental and human rights matters. These initiatives, when enforced, will address the policy intentions of the Bill.

Particularly relevant to this debate, as Deputy Nash earlier addressed, is the corporate sustainability reporting directive, referred to as the CSRD, which entered into force in January this year. Companies in scope will be required to report annually in their director's report on environmental social and governance, ESG, matters including with regard to human rights. The CSRD will harmonise the EU rules for ESG reporting by companies and put these on the same footing as financial reporting. It ensures that investors and other stakeholders have access to information to assess investment risks arising from climate change and other sustainability issues. Specifically under the social pillar of the directive, there are reporting requirements in respect of working conditions and other work-related rights including information regarding forced labour and child labour. While it is, in essence, a reporting directive, its impact will contribute to a more strategic and focused approach across companies on ESG matters and will bring greater transparency to companies' operations. The directive has phased implementation, with the largest companies in scope issuing their first reports in 2025.

Another significant initiative is the proposal for a directive on corporate sustainability due diligence, referred to as CSDD. This proposal was published in early 2022 and is currently in trilogue negotiations at EU level. This proposal sets out the first EU-wide mandatory system of binding behavioural obligations for companies in respect of human rights and the environment. In-scope companies will be obliged to put in place due diligence policies and carry out measures to identify actual or potential adverse environmental and human rights impacts and prevent, mitigate and minimise the extent of such impacts within their own operations, subsidiaries and value chains. The CSDD proposals set out a broad range of environmental and human rights that companies are required to protect. Included among these are specific labour rights provisions that seek to prevent exploitation, human trafficking and the use of child labour. Companies that fail to prevent or mitigate adverse impacts from occurring within their value chains can be subject to civil liability claims.

I also wish to refer to the proposal for the regulation on prohibiting products made with forced labour on the Union market. This proposal was published in autumn 2022 as part of EU efforts to promote decent work worldwide and eliminate the problem of forced labour. It is a cross-cutting measure covering trade, customs and the Internal Market while aligning to international standards and other EU initiatives such as the CSDD proposal. The objective of the measures is to effectively prohibit the placing and making available on the Internal Market and export from the EU of products made with forced labour, including forced child labour. This includes products that are produced within and imported into the EU. The proposal provides for enterprises to carry out appropriate forced labour due diligence in accordance with the relevant European legislation and international standards to lower the risks of having forced labour in their operations and value chain. Negotiations on this proposal are currently under way at EU level.

The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment has an ongoing commitment to promoting responsible business conduct. In this regard, a responsible business forum, a subgroup of the enterprise forum, has been set up to facilitate engagement between policymakers and businesses on existing and emerging proposals. The inaugural meeting of the forum, chaired by the Minister of State with responsibility for trade promotion and digital transformation, Deputy Calleary, was scheduled for 27 September 2023.

It should also be noted that there are long-standing provisions from the International Labour Organization, ILO, in this area. As part of its obligations as a member of the ILO, Ireland has ratified and implemented ILO conventions, including those which address trafficking and child labour. The effective abolition of child labour is one of the five principles under the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work of 1998, which was revised in 2022 to include a safe and healthy working environment. The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment reports on the national implementation of these conventions to the ILO on three-yearly basis.

In line with the commitment in the programme for Government, the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment is collaborating with the Department of Foreign Affairs to develop a second national action plan on business and human rights. The plan will bring together the various initiatives being undertaken across a number of Departments to ensure that Ireland meets its domestic and international commitments in areas including workers’ rights and trafficking. At national level, my colleague, the Minister for Justice, has policy responsibility with regard to human trafficking and there are a number of relevant criminal justice legislative provisions in place in respect of human trafficking, including child trafficking. I understand that a third national action plan to prevent and combat human trafficking is close to finalisation and will be brought to Cabinet shortly by the Minister for Justice.

The forthcoming plan will build on the progress achieved under earlier plans and represents a whole-of-government response to tackling the crime of human trafficking. This plan envisages a victim-centred approach to tackling human trafficking generally and the creation of a revised national referral mechanism, NRM, to support victims of human trafficking to ensure that they receive the appropriate supports.

Before I conclude, I wish to emphasise the desirability of action at EU level to promote responsible business conduct and provide an effective basis protecting abuse. The Government considers that legislative initiatives in the areas of transparency and corporate accountability are best progressed, where possible, at EU level in recognition of the complex international nature of many value chains. This will also help to ensure harmonisation, promote policy coherence and avoid the risk of fragmentation within the EU Single Market.

