Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 24 Mar 1960

Vol. 180 No. 8

Committee on Finance. - Vote 43—Universities and Colleges (Resumed).

Debate resumed on the following motion:
That a supplementary sum not exceeding £10 be granted to defray the charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of March, 1960, for Grants to Universities and Colleges, including certain Grants-in-Aid.— (Minister for Education.)

Deputies have had an opportunity of studying the Minister's speech in a calmer atmosphere and re-reading the relevant points in which each is interested. I should like to revert to this question of the time which the Minister states it will take to build University College, Dublin, at Belfield. The Minister said that he was advised, even if the work was in full swing, it would be extremely doubtful if it would be physically possible to spend £500,000 a year in Dublin on any single building project. I do not know who gave the Minister that advice but it is bad advice and it is wrong advice. Apart from being a reflection on the capacity of the building industry, and the ingenuity of the appropriate professional bodies ancillary to the building industry, it is extremely doubtful if this statement could be substantiated.

The Minister said that there must also be taken into account the no small matter of the requirements of the other colleges which the Commission had reported were also pressing. In all the circumstances, he said, he could not see how it would be physically possible to transfer the college entirely within, at the very least, 20 years. He was also informed that the expenditure concerned would have a 50 per cent. employment content for the building and ancillary trades of Dublin. I should like to point out to the Minister that whoever told him it was physically impossible to transfer the college in its entirety in a minimum period of 20 years was talking complete and utter nonsense. I calculate that if a Board were set up, once the Dáil passes this Estimate, to deal say with the appointment of assessors in order to hold an architectural competition, having invited architects to submit plans and having adopted the prize winning design, the successful architect would then have to prepare working drawings. Quantities would have to be prepared and consulting engineers brought in, and so on. I would allow 1½ years for that. Can any reasonable man say that in 18 months' time that having been done—it could be done in 12 months—the remainder would take, with the finance available, 20 years? I could understand, if the finance were not available, that we would have to stagger the project. That would be reasonable but with the finance available the actual building work should be finished in a further three years, or say four years.

Another aspect of the matter is this. If one looks at the employment figures at present in the Statistical Abstract one will see that there are very few skilled workers, if any, on the unemployment register in Dublin City. Does that suggest to the Minister's advisers that if the project were commenced the skilled trade would not be available? It is misleading to rely on these figures because we know—Deputy O'Donnell knows—that when building decreases these skilled tradesmen seek other employment.

There are many skilled tradesmen, plasterers, masons, carpenters and electricians in other parts of Ireland and some of them are also in England at present. Many of them have homes in Dublin and in Ireland, and they are waiting for such a project to start to come back. We have been told from all sides of the House and by successive Governments that the demand for houses for the working classes is decreasing, with the figures of a previous survey approaching reality and fruition. If that is so, is it not the duty of the Government of the day to produce, when they have the opportunity of doing so, an alternative means whereby our second largest industry after agriculture, the building industry, will absorb people who are losing employment in other branches of that industry? Here is the solution, at least for this part of the country, for that situation.

Another point is that the estimated cost of this Belfield project is £7,000,000. That is the estimated cost on the 1st February, 1960. What is this project going to cost on the 1st February, 1980? We are not foolish enough to think that building costs will come down; we are not foolish enough to think that wages are going to decrease. Is it not obvious—this is not the place to go into the reasons— that over the years to come, with the economic expansion of the country, and if conditions prosper, that wage-earners must get increased remuneration proportionate to the improvement of the standard of living as a whole? Therefore, if we voted an amount of £7,000,000 to-day, we know that in the coming years, if this programme is to be spread over a 20-year period, successive Ministers for Education will be coming into this House seeking very large sums in Supplementary Estimates and the project that will cost £7,000,000 to-day, if there is this delay in completing it and bringing it to fruition, could cost without the slightest shadow of doubt—and I shall be conservative—twice that amount.

I want to come to the position in Limerick. The Minister also said that a third pressing problem was that of the claims of some provincial centres for a University College. To that, he said, there was no facile answer one way or another. Only a thorough examination of facts and figures in the context of the national economy, resources and needs would bring to light whether there was a real problem in this respect and if so how best it might be solved. He proposed to set up a Commission to survey the field of higher education. As I said already, the terms of reference of the previous Commission were so narrow that they should have been given the task of investigating the field of higher education in addition to their terms of reference dealing with the needs of existing colleges. Are we to take it that apart from Limerick or Waterford or Wexford, Letterkenny or Drogheda that this commission will take another three-and-a-half years? Is this a means of fobbing us off in Limerick and in other interested places? Did the Minister not tell me in the House that three of his officials were permanently working, investigating the claims of Limerick for a considerable period over past months? Now we are told we will have a commission. Surely three intelligent officials of the Department of Education—and one does not get in there unless one has a high standard of education, I believe——

Except as a visitor.

