Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 22 Oct 1953

Vol. 142 No. 3

Committee on Finance. - Vote 49—Gaeltacht Services (Resumed).

Ba mhór an trua é, dar liom, már labhair oiread agus aon Teachta amháin Gaeilge ar an dtaobh eile den Tigh imeasc an cháineadh sheirbh go léir a dheineadar. Tá's agam gurbh fhéidir le cuid de na Teachtaí Ghaeilge labhairt go líofa ach dobé a ngnó féin é labhairt nó gan labhairt i nGaeilge. I think, a Cheann Comhairle, that, having regard to the fact that most of the debate and most of the attacks on the Estimate for Gaeltacht Services, and particularly the attack on the Estimate of the office of Oifig na Gaeltachta agus na gCeantar gCúng, were conducted in English, I will reply to it in English to-day. Many of the Deputies from the other side went to particular pains in their all-out attack on this office to exonerate me personally from any lash of their tongues. I want to assure them that, much as I appreciate their concern for me personally, I have no desire to shield behind the fact that I am the occupant of the public office.

I do not intend in any way todissociate my personality—and I use the word personality in its physical and mental senses—from the public office which I hold. After two years of it, I am used to attacks both front and rear and even broadside sniping. Therefore, I want to assure them that I am a bit more thick skinned now than I was when I took up office a little over two years ago.

There is one point, however, in the case made by the other side particularly against Oifig na Gaeltachta agus na gCeantar gCúng and that is that there is much inconsistency not particularly in the manner in which it was presented yesterday but in the manner in which it was presented yesterday compared with last year. Much of the debate was conducted both this year and last year by the same Deputies. Last year, it was attacked because it was felt that Oifig na Gaeltachta agus na gCeantar gCúng was set up largely as a publicity medium for the Government and that it was set up with ballyhoo and, as Deputy McQuillan said, with a flourish of trumpets. For my own part and on behalf of the Taoiseach who was primarily responsible for setting up this office I want to say that the contrary was the case. I am sure that the Deputies who met me when I visited their areas will admit that I went to considerable trouble to impress on the people whose grievances I heard, and whose suggestions I heard, and later examined, that I had no false ideas that my office, no matter how powerful it might be ultimately, was going to change the face of the West of Ireland overnight, or even in a period of two years.

I should like to impress on Deputies here generally, though I am sure I do not have to impress it on most of the Deputies who spoke in this debate, many of whom are natives of the West of Ireland, that the problems in the West of Ireland are largely historical and that many of them are centuries old. For that reason, there is no way out for me to say that these problems will take centuries to solve. There is no reason why they should; but, on the other hand, I never claimed thatthey were going to be completely solved in the short period of two years.

The tone of the debate yesterday would indicate to me that Deputies, on the other side, expected that by now emigration should have ceased in the West of Ireland, and that all the amenities available in big towns and cities should be available in the West of Ireland, with the result that industries should be thriving and bright lights shining along the western coast. The line of attack, generally, seemed to be based on the alleged ineffectiveness of Oifig na Gaeltachta agus na gCeantar gCúng.

I should like to explain to Deputies, for the third time, the purpose of this office. It was set up as a co-ordinating machine, to co-ordinate the activities of the different Departments of State in so far as their activities affect the West of Ireland, the Gaeltacht, the Breac-Ghaeltacht and the congested districts generally. Everybody knows of the existence, at one time, of the Congested Districts Board. They know the amount of valuable work it did in many spheres. They know also that, on the setting up of this State 30 years ago, the Congested Districts Board disappeared, and that its various activities were absorbed in the different Departments of State which were set up at that time.

According as the work of administration of these Departments increased, it was not unnatural to expect that the same attention might not be given to the particular requirements of the congested district within these different Departments. It was mainly with that end in view that the necessary attention should be given to the particular requirements of the congested districts that this office was set up. The figure in the Estimate, something exceeding £7,000, relates purely to salaries. Therefore I cannot understand what some Deputies were referring to when they mentioned this huge sum of money that was at my disposal and that was not being spent to any degree in the West of Ireland. I think it would be superfluous and only adding to complexity, at this stage at any rate, if I were given moneys to expend which up to the present arebeing expended by the various Departments. Each of the Departments, whether it be Lands, Agriculture, Forestry (which is a branch of the Department of Lands) has over the years built up technical staffs and systems of administration, and to superimpose another body of administrators and technicians on the existing ones would, I think, make for confusion.

