Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 21 Jul 1965

Vol. 217 No. 11

Committee on Finance - Vote 42—Posts and Telegraphs.

I move:

That a sum not exceeding £11,942,000 be granted to complete the sum necessary to defray the charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of March, 1966, for the Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the Minister for Posts and Telegraphs, and of certain other Services administered by that Office, and for payment of a Grant in Aid.

I find myself in something of a difficulty in presenting this motion because, as Deputies know, my predecessor in office, Deputy Hilliard, submitted this Estimate to the House on 10th March last, and the Vote was agreed to after debate on that day. Deputies will find the record in the published Report, volume 214, number 11, columns 1617 to 1702. It is only because of the dissolution of the Dáil in the meantime that the Estimate has to be re-submitted. Deputy M. E. Dockrell will be moving the reference back and, accordingly, I assume that there are some aspects of the Department's policy which he wishes to have discussed afresh. While I am anxious to be as accommodating as possible in meeting the desires of Deputies, I assume that they will not wish me to repeat the explanations previously given of the variations between the details of this year's Estimate and last year's, or the general statement on the Department's programme given so recently by my predecessor.

In the very short time since my appointment as Minister for Posts and Telegraphs I have been occupied in making myself more fully acquainted with the problems of the various services conducted by the Department and it is my intention to pursue actively the programme already placed before the House, with a view to giving satisfaction to the public, who are the Department's customers, and to securing that the maximum efficiency and economy be effected in the operation of the services so as to keep costs at as low a level as possible.

There is just one change since the Estimate was previously before the House, to which it is right to draw attention, namely, a revision of our forecast of the amount of telephone capital money likely to be required in the current year. As Deputies are probably aware, the accounting practice is that telephone capital works are paid for initially out of Vote moneys and recoupment is made from telephone capital funds. It had been expected, when the Estimate was being prepared, that £7¼ million would be spent this year, but, on reconsideration of the position when the Capital Budget was being put in final form, we found that the best estimate that could then be made was £7 million—the figure that appears in Table 3 of the Capital Budget, 1965, page 9. In effect, we now expect to underspend the provision under Subhead F, Engineering Stores and Equipment, by £250,000 and, in consequence, to receive £250,000 less in recoveries in respect of Telephone Capital Expenditure under Subhead T.1, Appropriations in Aid. The net totals of the Estimate and of the Vote moved by my predecessor and now moved again by me are not affected. I should like to make clear that this change does not indicate any reduction in the amount of work we intend to do this year but, rather, a later estimate of the amount of payments we are likely to have to meet within this financial year.

With the exception of this change, which was merely one of forecasting expenditure, such developments of Post Office activities as have taken place in the short interval since the Estimate was previously before the House have been in accordance with the long-term plans then described and hardly require to be mentioned in detail. However, as I have already indicated, I am at the disposal of Deputies and if there are any matters on which they wish for further information I shall be happy to do my best to provide it when replying to the debate.

With regard to broadcasting and television, fresh legislation is being prepared and will be brought before the House later in the year. In view of this fact, when the period of office of members of the Authority who had been appointed to serve from 1st June, 1960, expired on 31st May, 1965, the Government decided that the appointments then to be made should be for a term of one year only, pending the enactment of the new legislation. Some changes were made in the membership of the Authority and I take this opportunity of thanking in particular those members who were not re-appointed for their valuable contribution during the early formative years of the service.

As in the case of the Post Office services proper, I shall do my best, when replying to the debate, to deal with any fresh questions which Deputies may wish to raise in respect of major matters concerning the Broadcasting and Television Authority's development, and matters in which, as Minister, I have a statutory function.

I move:

That the Vote be referred back for reconsideration.

I have heard the Minister's explanation and I can assure him that we do not expect him to have anything very new to say at this juncture. He has been in office for only a very short period. However, his predecessor on 10th March last referred to the outstanding numbers of people who were waiting for telephones and it is in relation to telephones and the telephone service that we move to refer back this vote.

Telephones are a vital part of the machinery of the business community and of the country generally. It is because of that that we have taken a rather serious view of the Vote on this occasion. We want to pinpoint and drive home to the new Minister and to the Department that the country generally is not getting from the Post Office the service it should get where telephones are concerned. We are experiencing a big commercial drive and we want to ensure that this new drive is adequately backed by the Department of Posts and Telegraphs from the point of view of telephone connections and the telephone service generally.