I shall come to the question of visitors and the visitors who visited University College, Dublin, and presented a report to the Government which the Minister has not disclosed.

I meant the casual visitors like the Deputy.

I was not such a casual visitor because I spent four years in the University. That time could have been condensed to twelve months but the Minister appoints no commission to advise him on certain methods. The whole trouble in this country is that University education has not kept step with the times. It is archaic, antediluvian and Victorian. We will get no inspiration from the people in the Senate of the National University because they have not kept pace with the times either. We had some of them in this House and they did not even keep pace with progress here—which would not be very difficult.

It is a rather interesting observation that I made earlier that the four years I spent in college could have been condensed to one year. During the first year, on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays we had one hour's lecture. To say nothing about our unfortunate parents, think of the temptations open to boys with all that spare time which they had apart from kicking a rugby ball about. There was just one lecture for three days a week from 9 a.m. to 10 a.m. There was no lecture on Saturday and on the other two days we had two hours per day. You were supposed to go to the library but, apart from Galway, the National University is only a glorified technical school. I am not casting any aspersions on it because it is not to-day that this Vote should have been introduced but, perhaps, 15 years ago. It is too late now. It is a fantastic situation. They gave evidence before the commission that their position was critical: it is so critical that it will be 20 years before it is solved.

It was Disraeli who said that a University should be a place of light and of reason and of learning. Is U.C.D. a place of light, reason and learning? Is there that personal contact with the students which was Newman's conception of a University and which you have in Galway, fortunately? That too, I suppose, could disappear in time.

We did not have any outcry here when there was to be an airport for Cork although Shannon was there in Munster and Collinstown near Dublin. There is a University for Cork and that is not bad enough, but Dr. Lucey wants to run it himself; he wants Cork to run its own airport. They will soon declare a Republic in Cork and secede from the rest of the State.

Did they not declare a Republic in Cork long ago?

Republics were declared in many places but the Republic I am talking about was declared in absentia. The one Republic declared in this country was declared on the steps of the General Post Office.

Perhaps the Deputy would come to the Supplementary Estimate?

Cork got the airport but Limerick cannot get a University College because there are three others. There is an airport in Dublin and Deputy Dillon was looking for an airstrip around Monaghan. Galway secured improvements to the field at Oranmore. I have no objection to that——

I am afraid I have some objection to the Deputy bringing it into the debate on the Supplementary Estimate.

I can give facts and figures to substantiate the relevancy of what I say but I do not want to take up the few minutes left to me with quotations. It was Apollodorus who said—this is to show the relevancy of my remarks—on one remarkable and memorable occasion that if all the quotations in passages attributed to Chrysippus were to be taken away from his writings, there would be nothing left. It is the same in here. I do not want to follow the line of Chrysippus and make a speech with boring, long-winded statistics. Of course, I am relevant, Sir.

In regard to this suggestion that in Limerick there is not room for another college, the Department have got the facts and figures and let the Minister refute these figures without any Commission. Deputy Carew and Deputy Russell will speak after me and ask the same question. If these officials have completed their investigations, let us know what the answer is to be. If the information is bad, let it not be silenced. I should like to know one way or the other if there is any objection in principle.

We are told that Munster has U.C.C., Connacht has U.C.G. and Dublin has U.C.D. We have to go back only a couple of hundred years in our history to see how these colleges were founded originally. When £1,000,000 is being sought for a harbour, why do the Government not say: "We shall not give you £1,000,000 for a harbour in Cork because we have already spent £500,000 in Limerick"—as they have—"We shall not spend this £1,000,000 in Cork because Munster already has one in Limerick. We shall not give a grant of £150,000 to Killala because Galway are to get £4,000,000 for their harbour"? There is no tendency towards provincial centralisation.

The inconsistency down the years of the Department of Education appals me. What would Limerick want? Up to £2,000,000. Yet yesterday, very glibly, in a few minutes this House voted £3,000,000 for drainage of the Moy, but the giving of this £2,000,000 to stop the drain of a very large proportion of our young people from a very big area of this country has to depend on the considerations of a commission composed of "nuts", in the main. Nuts—that is right. Some "nuts" act on commissions. Like the balance of payments, you will not get equilibrium on a commission. Friends of various people like to go on these commissions and they are happy when they are put on them.