On the other hand there is a necessity for co-ordination. I think I need only mention one particular aspect of work which is peculiar more to the West of Ireland than to any other part of the country to illustrate the necessity for co-ordination. There are all along the coast small piers, slipways and small harbours, the responsibility for the construction and maintenance of which is reposed in different Departments, whether they be county councils, the Office of Public Works, the Department of Industry and Commerce, and with a certain amount of responsibility in the case of the Department of Agriculture.

When the need arises for having certain works and repairs done in these places, it is obvious that some co-ordinating machine should be there. I think that a scheme, working through the aegis of the inter-departmental committee attached to my office, with the co-operation of the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Agriculture, and as approved ultimately by the Government, will make for more expeditious treatment of complaints with regard to the maintenance and repair of these minor marine works throughout the West of Ireland. As a result of the increase in the engineering staff that is being recruited, and, with the speeding up of these necessary works—the clearing away of bottle-necks and obstacles—there is evidence of considerably increased activity in minor marine works along the whole coast-line. I believe that this activity will increase still more in the future.

Deputy Blowick led the line of attack when he opened the debate from the other side of the House yesterday. I should like to remind the Deputy that there is hardly a bigbusiness organisation in any part of the world to-day—and we hear a lot about business methods and management and their importance at the present time—that has not got some co-ordinating machine attached to it. Surely, when dealing with the problems that are peculiar to the West of Ireland, and which are so complex, and the responsibility for which reposes in so many different Departments and branches of Departments of State, some co-ordinating machine is at least as necessary as we are told it is in the case of any big business organisation. We can differ about the type of machine to be set up, but I do not think it can be denied that co-ordination is necessary. In saying that, I am not attempting to try to take any credit away from the Departments which have been doing this work over a number of years.

Last year, Deputy Blowick complained that I had not given a sufficient indication as to how this work of co-ordination had been carried out. Yesterday, in my opening statement, I gave, I think, a fairly full indication as to how this work of co-ordination is being done. It was not complete by any means, because it could never be complete, since there are so many different aspects of work involved. But then Deputy Blowick was trying to have it both ways, and sought to establish that I was trying to claim credit for work that was being done by a number of other Departments. I can assure Deputy Blowick and the House that that is very far from the truth. If my job is to ensure the economic and cultural betterment of the West of Ireland, it matters little to me what agency or what Department of State carries it out if the job is done. Deputy Blowick then proceeded to act like Little Jack Horner, telling us what a good boy he was and of the impetus he gave to the work of the Department of Lands during his three years of office. It is a fact—and I am sure Deputy Blowick will admit it—that in the past two years more work, particularly with regard to afforestation, has been going on in the Department than in the period in which he was Minister.

To pinpoint some of the claims thatDeputy Blowick made in that respect, I will refer to part of his speech. For one thing, Deputy Blowick suggested that the work on tourist roads which was initiated early this year and which was sponsored—and I am not saying this in a boastful manner—by my office was carried out at the expense of local authority works. I would like to remind Deputy Blowick that, in 1950-51, the last complete year in which he was Minister, the amount of the Road Fund grants to county councils was £2,265,000, at that stage a reduction of several hundred thousand pounds on the amount given to the Road Fund by the Fianna Fáil Government before it went out of office in 1948. The grant out of the Road Fund to county councils for the current year is £4,100,000 and when one adds to that the £400,000 special grant for the tourist roads which is being made available this year it brings the total sum to £4,500,000 in this single year——

Thanks to the users of motor-cars and to higher taxation.

And petrol tax.

Mr. Lynch

——an excess over the last Coalition Road Fund Grant of more than £2,000,000 which does not come within a donkey's roar of the decrease in the Local Authorities (Works) Act provision which has taken place this year. I cannot understand how Deputy Blowick can claim that the inter-Party Government spent more on roads than this Government has done in the light of those figures and in the light of what every citizen of the country who has recourse to the roads must have observed during the past year and a half. I do not believe there has ever been more work done on roads in any part of the country than there has been in the last year and a half.

We did more. We built roads all over the country when we took over after the emergency period.

Mr. Lynch

With half the amount of money that is being spent now?

With more money than is being spent now.

Mr. Lynch

With the figure for 1950-51 at £2,265,000 as against £4,500,000?

That is misleading. That does not represent all the work that was done. You have to take into account what the local authority spent besides.

Mr. Lynch

I listened for four hours to a rampage of attack and surely the Deputy after his three years of office should have become a little more thick-skinned than he appears to be.

I am not in the least thin-skinned, but I am not going to let the Parliamentary Secretary away with such statements.

The Parliamentary Secretary should be allowed to continue his speech.