What I have to say will, I think, strengthen the Minister's hand ultimately in his dealings with Finance from the point of view of getting a really adequate sum for capital expenditure on telephones generally. On March 10th last the Minister's predecessor gave a number of figures, in cluding a figure of 1,173 people waiting for telephones for over six months. One could see that fairly energetic steps were being taken to deal with the situation, but, nevertheless, not quite energetic enough.

A couple of weeks ago a number of Deputies visited Shannon. They saw certain new industries, some just opened and some on the point of opening. I was interested in one entirely new industry employing Irish girls and some young men. This firm deals in computers. As far as I could gather, the stuff is fed into computers in England and then sent to Shannon to be processed. This is material with regard to wages and complicated matters like that. When this firm is in full production, I understand the United States will be one of the suppliers. Some of the big companies, it is expected, will send stuff and this will go back to America and the final figures will then go back to England also. The point I am making is that an industry like that is entirely dependent on speed of communications and the accuracy of our telephone and telegraph services. An inefficient telephone system can have very bad effects on a country.

There are too many people in the queue for telephones. Telephones are not being installed fast enough. I know the Department have a technical problem of training engineers and so on but that must be faced in a really big way so that the backlog can be dealt with. There is a number of complaints about delays in getting answers and about trunk calls. I constantly get complaints about delays and about difficulty in dialling the various services: people do not get a response quickly enough. I have personal experience of inaccuracies and of telephones that either give an engaged tone or appear to ring so that it seems that nobody is bothering to answer. Quite frequently one finds that no call was received at the other end. That is very frustrating and I appeal to the Minister to ensure that this type of technical fault is cut down to a minimum. It has a very unfortunate effect on business when a firm is blamed for not answering a telephone which, in fact, did not ring.

I was interested in some comparative figures for the number of telephones in relation to the populations of different countries in 1964. Ireland has 67.8 telephones per 1,000 of the population. The United Kingdom has 174.1 and Sweden which has one of the highest in the world has 422.5. What is of interest is that we have one of the lowest rates per 1,000 in Europe. I am sure that the Minister will wish to see that position altered as rapidly as possible. Without unduly labouring the matter, we need more telephones and we need a very close watch kept to see that the technical standards in regard to the telephone service are of the highest order. I also appeal to the Minister to do here what is done in other countries—make a considerable reduction in telephone charges on Sundays and/or make a considerable reduction after 6 o'clock in the evenings. In the long run that would help the telephone service. If people are encouraged to instal telephones they will not use them exclusively in the cheap periods. I should be glad to hear from the Minister on that subject.

Turning to the radio and television side of the Department, these services continue to instruct and entertain us. Both in television and radio those concerned do a very good job considering the limited amount of money available. Compared with what big countries can spend on broadcasting, we are really doing it on a shoestring. Taking that into consideration we put on very good shows. I should first like to speak of the Radio Éireann Orchestra which is under the baton of Mr. Tibor Paul. It delights us with a very fine variety of classical programmes. The Sunday night concerts are always completely booked out in the Gaiety Theatre. That is a very good thing and it shows the support a classical orchestra can get in Dublin. I should also like to refer to Mr. Eimear Ó Broin, a very able and gifted young man, who does a tremendous amount of work behind the scenes on that orchestra. I congratulate all concerned, the musicians and the Department generally, on never lowering either the standard of the performance or the choice of programmes. One can lower somewhat the standard of a big orchestra by not attempting the most ambitious pieces but the Radio Éireann Orchestra has been built up to rank as one of the first-class European orchestras.

That goes for the light music section also. The Light Orchestra is very good and I congratulate it also, because it is no easier to play much of the light music than it is to play what is called very classical music. Light music is not necessarily any easier or any simpler to play. I would say that we have orchestras which, when the Kennedy Hall is opened, will be worthy to play in a hall dedicated to the memory of that very great man.

I will not deal with television programmes in any great detail but I should like to see as much use as possible made of our local talent, both in regard to music and in regard to plays, our actors and actresses. We are very fortunate in this country in being one of the places in the entire English speaking world which probably produces more first-rate artistes per thousand of the population than anywhere else. Our figures may be a bit low with regard to telephones per thousand but I would say that they are pretty high on first-class actors and actresses. I am glad to see that television gives these people the chance of earning a living in their own country and I should like to see more and more home produced plays and as little as possible of imported films.