Take the Programme for Economic Expansion. Can anyone say that that is not tied up with and must not be tied up with university education? What is wanted in this country is an industrial, agricultural and intellectual revolution over five years. One would think that this Programme for Economic Expansion was the greatest thing that ever hit this country, with all the talk there is about it. I do not agree with that view at all. I certainly think it was a magnificent production; but it is not a gospel. It must be treated with elasticity. It is a foundation, if you like, for progress in the country.

However, we are not Noahs in this House and our people will not live forever. If our mentality is to be a twenty-year one, it is a poor outlook indeed. I say that as a Government Deputy with all sense of responsibility. What you want here is this industrial, agricultural and intellectual revolution. They all go hand in hand. Why should we be satisfied with a Minister for Finance coming in here and telling us that the programme set down for economic development has been exceeded by some two per cent. or three per cent.? Compare the increases in other countries in Europe. We certainly have not kept in step. That is why I want action now. I know the Minister for Education is hamstrung. From what I read in the Library, I would not say there is any lack of finance in the Department of Education. They are two million pounds behind in the schools building programme. That is a queer one for you. It is evidently not a question of finance at all.

We hear cants and clichés from time to time that what we want are factories and not education. That belief is neither realistic nor factual. In the main, such comments are made by people who have not given sufficient thought to the subject. Certainly we need industry, and I am glad that the Minister, in his reference here, deviated for a time to refer to the subject of vocational schools. Whether a university is built in Limerick or not, you will have school children leaving school without any trade naturally, and with no intention of going to a university. Possibly they have not the wish, finance or the capacity to go to a university, are deterred by the entrance conditions and so on.

There is no co-ordination in this country at present, whereby the headmasters of all the vocational schools could be brought together and told: "Here is our programme for Shannon Airport and other areas. We want 230 sheet metal workers and 80 precision workers, etc." They are spending £1,000,000 on the Bolton Street Technical School. Have we in fact any target? What are we aiming at? In vocational education, are we still to concentrate on the export market, and, as I said, let the taxpayer subsidise to the extent of £700 or £800 each of these students exported? We want to see that the target we are aiming is employment for them in their own country.

Last night, the Minister gave us figures which prove beyond yea or nay that 50 per cent. of the doctors and civil engineers who graduate emigrate for good and yet on the present figures it costs the taxpayers £500 for each graduate who qualifies.

The public has to be educated to appreciate the necessity of education. On one occasion Aristotle was asked how superior were educated men to uneducated men and his answer was: "As superior as the living are to the dead." There is no public relations branch in the Department of Education and, as Deputy Dillon said, these Commission Reports are too dry, though I do not know what he expected, or if he expected them to be in the style of "Lolita." Admittedly they are too dry and, as I say, I think it is necessary that the public be educated on the necessity for education.

In his closing remarks, I should like the Minister to say how much of this sum caters for the requirements of Cork and Galway. Recently he received a deputation from the Governing Body of Galway University; funds are very necessary there if they are to continue their present building operations. Is it the position that Dublin is to get all this money and that Cork and Galway are to be cut down? I think they want only £600,000 in Galway, and not a lot more in Cork, and I think the projects there should go hand in hand with the Dublin one.

I thoroughly approve of the building programme for University College, Dublin, at Belfield, as any reasonable man must, but I want to point out it is estimated to cost £7,000,000; yet there is no provision in that for a Faculty of Agriculture. At present the position in regard to university education for agriculture is that students spend their first two years in Cork or Galway, but in their third and final years they must come to Dublin. Surely then, this is a golden opportunity to do something for the avowed principle of decentralisation which was held by successive Governments? The only decentralisation I saw was in the case of Bord na gCon coming to Limerick. That was the only example I saw for a long time and nobody could say that was a big departure, but we have had the appalling decision of one man, who talks decentralisation to all the young farmers' clubs, that the headquarters of Comhlucht Siúicre Éireann will be at Stephen's Green, in Dublin. I would like to hear Lieutenant-General Costello on that sometime.

Not on this Estimate.

An agricultural institution with ties in Mallow, Thurles, and Tuam coming up to Dublin—and he got away with it. I suppose we will be told it is an autonomous body and that the Minister had no function in the matter. Maybe he had not but I should like the Managing Director of the company to be at least consistent, and not attack successive Governments for not decentralising other things. He should see the mote in his own eye and keep his mouth shut in future. I do not mind whether or not that is printed.