Mr. Lynch

Deputy Blowick proceeded to make another extravagant claim. I instanced the work that had been done on the rearrangement of rundale of holdings over the past three years. I used one of the years in which Deputy Blowick was Minister, 1950-51, to indicate the speeding up that has taken place since then. In 1950-51 there were 106 holdings rearranged; in 1951-52 there were 254. Deputy Blowick claims that he was the Minister responsible for that. In 1952-53 there were 371 holdings rearranged and I believe that in the coming years there will be far more than that as a result of an increase in the inspectorial staff of the Land Commission.

Who increased the inspectorial staff?

Mr. Lynch

If the Deputy will bear with me, I will tell him. The conference preliminary to the increase in that staff was held not more than 12 or 14 months ago.

When I took over the Land Commission——

The Parliamentary Secretary must be allowed tomake his statement without interruption.

Mr. Lynch

I would like to refer to another claim made by Deputy Blowick to test the veracity of this Little Jack Horner.

This is the first time I have been called "little", if you mean physically.

Mr. Lynch

Metaphorically. Deputy Blowick claimed that the transfer from the Blasket Islands which is now being carried out was the responsibility of his Government. I would like to remind Deputy Blowick that there was no decision whatever about the transfer of people from the Blasket Islands until this Government took up the matter and it was only in the present year that the land to which these people are being migrated and on which the houses are at present being built—I think four have been completed—was acquired.

What about all the lands in the Midlands I acquired?

Mr. Lynch

I am sorry that the people ultimately had to be migrated from the Blasket Islands but the problem was that the families that were there were dying out. There were no marriages into the island. Girls from the mainland were not prepared to marry into the island and rather than let these people die out the Government decided that it would be far better if we could get these people with Togha na Gaeilgeto live in a Fíor-Ghaeltacht area as near as possible to the Blaskets. That is now being done and I believe before the winter is out the whole process will be completed.

Before I pass from the Vote for Oifig na Gaeltachta agus na gCeantar gCúng I would like to refer to some of the comments of Deputies who said that nothing, as far as they could see, was done either in their constituencies or in any other part of the country. Two West Cork Deputies were particularly loquacious in that respect. Deputy Murphy has a reputation for touring his constituency frequently butif he tries to establish here that nothing was done in his constituency in the past year as a result of the activities of this office I would like to ask Deputy Murphy whether he has been across the Ballingeary-Ballylickey road recently or across the Castletownbere-Allihies road, where £25,000 has been or is in the course of being spent in improving these very necessary thoroughfares. In one breath he says that nothing in the agricultural field was accomplished and in the next breath he questions me in regard to the onion scheme that was introduced last year as to the price and the market available to the farmers taking part in it. I wonder where the consistency is in that line of argument. The fact is that there is a market for all the onions that can be produced under the onion scheme. The reason for its introduction was that even during the season when we can produce our own onions we were forced to import something like £250,000 worth of onions every year, or more, a situation that I felt was undesirable and that should be abolished as soon as possible. Happily that is now about to take place.

Would the Parliamentary Secretary state the amount of money his office has put into this onion-growing industry in Skibbereen?

Mr. Lynch

If the Deputy had been here when I opened, he would have heard how my office operates; but apparently he was not interested enough. I do not want to go over that line of country again. For his enlightenment, he might consider reading the debates. Some Deputies made particular reference——

Your statements are not correct.

Mr. Lynch

I did not interrupt the Deputy yesterday, in spite of his meanderings. References were made by some Deputies to the activities of An Foras Tionscal. This organisation was set up by statute and it operates as an independent body. Its only obligation to the Minister and to the Dáilis to publish its annual report. I think it is wise that that should be so, to ensure that no pressure, political or otherwise, could be brought to bear on the members of the board with regard to establishing any particular industry. In its first year, as its report showed, it made quite remarkable progress, allowing that it was in its first year and that applications were necessarily slow in coming in the first instance, while applications completely outside the scope of the Act were also submitted in large numbers. These, together with the genuine applications, would have to be screened and examined. I believe that in the current year they will get ahead, largely as a result of the attuning of the minds of the investing public, and of the various industrial development organisations throughout the country, to the real purpose of the Act, and I believe considerably more industrial expansion will take place as a result of the Undeveloped Areas Act in the coming year.

Some Deputies referred to the afforestation problem in the West of Ireland and made what many people outside are apt to make, rather unenlightened statements about the whole subject. Everybody knows, and I am sure Deputies who spoke here yesterday know particularly, the difficulties attending the acquisition of land in the West of Ireland. As a result of approaches made to my Office recently and suggestions made about the people in a particular part of the West of Ireland being forestry minded, a special inspector from the Forestry Department was sent to that particular area. We had been informed that the farmers there were particularly anxious to co-operate in the establishment of a forestry scheme in the area, that many of them were more than anxious to adopt the rôle of pioneers. Every farmer that the inspector approached suggested that if the inspector went to a neighbouring farmer he might get land but he himself wanted all his land and had none available. The net result was that in no single instance, I think, was there an acre of suitable land offeredto the inspector for acquisition in this particular area.