That is not to say that some of the imported films are necessarily objectionable but these canned features are not good. One thing which I find especially ridiculous is the canned applause. A joke which might raise a smile but no more on the face of an average Irish person seems to rock these simple souls in the audience who were present when the film was being made—but, of course, in fact the applause is added afterwards and very often it gives a very unreal effect.

With regard to plays on television and other features, I would like to say that advertising time must be watched. In other words, you can break up a programme, whether it be a play or a film, too much by putting in too many intervals for advertising. I know that advertising revenue is of importance but one has to watch that the entertainment and interest of the viewers is not sacrificed to the revenue from advertising. After all, each owner of a set is paying £4 a year now and he or she is entitled to the maximum amount of clear viewing without having to watch too many advertisements. I noticed that in other countries advertising time is very closely watched by the parliaments concerned and by groups of people and I would suggest that the Minister should advise the Television Authority to keep a very watchful eye to see that these times are not exceeded. Radio Éireann does good work in its own way also. It, of course, has not now the popular appeal that television has but it is very good in its own way. There are many first class artistes of various sorts working for Radio Éireann and giving us very good entertainment on a very limited budget.

I turn now to postal facilities, the question of letters, parcels and so on. In the city we have, of course, more deliveries than in the country areas but we still have a very small number — I think there are only two — of deliveries per day. I would ask the Minister and his Department always to bear in mind that the post is very much the handmaiden of industry; it is not just a question of facilitating private individuals communicating with each other, just as it is not, on the telephone side, a case of the housewife or the private individual who wants to ring up a friend, although there is nothing wrong with that, and it is a very important part of both the postal deliveries and of the telephone service. These two sections have an enormous impact on business. Postal charges, as we know, have gone up a great deal and one of the difficulties about the price of letters is that it has cut into a type of business, namely circularising, of which a lot of businesses did a great deal in the past. Now it has become increasingly difficult, because of the expense, to use circulars as much as industry would like.

I have been looking back on the telegraph and postal and telephone services over the last number of years and apparently the telephone services have always seemed to pay, the post used pay but does not pay now, and the telegraph services apparently always lose and still continue to lose. It would be interesting to hear if the Minister has any comment which would throw fresh light on that situation in the Department.

I do not wish to hold up the House unduly. The services are improving but the telephone service has not improved from the point of view of the backlog of individuals awaiting telephones. When I say "individuals," I include businesses. It is much more serious for them to have to wait. I would urge on the Minister the urgency of dealing with this backlog and the great importance of ensuring that the standard of service is kept as high as possible because, of course, everybody who dials a number and does not get through instantly gets very annoyed. I tried to ring a Garda station a couple of nights ago and it took me five minutes to get through.

It was not 999. Only once in my life have I had occasion to do that and I got through quickly. The call I am speaking about was not a matter of any great urgency but it took me about five minutes to get through. It was not a case of the number being engaged. When I had finished dialling, it seemed to slip and went back to the general dialling tone. These are the things of importance, from a technical viewpoint, which should bother the Minister. The public get very annoyed and frustrated when that happens. I do not know whether it is a general complaint all over the country but it certainly is in Dublin exchanges which, I am told, are overloaded. I urge on the Minister to push forward his programme of capital investment in the telephone service with all speed. It is of tremendous importance to keep our standard as high as possible.

First, let me say how glad I am to see Deputy Joseph Brennan here as Minister for Posts and Telegraphs. I would wish him a long reign but I do not think that would be very satisfactory for me. Before the general election, I dealt at length with this Department and do not intend to detain the House very long on this occasion. However, I wish to ask the Minister a number of questions. If he is unable to reply to them when concluding, I hope he will do so later by letter.

First of all, I should like to deal with the matter of mail deliveries. The service is being taken on more and more by motorised postmen in place of personnel who formerly did it on foot or on bikes. I understand arrangements have been made for consultation with the union before new motorised posts are set up. When that happens, I understand that two posts are to be amalgamated into one motorised post. In this connection I should like to know exactly what is meant by consultation. Is it consultation with the representatives of the 70 head office districts at local branch level? When a motorised post is being set up, is it the idea that when posts become vacant in future, every two will be put into one?

