asked the Minister for Finance if the statement made by him, and reported in the press on 4th October, that the special import levy on motor cars is to remain in operation for at least two years, still represents the intentions of the Government.
Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Import Levy on Motor Cars.
Mr. Lemass
The Press statement referred to by the Deputy was to the effect that following consideration of the matter by the Government the Minister for Finance had, with regret, intimated to the National Union of Vehicle Builders that he felt it would be necessary in the interests of the national economy as a whole and to avoid adding to our balance of payments difficulties that the special import levy on motor cars should remain in operation for at least two years.
Mr. Lemass
The Minister had, I think, explained to him by the trade unions concerned the importance to them that there should be no doubt in anyone's mind that these special taxes —in this case involving motor cars— would last for at least two years. In view of the importance of having any doubt in that regard removed, will the Minister take steps to ensure that none of his colleagues make statements which will cause any misunderstanding?
None of my colleagues has made any such statement.
Mr. Lemass
They have indeed.
They have not.
Mr. Lemass
The Minister for Industry and Commerce implied that these duties might go off. The employment of a substantial number of workers depends upon its being understood that these are not likely to be removed. Will the Minister see that ambiguous statements, which imply the contrary, are not made by his colleagues?
The ambiguity was in the Deputy's interpretation, and not by the Minister. The Minister for Industry and Commerce is as aware as I am—perhaps even more so—that continuity of employment depends on regularisation of supplies in the way the Deputy has himself indicated.
He should keep his tongue quiet, then.
The Deputy should not try to misinterpret or misquote.