Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 15 Jun 1965

Vol. 216 No. 6

Committee on Finance. - Vote 41—Transport and Power (Resumed).

Debate resumed on the following motion:
That a sum not exceeding £5,006,400 be granted to complete the sum necessary to defray the charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending 31st March, 1966, for the Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the Minister for Transport and Power, including certain Services administered by that Office, and for payment of sundry Grants-in-Aid.—(Minister for Transport and Power.)

The Dáil adjourned last week shortly after I commenced to reply to the points raised by Deputies in the course of the debate. A great number of Deputies asked question of interest in relation to the operations of various State companies under my Department. I want to answer as many of the questions as I can.

Deputy Moore raised the question of the Ringsend power station using native fuel. All the fuel resources that can economically be used in the form of peat are being developed and it would be wholly uneconomic to bring peat to Ringsend. The whole purpose of Bord na Móna and ESB production is that the fuel should be as close as possible to the power station.

Deputy Moore also raised the question of whether the ESB should pay rates. That is a very complex matter and it is doubtful if anybody would gain any advantage, particularly in view of the difficulties in relation to the present valuations of property of various kinds. I do not think there would be any advantage in examining this matter at the present time.

With regard to the rest of the questions relating to the ESB, I think I can deal with these to better advantage in the course of the Bill which will come before the House, with the exception of some which do not properly relate to the Bill itself.

Deputy Barrett stressed the importance of making use of the knowledge possessed already by some of our own electrical engineers in regard to nuclear energy. Under the scheme for the nuclear energy committee, one of the objectives will consist in assessing all such information in order to ensure that we make full use of all the talent available in the country; in other words, we hope to draw together all the experts in the universities and elsewhere for the purpose of assessing the value of nuclear energy to the future development of the country.

Deputy Ryan raised the question of statistics in relation to the growth of tourism and made some comparisons with other countries. Erroneous impressions about the rate of growth of our tourist income have arisen as a result of some OECD figures which indicated a lower rate of growth for Ireland as compared with other European countries. These figures were in respect of the period 1961-1962 and are, therefore, out of date. Moreover they related only to a particular sector of tourist traffic. They were not comprehensive.

The House knows, I think, that since 1960, when the Second Programme for Economic Expansion was inaugurated, our total income from tourism and travel rose from £44.2 million to £67.8 million, an increase of 53 per cent. When account is taken of the change in money values since 1960 our tourist income in constant values has increased by 31 per cent. Comparable figures for European countries are not actually available, but I doubt if there are many which could surpass this performance. There may be one or two. If we can maintain this rate of growth over the balance of the decade, we will achieve the target set in the Second Programme, namely, the doubling of our tourist income in constant values between 1960 and 1970.

Deputy Lindsay, Deputy James Tully and Deputy O'Hara raised the question of hotel prices. It is very difficult to make comparisons between hotel prices in this country and those in other countries. Judging by the comparisons that can be made from a study of hotel guides and also from a study of the standard of living and the rates of wages payable in other countries, the picture is a somewhat mixed one compared with here. There are some instances in which excessive prices are being charged and others in which charges are very moderate indeed.

Bord Fáilte have given warning to all hotels and guesthouses not to charge excessive prices and Bord Fáilte offer help to hotels and guesthouses to enable them to improve their productivity from the point of view of arranging their facilities in such fashion as to avoid excessive labour costs. In some parts of the country labour is not readily available. It is scarce. We have now a hotel training scheme under which people are being trained and, when trained, they will, I hope, receive adequate and fair wages and, at the same time, enable hotel proprietors to operate their establishments as economically as possible. It is always wise to sound a warning to hotel proprietors who charge excessively that they will succeed only in killing the goose that lays the golden egg.

Might I remind the Minister he is not answering the points raised by the Deputies? They were talking about prices charged in CIE hotels. The Minister is talking about hotels in general. I have the debate here in my hand.

I have gone over all the observations made and the Deputy must allow me to reply in any way I choose. Moreover, I can add statements if I wish to. As far as the major hotels in this country are concerned, as compared with a great number of other countries——

I was commenting on all hotels.

