Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 21 Feb 1935

Vol. 54 No. 14

In Committee on Finance. - Vote No. 10—Office of Public Works.

I move:—

Go ndeontar suim Bhreise ná raghaidh thar £10 chun íoctha an mhuirir a thiocfaidh chun bheith iníoctha i rith na bliana dar críoch an 31adh Márta, 1935, chun Tuarastail agus Costaisí Oifig na nOibreacha Puiblí (1 agus 2 Will. 4, a. 33, s. 5 agus 6; 5 agus 6 Vict., c. 89, a. 1 agus 2; 9 agus 10 Vict., c. 86, a. 2, 7 agus 9, etc.).

That a Supplementary sum not exceeding £10 be granted to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending 31st March, 1935, for the Salaries and Expenses of the Office of Public Works (1 and 2 Will. 4, c. 33, secs. 5 and 6; 5 and 6 Vict., c. 89, secs. 1 and 2; 9 and 10 Vict., c. 86, secs. 2, 7 and 9, etc.).

This is a token Vote in relation to an eventual total of about £100,000, being for the building of new offices for the Department of Industry and Commerce on the vacant site of Maple's Hotel in Kildare Street. Having regard to the nature and size of the building and the congestion of business in the architect's branch in the Board of Works, due to the increased school-building programme and the like, it has been decided to put the design to public competition. It is not intended that any of the architects of the Board of Works should compete. With the exception of advertising the competition, it is not expected that any expenditure will fall to be made in this year. The token Vote of £10 is for expenses of the kind I have mentioned.

Even at this late hour I have to make my protest in connection with this Vote. It is now close on 12 months since a very representative deputation of citizens waited on the President, their object being to procure, if possible, the site of Maple's Hotel in Kildare Street, which has been derelict for at least 14 or 15 years, as a site for a new public hall. Very pertinent representations were made by members of the deputation to the President and the President seemed. so far as one could judge of by his manner and the very few words he spoke, to be entirely in sympathy with the object of the deputation. I asked a member of the deputation a short time ago if he had had any response to the request made and he said "No." I was foolish enough then to ask the Minister for Industry and Commerce what was to become of that site and he said "That site is ours. We are in a position now in which we must seek new offices. Our staff is scattered all over the city and the inconvenience of that is extreme." I quite admit that it is a much more important thing to have the staff of the Department of Industry and Commerce properly housed than to have a hall for the benefit of the citizens of Dublin. But I suggest that, after all, this Vote presupposes that this Parliament is going to remain here for ever. I do not think that it will. I think the time will come when the members here will begin to think of a better position for it in the centre of the city and that at some future time that position will be availed of and the Seanad House restored, rather than having it used as a bank. I believe that that will come about and then the inconvenience which the Minister for Industry and Commerce at present suffers will be intensified because he will have spent £100,000 on new offices which will be in an inconvenient position. The House would not be troubled by me at all to-night, especially at this late hour, if the Dublin Corporation had power to erect a citizens' hall. But we have not got power to spend a shilling on such a project.

It is a good job.

Mr. Kelly

It is not a good job. You would not say that of Cork.

We know you in Dublin.

Mr. Kelly

I should like Deputy Anthony and other members to remember that this is the capital city of Ireland and that no boundary will ever make it anything else. We have not got the power to erect a citizens' hall. In respect of many things, we have not got the power to raise the price of a smoke. That is the position in which representatives of the citizens find themselves in Greater Dublin. If the Corporation had that power, I should not introduce this matter here at all. I suggest to the Executive Council that as they handle a good deal of national property in the city, they ought to have a survey made of it and see if they could not hand over to the City of Dublin space for the erection of a hall. I am quite certain that, if they made a survey of the property they control, a convenient site would be found. We have only two halls here—one, the Mansion House hall, which does not suit great entertainments, particularly entertainments of a cultural nature, such as high-class music. The other large hall is certainly old enough and historic enough to be labelled as a national monument. Instead of that, it is a picture house. I allude to the Round Room of the Rotunda. Quite recently, a monstrous proposal was made to erect a chimney stack in the square attached to the Rotunda Buildings. I think that they would have power to do that, but there was such a remonstrance made that it will hardly go on. I ask the Minister to see if he could accommodate the city by having a site reserved for a public hall. I think that it is due to the City of Dublin that it should have such a hall. I understand that those who formed the deputation which waited on the President over 12 months ago had certain assurances from influential citizens that the money for the erection of the hall would be forthcoming, but to buy the site and erect the hall would be too large a project for them to undertake. Citizens are, however, prepared to put down the money for the building provided they get the site.

I should like to support very strongly the argument put forward by Deputy Kelly against the utilisation of Maple's site in the way in which the Minister and the Parliamentary Secretary say it is to be utilised. I should further support the Deputy's appeal to the Government to face, in a national spirit, having regard to the claim they make at times to a cultural aim, the problem of setting up a suitable hall in the City of Dublin which would serve as a national, cultural and musical centre.

