Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 5 May 1948

Vol. 110 No. 10

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Maize Meal Allocations.

asked the Minister for Agriculture if he will state the present monthly allocations of maize meal and if any contract has yet been made for the purchase of our requirements from this year's crop; and, if so, at what price.

The allocation of maize to millers for the month of April, 1948, was based on 40 per cent. of the usage of maize meal mixture in the year 1938-39. The actual quantity distributed amounted to approximately 16,000 tons. It is proposed to make a similar allocation for the month of May, 1948. No contract has yet been made for the purchase of maize of this year's crop, but this matter is under constant expert examination, so that adequate supplies may be secured on advantageous terms for our requirements.

For how long does the Minister think the present allocation will last.

It entirely depends on the percentage of the datum year distribution that is provided in the months that lie ahead.

Can the Minister give no five, six, seven or eight months' indication to the people who are depending upon maize meal? Can he give no indication to them as to the prospects over even a short period?

The Deputy will recognise that I have the obligation of performing my undertakings, and that when I give one to the people it will be performed. As soon as I am in a position to give that kind of undertaking it will be given, and that at a no far distant date.

When will the Minister make up his mind to cut out this buffoonery and give the House and the country and the farmers the information to which they are entitled?

I have told the Deputy that 40 per cent. is the present allocation. When maize is secured the people will be informed of the long-term prospects of maize supply. No undertakings will be given until they can be given in such form as will be performed.

I am not talking about assurances or guarantees. I am talking about the prospects. The Minister has indicated the allocation for this month. I want some indication of the prospects for the next three or four months.

The Deputy has got all the information about prospects that I am now going to give him.

It is very helpful, indeed.

Before passing to the next question, the Deputy will withdraw the word "buffoonery." It is not parliamentary.

Is it not? I would not like to offend the Chair in any shape or form, but I think it is a great pity that I have to withdraw it.

The Deputy does withdraw it.

Top
Share