Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 9 Mar 1939

Vol. 74 No. 14

Local Government (Amendment) Bill, 1939—Second Stage.

I move that the Bill be now read a Second Time. The purpose of this Bill is to extend by one year the period within which a new building must be begun and completed in order to obtain partial remission of rates under Section 12 of the Local Government Act, 1927. That Act, which applied only to new buildings completed before 1st October, 1930, enabled a reduction of two-thirds to be made in any increased valuation for a period of five years from the date of the increase or until the next general revaluation became effective, whichever was the shorter period. By amending Acts in 1930 and 1934 rate remission was allowed on new buildings completed before 1st October last.

It is intended to provide later in the year a separate Bill for rate remissions on dwellinghouses completed after 1st October next. Experience has revealed certain defects in the working of Section 12 of the Act of 1927, and it is considered that remissions of rates on dwellinghouses completed after next October can be more satisfactorily dealt with in a new Bill than by amending the Act of 1927.

I should like to ask the Minister whether the extension for one year applies to buildings other than dwellinghouses? I take it it applies to all new buildings being put up, but that it only applies to them when put up before 1st October next.

That is right.

The Minister has specifically fixed on what he is going to do in respect of dwellinghouses after 1st October next. I should like to ask him whether, in extending this principle after 1st October next in regard to dwellinghouses, he proposes to depart to any great extent from the amount of the concession that is being continued. I should particularly like to ask him why he makes no reference to buildings other than dwellinghouses after 1st October next. The whole building industry, as the Minister is aware, is very much confused with regard to the Government's policy. It will not be very much clearer as regards the Government's policy in respect of buildings other than dwellinghouses after 1st October next in respect of rates remission except he can say something about that now. Does he intend completely to drop rates remission in respect of new buildings other than dwellinghouses after 1st October next?

How will rural dwellings be affected?

That is farmhouses and farm buildings?

People building under the Small Dwellings (Acquisition) Act. They will be building up to 1940.

This Bill was brought in because I could not get as early as I had hoped the more complete Bill which has been in draft for some time. I had, therefore, to bring in this Bill to extend the law as it stands at present until the 1st October next. It extends that law in toto as it stands. With regard to the new Bill, I think Deputies will have to wait until they see it. If, as Deputy Mulcahy suggests, there is great confusion in the minds of builders, perhaps it would help them to some extent if I said that my present intention is to restrict the remission of rates to new dwellinghouses when the new Bill will be brought in. As to the extension of the remission of rates to rural houses, which Deputy Corish asked about, this Bill does not interfere with the present arrangement.

I submit to the Minister that it does imply as regards rural buildings after 1st October next that, while rates remission might be given in respect of farm dwellinghouses, it is not contemplated in respect of farmhouses or outhouses.

The new Bill will affect all dwellings.

Question put and agreed to.

When will the Committee Stage be taken?

Is there any objection to taking it now?

I should like to make the point that the Minister has intimated that he is not going to give any further remission of rates to buildings other than dwellinghouses after 1st October next. That is a rather important disclosure of policy on the part of the Minister. There is no real urgency in connection with the matter. There might be something that we would like to say on the Committee Stage for the purpose of elucidating what is in the Minister's mind, or giving the Minister a further chance of dealing with points that no doubt will arise in a number of persons' minds as a result of what he stated to-day. Perhaps the Minister would leave the Committee Stage over until next week and he can get the rest of the stages then.

All right.

Ordered: "That the Committee Stage be taken on Wednesday, 15th March."

Top
Share