I do not want to go into the economic war, but there is one thing that is very patent all over the country in connection with the present position, and that is that nothing that the Government may say or nothing that they may do in the matter of fostering and helping on national culture, whether in musical matters or in any other aspect of it, has any chance of thriving at the present moment. It is being throttled in the city and in every part of the country by all the economic difficulties and all the bitternesses and disagreements that are springing up around the country. It may be that the Government would like to do something that would offset that and, in setting their faces to the setting up of a hall of the nature and description that Alderman Kelly speaks about, they would be making a present-day gesture that would be, to some extent, an offset to the blows that are being struck at national culture throughout the country and providing something that, in the near future, might help to foster the cultural side of things that, at the present moment, they say they have at heart. Anybody interested in the development of orchestral music and other types of music in the City of Dublin, apart altogether from people who want assembly halls, must be struck at the way in which all chance of having it is being throttled in the city. The only large hall capable of being used for an orchestral performance was closed down comparatively recently and there is no hall to-day in which a reasonably large audience can be treated to an orchestral performance.

The gesture, in the first place, is wanted on the part of the Government. In the second place, the normal civic requirements of the City of Dublin require a hall of that particular kind. In the third place, the cultural requirements of the city require it, and it would be apart altogether from the necessity of spending £100,000 on the provision of central offices for the Department of Industry and Commerce. The Ministry should not take a decision to utilise the site that is available behind the Mansion House without fully considering and again discussing with those interested in that aspect of things, and with the Dublin Corporation, the utilisation of that site for culural and civic purposes. They should not utilise it in any other way without carrying those discussions to a further point and without giving the Oireachtas a further opportunity of discussing the disposal of the site of Maple's Hotel in the light of further arguments that may be brought forward by the bodies interested in this matter and by the Dublin Corporation with regard to the purposes about which Alderman Kelly speaks.

In the second place, the necessity which dictates the spending of this money on new offices for the Department of Industry and Commerce ought to be further elaborated. I think that the Minister for Finance and the Minister for Industry and Commerce have been trying to persuade the country recently that we have less civil servants in the country than ever before. Nevertheless, we are aware that the growth in the number of officials in the Department of Industry and Commerce is such that the offices attached to the Minister's Department are spreading themselves out in all directions. They have invaded the precincts of the Dáil as far as Dawson Street since the other day and they are spread out in all sorts of other directions too. It would be desirable, in passing this particular Vote, to have some discussion as to the staff development in the Department of Industry and Commerce. I think it would be well also, in telling the House that they were proposing to spend £100,000 on a building like this and proposing to advertise for a design in connection with these offices, to tell the House what prize they propose to offer to the successful architect, and what connection the successful architect would have with the subsequent erection of these buildings, if they are to be erected.

There is one question I should like to ask the Parliamentary Secretary, and it is a question that is agitating the minds of many people outside this House. I should like to ask him how far the sum of £100,000 that is being asked for is going to be used for new premises and why it is that the present premises at the disposal of the Minister for Industry and Commerce are not capable of containing or holding the number of extra officials in that Department.

Extra officials have nothing to do with it.

I suggest that they have something to do with it.

Nothing whatever.

Up to this, at any rate, certain premises in Dublin satisfied the requirements of the Ministry of Industry and Commerce. Now, we are asked for new premises and I want to know from the Minister, as he is here, will the new premises, which are going to cost the nation £100,000, suffice to accommodate all the officials, including the extra officials that have been engaged because of certain changes in the fiscal policy of this Government? May I take it, or will the Minister give us an assurance, that if he or his Government persist in their present policy, they will not require another institution costing another £100,000 within the next couple of years, or so long as they remain in office? I am always anxious to facilitate any Minister or Parliamentary Secretary who looks for extra money for anything he requires in his Department, but I think that our constituents are entitled to get information as to the reasons, which, by the way, have not been explained by the Parliamentary Secretary, for such expenditure. I am not going to question the efficiency of the Parliamentary Secretary at all, because, although I may disagree with him in some things, I know that in a business way he is very efficient, but I suggest that it is due to the people and to the House to tell us why this money is necessary and why a new building is necessary.

The Deputy will observe that the amount asked for is £10. The sum of £100,000 will have to be voted later and may be discussed when asked for.

As a matter of fact, Sir, I am not going to oppose it, but I should prefer to get some information from the Parliamentary Secretary as to why even this £10 is necessary.

I object very strongly to a Supplementary Estimate for £10, which is the herald of £100,000, to provide a suitable palace to accommodate the grandiose schemes of the Minister for Industry and Commerce. This country has been reduced to ruin by the Minister for Industry and Commerce and his colleagues.

Look at the ruined men! Ruin is staring us straight in the face.

Yesterday, we took legislative powers to establish a pound in every village in Ireland because, by the Government's own admission, the ordinary people of the country are not able to meet their obligations in the normal way and the bailiff must be sent out to plunder their property to the extent of £100 worth of goods for a debt of £10.

I move to report progress.

Progress reported, the Committee to meet again next Wednesday, 27th February, 1935.
Top
Share