Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 2.2 is COM (2010) 533, draft amending budget No. 8 to the general budget 2010 statement of expenditure by section, section III - Commission. No. 2.3 is COM (2010) 534, a proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the EU solidarity fund. In light of the information provided and the material benefit to Ireland, it is proposed that both measures do not require further scrutiny by the committee. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 2.4 is COM (2010) 540,a proposal for a Council implementing decision amending Decision 2007/441/EC authorising the Italian Republic to apply measures derogating from Articles 26(1)(a) and 168 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax. Based on the information available, it is proposed that this proposal does not warrant any further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 2.5 is COM (2010) 545, a proposal for a Council regulation fixing for 2011 and 2012 the fishing opportunities for EU vessels for certain deep-sea fish stocks. Based on the information available, it is proposed that this proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 2.6 is COM (2010) 577, draft amending budget No. 9 to the general budget 2010 statement of expenditure by section, section III - Commission. No. 2.7 is COM (2010) 578,a proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the EU solidarity fund. Based on the information available, it is proposed that these proposals do not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 2.8 is COM (2010 ) 592, a proposal for a Council regulation terminating the partial interim review of the anti-dumping and countervailing measures applicable to imports of polyethylene terephthalate film originating in India Based on the information available, it is proposed that this proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 2.9 is COM (2010) 594, a proposal for a Council regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No. 1225/2009. Based on the information available, it is proposed that this measure does not warrant any further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 3.1 is CFSP Cote D'Ivoire. It is proposed to note this adopted measure. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 3.2 is CFSP (2010) 639, Council Decision 2010/639/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against certain officials of Belarus. It is proposed to note this adopted measure.