Skip to main content
Normal View

Consumer Protection

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 22 January 2025

Wednesday, 22 January 2025

Questions (423, 424, 425, 426)

Paul Murphy

Question:

423. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment in relation to a Dublin-based windows and doors company that went into liquidation (details supplied), if he will implement significant reform on consumer law so that customer deposits cannot be used in a business's daily operations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46852/24]

View answer

Paul Murphy

Question:

424. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment in relation to a Dublin-based windows and doors company that went into liquidation (details supplied), if he believes the powers of the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission should be expanded so that it can take actions even if a company has gone into liquidation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46854/24]

View answer

Emer Currie

Question:

425. Deputy Emer Currie asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the engagement that has taken place with the liquidators of a company (details supplied) involving hundreds of disappointed customers and 225 unfulfilled orders amounting to over €1 million of lost deposits, whether they have an update; any learnings that will be incorporated into legislation to protect consumers in the future; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46884/24]

View answer

Emer Currie

Question:

426. Deputy Emer Currie asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if his attention has been drawn to the case of a business failure (details supplied); the impact on customers who had provided deposits and payments; the options open to the affected customers; the need for timely information for them; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46885/24]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 423 to 426, inclusive, together.

At the outset, let me say that I understand the frustration and upset of those consumers impacted by the manner in which DK Windows and Doors ceased operations.

The State’s legislative framework provides for a corporate rescue toolkit to ensure orderly and timely debt restructuring for companies facing financial difficulties.  Under examinership a business is protected from creditors in a bid to return it to financial health, under receivership certain assets are sold to repay debts and liquidation occurs when a company is unable to continue operating as a viable going concern. 

The State’s liquidation process is a well-established mechanism for the winding up of companies on both a voluntary and compulsory basis and can take the form of either a court-ordered insolvent liquidation or a voluntary solvent or insolvent liquidation. 

Under the Irish framework, the general order of priority means that consumers are generally ranked as unsecured creditors, thereby ranking behind secured creditors, such as Revenue (on behalf of the exchequer), employees owed wages, and banks owed money on a secured loan. The stark reality of an insolvent liquidation, where the value of the company’s assets is less that its liabilities, is that invariably there will not be enough funds to satisfy all creditors’ demands leaving the consumer unable to recover their monies.

An appointed liquidator is independent in their role and the exercise of their duties. They have a statutory role to identify, take possession of and redistribute the assets to the creditors. To do so, the liquidator must realise the value of the assets for the benefit of the insolvency estate. Neither I as the Minister nor my Department can intervene in this process.

Limited liability is designed to encourage and foster honest enterprise by permitting individuals to engage in entrepreneurial activity while limiting personal exposure to financial loss in the event of commercial failure. However, the law demands that, in return for the privilege of limited liability, those availing of it act in good faith and abide by minimum requirements of governance, transparency and commercial probity.  

Company law provides for robust compliance and enforcement mechanisms and sets out the clear legal duties that directors’ have in respect insolvency, as well as specific provisions in relation to reckless and fraudulent trading.  The Corporate Enforcement Authority (CEA), in particular, promotes high standards of corporate behaviour: It promotes compliance with company law; investigates instances of suspected breaches of company law; takes appropriate enforcement action in response to identified breaches of company law; supervises the activities of liquidators of insolvent companies; and operates a regime of restriction and disqualification in respect of directors of insolvent companies.  Where a breach of company law has been established, the CEA will take action as appropriate.

The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) is the statutory body under the remit of my Department with responsibility for promoting compliance with, and enforcing, competition and consumer law in Ireland. The CCPC is independent in the performance of its statutory functions.

Officials in the CCPC have advised that consumers affected should get the details of the liquidator and make a claim in writing setting out:

• Details about the product they have paid for;

• Exactly how much money they are owed, and

• What they would like the liquidator to do, for example, arrange for delivery of the item or full refund.

However, there is no guarantee that claims will be successful.

Top
Share