Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 27 Mar 1958

Vol. 166 No. 9

Committee on Finance. - Vote 57—Defence (Resumed).

Debate resumed on the following motion:—
That the Estimate be referred back for reconsideration.—(Deputy McQuillan.)

When dealing with the number of civilian tradesmen employed by the Army, Deputy McQuillan again showed his disrespect for facts. I do not think the Deputy will deny that he said there was an increase in the number of civilian tradesmen employed and that, at the same time, there was a decrease in the number of soldiers in the Army. The fact is that the increase of 30 civilian employees to which I referred is for the coming year. The provision for the coming year was for increased employment to the extent of 30 civilians over last year, when there was a decrease. The Estimate provides also for an increase of 250 men in the Army for the coming year. The increase in civilian employment will take place in the present year, when there will also be an increase in the Army.

Deputy McQuillan objects to the employment of skilled tradesmen in a civilian capacity, when there are skilled tradesmen available in the Army itself. The latter tradesmen are also soldiers and must be trained as soldiers and must learn military engineering. They must be trained in that work and, therefore, they would not be available for continuous employment in the maintenance of barracks and the construction of new works. They are in the Army because they are needed as members of the Corps of Engineers.

In comparing the cost of civilian employees and the cost of civil servants generally with the cost of the private soldiers in the Army, Deputy McQuillan apparently manufactured figures for his own convenience. The allegation he made was that the cost of civilian employees and civil servants generally was £953,000 and, according to his estimate, about £650,000 is provided for upwards of 4,000 private soldiers. He expressed the opinion that he could not be more than a few thousand out in his estimate. If he wanted to be accurate, he would want to increase his estimate by over 100 per cent. The cost of the private soldiers is £1,220,000 and that does not include marriage allowance which is paid to 1,117 soldiers at a cost of £130,000.

That is not correct. That is only an estimate for a full strength Army. That is not the pay of the number of men in the Army.

On a point of order, Sir. Deputy McQuillan was allowed to speak without interruption and surely the Minister should be allowed to reply without interruption.

Every Deputy should be allowed to speak without interruption.

Provision is made in the Estimates for 4,639 privates at a cost of £1,220,000, with £1370,000 for marriage allowance, which makes a total of £1,350,000, or something more than double Deputy McQuillan's alleged estimate.

Subsequently in his speech, Deputy McQuillan referred to the setting up of an internment camp in the Curragh. I would not object to any reference to this, because it is possible that some people may disagree with it, but I have no time for Deputy McQuillan in his attempt to pose as a revolutionary. He is not a revolutionary and it is not in him to be a revolutionary. He is a constitutionalist and accepts his seat in this House and accepts his salary from the Exchequer, but he pretends to sympathise with those people. If he had any sincerity in him, he would join with those people, but they would not have him any more than any political Party in this House would have him.

People who have flouted the authority of the State have forced this action by the Government, but I have only contempt for people like Deputy McQuillan who sit on the fence themselves and who have not the character or the sincerity to do more than talk about these things.

The next Deputy who spoke was Deputy Rooney, who criticised the small number of men provided for in the Estimate. There are 250 more men provided for this year than last year. Deputy Rooney stated that the strength of the Defence Forces had never been more than 7,500 or 8,000 in the past few years. I have the figures for recent years here and in 1953-54, when Fianna Fáil were in office, the strength of other ranks was 9,637. In 1954-55, that strength fell to 8,826; in 1955-56, it fell again to 7,909; and in 1956-57, it fell to 7,524. In 1957-58, when we were operating on the Estimate prepared by the Coalition Government, the average number was about 7,250. For this year, we are providing for a strength of 7,500.

