Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 30 Jan 1924

Vol. 6 No. 10

PUBLIC SAFETY (POWERS OF ARREST AND DETENTION) TEMPORARY BILL, 1923. - CO. CLARE STATISTICS.

I beg to move for a Return showing:—

1. The name of each District, Urban, and County Councillor in Co. Clare.

2. Tabular statements showing the cost of all services in Co. Clare in the years 1899, 1914, 1918-19, and 1922-23.

3. A list of all officials who have been superannuated or their offices abolished, with their ages, pensions, and gratuities, giving the reason for retirement and the basis of calculation of allowances upon withdrawal from duty in each department of local administration in Co. Clare, and having particular reference to the Amalgamation of Unions Scheme.

4. A list of all offices created in Co. Clare since 1914, with the names and emoluments of their holders.

5. (a) The cost of the Clare Mental Hospital in the year 1918-19, and the number of staff engaged and their respective salaries; (b) the increase in cost which followed the settlement of the strike in 1919; (c) the hours of work in 1918 and the present time, and the number of extra staff necessitated; (d) the present cost of the institution.

It was rather a surprise for me when the Minister for Local Government opposed this motion this day week. It will be well within the recollection of Deputies that similar motions have been put down asking for Returns, and invariably the rule has been to supply the Return asked for. I explained last Friday that the Return I am seeking was needed, from the farmers' point of view, in connection with a sworn inquiry into County Clare administration, which opens on the 19th February. On the Second Reading of the Local Government (Collection of Rates) Bill, the Minister said: "So far as my Department is concerned, we have done everything in our power to prevent that mal-administration, and I do not think Deputy Hogan has anything to complain of. He complained to me some time ago about the condition of affairs in County Clare, and I immediately agreed to hold a sworn inquiry."

If opposing a motion seeking necessary information to endeavour to establish decent conditions in the county, can be regarded as fulfilling this pledge, I am at a loss to understand what the pledge means or to interpret his words. Deputy Figgis put forward a motion on the 20th instant asking for a Return, and that Return was supplied him. I think the Dáil would like to know, and I would like to know, why this discrimination has taken place in my case.

It is not because I am favoured.

Does the Deputy suggest that he is the bug-bear of the Ministry? He has almost said so.

He is a terror.

It is rather a serious question when a Minister refuses to supply a return and when he makes a blank refusal. It seems to me, as I had occasion to point out in the debate to-day on the Committee Stage of the Local Government (Collection of Rates) Bill, that our Ministerial neophyte—if I can use such an expression—has yet to assimilate the traditions of Government. The next thing we will have in the Dáil is a refusal on the part of Ministers to answer questions; they will ignore the existence of Parliament and deny its right to challenge any abuse. I say that is an impossible position. As a matter of fact, the information I seek has already been promised as far back as two years by the then Minister for Local Government, now President Cosgrave. In consultation with the then Minister for Local Government, an agreement was drawn up on behalf of the Clare Farmers' Association, by which a conference was to be held with the Clare County Council. One of the terms of reference of this conference was that the county and district officials were to give the Clare Farmers' Association all reasonable facilities for collecting such statistics as might be required for submission to the conference. I may add that these facilities were never granted.

Those officials and their committees absolutely refused to allow the Farmers' Association to inquire into the condition of their institutions and to find out how the ratepayers' money was spent. If there is anything at all consistent about administration and about departmental procedure, it is that the pledges given by one Minister are always honoured by his successor. An Inspector of the Local Government Department actually suggested, and, in fact, dictated, the heads under which information should be collected. The Secretary of the Clare Farmers' Association, armed with that authority, presented himself, and in one institution he was told there was no occasion for him to enter, and that any extern supervision was merely a work of supererogation. I will read one little extract from the statement of a Councillor in regard to the Secretary of the Farmers' Association requesting the statistics I have referred to. This is what the Councillor said: "I think this is terrific cheek, and I, as a member of this Council, protest against anybody interfering with any Committee or any body set up by us. We have set up Committees to manage every hospital and institution in the county, and we have thorough confidence in their ability to do so. I propose the communication, or the resolution, or whatever you like to call it be marked read. It is absolute cheek. When they get into office they can appoint their own Committee, but while we are in office we will have our own Committees, and we have confidence in them."