The matter does not arise on this Supplementary Estimate.

With great respect, Sir, it arises in so far as the question of decentralisation is concerned. I am dealing with the Faculty of Agriculture and Comhlucht Siúicre Éireann is the second largest employer of its graduates. However, I have made my point.

It has a very tenuous connection.

As I said, there is no provision in that £7,000,000 for a Faculty of Agriculture.

I do not want any Commission to decide whether or not Limerick is to get a university. I want the Minister and the Government—for want of stronger language—to give a "yes" or a "no", and give over this Commission business. I say Limerick deserves a University; it is a self-evident fact —not because I live there, or depend on a certain amount of support. I do not know if some of the people on the committee dealing with that would support anyone, but that is neither here nor there. They are doing a job to the best of their ability and they have put up an unanswerable case. Let the Minister and the Government say: "You will get a University in Limerick" or: "You will not." Let them say that and if we are not to get it, then we want to know why. We might avail of various Trusts, O.E.E.C. Grants, or American Counterpart Funds, and speaking of those, we would make more use of them than was done in the past. I certainly would not be prepared to wait three or four years to be told "yes" or "no". That is unreasonable.

In today's Independent a man wrote very intelligently in a letter that, if you cannot put four gallons of milk into a three-gallon can, you want another tankard. I am not too sure about that, maybe my quotation is a bit strained, but it had something to do with milk anyway.

You could skim it off and put in the cream.

The Deputy has a University in Cork, so he is all right anyway.

Notice taken that 20 Members were not present; House counted and 20 Members being present,

I was right. He said here that if the farmer has sufficient to fill four tankards and possesses only three he will not strive to cram it all into the three.

Before I go on to this question of the evidence given before the Commission with regard to the faculty of Agriculture in U.C.D. I want the Minister to make a particular note of the question of the Charter as it stands at present. Remember that when the Irish Universities Act of 1908 was passed in the British Commons the outlook of the leaders of Catholic thought in this country was "This is not everything we want but we shall be satisfied." This is 1960. What are the changes, if any, proposed in this Act? Non-Catholics are otherwise catered for, and we are dealing here specifically with a Catholic University, the National University of Ireland. As the Charter exists it would not be possible, it would be completely fatuous, for my colleagues or me to be discussing a University in Limerick.

Is it the Minister's attitude that if this Board which he proposes to set up and which can take from three to five years to tell us something we know now, recommends a fourth constituent College, then the Charter can be changed? I do not know if it is as easy as that. Now is the time to take action because we had experience in Limerick of that Charter quite recently and what it means to us, in these extra mural courses. I was never quite certain what that meant. Deputy Russell would be more conversant with the matter than I am, for he was ably helped to prepare this report. It says that there was another reason why support from the National University was not forthcoming for a University in Limerick, namely, the fact that in order to provide for a constituent College in Limerick the Charter of the University would need to be amended. In its present form the Charter provides only for three constituent Colleges— University College, Dublin, University College, Cork, and University College, Galway.

What about Maynooth?

They occupy a unique position, naturally, and the Deputy's intention to head in that direction on one occasion does him credit. In the past Dr. O'Rahilly came to Limerick. He was then President of U.C.C. He is now writing in Hibernia attacking the claims of Limerick. When he was President of U.C.C. he came to Limerick and tried to institute a Higher Diploma in Education course. I think there were 60 applicants in response to a public advertisement sponsored evidently by U.C.C., and overnight there was a notice in the paper that that course would not take place. I do not know if it had something to do with this Charter.

The Limerick Committee's Report said:

In association with one of the University Colleges (for several reasons Cork was the obvious choice), to provide first and if possible second year courses in Arts, Commerce and Science, representatives of the Committee have had several meetings and exchanged correspondence with the President of U.C.C. regarding the establishment of first and, if possible, second year courses in certain faculties in Limerick. Arts, Commerce and Science appear to be the most practicable. The Committee were impressed by Dr. Atkins' personal desire to do all in his power to extend facilities for University courses to young people living in the Limerick area. Notwithstanding the President's good will, however, it would appear from recent information available to the Committee, that the University Charter precludes the holding of such courses outside the confines of the Constituent Colleges.

Will the Deputy give the reference?

