Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Thursday, 18 Feb 2010

Vol. 200 No. 14

Harbours and Piers.

I thank the Cathaoirleach for allowing me raise the need for the Minister with responsibility for the marine to explain why moneys are not available this year to progress work on Greencastle Harbour, County Donegal. Work in the harbour has ceased, leaving a potentially dangerous situation. I recognise that as the Minister of State with direct line responsibility, Deputy Killeen has taken a great interest over the years, not only in marine affairs but in Greencastle. I also recognise he is present to answer.

It is almost 14 years since I entered national politics. At that time, the ageing fishing fleet was a significant issue in my by-election. I remember being pulled into a boat by the Opposition Front Bench spokesperson, the then Deputy, Michael Smith. This nearly ended my by-election opportunities because only narrowly did I avoid breaking an arm or leg in the slightly less than ladylike way in which I was dragged into the boat. I am lucky to be here to fight this corner.

My party went into Government the following year and there was a renewal of the whitefish fleet. Greencastle and County Donegal gained significantly from that. It was a thriving port. There were ongoing difficulties in the port at the time and these remained. Work done in an earlier adaption of the harbour had made it dangerous for certain boats to be moored within the harbour. It had created a particular wind that could cause damage to bigger boats. This meant that despite the success of the fleet of the time, some of the bigger boats could not get into Greencastle. There was a move at the time to ensure a new infrastructure or facility was built. The aspiration was great; the cost was in the region of €33 million. Very many negotiations took place with the Minister of State's Department. An overall financial and other evaluation was carried out and the decision was taken to advance the work. Since then there has been a decommissioning of certain boat schemes. There has been other investment and finally there has been an agreement to advance the work.

The first phase was the breakwater. This commenced on the basis that the Department with responsibility for marine resources would fund 75% of the cost and the county council would pay 25%. At the time I was told this would cripple the council and that it was impossible for it to pay. I worked with the Minister of State, Deputy Killeen, and the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs, Deputy Ó Cuív, to find some mechanism to lighten the burden on the council. The Minister, Deputy Ó Cuív, saw the change in circumstances regarding marine matters and the manufacturing base in Inishowen and was able to help us by ensuring the council had to pay only 12.5% of the overall cost. He would lift the other 12.5% of the cost of the scheme.

I declare my interest. I do a little bit of rowing, some yachting and a lot of walking along the River Foyle and therefore, directly and indirectly, I see, close up and personal, what goes on. There is a car ferry going in and out of the harbour which is seen as a very busy and active place. Despite the long days spent at sea and the difficulties created thereby for many of our fishermen, I am reliably informed that the fishing co-operatives in the area are maximising their opportunities, are well organised and are very dedicated to their cause.

The bottom line is that a certain amount of activity has taken place already with some €6 million invested in recent years. The breakwater has advanced to a certain level and it is deemed that to stop work now would be extremely dangerous because it is neither high enough nor long enough. I will not go into the technical reasons because I do not have the time. However, there are swirls, tidal and wind issues and the fishermen realise that leaving the work unmanned at this stage could lead to a dangerous situation. It could lead also to a financially difficult situation because the work already carried out might be taken away in a bad storm and money already invested would be wasted.

It has also been brought to my attention that equipment was recently brought into the area. The fishermen are interpreting this to mean that if work stops now, it will not recommence within the next decade. I would find that unacceptable. I do not believe it is in line with what the Minister of State has told me concerning his commitment to the region. The fishermen want answers as to how they can progress this very important resource and piece of infrastructure in our area. As the Minister of State has heard me state on too many occasions, the River Foyle is one of the ways out of our present economic darkness. The Greencastle infrastructure is critical, not only to that but also as a signal of the Government's intention to help us in the north west to help ourselves.

I believe the Minister of State is on our side on this issue. There seem to be conflicting reports as to what might happen to advance matters. I was given the impression by local fishermen and engineers that any sum between €750,000 and €2 million would have been a very important investment this year. I believe the Minister of State may have been given information to the effect that unless much more significant sums of money were invested this year, what was given would be wasted money.

If I had one request for the Minister of State, it would that he sit down with all parties concerned, namely, the county council, the fishing industry, community representatives, me and other public representatives, to seek clarity. At present the feeling is that it is not a matter of the council not having come up with matching funds, rather a matter of the Department having €10 million but none of it is intended for Greencastle.

As far as I am concerned, as a native of the area, I want the innuendo and other difficulties I have mentioned dealt with. I do not want to be seen as in some way not wanting a positive outcome to this project. I want to see that cleared up. Nobody is more interested in my area than I am and that is not me blowing my trumpet. My record stands for itself, particularly with regard to the development of infrastructure for the marine sector. Will the Minister of State meet the relevant parties and clarify what is innuendo and what is fact and let us know what needs to happen to bring this important infrastructure to a happier place than where it is currently?