So far as the major hotels in this country are concerned, I do not see that the prices charged in A class hotels are excessive when compared with a great number of other countries. The figure varies from place to place and from area to area. When Bord Fáilte receive complaints about overcharging they are investigated and when they receive complaints about bad service they are likewise investigated.

Deputies were inquiring about bedroom accommodation in general. I wish to make it clear that grants are offered now which should be a source of attraction to B class hotel proprietors. We are now giving grants for improvement of guesthouses. One Deputy asked whether Bord Fáilte assist people who take over very big country houses. If the proprietor of such a house is able to provide up to ten bedrooms to satisfy the standards set by Bord Fáilte he can get a grant of 20 per cent. Interest-free loans are also available for these large house owners.

Interest-free loans.

Yes, interest-free loans.

A person could spend a lot of money on nine bedrooms and be struck off.

You must strike a balance somewhere. It is a question of whether one might reduce the figure to five. That is being looked into by Bord Fáilte. At the moment, the figure is set at ten bedrooms.

I know a hotel proprietor who spent up to £2,000 on a nine-bedroom house and he was struck off.

The Deputy knows that Government grants must be in accordance with Government regulations. If you give it for nine bedrooms, then you would have to give it for eight.

This is simply and solely a question of registration.

He should stick on another bedroom.

Deputies raised the question of the amount allocated by Bord Fáilte for promotion work in Great Britain and in other parts of the world. Bord Fáilte, naturally, provide very considerable grants for promotion work in Great Britain but they are extending promotion work in America. They do promotional work in America in conjunction with the air companies and the Shannon Free Airport Development Company. The British people are our nearest neighbours and it is essential that Bord Fáilte would engage on a considerable promotional programme, bearing in mind the British tourist potential. At the same time, they know the vast potential which exists in America for tourists coming here. One Deputy compared the total amount made available to the British Travel Holiday Association for tourism with that made available to Bord Fáilte and then compared the figures for tourists who travel to Great Britain with those who come here. He was evidently not aware of the fact that the British Travel Holiday Association have no funds for accommodation facilities and they do not give resort development grants. Therefore, the amount spent by the British association cannot be compared with the total amount spent by Bord Fáilte under all heads.

One or two Deputies referred, in a rather vague way, to the regional companies. The regional companies next year will have their boards elected on a democratic basis. Anybody who is interested in tourism can join any one of these companies. The local authorities will be represented on them. I believe these companies have a very important part to play in the future tourist development of the country. I hope the people who are elected to the boards of these companies are people who are prepared to work and do in effect what amounts to voluntary commercial work. There is a great deal of work to be done and the regional companies will have a very big agenda in front of them.

They should be able to take all complaints made by Deputies in the course of this debate. They will be able to concentrate their activities on the tourist potential of their own particular areas. Obviously, an effort should be made to ensure that there will be absolutely no overlapping by Bord Fáilte which could very easily be the case in view of the fact that Bord Fáilte have been in almost sole charge of tourism for many years. Bord Fáilte will be represented in every case on the boards of the regional companies. It will, therefore, be up to both to cover the general promotion of tourism in all its aspects in each particular region and see that no region is omitted.

During the past three years, I have personally inspected every single piece of publicity emanating from Bord Fáilte. I consider they give a reasonably balanced view in regard to the emphasis placed on the various regions. Certainly, this is the case in the matter of the main general holiday brochures published by them. They cover every area and tourists are afforded the opportunity of having some essential information about the different regions.

There are also a great many local guides. Some were published by the Irish Tourist Association and are still available. I consider every area has been reasonably well covered in regard to the publicity material issued by Bord Fáilte. The regional companies will examine this whole question and I am quite sure they will emphasise the special tourist features in their own areas. Deputy T. Lynch raised the question of advertising the Waterford Film Festival.

There is no Waterford Film Festival.