This is a Report of a Committee, published by the Limerick Leader. Apart from Limerick, if Deputy Thaddeus Lynch wants courses in Waterford or if they want them in Dundalk or Drogheda and put up a reasonable case to the Minister, as for instance that a Leaving Certificate student might do the first year equivalent to the PreMed. at least in Physics and Chemistry or get credit for the first University examination, or supposing some of these cities put up a case for a first and second year course in any part of Ireland, they cannot succeed because they are debarred under the present Charter which the Minister does not propose to change. The 1908 Act is remaining, the same Act in regard to which the leaders of Catholic opinion when it went through the House of Commons said: “This is a great progressive step but not all we want, though it is something.”

What did they not get that they wanted? There has been no change in the Act except a slight amendment in 1935. Deputy Moher has made reference to Social Science courses. They get these parchments. The President of U.C.C. came up to Limerick and gave them a diploma in Social Science that has no standing anywhere. A few who got that diploma have gone "nuts." They have gone peculiar and everyone knows that. They definitely have advanced Socialist tendencies. They want innocently enough to infiltrate into every political Party.

Including Fianna Fáil.

They will not infiltrate into the extreme Socialist Party where they would be at home. The President of U.C.C. and the President of U.C.D. conferred the same diplomas on young men.

And women.

And women. "Man" is a collective noun in certain instances. I give that as an example. The diploma has no standing here or abroad.

I have pointed out that there is no provision in this £7,000,000 for the faculty of Agriculture in Belfield or anywhere else in Dublin. You have the Albert College, and U.C.C. and U.C.G. but for their third and fourth years they have to come up to Dublin. Everything heads towards Dublin. I heard the Minister himself on a platform on which I spoke with him preach the gospel of decentralisation. The Minister has a very good opportunity of putting those expressions or wishes into concrete form.

I am asking him now to set up the faculty of Agriculture in Limerick. I am not doing that because it is the home of the dairying industry or because it is contiguous to the Golden Vale. There is a golden opportunity for the Minister now. These people have made no provision for the faculty of Agriculture. Three conferences of the Commission were concerned with the position of the faculty of Agriculture and with conditions in the Albert College, Glasnevin. Here is what the Report says:

"University College Dublin is the only college of the universities which had the full agricultural faculty. In University College Cork and University College Galway, only the first and second years of the course are taught. The third and fourth years of the degree course for all colleges (the professional part of the course) are followed exclusively in University College Dublin, in the former Albert College Glasnevin.

"The number of agricultural students has been growing and the college has now ceased to conduct the residential course thus making the whole of the Albert College available for the faculty courses.

What about the sons of small farmers? When the Albert College was a residential college, they could live in there for an all-in fee. Now they have to come to Dublin and pay £3-10-0 a week for "digs." We are told by some professors in University College Dublin that the number of students from Limerick in Dublin is not very impressive. Of course it is not impressive. How could they afford to come up here? What is the use of talking about sending the sons of small farmers or of any farmers to Dublin for the study of agriculture? It is not because Lieutenant-General Costello set up the headquarters of Comhlucht Siúicre Éireann in St. Stephen's Green that everyone else should follow his example. The Minister has a golden opportunity.

The President of University College, Dublin was here yesterday. He told the Commission that the college representatives could say that for the academic teaching of agriculture they were reasonably well off, but in order to bring the College up to date a further expenditure of £20,000 would be necessary to provide additional facilities for plant pathology, for laboratory research in soil science, etc. and this figure might have to be increased somewhat, if, as now appeared likely, certain repair and renovation work had to be carried out.

The College's greatest problems in relation to the Albert College, the President said, were farm buildings and farm lands. There is an area of 350 acres in all at the Albert College property, of which about 300 acres are effective farming land. The farm is in two sections; some land had to be given to the Dublin Corporation for the initial extension of Collins Avenue and it may be that this Avenue will be carried right through the farm. Many difficulties have arisen from the fact that the farm is surrounded by built-up areas.

There are eight miles of perimeter and ten miles of internal fencing. There is constant trouble with this fencing and the lands are subject to trespass by adults, children and dogs. It was instanced that some years ago seven years' research on potatoes had been ruined overnight when an experimental plot of potatoes had been uprooted. The field where it was hoped to plant spring wheat was crossed by an unauthorised Mass path. These difficulties, the President said, raised the question whether the College should continue to conduct the faculty of Agriculture at the Albert college.

The President of University College Dublin, Dr. Tierney, asked that question. He asked "The thing is whether University College Dublin should continue to conduct the faculty of Agriculture at the Albert College?" The Minister now has an opportunity to have his name go down in history. I am not casting any aspersions on his abilities. He has plenty of ability if he does not allow himself to be overruled by some of these officials who are also very able men. If the late Mr. Seán Moylan were Minister for Education now, the faculty of Agriculture would be started in Limerick and Mr. Moylan was a very capable man. The Minister himself is not lacking in intelligence.