You do not expect us to believe that? That is a nice little fairy tale.

Mr. Lynch

I would not say it unless it were a fact.

What about the offers on hand awaiting inspection?

Mr. Lynch

There are offers on hand which are being inspected. The Deputy knows—and I am not saying he made any unenlightened reference to the Forestry Department in that regard—the difficulty of acquisition in these areas. Someone referred yesterday to the price for sheep and sheep's wool at the present time. The farmer naturally will think twice and will weigh up whether he would offer for sale to the Land Commission or whether he would retain it and feed the sheep and cattle on the particular land, whether it be mountainside or arable land.

Deputy McQuillan made some reference to the price which was offered to certain farmers and landowners in the West of Ireland when their land was being taken from them. There was a clear implication, to my mind, that some form of compulsory acquisition was embarked upon. I think the Deputy knows, and I am sure Deputy Blowick knows, that in no single instance in the West of Ireland has there been a case of compulsory acquisition for afforestation. Therefore, any price given for land by the Land Commission is as a result of agreement between the landowner himself and the Land Commission. It is a voluntary sale and therefore the price agreed must be presumed to be to the mutual satisfaction of vendor and buyer.

Before the Parliamentary Secretary passes from that, would he enlighten me on one subject? Is it the Parliamentary Secretary or the Minister for Lands who administers forestry?

Mr. Lynch

The Minister for Lands. I have gone out of my way to explainthe co-ordinating functions that I have with regard to this and other matters.

I cannot think well of the man who invented that word "co-ordination."

Would you think well of any man?

Mr. Lynch

Not except himself and Little Jack Horner.

Not of the Minister for Finance, anyhow, and it is his own fault. No one thinks well of him.

Mr. Lynch

Deputies Palmer and Flynn referred to the heating of glass-houses. I agree this would be very desirable if it can be achieved. Recently an experiment was carried out and the results of it are under review, to see whether heating by certain turf appliances would be feasible for these houses. The very nature of the glass-house units, with the houses dispersed over a wide area, would make the heating of them as units very costly and I am advised that even heating by turf with the present known appliances would also be very costly. The net result would be, if heating could be introduced into each house, the bringing forward of the season by something like six to eight weeks each year. It would naturally be of some advantage to some of the growers, particularly in the West of Ireland, if tomatoes could be marketed at the end or even the beginning of June rather than in the first week of August and they would very likely qualify for better prices than they would get when the cold-house tomatoes come on the market in August.

With regard to Gaeltacht Services, I would like to comment on two bold headings that were rather significant in two of to-day's newspapers. One said there was a reduction of £85,920 in Gaeltacht Services. The other mentioned a similar reduction for the Gaeltacht. The truth is—and it is no harm that it should be known once again—that the Coalition Governmentduring its period of office resorted to certain stockpiling, as far as Gaeltacht Services were concerned. It was a very bad bargain, because the supplies were purchased at prices that put the Gaeltacht Services to the pin of their collar to sell the products made from these materials and to maintain the workers on full-time work in places and even half-time work in other places.

The £80,000 odd by which the Estimate has been reduced this year compared with last year, and which was indicated in the Book of Estimates last year as replenishment of stores is simply a carrying over of the amounts that are still in hands as a result of that stockpiling. The truth is that over £11,000 worth of materials will be used in the current year and I think over £4,000 worth of wages will be paid out more than was paid last year. Therefore, there is no truth in the suggestion—if that was the suggestion intended in these newspapers—that less money is being spent in the provision of work for the people of the Gaeltacht by Gaeltarra Éireann or the Gaeltacht Services in the current year. In fact, the contrary is the case.

With regard to particular points raised by Deputies about the operation of Gaeltacht Services, Deputy Blowick asked in particular about the knitting centre in his own area—Derrypark. The Deputy will remember that some time ago a strike took place in that centre and that many of the old workers did not return to work. Some of them possibly emigrated but, however, the centre is staffed at the present time by many young trainees and naturally they are not sufficiently experienced to give a high output.

How many are there at the moment?

Mr. Lynch

The fact that the output is not high at the moment might give rise to the impression that Derry-park is on the wane, but I expect that when the trainees become more experienced the output will be restored.