I should have said the Light Opera Festival. Deputy Lynch knows this has been most successful from the point of view of bringing tourists to Waterford. During the next few weeks there will be a promotional campaign for the Light Opera Festival there. I am sure the Deputy will find this satisfactory. The leaflet to which he referred was simply an illustration of the various attractions available. There was not any deliberate intention of omitting the Waterford Light Opera Festival from it. As I said, there will be special publicity for the festival and I do not think Deputy T. Lynch will find any complaints in regard to it.

If the Minister only treated me like this in other respects, I would commend him. This took about three years battering.

Deputies Lindsay, O'Donnell and T. Lynch raised various matters in connection with the promotional activities of Bord Fáilte in Great Britain. Deputy Lindsay asked whether Bord Fáilte were present at the ASTA Convention. This is a convention of travel associations at which bodies like Bord Fáilte are enabled to do promotional work and at which they can advertise their wares, so to speak. I understand that Bord Fáilte have been very highly commended for the way they presented the image of this country at a recent ASTA convention. There, they meet the people who sell travel, who provide package tours and who arrange reservations for people coming to this country. Indeed, I should make it clear that Bord Fáilte have immensely expanded the work of bringing travel writers, travel agents and even counter clerks to this country. They ensure that articles on Irish fishing facilities appear in the angling journals. They have one whole-time organiser and six part-time organisers in England alone for bringing anglers to this country. They have campaigns that have developed from five of the principal British towns and cities. There are four Bord Fáilte officers in Great Britain with a staff of eight. They make tens of thousands of contacts during the year. Bord Fáilte actually did a little market research in ascertaining what percentage of the contacts they made from their offices resulted in travel and it was found that it was reasonably satisfactory.

Deputies James Tully and O'Hara referred again to hotel accommodation and suggested that in the previous period only A class hotels seemed to benefit from the Bord Fáilte grant. In fact, in hotels of this class, some 1,500 beds were made available through the grants. As I have already indicated, the scope of the grants has been increased in order to encourage the growth of hotel accommodation with moderate prices. This question is being very closely watched because in most parts of the country the A class accommodation is reasonably satisfactory and what is required is more of the moderate priced accommodation.

As Deputies no doubt know, Bord Fáilte have also extended and prepared a list of unregistered accommodation amounting to some 5,000 to 6,000 beds and that work is continuing this year. It takes a good deal of time for the inspectors to get around but each year the numbers are added to. In addition to that, work has now begun for about two years on inspecting farmhouses in order to encourage the owners of farms to provide accommodation for guests. I have stressed to Bord Fáilte the very urgent necessity of encouraging the development of this class of accommodation.

The Deputy referred to the Bord Fáilte London offices. Bord Fáilte will have new offices in Bond Street not long from now. They will be found very satisfactory and will be in a strategic position from the standpoint of making contacts with people who desire information on travel to Ireland.

Deputy Molloy asked for particulars of the position in regard to the resort development scheme at Salthill. As Deputy Molloy knows, the South Park scheme, Salthill Park, has been completed. The promenade extension has been completed. Then there are schemes for a car park, groynes and shore works of various kinds and for improvements to the golf club. Other works are in hand and will be proceeded with as soon as possible. Deputy Molloy and other Deputies from Galway and the county must know that the works will have to be carried out through the finances available each year from the promotional fund.

Deputy O'Hara raised various questions in relation to the tourist potential in Enniscrone. He asked whether the angling facilities in his constituency are fully publicised. The answer is that there is a complete angling guide to the whole country with the names of the secretaries in charge of the various angling development associations. There are fairly well-developed angling associations in every county. I do not think he need fear that the angling potential of his area has been neglected. But, of course, one of the essential features of all the promotional work for angling is that there should be a live local development association. Indeed these local development associations have done very splendid work and set a headline for the whole country by their activities during the past five years.

Deputy Clinton raised a very interesting question about the connection between regional companies, the tourist companies and the Department of Local Government and asked what liaison exists. As Deputies know, there are some areas where resort development grants are available, where they have been classified by Bord Fáilte as areas suitable for this particular kind of assistance and there are other areas where the amenity grants provided by the Department of Local Government and available to associations as well as to local authorities, or a combination thereof, cover a great many of the improvements needed for the benefit of tourists. Bord Fáilte do co-operate with the Department of Local Government. They have been co-operating in relation to the Planning Acts. I think it can be said that there is adequate liaison between the regional companies, the Department of Local Government and Bord Fáilte. At least, I have had no complaints that there is any kind of failure to co-ordinate when this is required.