They cannot carry on in Albert College. They represent to the Commission that the Science and Research faculties in the third and fourth year cannot be provided for in the main College buildings but must be located on the farm. A farm, it was represented, is an essential adjunct for a faculty of Agriculture and, unless an adequate farm can be provided with the rest of the College, the teaching facilities for the third and fourth years of the courses cannot be provided in the main College buildings but must be located on the farm. The deputation continued that while the separation of the teaching and laboratory accommodation for the third and fourth years of the course from the rest of the College might involve some sacrifice, it was essential that such accommodation should be provided on the faculty farm, if only for the convenience and saving of time made possible when the theoretical class can be brought within five minutes to where the principles taught in the classroom can be illustrated in practice.

It was stated also that the properties which the College have at Stillorgan Road would not be sufficient to provide a faculty farm so that on top of the £7,000,000 which the Government are seeking now they will have to come back here for a further substantial sum.

Professor Ruane told the Commission that a factor which would determine the size of farm necessary would be the desirability of having within the College farm a number of different size farm units—one of 50 acres, one of 100 acres and one of 150 acres where the principles of efficient farming of holdings of these sizes could be illustrated. The College, in his opinion, should have a farm of about 300 acres for teaching in research purposes, and, as well, a farm of 200 acres operated as an efficient business unit where the principles of efficient farm management could be observed in practice.

That is what they have not got. That is what we have down South. The President of University College Dublin said that a decision to acquire a new farm would have to be taken within ten years. Professor Ruane is in agreement with his President and said he thought that it would be preferable to face the problem before the position would become untenable. The teaching of students could not be satisfactory if the position of the College farm is to become progressively more difficult.

Here is a Commission set up by the Government and those are the observations brought to the attention of the Government and the Minister. Our fundamental industry, agriculture, has not been mentioned at all in this Estimate. Is that not fantastic? Yet we mouth all those clichés that agriculture is the backbone of our whole economic life.

Winding up the discussion, they said:

The teaching and laboratory accommodation of the agricultural faculty in the former Albert College is, as has been stated, in part domestic accommodation which has been converted. This accommodation is not capable of being rendered permanently suitable for its present purposes. Low-ceilinged dormitories are not suitable for laboratories.

I was always under the impression that the Agricultural Institute, which was set up with the American grant, would have a faculty of Agriculture. That is not so. Our premier industry is agriculture and it is being taught in low ceilinged dormitories to the men who are supposed to teach the farmers how to increase output and become more efficient. The Commission say:

Low ceilinged dormitories are not suitable for laboratories, and long narrow rooms are quite unsuitable for lecture halls. An important research project—potentially of great value to agriculture—which we were shown was housed, for lack of a better place, in an out-office.

These are the facts.

We are told that the Minister is going to set up a Commission. We have not heard what the terms of reference of the Commission will be. We have been told that he proposes to set up a Commission to survey the field of higher education. What does that mean? Can anyone tell me? If I were Minister for Agriculture—a contingency which will never arise—I would not go home for the Easter holidays but would stay in Dublin and come to a decision about the faculty of Agriculture. For God's sake and Ireland's sake, apart from Limerick's sake, get this faculty out of Dublin. The golden opportunity is there now. Is the Minister going to provide them with £100,000 or £200,000 as a rescue operation—to use the phrase he used in his introductory speech? Surely he should catch the bull by the horns and tackle the problem now.

The Minister spoke for one and a quarter hours yesterday on the subject of education. It is a terrible reflection on us that he made no reference of any consequence to the faculty of Agriculture. I will be reasonable. Supposing Limerick did not exist—a consummation devoutly to be wished by many people, possibly—supposing there was no mention of Limerick, could the Minister not channel the funds into U.C.C. or U.C.G. for the provision of increased agricultural facilities so that the students in the third and fourth year, instead of travelling to Dublin, could stay at one of those universities? Is there any reason why they cannot finish the third and fourth years there?

The only solution that I see is not necessarily to set up such a Commission. This question of agriculture cannot be dealt with by the Commission the Minister is setting up on higher education, which will take three to five years to report back, and the Minister could be Minister for another Department by that time, or in some other position. Seriously speaking, it is necessary that the problem should be tackled within a reasonable time while the Minister is in the Department. It would be very unwise to include the question of a faculty of Agriculture in the terms of reference of the Commission on higher education.