Deputy Rooney asked a question about the disposal of surplus lands at Tallaght and he said he was under the impression that they had been offered to the Land Commission for division amongst local people. Deputy Rooney was probably thinking of the lands at Baldonnel which have been handed over to the Land Commission. I understand that the Land Commission are not interested in the lands at Tallaght and those lands are being disposed of by public auction. It is expected that they will be auctioned in the very near future. Deputy Haughey was one of a number of Deputies who paid tribute to the F.C.A. and I am glad to express my appreciation also of the very valuable work that that part of our Defence Forces is doing. There is no doubt that we are getting very great service at very little cost from the F.C.A. and An Sluagh Muirí and no praise can be too high for these young men who are sacrificing so much of their spare time to preparing themselves to defend the State, should that be necessary.

I was sorry that there were one or two Deputies who had some adverse criticism to make of that very excellent force. I want it to be understood that as far as the Government are concerned, we fully appreciate the importance of the work they are doing and the patriotic motives that inspire them.

Deputy Haughey thinks that possibly in defence policy insufficient attention is paid to the F.C.A. I do not really think that that is so. Possibly they could be brought more into the picture and I shall look into that aspect of the matter; but there are 450 officers and men of the permanent Defence Forces attached to the F.C.A., and I know that the different units of the Army throughout the country take a very great pride in the efficiency of their local units of the F.C.A. and, in this respect, there is almost as much rivalry between the Army people associated with the F.C.A. as there is between the units of the force itself. I was very pleased to find the high regard in which the force is held generally in the Army and I know that the Army authorities were very proud indeed of the fact that this year the F.C.A. were able to run their own competitions themselves at the Curragh, without any assistance from Regular Army officers.

With regard to the question of shortages of supplies of uniforms, there may occasionally occur shortages of a particular size, but this is hard to avoid, and it occurs only when there is an abnormal demand in a particular area for a particular size. To ensure completely against that would involve the tying up of a large sum in maintaining large stocks of every size of the different components of the uniform.

With regard to accommodation for training for the F.C.A., it is very difficult to get suitable accommodation in the different centres and the Army have had to erect huts in a number of centres in order to accommodate the F.C.A. There are 53 centres where huts have been erected. There are three in course of construction at the moment. These Estimates provide for the erection of four further huts, but the location of these has not yet been decided upon.

Deputy O'Higgins got the impression that developments in other countries in relation to modern weapons and so forth may not get the proper attention in our Army. I can assure him that the Army staff are as far as possible kept abreast of these developments. They are keeping informed as much as possible with regard to them. I do not say that we are keeping abreast as regards equipment. Naturally, we cannot even attempt to do that, but they are doing their best to keep up to date in regard to modern developments in methods of warfare.

Deputy O'Higgins referred to the figures for the strengths over the past few years and he made the point that the strength had never exceeded 8,000. I have already given figures which show that, about 1953-54, the strength reached almost 10,000. Deputy O'Higgins's point was that, in view of the fact that the full peacetime establishment decided upon after the war has never been reached, it should now be reviewed and a different establishment worked out. The establishment is at the moment under review, both in the light of our experience with regard to recruiting and in the light of modern developments. I do not know when that review will be completed, but it is being attended to at the moment.

With regard to the casualty service for the treatment of wartime casualties, as Deputy O'Higgins says, there has been some difficulty about that and I hope that the problem will be solved in the very near future.

Deputy O'Higgins left the complaint to which he appeared to attach most importance until last. That was in reference to an answer I gave him to a question he put down with regard to the present strength of the Defence Forces. I regret that the Deputy should have felt outraged by the fact that, in that reply, the Irish titles of the different component parts of the Defence Forces were used. Deputy O'Higgins appeared to be very annoyed about that, but I want to assure him that there was no intention on the part of the officers of my Department who framed that reply to cause Deputy O'Higgins any inconvenience. They were not actuated by any sinister motives, either of denying Deputy O'Higgins the information he sought or of offering him a personal insult by using the Irish language. I am sorry he should have taken up the attitude he did.

The position is that only Irish titles are in use in the Department of Defence now. I would say that these titles were probably used from force of habit, or possibly, if the people concerned in the drafting of the reply did consider the matter, they may have come to the conclusion that, since Deputy O'Higgins was one of those who had the advantage of being educated under a native Government, it was reasonable to assume that he would be able to understand the titles used.