This is an extraordinary state of affairs to have existing in any county. The ratepayers are called on to pay excessive rates, yet they are not allowed to know how one penny of their money is expended. The Minister for Local Government, in refusing my motion, has made it a question of confidence in himself.

I formally second the Motion. Without entering into the merits of the case and without saying anything in regard to the Clare County Council, I think it is a reasonable motion, and except there was undue expenditure needed to produce the figures required, I think the Minister ought to supply them without the necessity of having a debate here. After all, what is asked is information necessary at a sworn inquiry. I should like to know the Minister's reason for refusing to supply it; it is merely to give those people every facility to see if abuses exist in County Clare. We have heard a lot about mal-administration there, and I think the Minister ought to facilitate the people by giving them the information required. It is for this reason that I formally second the motion.

As my name has been mentioned, I must say I have no immediate recollection of the undertaking that Deputy Hogan says I gave. I believe I gave an undertaking that we would facilitate an inquiry. I would ask the Dáil to consider what is asked for in this resolution.

We are asked to go back to the year 1899, that is 24 years ago, and to furnish particulars for that particular year. Now, I would like to know what possible bearing the cost of services in the year 1899—the first year after the Local Government Act came into operation—can have in relation to the cost of services to-day. I do know that in the intervening period of years many and important services have been brought into operation in Local Government. An enormous extension of expenditure has also been incurred, and I think it is what the lawyers would call special pleading, to bring in a thing of that sort. I have some experience of local enquiries, of sworn enquiries, and so on. I was a member of a local authority in Dublin for a great many years, and I say, from the experience I have gained there, that piles and piles of statistics serve no useful purpose. They are rarely of use in coming to a sensible conclusion on any subject that is being considered; they only provide ammunition for the legal profession to support, or attempt to support, in whatever manner they may consider best in their own interest, the case that is put up. They support their case from some remote statistics that are probably as much out of date as any event that happened in 1899 is with things that occur to-day. Coming to the third paragraph in the Return asked for, we are asked for a list of officials superannuated in the County Clare. I think that information could be had in Thom's Directory; I am not quite sure, but I know that up to recent years one would find that information in Thom's Directory. What is asked for, according to this resolution, is to put some official of the Local Government Department at work in order to compile this, and supposing you had the whole lot furnished to you, what advantage would be derived from it? A case ought to be made, if public money is going to be expended, that some advantage is going to be derived from the information asked for, if it is going to entail cost in supplying.

When I was Minister for Local Government I realised the size of the problem we had in hand, and the dislocation that arose in the accounts of the local authorities and services of the local authorities, and the big work there was in trying to keep the machine going at all, with the cogs knocked completely out of some of the wheels, and some not operating at all, and so on. When it was first mentioned by the Government that was operating from the Custom House that grants would be withheld from local authorities it became immediately necessary to economise on every side, and to cut down services which might be even remotely described as luxuries or extravagant ones, and in that particular category there was one service which could not by any stretch of the imagination be called a luxury or an extravagance, but which was not heard of at all in 1899, and that is the treatment of tuberculosis. There was a particular reason for stopping any expenditure that could possibly be avoided in connection with that service because half of the cost, if my recollection is correct, was borne by the Local Government Board, and so on with regard to many other services; and to ask for a return of 1918 and 1919 is also unreasonable if the case be that in those years it was x pounds and that now it is 2½ times x pounds. I am sure the Deputy would admit himself that it would be impossible for him to submit to this House his budget of expenditure in 1918 and 1919, and to give his budget for 1922 and 1923. A great many of these returns which were in the custody and possession of the particular Department then in charge in the Government of Ireland were destroyed. The Deputy will admit that that was the case. He has probably heard of an accident at the Custom House a couple of years ago, when many documents were destroyed. To give these returns now asked for would mean that we would have to get into communication with every local authority in every county and ask them to look up their files and so forth, and to send in particulars of every case, and then when you have got them it would take an accountant—a legal man well versed in local government—to be able to make anything out of them.

I am positively certain that if the Deputy were to see the Minister for Local Government and to narrow down the points he wants information upon, and if he gave some consideration to the events of the last three or four years the Minister for Local Government would meet him in a reasonable demand. I have no recollection of ever saying to any deputation from the Co. Clare that I would seek for and get particulars tabulated showing the cost of services in 1899 and 1914, and 1918 and 1919, and 1922 and 1923. I have no recollection of saying anything of that kind at all.