Deputy Clinton also spoke of the Tidy Towns Competition. I agree that this is of very great importance. I do not know why I missed it from my Estimate speech. I suppose I could not say everything. I suppose I could not deal with every aspect, although I tried to cover the entire ground. I agree with the Deputy that the Tidy Towns Competition is of immense importance to the future of the country not only from the point of view of tourism but also from the point of view of our own enjoyment of our towns and villages.

Deputy Clinton also asked about the canal lock at Lucan. I did not quite understand what the problem was, but if he will write to me, I shall let him know the position.

Deputy Lindsay spoke in a general way about the future development of Shannon. A number of Deputies referred to this, including Deputy T. O'Donnell, who asked me to make some statement about the importance of Shannon. I am very glad to do it. I regard Shannon Airport as the natural centre for tourism in the west. I hope that it has a very great future. The number of terminal passengers there has been increasing and, as I say, it is the obvious centre for tourism in the west. As I indicated in my Estimate speech, I hope that all the regional companies in the area will realise the importance of the part they can play in maintaining Shannon and in securing even greater growth in traffic to and from the airport.

Deputy Lindsay also referred to the fact that airports in this country lose money when depreciation and interest on capital are included. I have dealt with that matter before. The practice of the allocation of costs to an airport varies throughout the world. In America, for example, air traffic control is regarded by the owners of an airport as a national charge, as merely an extension of police facilities. Equally, in some countries the meteorological information supplied to airports is regarded as part of the general meterological service and no special amount is debited to an airport account by reason of the fact that there is a concentration of meteorological information there. We choose to put on the airport operation account the whole of the air traffic control expenses and all the meteorological expenses applicable and, as a result, our airports are in deficit. That is all I can say. It is simply a matter of how one wishes to look at it.

Deputy Lindsay also referred to the general accountancy position of the company. I dealt with that fully in my Estimate speech, and made it clear that the air company had to develop traffic routes without being able to earn a surplus on the profitable routes which would provide the capital for expanding traffic in other directions. As a result, I do not see any hope of their remunerating the capital provided for earlier development. In respect of future capital, with the exception of a sum of £2 million of State capital for part of the cost of the four BAC One-Eleven aircraft, they are being asked to remunerate capital and I hope that will continue to be the position.

Deputy Lindsay and Deputy P. O'Donnell made reference to the position occasioned by the American authorities in relation to the amount that tourists can bring back in the way of duty-free goods purchased at the airports and to other suggested ways of improving the American dollar balance of trade. All I can say is we have made representations to the American authorities pointing out the fact that any changes of the kind indicated would be damaging to this country. We have done our best in regard to that.

Deputy Lindsay asked a question on why the number of landings continued to decrease at Shannon Airport. The answer is aircraft are getting bigger. More aircraft are overflying. That can be illustrated by the fact that in 1960 at Shannon Airport there were 8,380 landings. In 1964 it fell to 4.874 landings. In the meantime, the number of overflights had doubled but, as Deputy Lindsay knows, there was a decline in the total traffic passing through Shannon, at least for the time being, but in 1963 and in 1964 there was an actual increase in total traffic.

Deputy Casey made some references to Cork Airport, and seemed to imply that I had responsibility for delaying the decision to construct the airport. That is not true at all. Cork Airport was built as a result of a Fianna Fáil decision and I had nothing to do with the delay which was occasioned at the earlier period but we need not go back on that at this stage.