If so, what is to happen to existing postmen who cannot or will not become drivers? Is there to be a certain amount of redundancy because of the change in the system? Older men, particularly, must be considered in this respect. Are we to take it that all future motorised posts will be full-time and that there will be no part-time appointments? Of course part-time appointments are not favoured by anybody. I should like to know also whether the system of putting motor cycles into certain services instead of vans or cars is to be extended. I do not think that would be a good idea. The Department might save a few shillings a week because they would have to pay the person on the motor cycle less. Can I take it that in future vans and cars will be used rather than motor cycles to do this type of work?

Postmen's uniforms is another matter I should like to raise. Can the Minister say if it is proposed to improve the uniform? We know the design has been changed during the past couple of years but the quality of the cloth has not been improved. We still have the caps which, after a shower of rain, leave us with blue men because the dye comes off in the rain. The cloth being used at the moment seems to be like hessian. It is badly knit and does not keep out the rain. Postmen, it has truly been said, are the public face of the Post Office. Why should we maintain a system in which, it appears, the one uniform was designed for every postman in the service from a suit made for a fellow who was not too well made himself but on whom it was never fitted? That is the type of uniform we see on most postmen. Can we take it there will be a standard cut uniform for postmen? I understand an effort was made to present the Department with a special type cloth and a suit design. What happened?

On the question of buildings, I am sure the Minister is aware that a number of old ones need replacement. What is happening about Navan post office or, as it is known to the Department, An Uaimh? Will that post office be replaced in the near future or will it be left there until it falls? Going nearer to the Minister, what about Donegal? Something must be done there also. In Navan, there is not sufficient accommodation. I understand the telephone exchanges in Bantry and Skibbereen are entirely unsatisfactory, though we were told some time ago they were to be brought up to date. What are the reasons for the delay?

I must say the telephone service generally has improved. On the other hand, the rate of connections does not seem to have improved or is it that the people who come to me happen to be people who do not have the best luck in this matter? Every week I meet people asking why telephones for which they asked years ago have not been installed. It is useless telling them that the lines are overloaded and that they must wait until the new system is introduced. In most cases they can point to a neighbour who applied for a telephone several months after they did and got it without any difficulty. Can the Minister tell me if there is any hope of getting the service more quickly to people who have been waiting for long periods?

I find it necessary at this stage to refer to one other matter because a certain amount of confusion has arisen—it did so during Questions today. In speeches here status pay has been referred to. When we refer to status pay, in these benches we refer to people who got increases out of turn. We are not talking about the amount of money given to a number of people, including civil servants and Post Office personnel, who got increases in wages they should have got years ago. It is necessary to clarify that because there seems to be an awful lot of misunderstanding about it. Some people think officials in the Post Office got increases out of turn and that they thereby set in motion another wage increase round. That is not true and it is necessary to make the point clear. The so-called status increases they got were in fact the arrears they should have got many months, sometimes many years, before.

May I ask the Minister to ensure that in future, when there is a general round of wage increases, the employees in his Department will be kept in line with what is happening elsewhere and that they will not be left behind for a couple of years, then find themselves getting an increase and having the finger pointed at them by people who say: "Those people are getting an increase out of turn and we must get up to them now."

I rise to protest in no uncertain terms against the recent production shown on Telefís Éireann. I do so on behalf of the parents who found their children were viewing a filthy and foul-spoken production. It is a sad day when we are not sure of the type of production which can be put across on our children. It is rather strange that the News of the World said that such a production was not fit to be seen on the BBC.

Why did the Deputy not switch it off?

I am glad the Deputy asked that. There is many a parent who was not there to switch it off. Their children had to view that sort of production. Some of those people put their children into a room to get away from them.

They should not be there at night.

When people are paying such high fees for a television service, they are entitled to see that the type of production which their children see is suitable. It is a sad day when such stuff can be shown by Telefís Éireann. Telefís Éireann should have some standard of decency and it is about time the Minister put his foot down in regard to a matter of this sort. I protest against this in the very strongest measure.

