Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 21 Apr 1926

Vol. 15 No. 2

CUSTOMS RESOLUTIONS. - RESOLUTION No. 7—WINE.

I move:—

(1) That in lieu of the present Customs duties in respect of wine, there shall (subject to the provisions of this Resolution) be charged, levied, and paid as on and from the 22nd day of April, 1926, the following Customs duties on all wine imported into Saorstát Eireann, that is to say,

Wine—

£

s.

d.

Not exceeding 30 degrees of proof spirit, the gallon

0

5

0

Exceeding 30 but not exceeding 42 degrees of proof spirit, the gallon

0

12

0

And for every degree or fraction of a degree, beyond the highest above charged, an additional duty, the gallon

0

1

0

Sparkling wine in bottle, an additional duty, the gallon

1

5

0

Still wine in bottle, an additional duty, the gallon

0

4

0

(2) That the provisions of Section 8 of the Finance Act, 1919, shall apply to the duties mentioned in this Resolution with the substitution of the expression "Saorstát Eireann" for the expression "Great Britain and Ireland."

(3) That, for the purposes of this Resolution, wine rendered sparkling or effervescent and bottled in the warehouse shall be deemed to be sparkling wine imported in bottle, and upon delivery for home consumption shall be charged with the duty imposed on sparkling wine by this Resolution, and the time when the wine is entered for home consumption shall be deemed to be the time of importation.

(4) That in this Resolution the word "wine" includes the lees of wine.

(5) It is hereby declared that it is expedient in the public interest that this Resolution shall have statutory effect under the provisions of the Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1913.

This is a resolution increasing the duty on wine. As the Deputies will see, the duties, even the new duties proposed, are very low indeed. Under the old scale the ordinary bottle of white wine that sold for 5/-, 6/-, or 7/- paid a duty of about 5d. Under the new arrangement it would pay a duty of about 10d. The prices at which wine is purchased outside this country bear absolutely no relation to the prices at which they are sold here, even allowing for importation and other duties. It is one of the things on which somehow or other there are enormous rates of profit as between the producer, as you might say, and the ultimate consumer. The duty comes, perhaps, a little more sharply in the case of sparkling wine, champagne or such wines, which are either imported in bottles, or are here in warehouses converted into sparkling wine. Even in that case the extra duty is only £1 5s. Having regard to the price at which these commodities are sold there will be no need to pass the duty on to the consumer. Probably to some extent it may be passed on, but if it is passed on it will not, we believe, very greatly decrease the consumption.

It will still leave the charge on wine, having regard to the alcoholic content, lower by far than the spirit duty, and lower than the charge on beer.

Can the Minister say what is the existing duty on sparkling wine in bottle? Is this an additional duty of £1 5s.?

All wine is charged as to whether it is 30 degrees or 42 degrees proof spirit. Sparkling wine is charged an additional duty. In the past it was 12/6, and now with the additional duty it is £1 5s. We simply doubled all the duties. On wine not exceeding 30 degrees of proof spirit, the duty was 2/6 a gallon, and now it will be 5/-. Wine over 30 degrees and under 42 degrees proof spirit previously paid a duty of 6/- and now it will be 12/-. For every additional degree of proof spirit there was an extra 6d. and now it will be 1/-, and the surtax added.

Would the Minister say what would be the normal additional percentage on the retail prices of bottled wine?

I cannot say, having regard to the abnormal prices of wine, but I would just say what I have already said. For instance, a bottle of white wine which would come under the lower duty may sell at anything from 5/- to 7/-. There was previously a duty of fivepence on that bottle, and now there will be a duty of 10d.

Is the Minister willing to have evidence on this before the present Commission on Prices?

No. I hope to have an authoritative statement from the Commission, but at present I am relying on rumour.

I think it is inadvisable we should have to tax wines at all. In my opinion encouragement should be given to wine drinking as against the drinking of stronger alcohol, beer and stout. We are not helping temperance by increasing the tax on wine. I do not know how it will affect medicated wines, but I must say I do not attach very much importance to wine as medicine.

Perhaps the Minister could say if medicated wines are to be included in this?

They are.

Would the Minister say what the income from this tax would be?

The yield would be, if the wine sellers, wholesale and retail, do what they ought to do, and bear the tax, £200,000 per annum.

The Minister could put it another way, and say if the sellers of wine would do what he would like them to do.

Resolution put and agreed to.
Top
Share