Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Friday, 25 Apr 1924

Vol. 7 No. 1

COMMITTEE ON FINANCE. FINANCIAL RESOLUTIONS. - RESOLUTION No. 9.

I move:—

"That a Customs duty of an amount equal to ten per cent. of the value of the article shall be charged, levied, and paid on all candles imported into Saorstát Eireann on or after the 1st day of July, 1924."

This, again, is a tax that cannot be imposed immediately, but the amount of the duty is small. It is, of course, an industry that is associated with the soap industry, and it is anticipated that the result will be that a considerable manufacture of candles will be transferred to the Saorstát. There are factories in the Saorstát which are not working to anything like their full capacity.

Again I want to make a protest against the imposition of a tax for which the machinery of collection does not exist. It is, as far as I know, an absolutely unheard of procedure that people should be given two months' warning that a tax is to be imposed, and encouraged to import, and anticipate and forestall it. This is simply an encouragement to the profiteer to import. I agree with what Deputy O'Mara, in one of his series of maiden speeches delivered to-day, has said, that it is well that we should know what we are doing. We are taxing the most backward parts of the country. We are not taxing the city dweller, who has gas or electric light. We are taxing the poorest parts of the country where they have to light a candle to go to bed. I think that consideration should have entered into the mind of the Minister before he suggested the imposition of this tax. I myself am a very old-fashioned and eccentric person, and I have a certain affection for antique furniture. I personally have an affection for candle light, and I burn candles whenever I can. I prefer them to gas, and I do not mind paying the tax. But it is a very different proposition where you are dealing with mountainy men, who must either use lamps or candles, and it is more economic for them to use candles. I think we should consider the incidence of the tax as well as the encouragement which it may give, because we have no assurance that any encouragement will be given to the candle-making industry in the Saorstát.

I would like to know would there be any margin between the extra expense that would be incurred in collecting the duty and the amount of revenue that will be received.

I do not anticipate that there will be any revenue worth talking about.

I cannot let this matter pass. I must support Deputy Cooper in the protest he has made. I feel this is going to affect the poorest people. What we are really doing in putting a tax on candles and soap, particularly on candles, is putting a tax on the poorest people in out-of-the-way places, largely for the benefit of Lord Leverhulme and the shareholders of Lever Brothers. I think that is very bad work for an Irish Parliament to engage in.

I wish to say I am not forcing a division on these Resolutions. The opportunity will come later on in the Report stage, and I wish to save the time of the Dáil, which would otherwise be wasted. There will probably be amendments at a later stage, and we can divide on them.

Would the Minister consider the advisability of substituting May instead of July?

I cannot agree to substitute May.

Resolution put and agreed to.
Top
Share