With regard to a different topic, I should like to see Telefís Éireann having talent scouts out to tap the latent talent we have throughout the country. We have Dublin jackeens with beards and what-have-you. It is all right to see them once. We saw them with bottles of stout at the fleadh ceóil. They made a big business of it. We have very good material throughout the country. We had them at the fleadh ceóil but they were not out with porter bottles, beards or what-have-you. Some of them were good all right but it was the others whom Telefís Éireann told us about on the news. This latent talent throughout the country should be tapped and given its chance. Mind you, God did not give all the talent to Dublin.

Galway poteen.

We have that too. If we look to any part of Ireland, we can get talent as good as that which we get in Dublin. The Minister should look into this matter. We are paying enough for Telefís Éireann and it is time something was done about this matter.

I want to mention two small matters to the Minister. One matter refers to the provision of a telephone at Guileen, Whitegate, which is four miles from either a priest or a doctor. There is no means of obtaining one during the night, if one is needed, except on foot. I would suggest to the Minister that he should look into this particular matter. My friend from Galway, in his protest, reminded me of two Deputies who were coming up here to Dublin.

Are these the two who were buying socks in a Grafton Street store?

One of them was a bit of a lad. He started off talking about the fine time he had last week when he came up and went to that sanctimonious place, the Gaiety, that Deputy Ryan wanted a grant for. He was describing the high kicks of the ladies there. The following week he was up again and he went to the Gaiety. The old lad who had all the complaints about the disrespectful talk was sitting in the seat in front of him.

The other matter I want to speak about is in connection with advertising. Some of our Irish industrialists have come to me about this matter already. I wonder would the Minister tell us is it correct that there is to be a pretty stiff increase in the advertising charges on Telefís Éireann? I wonder how is that increase to be explained to the prices board or the prices commission when we come to deal with it now? Will it be explained on the ground that we are paying more to the bearded gentlemen alluded to by the Deputy opposite a while ago? Is it because we have to increase the fees to the gentlemen who off and on appear on the screen that we have to increase the charges for advertising on Telefís Éireann? I should like the Minister to make it clear, if there is to be an increase, if an increase has been proposed already and if it is as high as 50 per cent, or what percentage is it? Those are just a few matters to which I should like an answer.

(Cavan): I rise to deal with one net point, that is, the telephone system. This is the year 1965 and communication by telephone has now ceased to be a luxury. It has ceased to be an exceptionally fast system of communication. It is the normal system of communication that every businessman relies on to carry on his normal business. As a matter of fact, if a person were deprived of the telephone in this year and age, it would take him perhaps hours to do something that he should be able to deal with in a matter of minutes. Therefore, I appeal to the Minister and to the Government to get ahead with the completion and the supply of telephones to everyone in the country who wants them. This is not something that will be a charge on the Exchequer because, as I understand it, the telephone system is one section of the Department of Posts and Telegraphs which is paying its way. It is only a matter, therefore, of providing the equipment, providing the men and getting on with the work.

I hope, now that we have a new Minister for Posts and Telegraphs, that matters will be attended to much faster than they were previously. I wish to congratulate the Minister on his appointment. Like Deputy James Tully, I could not be expected to wish him a long reign but I wish him a fruitful reign. I wish him a period of office during which a lot of work will be done in his Department.

So far I have dealt with the problem of telephonic communication in a general way, and I may be pardoned if I become parochial now. The county of Cavan is one of the few counties, if not the only county, that has not got an automatic exchange. This is something with which the people of Cavan are very dissatisfied. To come to the town of Cavan, the Department of Posts and Telegraphs acquired a property known as the Central Markets in the centre of the town over two years ago—as a matter of fact, I think it was in 1962—for the purpose of providing a new post office and an automatic exchange. Nothing has been done with that building yet. It is lying there, and not only have the Department failed to use it, although the local urban council gave it to them for a song, but it is an eyesore and a derelict site in the centre of the town.

It has come to my knowledge recently that the Department propose to spend money on the existing building by erecting some sort of additional exchange in the garden of the old building which they hold under a lease with only a few years to go. As I said in a communication to the Department recently, far be it from me to dissuade the Department from providing much needed additional telephones in the town, but it appears to me to be a waste of money to spend it on a building which they will be handing over in a short time, when they have a fine new building in the centre of the town on which they could get on with the work.

