Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Friday, 12 Feb 1926

Vol. 14 No. 9

BANKING COMMISSION. - MOTION BY DEPUTY HEFFERNAN.

I move:—

That the Dáil is of opinion that agricultural interests in the Saorstát should have been given direct representation on the Banking Commission and that the Terms of Reference should have specifically provided for an examination of the agricultural credit problems of the Saorstát.

I do not intend to enter into a long or elaborate argument to show that the agricultural credit problem of the State requires careful and minute examination. I do suggest that the Commission appointed by the Government is not composed of men who are in a position to deal adequately with the credit problems of the Saorstát. So far as one can judge from the names of the gentlemen who have consented to act on the Commission, they are mostly identified with the banking profession or with business interests. There is not on the Commission any member who could be regarded as having a complete knowledge of the theory and technique of banking and at the same time a thorough practical knowledge of agricultural credit problems in the Saorstát. The only man on the Commission who might be said to have a knowledge of agricultural credit problems is Mr. Smith-Gordon. All I have to say about him is that although he may be an expert on theoretical agricultural problems, it is not possible that he could be regarded as an expert on the practical agricultural problems that exist in the country at the present time. When it was suggested from these benches that the banking system of this country required to be inquired into, particularly in view of the changes which have taken place in the Government of the country, we had in view a totally different kind of Commission. We were aware of the fact that agriculture is the main industry of the country, and that upon its prosperity must depend the prosperity of the whole State. We believe that the banking system in existence in the country must be modelled so as to suit the peculiar conditions that exist in this State. In the past the banking system in Ireland was modelled to a very large extent on the system existing in England. We do not believe that that system, in all its ramifications, is the one that is best suited to the conditions that exist in the Saorstát.

The Terms of Reference given to the Commission may be regarded as fairly wide. They are: "To consider and to report to the Minister for Finance what changes, if any, in the law relative to banking and note issue are necessary or desirable, regard being had to the altered circumstances arising from the establishment of Saorstát Eireann." The Minister may argue that these Terms of Reference can cover almost any matter which the Commission may see fit to inquire into. My idea of these Terms of Reference is that they point directly to an inquiry into a certain line of banking business rather than into general bank problems relating to the agricultural conditions existing in the country. I fear the inquiry will, to a large extent, apply itself to technical questions of banking, such as banking law, note issue, currency and matters of that kind. In my opinion the inquiry should be a comprehensive one into banking and credit conditions, having particular reference to the agricultural conditions peculiar to the Saorstát. It is not my intention to make an attack on the banks or on the banking system, because I have no desire or wish to make charges which I am not at this stage prepared to prove. It is my idea that this Commission should be set up for the purpose of making a full inquiry into all these problems, and that everyone who has a case to put forward in regard to this banking question should be in a position to call witnesses: that the Commission should be regarded as to a certain extent, judge and jury inquiring into the methods by which work is carried on by the banks at the present time.

There is a crying necessity for credit in the agricultural districts, and we hear day after day that some change will have to be made to provide the farmers of the country with a better and freer system of credit than exists at the present time. I need hardly point out that the agricultural conditions are not good; they are worse to-day than they have been for many years, and the financial position of agriculture is at a lower ebb to-day than it has been for a long time. Proofs are beginning to come forward, now, that the farmers of Ireland are living, and have been for some time past living, upon their capital, and are actually drawing upon their capital. The great increase in the adverse trade balance of the country represents, to a certain extent, the capital drawn from the banks of Ireland. Those who have deposits in the banks are withdrawing them, and evidently the effect of this is that the investments of our banks in England are being reduced, and it will be found on examination of the balance sheets of the banks last year that there has been a reduction of the sterling holdings in the banks in England. Now that is a very unsatisfactory state of affairs if it is coming into existence, and if it continues it will have the effect of bringing the affairs of the State into chaos and bankruptcy, that is if the rural community is existing on its capital as I maintain it is. The effect of that will be ruinous to the economic condition of the country if it is allowed to proceed. Now complaints are made that credit is not available to the farmers of the country as readily as it ought to be. Doubtless a case can be made in the opposite direction. Doubtless people will say credit is available for those worthy of credit. I doubt if that is the case. I am inclined to think that the present system of banking in Ireland is such that it is found too easy by the banks of this country to make their profits by taking deposits from Irish depositors, and mainly rural Irish depositors, and investing these deposits in England rather than using them for the purpose of providing credit in Ireland. We find, on examination of the bank balance sheets, that a very large proportion of our bank resources are invested in England. We find that only 46 per cent. of the bank resources are invested in Ireland, and in regard to some banks the percentage of investment in Ireland is very much less. Of that 46 per cent. in all probability, only comparatively a small proportion, perhaps not more than half is invested by means of loans to the rural community. Now I am aware of the fact that the first requirement and duty of banks is to see that the money of its depositors is safe. I believe that under modern conditions, and in view of the privileges which joint stock banks enjoy, this must not be regarded as the only duty that they owe to the people. They owe them other duties, and the question the Commission will have to inquire into, amongst other things, will be whether or not they are efficiently performing the duties which should be expected from them in the financial interests of the Free State.