Deputy Lindsay referred to the public address system being defective, in connection with an airport. If he writes to me, I shall make inquiries. Deputy Lemass suggested that the air companies had not purchased enough planes. Aerlinte has ordered another Boeing to be delivered next year. The present fleet of transatlantic aircraft offers 30 per cent more capacity this year than last year. They are exchanging Freindships for Viscounts during the course of this year. This will also increase capacity and I think they are doing everything possible to meet the demands made on them. Of course, there is a great peak at the height of the summer and it is very difficult to meet it, in the sense that it is difficult to provide passengers with seats on planes at exactly the hour satisfactory to them. I think it will be found they are doing a good job in regard to that also.

In reply to Deputy Lemass, a transatlantic service to Canada is contemplated in the very near future. Deputy T. O'Donnell, I was glad to hear, is helping the Shannonside Regional Development Company in its development work and referred to the need for more moderate priced accommodation. I hope people will extend their premises as a result of the new grants. As the Deputy knows, total investment in hotel and guesthouses since 1958, including the private capital invested, is of the order of £8 million to £10 million, which shows that many people in this country have faith in the tourist business. I hope there will be more accommodation in the area. He also referred to shore fishing and sea angling in the Shannonside area. I suppose he was referring to the very fine shore angling facilities along the coast of Clare and to the sea angling in the various ports. The answer is there must be accommodation, that there must be boats available and that there must be an active local development association, so that sea angling will prosper. It has prospered in many other areas. In certain areas there is either a lack of boats or a lack of interest on the part of the local development association in bringing tourists to the area. Bord Fáilte are doing their best to organise that and the Inland Fisheries Trust are organising on the technical side, and we hope to see sea angling grow in the future.

The question of the purchase of KLM aircraft by Aer Lingus was raised by a Deputy who said that the purchase might not be a good proposition because the aircraft might not be in good condition. The answer is KLM aircraft have always been splendidly maintained and Aer Lingus with their great reputation for safety in the air would hardly buy aircraft secondhand unless they were sure these aircraft were in good condition. Subject to the usual checks and maintanance, they would ensure that these aircraft were suitable for their purpose.

Deputy Molloy raised a question with regard to our Meteorological Service and suggested that an additional meterological station might be established at Galway. This may well be the case in the future although I cannot say on what date the decision would be made. The Deputy will be interested to know that the rainfall, whatever there is of it, is about equal at Claremorris where there is a meteorological station, and Galway. I can assure the Deputy that the Meteorological Service, allowing for scientific difficulties of no mean order, is reasonably accurate in its predictions. I would say that it is about 80 per cent correct and at certain times of the year its accuracy is even greater. Every effort is made to make use of the most modern scientific devices for this purpose and I do not think the Deputy need have fear that as a result of the absence of a meteorological station at Galway, the rainfall predictions are incorrect.

It was done badly over the bank holiday weekend anyway.

The Deputy knows there may be rainfall in one area and sunshine in another area and the Meteorological Service still says—there will be scattered showers.

It said—"particularly the east coast". We never had such a weekend.

People in the area of the scattered showers may not appreciate the prediction and they may object that there are, in fact, showers.

Deputy Lindsay asked for information about the four Bord na Móna small stations in the west. Some of these get the full quota of turf; others do not. This is a mixed picture. The turf station in Donegal is the most successful in that regard. In others, in spite of our giving grants for road development in the areas, it has been found difficult to provide sufficient turf to enable certain stations to operate at full strength.

Deputy Lindsay asked for information on the quantity of milled peat delivered as a percentage of requirements. The figures are: 1962-63, 86 per cent; 1963-64, 65 per cent; 1964-65, 75 per cent. As I indicated in my Estimate speech, Bord na Móna are now extending their bog area so the amount of peat to be milled per acre will be less. In other words, they will carry over a larger area. It is hoped that they will be able to achieve their targets in spite of the bad weather conditions which prevailed in recent years. I might add in that connection that when Bord na Móna were starting out on their turf programme in the Midlands, in Bellacorick, they took advantage of all the meteorological information available to them, but the question of surface humidity was something which no one could predict in advance. I am hoping they will be in a position now to extend the area to be milled each year with the result that they will be able to achieve their targets. Deputy Lindsay also asked what the areas of milled peat were. The answer is: 1962-63, 23,800 acres, and for the current year, 37,200 acres.

