Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 10 Jun 1964

Vol. 210 No. 7

Committee on Finance. - Land Bond Bill, 1964—Second Stage.

I move that the Bill be now read a Second Time.

Deputies may recall that in my opening speech on the Second Reading of the Land Bill, 1963, I drew special attention to section 26, which provided authority for the creation of additional land bonds to a total of £5 million, and I mentioned that it was imperative that some such provision should be enacted if the land reform programme was not to be brought to an abrupt halt through lack of funds. Existing supplies of bonds are now expected to run out in the Autumn.

As the Taoiseach has already stated in the House, it will not be possible to deal with the whole Land Bill in this session and so it has been decided to segregate the Land Bond provision and make a special one-section Bill of it.

Since that decision was taken, however, I have given further consideration to the steady rise in the price of land and also to the very lively tempo of the Land Commission's current work in the field of land acquisition and I have come to the conclusion that £5 million is not an adequate increase in the financial supply. Accordingly I now propose to provide for an increase of £10 million over all. This should keep the Land Commission supplied for a reasonably long period during which I expect to see them make a very big impact on the remaining congestion in the country.

Save for this change in the money limit and some textual adjustments this Bill follows precisely section 26 of the Land Bill which, of course, will be deleted when we reach it.

Land bonds finance on a substantial scale is vital to our land reform programme. I trust, therefore, that the House will agree to the immediate passage of this Bill so that the Land Commission's planned acquisition target for the immediate future can be achieved and the completion of pending voluntary purchase dealings finalised.

We agreed earlier this morning that in the discussion on the main Estimate we would discuss the terms of this Bill and I have already referred to it. It meets with no objection from this side of the House. It is only a two-section Bill which is desirable, if the Land Commission is to function. I agree that the Bill is necessary.

We also agree to this Bill. The Minister was wise to revise the original Estimate of £5 million which would not be sufficient to meet the requirements so that he would have to come back here and look for more money in a year or 18 months. We give the fullest support to the Bill.

I thank the House for the manner in which they have accepted the Bill and for the way in which they appreciated the necessity for the speedy passage of the Second Stage. As I have said, we would not have had sufficient money to carry on until the autumn, unless we had passed the Land Bill or put this Bill through the House. These bonds are now becoming more acceptable to purchasers than they used to be because of the value of the new bonds coming on the market. They play a big part in the working of the Land Commission. In facilitating the speedy passage of the Bill, Deputies will be ensuring that the machinery of the Land Commission will continue to work at full blast and that transactions at present pending will be finalised.

Question put and agreed to.
Agreed to take remaining stages today.
Top
Share