That could safely be assumed.

Deputy O'Higgins unfortunately chose to be insulted by the fact that the Irish titles were used.

That is not so.

He complained that he did not know what Na Buan Oglaigh meant and what An Cultaca Oifigeach agus An Cultaca Fear meant. He knows now, so he has gained even more knowledge. Not alone has his knowledge been increased as to the strength of the Defence Forces, but he also knows the titles for the component parts of the Defence Forces currently in use in the Department.

Deputy O'Higgins made the point that I broke the law and acted illegally in using these titles. I am aware that it was illegal at one time to use Irish names, but I am also aware that the Constitution enacted by the people 21 years ago established the Irish language as the official language of the State and, while I have great respect for the status of Deputy O'Higgins as a learned counsel, I refuse to believe that I have in any way broken the law by describing the permanent forces as Na Buan Óglaigh and the Reserve of Officers and Men as An Cultaca Oifigeach agus Fear. I do not intend to take account of the fact that Deputy O'Higgins tells us this is illegal. I see no objection to the continued use of these titles.

I could not attempt to justify the expenditure on the Department of Defence to any person who does not believe we should have an Army at all. Anybody who has that opinion is entitled to have it. It is a matter for himself. But unless a person believes in the desirability and necessity of having a defence force, I could not justify the expenditure involved in this Estimate.

There does not seem to be much point then in dealing with Deputy Kyne's criticism of the Estimate. He started off with a straightforward point of view that we should not have an Army here at all except for internal purposes. This whole Estimate is based on a defence force for the purpose of defending the State from possible external aggression. That being so, it is impossible to justify the expense to people like Deputy Kyne.

Deputy Kyne stated that he does not consider it worth while. His attitude could be expressed by the phrase that freedom is not worth the shedding of a single drop of blood. If that viewpoint had always obtained, we would not be here to-day. He says it is hopeless for us to attempt to defend ourselves against a great power. I am sure it looked equally hopeless to attempt to free ourselves from domination by a great power, but that has been done for this part of the country at any rate. While I respect Deputy Kyne's views, I should not like to see them gain any great support. The freedom of the country is worth defending and I am glad that the vast majority of the speakers on this Estimate accepted that view.

Deputy Booth was one of those who referred to the fact that in his opinion there was an excessive number of posts occupied by the Army. I have already dealt sufficiently with that. The saving, such as it would be, would be small and mainly at the expense of the maintenance staffs employed in the different barracks. In present circumstances that would be undesirable. In addition, Deputy Booth says—and there is something to be said for his view— that there are too many barracks occupied in Dublin city. The fact is that the accommodation in these barracks is by no means ideal, particularly with regard to dining room accommodation and cooking accommodation. The numbers housed in these barracks during the emergency period could hardly be accepted as a suitable standard during peacetime. It would not be desirable to overcrowd the different barracks, the putting into them considerably larger numbers of troops would accentuate the difficulties I have referred to in regard to accommodation.

Deputy Booth mentioned the question of the professional pay of legal officers and said that that had been overlooked at the time when increases were granted to the other professional officers. That, it is true, is not included in the actual Estimate. However, sanction has been obtained for the adjustment of that position but was received too late to be reflected in the Estimate.

Deputy Booth also referred to the soldiers' pay section of the Civil Service attached to the Department of Defence. He may be under a misapprehension as to the actual nature of the work done in that section. The soldiers' pay section keeps the accounts of the personnel of the entire Permanent Defence Forces as well as the accounts of the Reserve Defence Forces and civilian employees. That is a total of nearly 40,000 individual accounts. It is true that the actual cash disbursements to serving N.C.O's. and privates, to reservists in training and to civilian employees are made by military personnel but all the other payments are made directly by the soldiers' pay section. The position is not what Deputy Booth imagined it to be and there is a slight reduction in that section this year as against last year.