Deputy Treacy asked whether we are supplying sufficient briquettes to satisfy the public demand. Consumption habits with regard to fuel are changing, and it would be unwise to take an over-optimistic view of the demand for Bord na Móna briquettes. There will be a fourth briquette factory. Sales were higher than anticipated and exports are being maintained. The production of briquettes was slowed down to a certain degree through the factories having inevitable teething troubles which I hope will not be repetitive. In reply to Deputy Treacy, I think the agents were supplied on a quota basis. I have not had complaints that agents were unfairly treated in having supplies made available to them which proved to be insufficient.

Deputy Lyons referred to the price of turf and pointed out the increases that have taken place. The increases in the price of Bord na Móna turf have been reasonably moderate since 1957. That turf has to compete with coal in regard to sale for domestic use. The price must bear some relationship to the price of coal, having allowed for the different calorific value of that form of turf as against loose turf.

Deputy Lindsay made some observations of a general kind on Irish Shipping. As I indicated in my Estimate speech, now that the character of the Irish Shipping fleet is altering to include vessels with larger tonnage, I hope the financial position will likewise improve. It is believed by a number of people that freight rates will remain reasonably satisfactory compared with what they were in 1960, and in 1962 when freight rates fell very low. Now that we have several 14,000 tons and 15,000 ton cargo vessels— and a 30,000 ton vessel—I hope Irish Shipping will have a brighter future.

If one examines the position of the cargo companies in Great Britain, for example, where they obey mercantile law, have properly manned boats and pay trade union wages, one finds that their financial history has been very much like that of Irish Shipping during the past five years, save that some of them have invested their previous reserves in other industries and equities. Some have sold their old boats and not bought new ones. Some have been able to make connection with the large importing companies. When a shipping company is linked financially with an importing company, it is very difficult to know exactly what the profits of the shipping part of the operation are because it is all part of the consortium. In spite of the precautions they took, a great many of them were unable to pay anything remarkable by way of dividends, and a number were unable to earn their depreciation, so there is nothing exceptional in the position of Irish Shipping, except that they have been given orders by successive Governments to build up their strength regardless, to some extent, of financial considerations until their total strength is such that it can be used in the event of an emergency for the purpose of importing essential supplies. That is the position. As I indicated in my Estimate speech, most of the loss in the past year was the result of the operations of the two tankers. Nearly all the rest of the fleet managed to pay their way and depreciation. The two tankers are of a size which is totally uneconomic and as a result the loss upon them is extremely heavy.

Deputy Moore asked about repairs to Irish Shipping vessels. They are repaired whenever possible in this country, but repairs may be necessary wherever they are stationed for the time being. On a number of occasions Irish Shipping vessels were repaired at Rushbrooke, and on two occasions they were repaired in Dublin. Irish Shipping are fully aware of the necessity for repairing their ships here whenever possible, but it sometimes depends on the facilities available. There are certain types of repairs for which it is best to go to a particular location because of the nature of the work to be done.

Deputy O'Hara referred to harbour development. Perhaps he is not aware of the harbour grants that have been made available to harbours in the West. The grants were: Sligo, £15,000, Ballina, £17,000, Westport, £46,000, and Galway, a total of £360,000. I might add that it is rather difficult to judge the level of harbour grants to the harbours concerned. Perhaps the best way is to compare the capital grant to the harbour with the tonnage of the ships entering and leaving the harbour in the year closest to that in which the grant is given. On that basis it cannot be said that the Government have been stingy in grants made available to western harbours per ton of shipping arrivals. The grant in the case of Galway is £7.6.3; in the case of Limerick which is a bigger harbour, it is £1.11.6; in the case of Westport it is £15; for Sligo it is £3.6.4; for Ballina it is £3.12.1; and for Wicklow it is £5.14.10. When we compare those grants with Dublin where the grant is 5/10d, and Cork where the grant is of the same order——

It is hardly a fair comparision.

I do not know of any other comparison. If you give a great deal of money to a harbour which has relatively little shipping and even if you allow for a doubling of the shipping as a result of the grant and it does not materialise, you are at least showing an interest in the small western harbours.