Could the Parliamentary Secretary say how many are employed at the moment?

Mr. Lynch

About 12 in that centre at the moment. The Deputy also referred to activities at Tourmakeady. Unfortunately, that centre did not do so well last year, due entirely to matters outside the control of Gaeltacht Services. The Deputy will know that the centre was established as a finishing centre and a dispatch centre for knitwear.

Oh, no, it was established as a knitting centre.

Mr. Lynch

Established originally; but rather than bring articles of knitwear that are manufactured all over the West of Ireland to Dublin for examination or for finishing and then, in cases of defects, having to send them back again to the different centres, it was found more desirable to have a proper finishing and pressing centre established at Tourmakeady.

Yes, but the two were to work side by side in separate buildings, the knitting on the one hand and the finishing on the other, and neither was supposed to interfere with the work of the other.

Mr. Lynch

However, to come to the question of the lack of expansion, if I may call it that, in that centre, it was due to the loss of technical officers through death or illness, and as the Deputy knows technical officers in knitwear are not easily replaced quickly.

I want to say also in regard to Tourmakeady that some of the knitting machines were removed for use in other centres but that was only done when power finishing machinery was installed.

No; that will not do. Surely the hand-knitting machines did not want power, and they were being operated in a separate building, and in the other part of the building the finishing was to be done?

Mr. Lynch

The Deputy asked me about ascophyllum last year, and I did not know much about it. This year I would like to inform the Deputy that the company, Alginate Industries (Ireland) Limited, bought ascophyllumthis year, dried and ground it into meal, and succeeded in getting a market on the Continent for it. It is hoped that there will be scope for considerable expansion in this field in the near future.

Has the Parliamentary Secretary the figures for the weights this year?

Mr. Lynch

I have not got the figures before me. These were presented to the Dáil in the annual report of Alginate Industries recently. I did not trouble to get them, but I am sure the Deputy will get them readily if he cares to consult the annual report which is laid on the Table of the Dáil each year.

Is the company carrying out any experiments directed towards discovering an alleged secret process?

Mr. Lynch

I cannot say that there is any secret process being explored but they have made a start in this field and, as the Deputy will know, bíonn gach tosnú lag. It is hoped expansion will take place.

Deputy Cunningham is not here at the present time but on the general question of the Gaeltacht he made a suggestion for the establishment of a separate board to deal only with the Fíor-Ghaeltacht areas. The Deputy may not know it but that question has been raised from many sources over many years. Apparently it has not found favour with any Government to date. It is a big question and a question that would require considerable and detailed examination. The question would arise whether the board would take over the existing technical officers from the different Departments or whether they would recruit their own officers if a certain sum were given to them for their own administration. However, the Deputy can be assured that the suggestions to which he referred yesterday are receiving the fullest possible attention and consideration.

There is also the point made with regard to the Gaeltacht about non-replacement houses. Well, that is a problem that is raised, I suppose,every year on the Gaeltacht Services Estimates. The reason for the present policy with regard to Gaeltacht housing grants is pretty obvious. Congestion in the West of Ireland is admitted to be very bad, and to give more favourable Gaeltacht housing grants for new houses would only add to the already considerable congestion problem. There is nothing against an applicant who seeks to build a new house applying to the Department of Local Government for the ordinary local government grant.

Admittedly the Gaeltacht grant is more favourable and the Gaeltacht Services Division housing supervisors assist in the buying of materials and the designing of the houses. Coupled with that there is the fact that there is a better and longer remission of rates. There is, however, nothing against any applicant who wants to live in any part of the West of Ireland, if he can get the land, applying for the appropriate grant to the Department of Local Government. The problem, therefore, is not as serious as some Deputies would suggest.

Several Deputies asked about the prospects for Gaeltacht tweeds in the years ahead. The difficulty is in supplying, particularly the American market, with the suitable designs and finish. It is necessary to keep in close contact with the American market and the American trend. In the current year officers from the division visited America and the experience and knowledge gained on that visit makes it a worthwhile proposition to keep that as a permanent feature of Gaeltarra Éireann. The trouble about the American market is, as someone once suggested, that if an American firm places an order for goods to-day it wants the goods delivered yesterday. Gaeltacht Services will have to keep as close as possible to promised delivery dates and try not to outstep itself with regard to taking orders that might not be fulfilled at the right time. It would be serious for our trade generally if the impression were allowed to grow up that Irish industry was not reliable with regard to delivery dates. There is a very good future for Gaeltacht tweed providedthe standard, quality, design and finish are suitable and provided we can keep up with deliveries.

Vote put and agreed to.
Top
Share