It is rather to be regretted that the President did not follow the precedent of the Minister for Finance earlier in the evening when he was replying to a motion of Deputy Johnson, for he not only indicated the reason why he could not give the information, but he also indicated what information it was in his power to give. No doubt the President did indicate to the Deputy that he might confer with the Minister for Local Government on the motion if he divided it up, but he did not indicate how far. I agree with the Deputy's desire for information, but I agree with the President that the demand is a far-reaching one, but so far as it affects the important items 4 and 5 the information should not be difficult to obtain and particularly in regard to the Clare Mental Hospital. Presumably that institution keeps its own accounts and could supply the information. The Government always adopt a very lofty attitude—an attitude I admire—"they say—let them say." We are living in the most suspicious country in the world, and it is occasionally desirable to provide facts. I think item 4 would probably provide facts available which would help to dispel suspicion rather than create it, and therefore, if possible, I urge that the Government should meet the Deputy in this respect at all events.

The President in his remarks has certainly put his finger on what I think is the unnecessary information looked for under item number one, but as far as item number two is concerned, and as far as it relates to the years 1914, 1918, 1919 and 1922-23, I do not think it is unreasonable to look for the statistics mentioned, nor do I think it is proper to describe them as extravagant demands. The President, in his statement, did not give an answer as far as that portion of the motion is concerned, and I think it is only right to point out that this demand for information was not put down in a flippant spirit. The information asked for has been refused by the officials of the Clare County Council. The President stated that it would give considerable trouble to his Department, or indeed to any other Department, if it had to supply this information. All these figures that have been asked for are in the possession of the Clare County Council and its officials. The records are in their possession, and they were asked for the information, but refused to give it, and I think that the proper authority here in Dublin should insist on the production of the information asked for. The officials of the Clare County Council have refused to give this information to anybody, and there is no means of getting it if we have not a sympathetic Department here to see that the demand is complied with.

I think, as Deputy Cooper said, it would be in the interests of good administration, and would help to restore confidence in the country, if the Government here made the Clare County Council, or the officials responsible to it, produce the figures asked for. It would clear the air if the information was supplied. If they have a clean sheet why hide it under this cloak of refusal, such as telling us about the trouble and the expense that would be involved if the information were to be supplied. I hope that when the Minister rises to reply that he will give the information, especially in regard to the years that I have already referred to. I think we should also get a list of the officials in that county who have been superannuated or whose offices have been abolished. We have an instance in Clare where a certain officer was dismissed for incompetence, but despite that ten years were added to his period of service for superannuation purposes. These are matters that must appeal to the Minister and to the Executive Council. They are of vital importance in the interests of clean administration in Clare, and I think it is about time that the light of day was thrown on some of these proceedings. I suggest to the Minister not to take up the same attitude as that adopted by the President, but rather that he should meet in a reasonable way the demand put forward for this information.

I would like to say a word of explanation. I was not giving a Government decision on this at all. It is a matter for the Minister for Local Government, who is the External Minister concerned, and he can give all the information he considers, or is advised, is necessary. I should also say that I am not so sure that the Minister if he ordered the county council to do these things, would be entitled to see that his order was carried out. I am not so sure at all on that point. You have extraordinary powers with regard to boards of guardians and possibly rural district councils, but I do not know that you have these extraordinary powers with regard to such bodies as county councils. The suggestion I made was that the Deputy would see the Minister and ascertain what reasonable information was possible and which would not be extra costly to supply, because if the demand made is acceeded to, every Deputy in the Dáil would have the same right as Deputy Connor Hogan claims to have to ask for the same amount of information in respect of the other twenty-five counties. You can see at once that if you are going to place such a burden as that on the Department, and if you also consider the expense involved that the other work in the Department must be held up and naturally, if this extra work can be done, it may be said that the officials are apparently not doing their work.

This, to my mind, is another attempt to level another blow against local administration in this country. For the past twelve months, as I said in this Dáil some time ago, a movement has been initiated with one object in view, and that is to do away with the popularly elected representatives of the people. Now, I would advise the Government not to give this return.

No, to put on the cloak.