I had a telephone call yesterday morning before I left Cavan from a very staunch supporter of the Minister, a travel agent, who rang me in desperation to complain about the telephone service in Cavan. He stressed the fact that he was not complaining about the personnel who were doing the best they could, but was complaining about the lack of equipment and the lack of installations there. He had in with him yesterday morning an American priest and a German tourist, and he had sent them out to walk around the streets of Cavan, while, as he told them, he was waiting on a call to Dublin to deal with their problems. We hear all sorts of pleas in regard to tourism, but when tourists meet with that sort of service, and that sort of delay, they cannot be very impressed.

I want to say that the personnel in the post office in Cavan are the soul of courtesy. As a matter of fact, one wonders how they keep their patience, working under such conditions as they are expected to work under, and putting up with so many justified complaints as they have to listen to from subscribers. I do not expect miracles from the Minister. He has been in that office only a short time, but I do think we would have done a good day's work if we could impress on the Minister that this is something that should not be dealt with as Departments are wont to deal with things. Sometimes it occurs to me that Departments of State must believe that the life of man is about 500 years, because four or five years to a Department seem to be nothing. It is a substantial length of time in the business life of a man.

They seem to pass things about from one section of the Department to another and they seem to consider and reconsider them. I urge the Minister to bring a breath of fresh air into his Department—and I am not saying it is any worse than any other Department. It has inherited an easy and ponderous way of dealing with things and the idea that a year or a few years are neither here nor there. We have only our lives to live, and we all wish to avail of such modern methods as are available to the rest of the world, particularly telephones and rapid communications.

I appeal to the Minister to get on with the business all over the country, and I particularly appeal to him to give Cavan a fair crack of the whip. Cavan is one of the Cinderella counties, and it is not getting a fair crack of the whip from his Department and, indeed, some other Departments. I appeal to him to get on with the building of the new post office and the automatic telephone exchange in the town of Cavan for two reasons. First, they are badly needed and, secondly, the site which the Department acquired is an eyesore in the centre of the town, a derelict site, which has done the town a lot of harm.

I intervene in this debate, like the previous speaker, to dwell primarily on the delays involved in the installation of telephones. I must question the kind of test which the Department apply to priority rating for the installation of telephones. I know there is quite a backlog of arrears in my own constituency of South Tipperary in the provision of this essential amenity.

It is disconcerting for a public representative to have to repeat time and again the urgency of the installation of telephones, not merely for the ordinary person but also for people in business who are dependent in very large measure on telephones. Grocers, building contractors, publicans, people of great importance in our community, are held up interminably awaiting this modern amenity. I appreciate that certain preliminary work must be carried out before one gets a telephone, and that the laying of trunk lines is a very important factor.

My primary purpose in questioning the kind of test the Department apply in regard to who is entitled as a matter of urgency to a telephone, is the fact that within recent weeks I was obliged to make representations to the Department, and to the Minister directly, in regard to a party I consider to be not merely of great local importance in my constituency, but of great national importance and, may I say, of great international importance. Some delay ensued before I received an acknowledgment of my recommendations and I was obliged to talk to the Minister and tell him who the personalities involved were. The talk on that occasion was very heartening to me, and I assumed the telephone would be installed without further delay. There was further delay and I had another talk with the Minister. My concern can be imagined when I finally got the usual reply that some considerable time would elapse before this telephone could be provided.

I think it is fair to mention the parties concerned because they are people who, in my opinion, have brought great fame to this country. They have brought quite a sizeable amount of revenue to this country as well and have brought the fame of Ireland abroad into the world by reason of their proficiency in balladry. They have been primarily responsible for the resurgence of Irish balladry all over the world. I refer to the Clancy Brothers. This group, on whose behalf I made representations, who are selling more records in this country than any other group of artists or group of singing personalities, including the Beatles, could not be provided with this telephone until some time had elapsed. It is rather startling when Her Gracious Majesty the Queen could confer the signal honour of MBE on the Beatles, that the Minister, in spite of representations by me, could not provide a telephone for the Clancy Brothers. I question the wisdom of doing this kind of thing to people who, as I have said, have won world renown for their outstanding ability as ballad singers and who have brought substantial revenue to this country as a result.

They do not live in this country at all.

I beg the Deputy's pardon. They are regular visitors to their home in Carrick-on-Suir.

Yes, they are regular visitors.

They have property in that area and they have never lost touch with this country.