I am pleased to be given the opportunity to deal with the issues raised by Senator Keaveney relating to the Greencastle project in County Donegal. I want to clarify the position with regard to the responsibilities of the Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Food with regard to the development of fishery harbours. The Department is responsible for the day to day running, maintenance and development of the six fishery harbour centres. These are located at Killybegs, Ros a' Mhíl, Dingle, Castletownbere, Dunmore East and Howth. There are however numerous other fishery harbours throughout the country which are not in the ownership of the Department. These harbours are, in the main, in the ownership of the various local authorities, but the Department has in the past assisted where possible in their development and upgrade. Funding for such developments was provided under the Department's fishery harbours and coastal infrastructure development programme, subject to the availability of Exchequer funding.

Greencastle Harbour falls into this category and is owned by Donegal County Council. That local authority is responsible for the day to day operation of the harbour as well as its maintenance and development. Greencastle Harbour was identified by Donegal County Council as a priority for further development. The recommended development at the harbour is divided into three main phases, which will provide a rock breakwater, fuel and mussel berths and a new deep water berth at the harbour. In recent years, the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food co-funded phase 1 of the development, which as I have mentioned involves the provision of a rock breakwater. The breakwater would, when completed, extend to 290 m in length. The cost of phase 1 was estimated at €16.8 million and this was being jointly funded by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs and Donegal County Council. The agreed funding breakdown was: 75% to be paid by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, 12.5% to be paid by the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs and 12.5% to be paid by Donegal County Council.

In addition, although the harbour is in the ownership of Donegal County Council, agreement was reached whereby the Department's engineering division would project manage the development. This decision was taken because the Department is fortunate in having a highly experienced engineering division with accumulated expertise that would not be readily available within the resources of Donegal County Council. Work commenced in 2007 and considerable progress has been made to date. The spend on the project was €1.537 million in 2007, €5.062 million in 2008 and a further €1.604 million in 2009. While Donegal County Council agreed to the above funding arrangement, it currently owes in excess of €900,000 to the Department for works on Greencastle dating back to 2007.

As Members may recall from a previous Adjournment debate last May, the Department was in correspondence with Donegal County Council with regard to the payment of the arrears outstanding for construction costs on harbour works to date and was seeking an undertaking that future liabilities accrued by this Department on behalf of Donegal County Council would be discharged in a timely fashion. This correspondence is ongoing and little progress has been made to date with Donegal County Council still owing this Department in excess of €900,000 for this project. In addition, matters have arisen with regard to grant aid which the Department provided to Donegal County Council in 2007 for other harbour works. These matters, which are significant, remain the subject of ongoing correspondence with the council and are not resolved.

It is important to note that the harbour development project at Greencastle is designed ultimately to address the health and safety issues already existing at the harbour. The issues are harbour congestion, wave penetration and cross currents at the harbour entrance. The Department's engineers previously advised that it is expected that these problems will continue to feature at Greencastle to a greater or lesser extent as the project advances and can only be fully addressed when the project is completed. I assure all harbour users, however, that appropriate measures are already being taken to address health and safety concerns relating to the project. The measures taken to date include the deployment of navigational markings, diver survey inspections of the constructed breakwater works as well as the issue of a marine notice warning all ship owners, agents, shipmasters, fishermen, yachtsmen and seafarers of the breakwater construction site and the changed tidal current patterns in the Greencastle area. Health and safety are, however, everybody's responsibility and there is an onus on all harbour users to proceed with due diligence and care while navigating in the vicinity of the breakwater and while entering Greencastle Harbour. Donegal County Council will, I am confident, continue to monitor health and safety issues at its harbour in Greencastle and take appropriate action where required.

As Members are no doubt aware, funding for capital projects has, of necessity, been significantly reduced due to the current economic environment. Therefore, the available budget for the 2010 fishery harbours and coastal infrastructure development capital programme has been allocated to meet expenditure that is contractually committed for 2010 and essential safety and maintenance works at the six fishery harbour centres. The amount of funding available for the Greencastle project was limited to €104,000. This amount has been allocated under the programme to enable the Department suspend the project in a safe and acceptable manner and transfer responsibility for the project back to Donegal County Council. The Department will keep the matter under review on an ongoing basis, having regard to expenditure in the Department's fishery harbours and coastal infrastructure capital programme. It is, of course, open to Donegal County Council, as owner of the harbour at Greencastle, to continue works on the breakwater out of its own resources.

I welcome the offer by Senator Keaveney to have the matters of outstanding concern addressed. I look forward to finding an opportunity to take up that offer as soon as Donegal County Council has addressed its obligations in that regard.

It is clear from the Minister of State's response that the issue is indeed the lack of co-funding coming from the council. In the interests of everyone, it is very important that the Minister should meet within the next week with council officials, councillors and fishing representatives. There seem to be cross-messages on the issue, but the bigger issue is more important, namely, how we get the work recommenced and brought to finality. The county council does not have the resources to continue the work. The work must be done in partnership, as has been done to date. I urge the Minister of State to try and find a gap in his schedule within the next week to deal with the issue. I will challenge council officials, councillors and the fishing community to get together with him to try and find a solution to this serious issue in my constituency.

Top
Share