I am not in the habit of either putting on a cloak or a blanket, but I am out for clean administration just as much as Deputy Gorey or the Party to which he belongs. I think I heard Deputy Connor Hogan say that there was to be a sworn inquiry into the conduct of the affairs of the local bodies in the county of Clare. Now, if that is a fact, is not that the proper tribunal at which to elicit the information asked for here. Is it fair, I ask, for a Deputy because of his privileged position in this Dáil to come here and ask for certain information which he will have beforehand—not I say in the interest of the ratepayers of that county as a whole, but in the interest of the particular organisation that he represents here. That appears to be the line he is going on all the time. He appears to resent very much the attitude of the Clare County Council or some of its committees because, forsooth, the Farmers' Union representatives were not allowed to go in and examine the work the committee was doing. The committee, it appears, from what we have been told, was engaged on some work in a room, and these representatives from the Farmers' Union went there and made the claim, it appears, to go in and examine the work on which the committee was engaged. They were refused admission, and I certainly would congratulate any public board in Clare which refused them such permission. In the course of the debate it was alleged that the President made a certain statement. I never heard him make the statement he was supposed to have made, and from my experience I think he knows as much about local administration as any other man and that he would not make the statement attributed to him.

If there is going to be a sworn inquiry into the administration of affairs in the County Clare it would, in my opinion, be a very undesirable and injudicious thing for the Government to give this information. In the event of such an inquiry being held the giving of the information would prejudice the position of the Clare County Council. It would create an atmosphere which would condemn the County Council beforehand and before any evidence had been heard, because certain inferences would be drawn, as I am sure certain inferences will be drawn even from this debate to the effect that the public bodies in Clare are not carrying out their duties.

It is the popular thing, as I said before, to condemn local Councils, but it ought to be remembered in their favour that these Councils have had to carry on under very abnormal conditions, and I think they ought to get a chance to settle their affairs. I do not think it is a reasonable thing at all to ask for this information in view of the fact that there is going to be a sworn inquiry. Deputy Cooper says we are living in the most suspicious country in the world. That may be, and I suppose we are. But I think debates of this kind are going to make the people in this unfortunate country far more suspicious still and far more suspicious of the public bodies charged with the administration of local affairs. As I have said already, if there is going to be a sworn inquiry in Clare, I would advise the Government not to give the information asked for, but rather to offer every facility to the ratepayers of that county as regards the holding of the inquiry with a view to trying to get clean administration in Clare, and, indeed, in every other county in Ireland.

(at this stage) took the Chair.

I intend to support Deputy Corish. I understood him to say that if there was need for a sworn enquiry, a sworn enquiry should have been asked for, and it should not be necessary for a Deputy to put this series of meaningless questions, to my mind, before the House and the Minister for Local Government. It strikes me that to ask for this return is simply stating that the County Council in Clare, like a great many other County Councils in Ireland, have on these public bodies men who do not do their duty. If the farmers in Clare and elsewhere took an interest in their work and saw that the work these men are sent to do is done, and if there was proper treatment of their various institutions, mental hospitals and asylums and roads and so on, by the farmers who are returned by the Farmers' Union to do these duties, there would be no need to ask for returns as far back as 1918 or 1919. Why these figures are asked for I do not know. I know nothing about the position of County Clare or of the County Council or other bodies, District and Urban Councils there, but it seems strange to ask for the names of the Councillors in Co. Clare as if the people of the county did not know who they were. If they do not know it means that these men are not attending the meetings, and it is time for the Farmers' Union to see that these men do their work even if they don't know their names.

Deputy Bryan Cooper referred to the purity of the conditions under which we are living. Of course in the past we were always rather doubtful of public representatives, and unfortunately those who were in control of affairs, Grand Juries and other bodies, were not, like Ceasar's wife, above reproach. Let us hope in the future that we will not act on the lines that were adopted by these bodies, but that the Farmers' Union will take steps to see that the work of their representatives will be something other than voting for increased salaries and, above all, sending to the Local Government Department proposals that ten years should be added to the superannuation of a servant of theirs who is about to retire. It is generally on the recommendations of councils that these ten years are added, and the Local Government Department have very great difficulty in not acceding to the requests of the county and district councils. It is up to the Farmers' Association to see that they have proper representation, in the same way as it is up to the labourers, the Cumann na n-Gaedheal, and other bodies, to see that the right people are appointed and not to be asking for these meaningless returns from the Local Government Department or other authorities.