I would have no objection if the Minister were to invite certain people to advise him and the Government as to (a) what steps are necessary for the improvement of agricultural education; (b) how the existing agricultural colleges could be approved, by an amendment of the existing charter of the National University of Ireland, so that certain years could be credited to them and (c) where a faculty of Agriculture for the whole of Ireland should be located.

If Albert College want another 400 to 500 acres of land, there is no suggestion as to where that land could be obtained. Is the Minister suggesting that the land in the vicinity of Albert College would be suitable for the purpose of pilot farms of 100 to 200 acres? There is not a great deal of training needed if one wants to become a rancher. One needs to be reared to the cattle trade from the age of 10 years. The Minister would not seriously suggest that Albert College should be given permission to buy 500 acres around here? The land would not be suitable for tillage, for research or for giving practical experience of the dairying industry.

This position is heartbreaking. I shall do all in my limited capacity to see that some quick decision is taken in regard to agriculture. I shall do all I can to secure that some decision will be made in regard to the representations which have been before the Department for quite a while, to see whether we can get a decision from the Government in principle. In a few minutes yesterday the Minister for the Gaeltacht, Deputy Michael Moran, was given £3 million by this House for the drainage of the Moy, and I made the telling point that £2 million would stop the drain of young people from that part of the country.

This Fianna Fáil Government are the first Government to do anything constructive in relation to the critical position at Earlsfort Terrace; be that to their credit and be it to their credit that they have accepted the findings of the majority report in regard to locating the site at Belfield. It is a pity they did not also bear in mind the observations in the report I have here. This question of a University in Limerick is not of recent origin. During the Mayoralty of the former Alderman Michael Hartney I recall a meeting being called to which the late Most Reverend Dr. Patrick O'Neill, Bishop of Limerick, gave his unstinted support, and the following is reported:

(a) For many years past there has been a persistent and a growing demand for the provision of University facilities for the sons and daughters of parents living in the populus area of which Limerick City (the third city in the State) is the natural centre. This demand has found various expression over the years, notably in the setting up of a representative committee some 14 years ago, under the Chairmanship of the late Most Reverend Dr. Patrick O'Neill, Bishop of Limerick, and in the attention the subject has received from parents, teachers, schools, commercial, cultural and other bodies.

(b) It has been contended—quite rightly in the opinion of this committee, that the vast majority of parents cannot afford to send their children to Dublin, Cork or Galway, and in consequence, University education in this area has been confined to the children of the well-to-do and those young people who have been successful in securing the small number of scholarships offered annually by the local Councils and the State. In the case of the latter, of course, the parents are still obliged to find a substantial yearly sum to augment the value of the scholarships.

The raising of Limerick to the status of a University City would be of great benefit to its commercial life. I would ask the Minister to note the figures submitted to him by these committees and the upward tendency in regard to secondary education. In 1936-37 in Limerick City alone there were 1,248 secondary school students. It should also be noted that Limerick County, Clare, North Tipperary and North Kerry have all passed resolutions in this regard. There is no parochialism in these areas because they regard Limerick as a natural location for this constituent college, realising that it will be of benefit to them. In 1936-37 there were 4,624 secondary school children in this area of North Munster and in 1958-59 that number grew to 11,000. Comparing Cork, Limerick and Galway from the point of view of size and population we find that in 1957-58 there were 3,700 secondary school children in Cork, 2,200 in Limerick and 1,100 in Galway.

I pointed out some time ago that other bodies besides Limerick sought extra-mural courses. I specifically mentioned the higher diploma in Education. Would the Minister tell me what is the background to this peculiar state of affairs? I read from this report which I have already quoted:

(c) With the co-operation of U.C.C. to provide courses in Limerick for the Higher Diploma in Education. This matter was first raised at an early meeting of the Committee when it was unanimously agreed that the establishment of such a course in Limerick would be a valuable step forward. At present, this course is confined to the University Centres with consequent great inconvenience to teachers, resident in and near Limerick. In fact, the Committee are aware of certain teachers who have been teaching in this area for years and have never had the opportunity of securing the H. Dip. in Education.