It is found in the country districts that credit of a kind which is very urgently required by the farmers is not available. The only credit available is what is known as short-term credit. That credit is granted only when the farmers are prepared to provide good personal security in addition to their own security; otherwise the banks will not make those credits. It is well known to anybody connected with agriculture that short-term credits do not meet requirements. What really is required is a system of medium or long-term credits. Such credits would be more useful to the agricultural community than short-term credits.

The banking system in this country is such that the banks must keep their resources readily realisable; they must keep their assets in a liquid condition and must not lend out money that they would not be likely to get back within a reasonable time. They have to see that a very large proportion of the money lent is readily realisable. The bank investments in England can be regarded as actual cash, because they can be turned into cash on a few days' notice. With banks in Ireland it is quite different. It is evident, if there is a rush on the banks—if the banks are forced to make a demand—that people to whom they have lent money will not be able to produce the cash at the moment of demand. Such being the position of the banks, they endeavour to keep as large a proportion of their capital as possible in a readily realisable form. It would appear that the amount available for making advances to agriculturists forms a comparatively small proportion of the total resources of the bank.

I believe there will have to be some new institutions devised and established in this country. There is a real need for the establishment of some form of institution, either directly or indirectly connected with the banks or disconnected from the banks altogether, which would provide loans for the farmers on medium or long terms. That there are such institutions in existence in other countries must be known to the Government. The Commonwealth of Australia has established a bank which is providing long-term credits for the farmers and great hopes are expressed as to the advantage which will result to the farmers in the Commonwealth through the work being done by this bank. In Germany the German Government is making arrangements whereby money can be advanced to farmers. The money is provided by means of bonds issued to the public. The bonds are regarded as almost gilt-edged securities. The land in itself is reregarded as the best possible form of security, and on that account the bonds have not to bear a very high rate of interest; the rate is about seven per cent. Some system will have to be instituted in this country whereby credits of this kind will be made available for the farmers.

The whole system of credits was examined with great care in this country in the past. There was a commission which examined the system of agricultural credits and which made a very valuable report some years ago. There was also an examination into the matter by the Agricultural Commission. I regret that the Government has not seen fit to carry out the recommendation of the Agricultural Commission. It is my opinion that, somewhat along the lines suggested by the Agricultural Commission, credits can be devised which will meet the requirements of farmers. If credits are to be provided they will have to be provided through existing institutions, or institutions of a similar kind, rather than that some attempt should be made by the Government to provide credits.

I have endeavoured to show that there is an urgent necessity for an examination into the credit problem in Ireland. There is a still more urgent necessity for an examination into the credit system as applied to agriculture. Agricultural conditions at the present time are not at all as satisfactory as we would like them to be. There is a demand from the farmers for more credit than is available. It is stated that the ordinary farmer is not able to get sufficient credit to carry on his everyday business. I have tried to show that the banking system as it exists does not provide for anything but the short-term system of credit for farmers and that medium or long-term loans are not available.

I have tried to show that the personnel of this Commission is such that it is more likely to deal with the technical details of banking than with the broad general problems peculiar to an agricultural country, and that the personnel is such that we have not on this Commission any man whose knowledge of agriculture is such that we, the farmers, are prepared to rely with confidence upon its findings. I have endeavoured to show that the Terms of Reference are such that the inquiry of the Commission will be diverted rather away from the lines of agriculture and credit problems and into the technical details of banking. If that is the intention of the Minister in setting up this Commission I would say to him that he is wasting the time of the Commission, and that he is appointing a Commission which will not have the confidence of the Farmers' Party in the Dáil nor the confidence of the people of this country. I would, therefore, ask the Minister to reconsider the personnel of this Commission, and to meet us by agreeing to appoint some further members on the Commission who will have possibly a knowledge of banking and at the same time a knowledge of practical farming problems.

Mr. O'Hanlon.

It might be said that there are not many people who would be available and who have the qualities that we should look for in those who compose that Commission, but we hold that there are to be found such people and that the Minister would not have much difficulty in securing men of the kind that we think shoult sit upon a Commission of this kind. I beg to move the motion.