Deputy Casey was one of those who criticised An Fórsa Cosanta Aitiúil and An Slua Mhuirí. I realise he did not intend to criticise the personnel in any way but he was of the opinion that there could be some economies. He also appeared to be under a misapprehension. He apparently thought the figure of 20,000 I mentioned for the F.C.A. was the total strength of the F.C.A., not the effective strength. He based his remarks in regard to expenditure on the F.C.A. on the assumption that the majority of that 20,000 were not effective members. That is not the position at all. The fact is that the latest figures for the effective strength of the F.C.A. is 19,527 and for An Slua Mhuirí, 345. Those are the effective members, the members who are turning up regularly for training and fulfilling the obligations they undertook. That being so, I do not think anybody can say too much is being spent on the F.C.A. Certainly I have no intention of cutting down in any way on the F.C.A. I do not think there is any waste there.

There was also the non-effective strength. That is roughly half of the effective strength. It is not true to say that these people joined for the sake of two weeks' holidays during the summer period. In the first place, they do not go on holidays. They go for two weeks' training and they do very effective training during those two weeks. Unless a man has been active and has attended his parades during the year, he is not considered and cannot go on the two weeks' training. Nobody joins the F.C.A. just to get a cheap holiday. While I hope they all enjoy their two weeks' training, they also give very valuable service to the State during those two weeks.

There were some suggestions in regard to recruiting made by Deputy Moloney and others. I shall look into those. With regard to the question of helicopters which was raised by Deputy Coogan, Deputy Blowick and others, the military authorities are keeping themselves fully informed as to the uses to which helicopters can be put. The position is that they are not prepared to recommend the purchase of helicopters for military purposes at the moment. They have some military uses, all right, but there is a number of other things more important from the purely military aspect and which would have to receive prior consideration. We are not prepared to recommend their purchase at the moment and the uses suggested for them here are not purely military uses.

I think it was Deputy Blowick who wanted some idea as to the cost of a helicopter. The cost of a suitable helicopter is reckoned at £36,000 but, of course, that does not mean that the service that Deputy Blowick would wish to see rendered by this type of aircraft could be provided at a cost of £36,000. The range of these craft is extremely limited and one helicopter would be absolutely no use. It would be purely a matter of coincidence if it happened to be in the right spot at the right time. It is estimated that the very minimum that would be of any practical use would be three. These would have to be stationed at different points along the south and west coast and it would be necessary to set up suitable bases for them there which would also cost a considerable amount. It would also be necessary to train personnel to man them and such personnel would have to be sent abroad for that purpose. Consequently, the cost of the actual craft gives no indication as to the ultimate cost of setting up a service such as was requested here. There would be no point whatever, of course, in buying one of these craft and retaining it in Baldonnel. It would be of no use whatever in the event of an emergency arising on the west coast.

A number of useful suggestions, which I shall look into, were put forward; some of the things suggested have been already much in my mind. I am glad that Deputies generally were so helpful and that we had such interest displayed in the F.C.A. in particular. A great number of Deputies expressed appreciation of the importance of that constituent of the Defence Forces. I certainly agree with them and I shall do everything possible to encourage and expand the force in the country. I do not think there is anything else that requires comment from me at this stage and I would ask the House to accept the Estimate.

I wish to accuse the Minister of deliberately misrepresenting the figures for payments to private soldiers in comparison with the payments to civilian employees.

The Deputy will please resume his seat.

Will the Deputy please allow me to put the Vote?

I am sorry for interrupting you, a Cheann Comhairle.

Motion put and declared lost.
Vote put and agreed to.

Is there any possible way in which the Minister may be forced to give the accurate figures with regard to the payment of private soldiers?

He has given the actual figures.

The Minister did not.

The Deputy and the Minister may disagree. We are here because we disagree.

I know the Minister's statement will be published in the papers and the public will get a misleading figures.

It is correct.

The Minister will not get away with it.

Top
Share