With the co-operation of Dr. Atkins and the helpful and encouraging support of his Lordship Most Reverend Dr. Murphy, considerable progress was made in arranging for a start to be made on this course in October, 1959. A senior lecturer was engaged after much difficulty; assistant lecturers were to be recruited locally and accommodation was readily available. Following these steps, a notice appeared in the Press announcing that the authorities of U.C.C. were considering the provision of a H. Dip. in Educ. course in Limerick and inviting intending candidates to notify the Registrar of the college. Hardly had this notice appeared when a circular letter was sent to each candidate who had applied to take the course in Limerick stating that ‘owing to various problems which had arisen it would not be possible to provide such a course in 1959-60.'

This turn of events came as a great disappointment to the committee and, needless to say, to the intending participants in the proposed Limerick course. The committee understand that almost 60 candidates applied to take the course in Limerick. Of these, about half had the necessary qualifications required by the University authorities.

The Minister has a problem of the greatest magnitude on his hands. It will not be easy to arrive at a solution but the longer he thinks of the problems that confront him the deeper he will get into the mire. The longer he stays in the Department of Education the more departmentally-minded he will become. Now is a time for him, in the full flush of youth and inexperience, to take action. Inexperience is a tremendous thing sometimes because one can, as an outsider, consider the pros and cons without being committed to any fixed point of view. This does not require the advice of any Departmental officials as such; it requires common-sense. As I said at the outset, if the Minister would agree to my statement that the economic expansion plan envisaged too long a period and if he agrees that what is needed in Ireland now is an industrial, an agricultural and an intellectual revolution all over a period of five years, then he must act quickly in these matters.

As things are, there are proposals in the Department of Education which are evidently to be discussed by Commissions and future Commissions of the Department. The school-going children of today will not alone not have the facilities we are advocating but their children will be very lucky if University education has been improved by their time up to the standard we want, not alone in the Department of Education but in Ireland generally. The whole trouble is this delay— there is not a sufficient spirit of being up and doing.

It is very little use for the Taoiseach to make speeches about increased productivity or for the Minister for Agriculture or the Minister for Education himself to follow on similar lines if they do not do their part. Surely it is accepted that if the farmer is to give increased productivity and output, the maxim should be that he should have the best advice available in the State? After all, if a patient is sick the best physician or surgeon should be called and his advice taken. Does the Minister seriously suggest that his neglect and the neglect of his Department to create a Faculty of Agriculture can continue in view of the position of this country where agriculture is supposed to be the mainstay? Is he being realistic? It will be a bad day's work if some quick decision on this matter is not taken. Naturally, I am biassed in favour of having this University located in Limerick. I do not know where else it could be located——

That is some bias.

——if one goes to the trouble of looking into the background. I am sorry for stressing this point so often but I must appeal to the Minister to be more specific before this debate concludes. Nowhere do I see in his statement that this question of the Faculty of Agriculture is discussed. He said last night that an inter-Departmental Committee had been set up by the Government to advise on the establishment of a post-graduate course for science graduates and that in that connection it was estimated the cost would be £250,000 of which the College authorities would contribute £100,000.

Will somebody not move to report progress?

This is a brilliant flash of silence.

I cannot find the reference now.

In five minutes the Deputy will have all the opportunity he wants.

Perhaps I had better sit down? The Minister said that as a result of the recommendations of this inter-Departmental Committee it was proposed to expend £250,000 of which the University itself would contribute £100,000. When replying, would the Minister let us know why this quarter of a million pounds is to be spent in the already overcrowded Dublin area? In the Commission's report we see that the present residential facilities in Dublin are not nearly adequate and yet it is proposed, with this post-graduate science course, to create a worse problem.

I sincerely trust that the Minister will give his attention to these problems. If, by any stretch of imagination, the Minister fails to locate this Faculty of Agriculture in Limerick—I do not believe in view of the arguments put to him by me and which will be followed in a more capable manner, no doubt, by Deputy Russell and the Mayor of Limerick, Deputy Carew—he will be doing a great disservice to agricultural Ireland. If the Faculty of Agriculture was not set up in Limerick, the heart of the dairying industry——

It should be set up in Cork, then.

A voice crying in the wilderness. I think the quotations and extracts which I have given the Minister and the House from the report of the Commission in the past hour are sufficient to prove that the faculty of Agriculture must be established outside Dublin. The Minister will have a lot of explaining to do if he wants to say that he came into this House looking for £7,000,000 and never mentioned where the faculty is to be located. Was it an omission on his part? I submit that the suggestions I have put before him would solve one of the problems in regard to the faculty of Agriculture but I think he should also give further consideration to what his advisers told him—that the building of Belfield would take 20 years—a proposition that is fantastic and ridiculous. The whole project could be started and finished within five years.

Progress reported; Committee to sit again.
Top
Share