I think it is because the farmers of Clare were not able to do what Deputy D'Alton would like to see them do that this motion has been put down, because they could not succeed in getting the information in their own county, that they thought they were entitled to as ratepayers, that this demand is made. Is it too much for the ratepayers of Clare to ask? Perhaps it is, but that is the opinion only of some Deputies. It is not the opinion of the ratepayers of Clare, and as ratepayers they are entitled to be supplied with that information; they are entitled to know what money has been spent in their county, at least from 1918. They are entitled to know if there is reason for their suspicion that more money has been spent—injudiciously spent—than should have been spent. The question that the Minister for Local Government has to answer is:—How far is he prepared to meet Deputy Hogan, and what information is he really prepared to give? Deputy Cooper struck the nail on the head, and I would say to the Minister that if he wants to create the feeling that his Ministry is perfectly impartial, this information will be given, and that he will supply whatever information is at his disposal. If he is not prepared to do this what will the ratepayers in Co. Clare say? They will say that other influences are at work to prevent the Minister doing so, and their suspicions will be removed from the Clare County Council and the Clare District Councils to the Ministry of Local Government. The Minister himself can answer whether it will be a good thing or not for his Ministry if the people of the country feel that when information is refused by the councils or their officials, these people are also able to prevent the Ministry from supplying this information.

I think the Deputy loses sight of the fact that certain documents were burned in the Custom House. There are audits open to any ratepayer to go into, and a ratepayer is not entitled, if my recollection of Local Government law is right, to ask for particulars regarding years gone by. It is supposed to be his duty to look to one particular year. Under local government, I may say that a ratepayer has a life of only twelve months. He exists only for one twelve months, and he is liable for that twelve months. The new list of ratepayers in the county is responsible for the next twelve months. It may be altered, increased, reduced, but the liability lasts for twelve months. A man going into County Clare this year has no right to look at last year's accounts, for he was not a ratepayer there then. A man who came out of Clare last year and came to Dublin has no right to look at anything in Dublin for last year, a thing which is not generally known, or not generally appreciated.

I would like to remind Deputy Gorey that it is not with the object of cloaking anything in Clare, or elsewhere, that I have been compelled to refuse this.

On a point of explanation, my remarks did not apply to the Minister for Local Government at all. I referred to the action of Deputies on the other side of the House.

I presume that means me, and I would like to know when I am in the habit of cloaking anything? I made my position absolutely clear that I did not want to cloak anything. We are out for as clean an administration as the Farmers' Party ever were.

And refuse figures.

No, We did not refuse figures. The Farmers' representatives have been in power longer than Labour representatives, and a bad mess they have made of it.

We have heard that suggestion before.

It is not a suggestion. It is a statement of fact.

It is a statement of falsehood.

I have endeavoured to facilitate the Deputy in every way I could. Clare County Council and Deputy Hogan asked for an inquiry. I sent a man down to hold one, over a month ago, and that inquiry would be proceeding at present only that Deputy Connor Hogan asked me to adjourn it, so that he might be in a position to state his case there. I also sent down an auditor to audit the accounts, and Deputy Connor Hogan, like every other ratepayer, had an opportunity of attending while that audit was in progress, and getting whatever information is to be had from that source.

The pressure on my Department at present is very heavy, and the work entailed in compiling this information is very heavy, and I find great difficulty in compiling it. It would mean getting information from all those various local authorities and would take considerable time. It would be much more convenient for the Deputy to get that information from the local bodies themselves. As I have said, I have done everything to facilitate the Deputy in the way of appointing this Inspector, and when the inquiry is opened and in full swing he will have every opportunity of making any enquiry he desires, and if there is any information withheld, which he thinks is material to his case, he can bring that matter before me and I will make sure he will get justice. With regard to this information he asked for, if I were to give him the detailed information required of me in this motion it would run into a book, and as Deputy Gorey, or some other Deputy has pointed out, every Deputy is entitled to ask for such information. If we were to proceed on those lines we would have to set up a staff to deal with these returns alone. I am not opposed to giving Deputy Hogan any information that can be procured without going to any exceptional cost or trouble, and if the Deputy will come over to me and look for this information I will be willing to oblige him in every possible way, but I cannot undertake to give him this huge amount of information he looks for in the return asked for.