Agreed, but it is hardly fair to compare it with a thriving harbour like Dublin.

I do not know why. The figure for Dublin is only 5/10d.

It is the biggest port in the country. It is booming.

Deputy Ryan raised the question of the levies by private stevedoring companies at Dublin port. I understand these rather penal levies have now been remedied but it is a fact that goods are left for a greater average length of time at Dublin Port and a working group has been established to examine everything that can be done to expendite the handling of goods in the major harbours.

This group have reported to me and we are studying the question in order to see what is required to be done to remedy the situation. Deputy Ryan can be assured that there are considerable delays in respect of certain classifications of goods at Dublin port and to my mind, the Dublin Port and Docks Board are entitled so to adjust their prices as to get goods more speedily out of the harbour to the premises of the purchasers.

Deputy James Tully asked a question in regard to Drogheda harbour. We gave a 50 per cent grant, subject to a maximum of £175,000 as the Deputy knows. Certain works have been carried out but the main part, the dredging of the bar and channel, is in abeyance, pending the building and investigation of a hydraulic model. I understand the model is under construction and the investigation will take about a year. Another report was received from the engineers but the recommendations were too costly to put into effect and were not acceptable to the Office of Public Works. On account of certain technical aspects, the consulting engineer to Drogheda harbour did not agree to this report. I am sorry there has to be a delay but the construction of these models is a difficult and technical business and delays take place in every harbour in the world once a model has to be built. I hope a solution will be found to this serious problem of siltation.

The siltation problem is easy enough. Has the whole trouble not started since the purchase of the new dredger?

I do not think so.

Most of the siltation has been built up during the past six or seven years because the dredger is only sucking sand. How much has the preparatory exploration for the scheme cost to date?

I cannot give the figure.

The Minister could not give it or has not it available?

I might have it available. If the Deputy will write to me, I shall give him the details. I can assure him that the delay in the carrying out of the works originally devised for Drogheda is not due to anybody's fault. It is a fundamental question arising from the examination of a model.

I am glad the Minister is prepared to accept that. Nobody in Drogheda is.

I am advised that in fact the Drogheda Harbour Commissioners bought the dredger themselves. We had nothing to do with it. They did not require our consent.

I am not suggesting the Minister had anything to do with it. It happened before his time.

The dredger is good for its purpose—not for dredging the harbour but it could be leased out when we did not require it for work in the harbour.

It could not do the work in the harbour.

I had a number of questions from Deputies Ryan, Treacy and Davern about the anthracite industry and I replied to the subject matter of these questions at Question Time earlier today. I was very glad then to be able to announce an agreement between the United Kingdom authorities which will result in a restriction of exports which, in turn, will offer temporary relief to the mines concerned here. In view of the change in fuel consumption habits, it would be unwise for mine owners to increase their production here without collaborating and examining the whole position of consumption in the country because, as I have already indicated twice, imports decreased in 1964 by nine per cent and production increased by ten per cent.

There are many problems associated with the industry, including one of grading, and the Buy Irish Committee, which did a great deal of good work, made certain proposals to the anthracite mine owners in December. The mine owners were to examine these proposals but I myself heard no more about the matter until 6th May last when we managed to get in contact with the British authorities with reasonable rapidity. I hope this restraint in imports will result in the short-term problem being resolved. However, there is the long-term problem of the future of the industry which has to be examined.

A number of Deputies, including Deputy James Tully, made reference to CIE wages and superannuation schemes and objected to the situation in regard to social welfare benefits. Allegations that CIE employees are dependent for pension incomes on CIE pensions only and not from both CIE and social welfare sources would be unrealistic. CIE employees are insured under the Social Welfare Acts and are entitled to benefits under those Acts. I adverted to the fact that when a commission reported last year on this question they considered that a revised CIE pension scheme should be instituted but provided for a weekly contribution which, when added to the weekly social insurance contribution, would amount to a substantial percentage of the members' weekly wages. The recommendation was that, likewise, the aggregate of the CIE pensions and the statutory social welfare benefits would remain unchanged in relation to the basic wage at retirement.