We want to make it perfectly clear, in putting down this motion, that we are entirely in sympathy with the action that the Government has taken in the matter. But we will admit that we are to a considerable extent perturbed by the fact that the personnel of the Commission does not include any man from the country who can be said to combine with a knowledge of finance, a close and intimate knowledge of the problem of agricultural credit as affecting the ordinary farmer in the Saorstát. I think the country, as a whole, has been looking forward to the establishment of this Commission with expectations of good coming from it and from its work. One cannot go through our country to-day without realising that the problems that the farmers will have to face in the future will be solved, at least to some extent, by whatever change is made in the system of credit that obtains now. With regard to the first part of the motion moved by Deputy Heffernan, we have to ask ourselves can we possibly expect from the body of men put on this Commission, composed very largely of individuals who have made their name in the banking world, a report favourable to a change in the banking conditions that obtain here? Can we expect that they will suggest alterations in the laws of banking or that they will suggest the establishment, for instance, of a new institution different from the existing institutions in certain respects, and which institution, if it is to be a success will, at least to some extent, take from the existing organisations a considerable amount of the trade they have had up to the present? That is a point with which I have some difficulty myself. I am not inclined to think that the representatives of the Irish banks, as they stand at the moment, will advise in the report that a new institution will have to be created that may in the process of time take the place to a considerable extent of the banks doing business here now.

Accordingly we question if this Commission can be expected to view the problem of credit in Ireland in the impartial manner that it is necessary for them to view it, if they are to make out a report that will be satisfactory to the country and to the economic conditions that exist. The Terms of Reference read:

To consider and report to the Minister for Finance what changes, if any, in the law relative to banking and note issue, are necessary or desirable, regard being had to the altered circumstances arising from the establishment of Saorstát Eireann.

On reading those Terms of Reference I confess that I cannot see any reference whatever to the economic conditions in the Saorstát. I want the Minister to tell us in what way the economic conditions have altered for the farmer anyhow through the establishment of the Saorstát. From the farmers' point of view in this country the question of the altered circumstances arising from the establishment of the Saorstát cannot be interpreted as having allusion to his economic position at the moment. It may be said that the Terms of Reference are so wide that the economic conditions of the farmers can be taken into account. But what we would like to see on this Commission is an addition to the personnel that would include men who would combine with some knowledge of finance and an intimate knowledge of the difficulties the farmers of Ireland labour under at present. We do not suggest from what party those men may be drawn. We do not suggest that it is necessary that they should have the technical knowledge of finance that, say, one of the directors of the Bank of Ireland would be expected to have. I wish to point out that the farmers of Ireland labour just now under difficulties because of the restricted credit conditions that are imposed on them through the present banking institutions. We are one of the last of the European countries up to this to face the problem of agricultural credit. France, Germany, and the northern European countries have long ago established institutions, or in some way established systems helpful to the farmer in his time of need. A report from the New York Federal Bank a couple of months ago told us that Germany was there in New York negotiating a loan for the assistance of agriculture in Germany. We know what America has done and we know what Australia has done in the way of helping the farming communities in those countries. They have established State assistance and other assistance for their farmers, and yet against all this State assistance the farmers of this country are expected to live and compete and to progress. We have to meet these people. They are our competitors in the markets of the world. We are expected to meet them, and if we do not beat them at least to hold our own against them under the restricted hampered conditions in which we, the farmers of this country, have to carry on.

This Commission must have a definite end in view if it is to supply a solution for the economic difficulties of the country. The greatest trouble of the farmers at present is restricted credit. The farmer who desires to increase his area under tillage has to face the problem of employing additional labour and of procuring seeds and manure. That raises the question of cash or credit. He has to invest money in the land, and in order to get the best results from it he must feed his cattle with the crops he raises. He has to wait twelve months before he realises one penny from the capital invested. If he goes to a bank to raise credit he meets with very great difficulty. He will find it very difficult to get a loan, and if he gets it, he has to go in every three months and renew the bill. Conditions such as that may be all right for big business concerns with a quick turn-over. Such methods of banking may be suitable to an industrial country where the borrowing would be for short periods. In a predominantly agricultural country like this, however, we should have a system of finance which would make money available for our main industry. Very little finance is available at present for agriculture. If this Commission is to be of any service to the State as a whole, the personnel should be such that it will look at the problem as a whole and suggest remedies. That is why we think the personnel should be either altered or added to. The Terms of Reference should have a specific, definite reference to the agricultural industry, because any change suggested in that respect means more to the future of the country than anything else. The Commission might suggest the establishment of a system of agricultural credit. If they do not do that, I agree with Deputy Heffernan that the fruits of their labours will not be what we expect or would like to see coming from them.