Cross-border business activities, by their very nature, are not confined within political borders and are most effectively and impactfully addressed through multilateral co-operation and action, rather than individual legislative initiatives at member state level. The Government recognises the legitimate policy aims behind this initiative and as a result is not opposing the Bill. As is clear, however, the Government has greater ambition and looks forward to giving effect to the various EU initiatives, which have broader scope than the provisions contained in the Bill and have the potential to be a real game-changer in terms of enhancing responsible conduct my business. It is also important to emphasise the importance of any national initiatives not cutting across or interfering with the implementation of the aforementioned EU initiatives, and careful scrutiny will be required in this context should the Bill progress.

In conclusion, I commend Deputies Ó Ríordáin, Nash and Sherlock on the work they have undertaken on this Bill. The Government recognises the importance of ensuring good corporate conduct and increasing transparency regarding business activity but considers that those aims are best achieved with the implementation of legislative measures that are already in train.

I call the proposer, Deputy Nash, to reply. He has ten minutes.

We may not use the entirety of our ten minutes but let us see where the journey takes us. I note the Minister of State's remarks in respect of the Government having greater ambition than is laid out in this legislation.

I would take issue with that. There is no doubt that developments in respect of the directive have, in some respects, overtaken the ambition of our own legislation. If the Government were ambitious, it would have legislated to put this on a mandatory footing before now. In truth, given the Government's track record in this space over the last few years, and its reliance on voluntarist codes, I think we can conclude that the reality is the only reason the Government is intending to legislate in this space is because it will be forced to do so arising from the requirement to transpose the directive. I say this to the Government with the utmost of respect.

France legislated in this regard in 2017. As I said in my opening remarks, several other EU states are in the process of putting these very important frameworks on a legislative footing as well. I also said very clearly in my opening remarks that Ireland, of all countries, has a historical responsibility and a moral and ethical obligation to put such codes on a mandatory legal footing to ensure we root out exploitative practices in a global supply chain that is often very opaque and complex. It is becoming increasingly so in an ever more globalised and interconnected world. We have a particular responsibility here because many of the companies engaged in these practices, of which we are all only too well aware, have their Europe, the Middle East and Africa, EMEA, headquarters in this country. They employ many people, contribute significantly to our tax base, whether through corporation tax or payroll tax, and also contribute to the creation and retention of good, skilled jobs in this economy.

We should not, though, be beggaring somebody else and accepting that forced labour, and child labour in particular, the most egregious form of forced labour, is in any way tolerated in the global supply chain. There is always a price to be paid for cheap products. We may not be paying the financial price here but there are children, families and entire communities and countries paying the price because of our appetite for cheap goods. In this regard, cheap food is the area for which the Minister of State is himself directly responsible in the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine. These are cheap goods and services on which we all rely, and, unfortunately, we do not ask too many questions about where these goods and services come from, why they are so cheap, what goes into making them and who, ultimately, pays the price for them.

I saw and noted the statement yesterday from the Minister of State, Deputy Calleary, concerning the inaugural meeting of the responsible business forum. I have been around long enough to know when I see a corporate social responsibility initiative, and I think we can separate out corporate social responsibility initiatives from initiatives that make a structural difference, a real difference, to the kinds of imbalances and power inequities we see across this country and the globe. While any initiative of this nature is to be welcomed, we must move beyond marketing initiatives to real initiatives and legal mandates that bestow actual legislative responsibilities and responsibilities to be accountable on big corporations that are profiting in so many ways from issues in the global supply chain that we reflected on during this discussion.

I thank the Minister of State for his response from the Department and for his commitment, and that of other Ministers in the Department, to moving on this agenda. This is the first piece of legislation of this nature presented to either House of the Oireachtas and we in the Labour Party are proud that we have produced this legislation in 2021. Two years old and all as it is now, we hope this Bill, originally introduced on First Stage by my colleague, Deputy Aodhán Ó Ríordáin, has in some way prompted some action from the Government and informed the position that officials and Ministers have taken at European level in connection with the negotiations currently under way, for example, on the new directive. We also hope that the imprint of this legislation will be found in the legislation that will be required to go through these Houses to enact the provisions in terms of the transposition of the CSDD directive when it comes before us.

The Minister of State is right that countries can act independently, but the most effective form of action, undoubtedly, in all our collective experience is multilateral responses by the EU and the UN. In respect of Ireland, I refer to a strong response from the EU in respect of an acceptance of responsibility as a wealthy and rich bloc of trading countries to low-income countries across the world. We can do better. I hope this legislation will assist the Government in this process in terms of the directive and I look forward to debating the legislation that will arise from the transposition of that directive when the time is right. I am hopeful we will see this legislation and action in this regard sooner rather than later.

Question put and agreed to.
Cuireadh an Dáil ar athló ar 5.35 p.m. go dtí 2 p.m., Dé Máirt, an 3 Deireadh Fómhair 2023.
The Dáil adjourned at 5.35 p.m. until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, 3 October 2023.
Top
Share