Deputies implied that the social welfare benefits were taken into account to cut down the CIE pensions. CIE pensioners are entitled to pensions under the scheme to which they have contributed and there is no question of the amount of these pensions being reduced because of receipt of social welfare benefits to which the workers have contributed statutorily. In fact, the CIE pensions have been increased on an ex gratia basis and as far as I know the Minister for Social Welfare regards the social welfare benefits as basic benefits available to certain classes of workers and the additional CIE pensions as benefits to which the CIE employees have contributed.

Would the Minister like to see this letter I got today where a pensioner gets £1 a week?

The commission took into account the social welfare benefits in proposing their scheme and I understand the basis of that is a matter for agreement between the unions concerned and CIE.

The Minister is the only man who would be likely to use that argument.

Would the Minister answer my question on this subject?

I did answer it. The Deputy was asking about pre-April 1963 pensions.

The position is that the revised pensions of these people, together with social welfare benefits, would bring the single man to £3 a week minimum and £4-13-9 maximum. In the case of the married man the minimum and maximum figures will be £5-7-6 a week and £6-3-9 a week. That is the position of the pre-1963 CIE pensions.

What about the people before that?

They are all included in that. I have included all those in this statement. Nobody is getting less than the amount I have indicated and nobody is getting more than what I have indicated.

There are more than 1,000 of the old servants of CIE who have only a pittance.

I have already replied to the Deputy. No single man is now getting, between social welfare benefit and the pension, less than £3-10-0 or more than £4-13-9.

How much is the social welfare?

I have not got the figures.

It is £2-7-6.

As I said, the total amount must be considered in this relation. Twice CIE have made ex gratia payments to the large number of workers who are only on the smaller rate of pension. That shows that we made an improvement in the position and then, of course, the contributory pension is increasing in January.

They only got a rate of about 1s. 9d.

If they live that long.

The Minister is abandoning these fine old people.

That is not true. The old people are not being abandoned in comparison with what existed before 1960 when there was no contributory old age pension whatever and when the maximum they could receive by way of old age pension was 24/- or 30/-. The means test then was severe and their CIE pension had to be reduced as of a certain date in order that they could qualify for the old age pension. Although, I agree, we always want to look forward to an improvement in social services, since then they have been able to take part in a contributory old age pension scheme. They did not earn the stamps for it; they were included in the group of people who could partake in the contributory old age pension scheme. No means test was applied to the CIE portion of the pension and their incomes, however modest, have very much increased beyond the figure of 1960.

Would the Minister agree that CIE have unloaded their responsibility on to the Department of Social Welfare?

I would not agree at all. They made ex gratia payments, for which no contributions had been paid, in order to increase these pensions. As I said, we always hope to increase social services and we are doing so constantly, but I do not think there is any need to exaggerate when one considers what these men are getting now compared with 1960 when, I agree, the pension was undesirably low. That was because we had no contributory old age pension scheme at the time.

Because these men did not get a fair break from CIE.

I think I have dealt with practically every question asked— certainly every question of importance.

I asked the Minister a question in regard to the position which we now have of CIE locking out the men and these men taking stiff action. Is it not time that the Minister stepped in?

I understand the Taoiseach dealt with this matter at Question Time.

I am asking the Minister for Transport and Power who has some responsibility in the matter.

The Minister for Industry and Commerce and I are, naturally, engaged in constant discussions on how in general we can improve industrial relations, particularly having regard to the position of State companies and essential services. The Deputy will appreciate that I could hardly do anything that would mitigate the effect of the strike if I started to make pronouncements of the kind he wants me to make in the midst of this unfortunate position.

I am not asking the Minister to make a pronouncement. I am asking the Minister to take some action and to ask the men to meet the chiefs of CIE. It will have to be done some day and the people all over the country should not be put on their feet.

The Taoiseach has already replied and made his position quite clear.

Vote put and declared carried.

Is the Deputy challenging a division?

No, but I am dissenting.

Progress reported; Committee to sit again.
Top
Share