My intervention in this discussion is due to the fact that I am a representative of farmers, labourers, and of some branches of Government.

An all-round man.

I generally agree with Deputy Heffernan when he addresses the Dáil, but I always think it a pity that he does not stop at a certain point. I agree with him in moving this motion, but I still have the same objection. As regards the seconder— Deputy Baxter—I could not help picturing him as taking up a sturdy Cavan farmer in his arms and saying to the Minister, "Do not strike this child," or, in other words, set up a Commission against him. Although, as a representative of farmers, I can support this motien, I am doing it from a different motive. Much as the farmers are hampered by the banks—particularly by the banks calling themselves Irish, which have not their headquarters in Ireland—the commercial community, particularly small business men, are hampered still more by these vampires. As I might be betrayed into using unparliamentary language, I will leave it at that. Nobody was more astounded than I was, when the Minister announced the personnel of this Commission, at some of the persons nominated on it. I am entitled to speak of this, because I have personal knowledge. Some of these persons should be standing in the dock instead of being appointed on a Commission set up by a Minister.

That question does not arise. This is a question of adding to the personnel of the Commission.

Then the only remark I have to make is, that any person or persons who can counteract the malevolent influence of some of the members of this Commission should be added to it, and I support the motion.

Deputy Heffernan's resolution could be condemned on his own statements, and if he puts it to a division I am not going to go to the trouble of voting for it as it stands. He said the Commission should be regarded as a judge and jury. If that is why he wants to put some member representing his own party on the Commission, I would prefer the matter to be considered by a tribunal that did not include any of the alleged financial experts who sit behind the Deputy. I think the Minister has taken the correct line in the appointment of this Commission. At the same time, I feel that the inclusion of a number of people representing the alleged banking institutions in this country that could not be justified, might be regarded as prejudicing the findings of the Commission.

I should like to know from the Minister if it is his intention that evidence can be given before the Commission by expert agriculturists from Denmark, Belgium and other countries where the conditions more nearly approach those existing here than in the countries from which some members of the Commission are being brought. The Minister for Agriculture, particularly, always holds up Denmark to us as an example for this country. The agricultural communities in Denmark, Belgium and other countries are not suffering from the same lack of credit facilities as agriculturists are here, and I think it would be very helpful to the Commission, who will have to come to a decision on the evidence given, if they had evidence from some experts from the countries I have referred to. I also want to know if it is possible, or, if it has been arranged, that evidence will be given before this Commission by representatives of the Department of Lands and Agriculture and by representatives of the Department of Industry and Commerce? I know civil servants in these Departments who, I believe, are capable of giving very useful evidence. I want to know if any restriction will be placed upon civil servants going before the Commission and giving evidence, unofficial evidence if you like, as to the banking system most suitable for this country.

I think I am correct in assuming that the Terms of Reference are sufficiently wide to allow of recommendations being made for the institution of a State bank. If that is so, I hope Deputy Heffernan and members of the Farmers' Party, before the Commission concludes its labours, will give that aspect of the matter serious consideration. I believe that is Deputy Heffernan's idea and not so much as to press for a representative of the Farmers' Party. He does not say that in so many words. The farmers have a splendid opportunity now, if they take advantage of it, and it is up to some of their financial geniuses to go before the Commission and put up a case for what, in their opinion, is the best system of banking suitable to the needs of the agricultural community. I hope that hundreds of farmers who rightly complain of restricted credit facilities will have the courage to go before the Commission and give evidence in proof of that complaint. If Deputy Heffernan regards the Commission as being judge and jury I only hope the members of it will come to a decision on the basis of the evidence produced by the farmers in order to bring about an alteration in the present banking system.

The Minister will, I hope, deal with the right of civil servants to give official or unofficial evidence, and also as to whether the Departments of Lands and Agriculture and Industry and Commerce will be officially represented before the Commission by selected officials. I realise that this is the most important Commission that has been set up since the establishment of the Saorstát. Anyone going through the country will realise that its future prosperity and progress will depend very largely on what happens as a result of the operations of this Commission. I agree with the Minister in going outside sectional interests and in looking for men for this Commission who, I assume—and I do not know anything to the contrary—are experts in this matter in their own country. I would like if the Minister would say if evidence of an expert nature will be given before the Commission by agriculturists from Denmark and other countries somewhat similar to Ireland.

Debate adjourned until Wednesday, 24th February.
Top
Share