As far back as two months ago I wrote to the Minister for Local Government asking for this return. He referred me back to those councils and subsidiary associations. What is that but treating the ratepayers with contempt? In fact, he made a gesture of impotency by stating that it was not in his power to grant it. There was nothing left then but to come to the Dáil and demand it. He speaks of having directed a sworn inquiry on behalf of the County Council, yet, curiously enough, it was at my request, or after the interview I had with the Minister, that he directed it. We are making specific charges against those councils, and they have an efficient staff and legal aid at the expense of the ratepayers. Are we, who provide all this money, to be out in the cold? I say it is an impossible position. Deputy D'Alton says I should refer myself to the farmers on the Clare County Council. As a matter of fact there are very few farmers on Clare County Council. I should say 75 per cent. of the members are officers in the Army, men who are too keen on and fond of rattling the sabre. The Minister for Local Government had this inquiry opened, and it was only as an afterthought, again at my suggestion, the auditor appeared. I think that sufficiently disposes of the case made. The Minister has only put up futile arguments, and I say it will leave a very bad impression on the country if this motion is refused. It will certainly go to a division.

I should like to know if Deputies are aware that Clare County Council, under review at the moment, was the only County Council in Ireland that could not hold a meeting under the Black-and-Tan régime. Any meetings they held were held in barns at night behind closed doors with the light of a candle in a bottle. Was the Deputy aware of that fact, and did he take it into consideration, when he was making these grave charges against men who are in the Army and who are members of the Council? I do not like to hear Deputies getting up and making charges against men because they were in the Army. These men, if they had the opportunity, would have done public business as well as Deputy Hogan or any other one. When this inquiry is over I think these charges may not be found to appear in the same light as Deputy Hogan presented them.

I am sure the Dáil will permit me the indulgence of saying a word. I heard, when Hamar Greenwood directed his troops to pursue General Brennan, who was Chairman of the County Council, he was holding a County Council meeting. The troops were directed to get him at the Council meeting. But when the troops were proceeding to the meeting he ambushed them. Then the troops were directed to surround him at an ambush, but at that time he was holding a meeting of the Council.

When Deputy Hogan said 75 per cent. of the Clare County Council were members of the Army he did not say what Army they were associated with.

Mr. HOGAN

On a point of explanation, I think there is but one legitimate army in the country.

What Army had you in 1899?

Motion put.
The Dáil divided.—Tá, 9; Níl, 39.

Tá.

  • Pádraig F. Baxter.
  • John Conlan.
  • John Hennigan.
  • Connor Hogan.
  • Risteárd Mac Liam.
  • Tadhg S. O Donnabháin.
  • Donchadh S. O Guaire.
  • Mícheál R. O hIfearnáin.
  • Pádraig H. O hOgáin (Luimneach).

Níl.

  • Richard H. Beamish.
  • Earnán de Blaghd.
  • Seán Buitléir.
  • Séamus de Búrca.
  • Louis J. D'Alton.
  • Máighread Ni Choileáin Bean Uí Dhrisceóil.
  • Patrick J. Egan.
  • Domhnall Mac Cárthaigh.
  • Liam T. Mac Cosgair.
  • Patrick McGilligan.
  • Tomás Mac Eoin.
  • Pádraig Mac Fadáin.
  • Risteárd Mac Fheorais.
  • Pádraig Mac Fhlannchadha.
  • Seán Mac Giolla 'n Ríogh.
  • Seoirse Mac Niocaill.
  • Liam Mag Aonghusa.
  • Martin M. Nally.
  • Tomás de Nógla.
  • John T. Nolan.
  • Peadar O hAodha.
  • Criostóir O Broin.
  • Seán O Bruadair.
  • Próinsias O Cathail.
  • Aodh O Cinnéide. Tomás O Conaill.
  • Aodh O Cúlacháin.
  • Liam O Daimhín.
  • Eoghan O. Dochartaigh.
  • Séamus N. O Dóláin.
  • Peadar S. O Dubhghaill.
  • Pádraig O Dubhthaigh.
  • Aindriú O Láimhín.
  • Fionán O Loingsigh.
  • Domhnall O Muirgheasa.
  • Tadhg P. O Murchadha.
  • Séamus O Murchadha.
  • Seán M. O Súilleabháin.
  • Liam Thrift.
Motion declared lost.
Top
Share