I agree with the Deputy there.

The Deputy is completely wrong in insinuating that these people live abroad.

Please do not let the debate develop into a Tipperary row.

These gentlemen's work of necessity leads them to England and America, and other places, and they are proud of that fact. But, basically, these men are Irishmen, and home-lovers at that, and they avail of every opportunity to visit their friends and relations in famed Carrick-on-Suir.

Seeing that a visitor can get a permit for a gun, surely the Clancy Brothers should get a telephone?

I would ask the Minister now, having regard to the importance of the telephone to the parties concerned, to have it installed, to apply a priority rating in this instance to people who are not merely of local importance but of great national and international importance as well.

I do not wish to detain the House, having regard to the arrangements that have been made but there is another matter that concerns me and I shall mention it briefly. The kind of efficiency in the Department of Posts and Telegraphs in recent years has been such that I sincerely hope the Minister in his capacity will improve it. It seems to me utterly degrading that senior officers of the Department of Posts and Telegraphs are sent down the country to apply a system of time and motion study to unfortunate postmen and various other categories of workers in the postal service.

These officials walk or cycle out behind these unfortunate men and time them in respect of every house they are obliged to visit with a letter or parcel. As a result of this unsavoury and degrading practice the amount of time previously allotted for the carrying out of the job is reduced. This creates an element of redundancy in the various regions. To call this efficiency, to my mind, is a retrograde step. I submit to the Minister that there is a more honourable, Christian and a fairer way of determining redundancy within his Department than by this kind of unchristian imposition on these workers.

I do not wish to delay the House. I just wish to mention a few points in which I know the Minister as a Donegal man will take special interest. Knowing him as I do. I shall not have to mention the matters here again. I should like to take this opportunity of congratulating him on his appointment as Minister for Posts and Telegraphs and, like my colleagues, wish him happiness while he is there but, at the same time, hoping that he representing Fianna Fáil will not be in that office too long.

One of the things I feel the Minister for Posts and Telegraphs, like myself, must have received many representations about is the practice regarding postal addresses in County Donegal. I should like to tell the House that if one wishes to post a letter to Malin Head, one must put Lifford on the address. That tends to mislead people into believing that Malin Head is a suburb of Lifford. Likewise, if you wish to post a letter to Arranmore Island, you must put Letterkenny on it. I have discussed this with Post Office officials and I feel that a serial code, the same as in the city of Dublin, of 1, 2 and 3 to cover Donegal town, Letterkenny and Lifford would be more of a guide to tourists and to people who do not know the geography of Donegal as well as the natives of the county. I hope that the Minister will take special note of that. I have raised the matter many times in this House before. I think some stubborn civil servant in his Department knows he made a mistake and is not manly enough to admit it.

There is another point I should like to take up with the Minister and I am sure he has received representations on this as well. In Donegal, if we wish to telephone someone in Great Britain, the call is channelled through to Dublin and from Dublin to Liverpool and ultimately to the destination which we wish to contact. When the Minister's predecessor was in office, I asked him would he consider, in co-operation with the Northern postal authorities, using the line between Belfast and Great Britain.

I should like to bring to the Minister's attention the case of a constituent of mine whose daughter was working in London from whence he received a telegram that she was involved in a motor accident. He booked a call immediately to London and was told that there would be four to five hours delay. He lives in a very remote part of Donegal but he made his way to one of the larger towns and he, again, booked a call explaining to the telephonist the urgency of it. The telephonist in his anxiety to help decided he would get through to Derry. He routed the call through Derry and had the London number on the line in three minutes.

This particular constituent of mine, trying to figure out why this could not have been done in the first instance, approached a senior officer in the Department of Posts and Telegraphs only to discover that the officer was more interested to know who the telephonist was who put through the call, and broke the regulations of the Department by going through Derry, than he was in the predicament in which this constituent of mine found himself.

On the following day, to avoid all the red tape in the Department of Posts and Telegraphs, this man went to Derry city and booked a call. I would venture to say he got the call quicker than if he had rung Lifford. He told me he had the London number on the line in two minutes. This is no news to the Minister: I know he has received many complaints similar to this and I hope he will give special attention to it. I hope that when next he presents his Estimate to this House all of these matters will be remedied.

Like other Deputies, I must refer to the delay in the installation of telephones. I am told by an official in the Department that the worst county in Ireland for the installation of telephones is County Donegal. I do not know if this is due to the practice of the Minister's predecessor in the Department——

You have too many phones there already.

I shall remain silent in regard to that interruption.

Leave Deputy Corry to his fate.

Deputy Corry is more interested in Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves than he is in County Donegal. If it is the position that County Donegal is the worst off county in respect of telephone installations, then I protest in the strongest possible terms. I trust the Minister will bring the installation of telephones there up to the average of that of every other county in Ireland.

There is a particular point I would like to raise in relation to a person from rural Ireland who comes to Dublin and wishes to contact home by telephone. He goes into a telephone kiosk in some part of the city and books a call and the operator informs him that there will be a delay of one hour or more. If he changes his mind and wishes to contact the operator to cancel the call, it is nearly impossible to get the same operator on the line again. In view of the fact that operators do not disclose their names—and obviously it is a very good idea that they do not—I suggest that each operator should have a number so that when a person would find himself in this dilemma, then, on re-dialling the exchange, he could ask for the telephonist of that number.

In County Donegal, we have officials being paid overtime for doing night telephonist work.

There seems to be nothing right down there. Their team did not beat Cavan last Sunday, either, and now they protest.

And the beauty of it is that we are going to be more successful than Deputy Corry was about the Cork city boundary and Ali Baba.

Might I object to the way in which the debate is turning away from the Estimate?

Blame Deputy Corry who, I believe, was waiting there until I got on my feet so that he could interrupt me. I feel that the Department should pay night telephonists more money so as to get volunteers to do this type of work. I have spoken with a few of the senior officials in the Department who must take their turn at this type of work and they do not wish to do it, despite the fact that they are being paid overtime for it. If the Department would pay people who are unemployed or who have part-time jobs, I think they would have volunteers to do the work. All the civil servants in the Department of Posts and Telegraphs recognise that one of the biggest problems at the moment in rural Ireland is to get night telephonists. I cannot see why they should not pay night telephonists and discontinue this practice of paying senior officials of the Department who do not want to do the work.

Another matter I cannot understand is that when the Department re-issue stamps, they continue to use the word "Éire". What is wrong with the word "Ireland"? If a letter goes to America, it used to have "Irish Free State" on the stamp and any returned American to this country continually refers to the "Free State". I can visualise, in ten or 15 years' time, this country being called "Éire" due to the fact that the Government persist in the use of the word "Éire" on the postage stamps. I feel that "Ireland" should be the word to use and that we should be proud of it.

Deputy Coogan mentioned a famous programme on Telefís Éireann on Sunday night week last. I did not see the particular programme but, from what I hear, it is something that should be condemned from the highest sources. I hope we do not have a repeat performance.

I feel that something is wrong when Telefís Éireann collect money from advertisements and also collect money out of taxation to produce a programme. The BBC charge for a licence. Ulster Television do not charge for a licence: they can produce the programme out of the money they receive from advertisements. However, Telefís Éireann have to have a go at both sides. Deputy T. Lynch, speaking about the difference between Sweden and Ireland, said that possibly the prosperity in Sweden is due to the fact that they have not a Fianna Fáil Government there. Maybe the same applies in relation to Telefís Éireann.

I want to sound a warning that most people in the country believe it more as day follows day that Telefís Eireann is heading towards a propaganda machine for the Fianna Fáil Party. This is a national authority. I feel that if the Government deserve praise, they are entitled to get it. Likewise, if they have to be criticised they should be criticised and in no uncertain terms. It must be an offence for any member of the television authority to criticise the Fianna Fáil administration.

In conclusion, let me say that I disagree with the direction of the Department of Posts and Telegraphs in relation to the closing of sub-offices. If it is necessary to close these offices, surely the Minister should take into consideration the possibility of allowing the telephone communication to remain in them? In answer to a Parliamentary Question which I put to him the week before last, he informed me that it is uneconomic to do so. In a case like this, I feel that economics should be a secondary consideration. We should respect the aged, the infirm and the people who, for one reason or another, just cannot go to the nearest town to make a telephone call or go to a post office for a service which was available in their own locality until then.

I wish the Minister well while he remains Minister for Posts and Telegraphs.

Progress reported; Committee to sit again.
Top
Share